Just completed the interview. Live on Rumble now. A wide range of topics are covered including my genesis story: how I went from blue pilled to red pilled in 2 weeks.
OT, here is a list/summary I assembled today of the top 6 Covid/Vax Disaster stories of the last coupla months. Useful for those having a hard time keeping up with the "dissident firehose." https://pomocon.substack.com/p/recent-must-read-articles-on-the
With the New Zealand data, the decrease in death rates in the vaccinated cohort in the 20-40 age group can be explained by the realisation that in NZ most deaths in this age group are normally from suicide. In the 20-24 age group suicide normally accounts for 40% of all deaths, and in the 30-34 age group, 20% of all deaths. Those who seek to be vaccinated are unlikely to be contemplating self-harm.
States vary on citizen's arrest law and the types of crime for which a person can conduct a citizen's arrest. Generally, private citizens can arrest someone they reasonably suspect of committing a felony.
The felony doesn't have to occur in the presence of the individual making the arrest. They can still conduct a citizen's arrest if:
A felony was actually committed
The individual making the arrest knew of the crime
Reasonable suspicion about the identity of the perpetrator will justify their arrest
Like a peace officer, you need probable cause to detain someone for a felony. However, if the alleged crime did not happen, the person making the arrest could become civilly and criminally liable. For example, you might face a lawsuit for wrongful arrest, use of force, or false imprisonment.
In general, people can't use a citizen's arrest for misdemeanor offenses unless the misdemeanor involves a breach of the peace. Even in these circumstances, however, individuals can only make arrests when:
They've personally witnessed the criminal behavior
The breach has just occurred
There's a strong likelihood the breach will continue
Some criminal cases might be easier to witness or show reasonable suspicion. Examples include those involving controlled substances or driving under the influence (DUI). However, the average citizen might not know the severity of whether the crime constitutes a felony or misdemeanor. So if you conduct a citizen's arrest, you do so at your own risk.
I'm preparing signs for a medical freedom rally at the Capitol in MN. I'm looking for the cash incentive programs for hospitals: CVID diagnosis, Remdesivir, intubation. Do you have any of this info at ur fingertips that could be recreated on a tag board size board?
Also, in my research I've come across a boat load of info on the incentive programs governors/states were offering, not to mention insurance companies like BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD. This would be an interesting story to be told and captured. Are you up for the challenge? Think Nuremberg Code and coercion. I've also included a Harvard Study looking at incentives.
@steve this is a good questionnaire for people that may help them realize they aren’t very educated on vaccines . It needs to be updated but still good. Encourage them to research the questions.
"Nobody can explain the rise in death rates.." I believe, that multitiudes not financially connected and profiting from vaccines or connected to depopulation...can explain!!!
Steve, Your interview with Viva Frei was amazing as usual. You bring a selfless persona that enriches these episodes, and your courage and commitment to justice is without compare in this arena. That is just one reason that we and many millions trust and respect you. You have a very saintly personality and a great heart, with a warrior quality to make you successful in this selfless duty. Never mind those who want to bring you down or deny you or abandon you. Millions have replaced these individuals. The Hand of the Divine is with you. Thank you for all. Please keep up, and you will be kept up.
When has one reached the state of truly being red pilled?
There is the issue as to whether pathogenic viruses actually exist. I think your response to even considering this would be like your friend who could not even consider that the Covid jab was not safe and effective. I believe it was an issue of Swiss Cheese.
There are many articles that address the issue of the existence of pathogenic viruses. They tend to be more technical than one would like and leave a person wondering whether they are based in fact or prejudice. I believe I have a way of knowing whether pathogenic viruses exist that is based on simple reasoning.
In 1954 John Enders developed a method that is said to demonstrate that a virus exists and is pathogenic. It is based on the cytopathic effect. He did not use a control. He added snot from a person with measles to an in vitro culture of kidney cells. After a while the cells broke apart and died. That was said to be proof that a virus was in the snot that was responsible for the cells dying. He didn't do a parallel experiment where everything was done in the same manner, but where snot without the virus was used. Simple logic says that he didn't prove anything because he didn't use a control. Experiments have been done that show that the in vitro cells die whether snot is applied or not. A better method for demonstrating the presence of a pathogenic virus was/is clearly needed. The thing is that they are still using Enders' method to this day. It is the method they used to demonstrate the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus for the first case of Covid in Washington.
Enders won a Nobel Prize for his work, though it was for work he did before developing the above method. Since Enders method does not clearly show the existence of a virus there is a void screaming to be filled with a method that does. It has been 70 years. If a method were developed a Nobel Prize would surely be in the offering. The person developing the method would become rich, famous, and would have a guarantee of great job placement for life. What more incentive could there be for developing a method that clearly shows the existence of a pathogenic virus. The Prize has been on the table, lying there to be picked up, for 70 years. If pathogenic viruses exist why hasn't a method been developed to clearly show they do exit that uses the scientific method which requires controls? Why is the old and repudiated method done without controls still being used?
It is usually impossible to prove that something does not exist, but since a sound and logical method that uses controls has not been developed to demonstrate the existence of pathogenic viruses in over 70 years when the rewards for doing so are great, one surely must wonder whether they do. T
I think there is another red pill here to be swallowed. It doesn't smell like Swiss Cheese.
For some reason….lol
I just think we are getting sidetracked. What is autism ? How are we defining that. Is everyone with brain fog to be seen as autistic ?
The main thing at this juncture is the recall of these products There are more than fifty deaths They should be recalled And that's that
That is whatI'd put on my poster if I could.And possibibly sonething more easy for people to accept
For some reason!
OT, here is a list/summary I assembled today of the top 6 Covid/Vax Disaster stories of the last coupla months. Useful for those having a hard time keeping up with the "dissident firehose." https://pomocon.substack.com/p/recent-must-read-articles-on-the
With the New Zealand data, the decrease in death rates in the vaccinated cohort in the 20-40 age group can be explained by the realisation that in NZ most deaths in this age group are normally from suicide. In the 20-24 age group suicide normally accounts for 40% of all deaths, and in the 30-34 age group, 20% of all deaths. Those who seek to be vaccinated are unlikely to be contemplating self-harm.
I thought that's why they get "vaccinated"!
What about this?
When Can a Private Citizen Arrest Someone?
States vary on citizen's arrest law and the types of crime for which a person can conduct a citizen's arrest. Generally, private citizens can arrest someone they reasonably suspect of committing a felony.
The felony doesn't have to occur in the presence of the individual making the arrest. They can still conduct a citizen's arrest if:
A felony was actually committed
The individual making the arrest knew of the crime
Reasonable suspicion about the identity of the perpetrator will justify their arrest
Like a peace officer, you need probable cause to detain someone for a felony. However, if the alleged crime did not happen, the person making the arrest could become civilly and criminally liable. For example, you might face a lawsuit for wrongful arrest, use of force, or false imprisonment.
In general, people can't use a citizen's arrest for misdemeanor offenses unless the misdemeanor involves a breach of the peace. Even in these circumstances, however, individuals can only make arrests when:
They've personally witnessed the criminal behavior
The breach has just occurred
There's a strong likelihood the breach will continue
Some criminal cases might be easier to witness or show reasonable suspicion. Examples include those involving controlled substances or driving under the influence (DUI). However, the average citizen might not know the severity of whether the crime constitutes a felony or misdemeanor. So if you conduct a citizen's arrest, you do so at your own risk.
Watch this... https://librti.com/view-video/the-conversation
I'm preparing signs for a medical freedom rally at the Capitol in MN. I'm looking for the cash incentive programs for hospitals: CVID diagnosis, Remdesivir, intubation. Do you have any of this info at ur fingertips that could be recreated on a tag board size board?
Also, in my research I've come across a boat load of info on the incentive programs governors/states were offering, not to mention insurance companies like BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD. This would be an interesting story to be told and captured. Are you up for the challenge? Think Nuremberg Code and coercion. I've also included a Harvard Study looking at incentives.
https://www.nga.org/publications/covid-19-vaccine-incentives/
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:abb4d7ea-aff5-4772-a5fe-9654a1e97da4
Elle what is the name of your group and how can we be notified of the freedom rally at the Capitol in Minnesota?
MN for health and parental rights
www.mnrights.org
How MEDICAL FACILITIES are getting paid off with COVID funds
https://medicareadvocacy.org/report-snf-financial-support-during-covid/
How DOCTORS are getting paid to give COVID shots
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1fe8679b-ab9b-4082-b05b-fa549d2b0c47_904x1280.jpeg?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
!!
Thank you for standing for freedom.
Good interview, Steve.
My 81-year-old Aunt Carol (fully jabbed/boosted) won't watch it. She thinks Rumble is what a stomach does when hungry...
What are the steps to set up an independent grand jury similar to the process called for in Australia? Without a grand jury, how do we ever get to the bottom of the government response to Covid? https://expose-news.com/2024/02/03/professor-gives-powerful-reasons-for-royal-commission/
@steve this is a good questionnaire for people that may help them realize they aren’t very educated on vaccines . It needs to be updated but still good. Encourage them to research the questions.
https://www.michiganvaccinechoice.org/_files/ugd/49f017_4aed1f47d64941619f075d7f5d2ab329.pdf
Can’t be viewed on You Tube for some reason -🤔😂🤣 good one Steve! Thanks for you service to humanity.
Very good interview; thanks for recounting in detail your painful experiences with irrational rejections!
Steve
Watched the whole interview. It was amazing.
Anyone that can discuss facts for almost two hours is almost super human.
"Nobody can explain the rise in death rates.." I believe, that multitiudes not financially connected and profiting from vaccines or connected to depopulation...can explain!!!
Steve, Your interview with Viva Frei was amazing as usual. You bring a selfless persona that enriches these episodes, and your courage and commitment to justice is without compare in this arena. That is just one reason that we and many millions trust and respect you. You have a very saintly personality and a great heart, with a warrior quality to make you successful in this selfless duty. Never mind those who want to bring you down or deny you or abandon you. Millions have replaced these individuals. The Hand of the Divine is with you. Thank you for all. Please keep up, and you will be kept up.
When has one reached the state of truly being red pilled?
There is the issue as to whether pathogenic viruses actually exist. I think your response to even considering this would be like your friend who could not even consider that the Covid jab was not safe and effective. I believe it was an issue of Swiss Cheese.
There are many articles that address the issue of the existence of pathogenic viruses. They tend to be more technical than one would like and leave a person wondering whether they are based in fact or prejudice. I believe I have a way of knowing whether pathogenic viruses exist that is based on simple reasoning.
In 1954 John Enders developed a method that is said to demonstrate that a virus exists and is pathogenic. It is based on the cytopathic effect. He did not use a control. He added snot from a person with measles to an in vitro culture of kidney cells. After a while the cells broke apart and died. That was said to be proof that a virus was in the snot that was responsible for the cells dying. He didn't do a parallel experiment where everything was done in the same manner, but where snot without the virus was used. Simple logic says that he didn't prove anything because he didn't use a control. Experiments have been done that show that the in vitro cells die whether snot is applied or not. A better method for demonstrating the presence of a pathogenic virus was/is clearly needed. The thing is that they are still using Enders' method to this day. It is the method they used to demonstrate the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus for the first case of Covid in Washington.
Enders won a Nobel Prize for his work, though it was for work he did before developing the above method. Since Enders method does not clearly show the existence of a virus there is a void screaming to be filled with a method that does. It has been 70 years. If a method were developed a Nobel Prize would surely be in the offering. The person developing the method would become rich, famous, and would have a guarantee of great job placement for life. What more incentive could there be for developing a method that clearly shows the existence of a pathogenic virus. The Prize has been on the table, lying there to be picked up, for 70 years. If pathogenic viruses exist why hasn't a method been developed to clearly show they do exit that uses the scientific method which requires controls? Why is the old and repudiated method done without controls still being used?
It is usually impossible to prove that something does not exist, but since a sound and logical method that uses controls has not been developed to demonstrate the existence of pathogenic viruses in over 70 years when the rewards for doing so are great, one surely must wonder whether they do. T
I think there is another red pill here to be swallowed. It doesn't smell like Swiss Cheese.