Natural infection works: it makes you less likely to get COVID. But vaccines do the opposite: they make it MORE likely you'll get COVID.
And Dr John Campbell had his video on this study yanked from YouTube. Because of course youtube would yank it.
I wonder how many "Died Suddenly" case they saw overtime?
As a wannabee Misinformation Superspreader, I carry around Page 12 of Pfizer's clinical trial data (the supplement) as well as the Cleveland Clinic study, Figure 2.
Res Ipsa Loquitur. "The thing speaks for itself."
Steven Todd Kirsch is an American entrepreneur. He has started several companies and was one of two people who independently invented the optical mouse. Kirsch has been both a philanthropic supporter of medical research, and a promoter of misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines. Wikipedia
With this line of complete bull needless to say all the thousands of deaths before the vaccine were not part of this study because there was no vaccine yet people were dying by the thousands.
It is obviously a slanted view of reality, like a t*** reality .
Also those who got the vaccine, their symptoms were not as severe.
Go ahead and take this line of bs and go in peace just know how incredibly stupid your choice was.
china found 300 new covid variants in 1 week, so one can say the virus has a big playground to mutate in.
this is a bioweapon , due to the furin cleavage site, fcs, and the consequence of that is that the virus plays around in ALL organs. the fcs allows the virus to “buckle” down into about any’s cell receptors.
i’m not blamin china for this btw. the fauci-gang enabled them to jockey around, and the upper echelons probably werent aware what a club of pla colonels were doing, allowing to do, and which risks they took.
the effect of this fiasco is killer mutations down the line, and most likely not where you first expect this..it can manifest itself as a deadly infection in some specific organ. mrna vaccinations just make it worse, and certainly for those so stupid to still take them.
It's fair game to take their arguments and counter them. You've done a thorough job with that. But let's not lose sight of the fact that COVID-19 the disease has not been proven to be caused by SARS CoV-2. The only isolates of SARS CoV-2 are genetic clones artificially made from the China supplied sequence. And most of the sequences from SARS CoV-2 come directly from the vero cells they cultured the sample in. These are the same cells they culture many childhood scheduled vaccines in, and the flu shots. The PCR test primers target these. That's why early serology tests shocked many when they found such a high percentage of Americans had already seen the virus before. Yeah, they saw it before because it had been injected into them.
No one to my knowledge has done a complete review of alternative causes for the symptoms, such as radiation sickness. Considering the military rapidly deployed 5G antennas around the US beginning around nursing homes January 2020, I think that merits further investigation. And also consider the elderly take up most of the flu shots. It's interesting, there are reports of the 2019-2020 flu shots containing graphene. It is also interesting that these metals are conductive and hold magnetic fields, and serve to enhance the 5G radiation which could be what caused Havana syndrome.
What is this January 19 column back at the top?
Like waves coming into the shore as high tide approaches, more and more of these studies are damning the clot shot pushers!
There was this interview with health advisor to Broadway and the theaters in NYC opining on the vaccines with the once great interviewer Leonard Lopate last week with the incompetent Minona Rossol:
So many irrrational assertions here, still pushing the current "vaccines". Unbelievable.
WBAI has some unique programming with Chris Hedges and Jimmy Dore and investigative journalists. Not all radio is brain dead.
Over 30+ years of failed vaccines against coronavirus. ALL. OF. THEM.
RFK Jr should know what to do
Totalitarian time clock is ticking. Stop the BS
Steve, it is easy to explain the superiority of the immunity that unvaccinated people have compared to the vaccinated.
Based on seroprevalence surveys, a larger percentage of the unvaccinated have had a Covid-19 infection compared with the vaccinated. As you point out, natural immunity is far better protection than vaccination, so it shouldn't be surprising that, statistically, the unvaccinated are now better protected than the vaccinated. However, this protection came at a cost, namely, the unvaccinated had to take the risk of a serious outcome from Covid-19. The vaccinated people who have yet to have an infection and who are now only slightly more likely to get an infection than those who have had an infection still would not choose infection as the preferred way to gain protection.
Given that so many have now been infected and have naturally immunity, the number of doses of vaccine has become a relatively inconsequential measure, statistically, of the immunity level. It is for this reason that statistical reports by vaccination status have become irrelevant. What are needed are reports which combine previous infection history and vaccinations, however, since so many infections are asymptomatic, such reports would only be possible if testing could be done to confirm an individual's infection history.
Your statement: "COVID vaccines do the opposite and increase your risk of infection" is a relative statement, relative to the unvaccinated group most of whom have already had an infected. There is nothing controversial about the fact that a group with a lower rate of previous infections and relying on a vaccine with low effectivity against new variants will have more new infections than a group that has a higher rate of previous infections.
What the never-infected care about, particularly those with chronic health risks, is reducing the risk of becoming infected. Once the previously infected are removed from the comparison, it becomes clear that vaccinations do still reduce the risk of a first infection.
Those injected, are done so, with the spike protein of the virus they say exists. Cases were not significant prior to the gene therapies being rolled out. Since the rollout, cases were far greater, adverse events greater than all previous vaccines, and excess deaths of unheard of numbers occurring. Was there a virus beforehand, because scientifically it does not exist, an isolated, purified sample has not been provided by any medical establishment. Perhaps it is because if it had been, it would have been recognized as man made, and many questions raised about gain of function , and the safety of a "vaccine" made from it. The plandemic was initiated from PCR false positives, and now millions have been injected with a treatment not safe, or effective. Fits in with the elite's main agenda, eugenics.
If a PCR test is what constituted someone having Covid, then the entire paper is meaningless. A flip of the coin could tell you just as well if someone was "infected". The more shots you get, the more toxic your body becomes. That much is true and therefore your chances of becoming ill are greater as your body tries to detox what you just put in the bloodstream. Symptoms of detoxing are....the same as covid.
I’m thankful to have had the discernment to know that something wasn’t right with this virus and the “vaccine”. This information is out there for people to see. If they won’t face the truth, they will face the consequences. There isn’t much we can do about it except keep pointing out the flaws in whatever thought process made them this way.
My double-vaxxed, morbidly obese sister-in-law has allegedly had COVID twice since being vaxxed and nearly died the first time. I was surprised that my brother's insistence on no Remdesivir kept his wife from death by hospital protocol. But he is aware that PCR cannot show COVID. However, he says he knows she had COVID because they did blood tests that "proved it." I can't find what type of blood test they are using, and certainly no search engine will return honest results. Does anyone have any idea what type of blood test they are using? I think these blood tests have to be just as fake as PCR test results but I don't really know.