More to the point, hospitals not knowing vaccination status often code unvaccinated by default. That has been reported by many observers. But the excess deaths of vaccinated people, suddenly dead, are troubling per Ed Dowd's book.
I see a bit of waffling in that report. Still nearly half of the excess without CoV. They assert the Therapeutic Goods Administration is doing good work. Do you have a Dowd quote debunking his work or just a citation that you interpreted your way?
I think he spends more time on US data, not AU actuary reporting. You persist in name calling when I noted I did get vaccinated prior to learning of issues with this new platform. But I asked if Dowd, himself, debunked his book in some quotation. I think debunked was a term you used which now has become a bias trigger word.
CDC has no credibility, my suggestion is not to cite its data. You sound like you think yourself smart, don't make yourself look stupid by citing junk data.
For example, CDC recommends masking and claims masks(80% effectiveness in preventing infection) are more effective than vaccines. However, it never did any RCT about this topic. Talking about bogus claim CDC is an expert.
Be careful about this data, it's from CDC
CDC has difficult time in counting Covid death
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/24/cdc-coding-error-overcount-covid-deaths
More to the point, hospitals not knowing vaccination status often code unvaccinated by default. That has been reported by many observers. But the excess deaths of vaccinated people, suddenly dead, are troubling per Ed Dowd's book.
I see a bit of waffling in that report. Still nearly half of the excess without CoV. They assert the Therapeutic Goods Administration is doing good work. Do you have a Dowd quote debunking his work or just a citation that you interpreted your way?
I think he spends more time on US data, not AU actuary reporting. You persist in name calling when I noted I did get vaccinated prior to learning of issues with this new platform. But I asked if Dowd, himself, debunked his book in some quotation. I think debunked was a term you used which now has become a bias trigger word.
CDC has no credibility, my suggestion is not to cite its data. You sound like you think yourself smart, don't make yourself look stupid by citing junk data.
For example, CDC recommends masking and claims masks(80% effectiveness in preventing infection) are more effective than vaccines. However, it never did any RCT about this topic. Talking about bogus claim CDC is an expert.
https://twitter.com/cdcdirector/status/1456645731691925518
'Never vaccinated' vs 'Ever vaccinated' mortality rate illusion
Survivor bias and how to overcome it
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/never-vaccinated-vs-ever-vaccinated
Interesting, so few who have the bivalent booster - numbers at work? I worry about the excess deaths which seem to be associated with the vaccines.