If autism is not caused by vaccines, the reported rates of autism should be proportional to the number of doses of the vaccine since these are all coincidences. But they aren't.
So many of us care! We are here, donating money to you, reading your words, because we care. I know what you mean, though, you mean no one who can make a difference seems to care. No one in the industry seems to care. My fear is that if you continue to think like that, you might give up, and you are too important and making too much of a difference to give up. We Love You Mr. Kirsch
What the heck, Steve?! Your statement makes no sense: "If autism is not caused by vaccines, the reported rates of autism should be proportional to the number of doses of the vaccine". I'm working hard to wrap my mind around this one. In my mind, if autism (or any other condition) is not caused by the vaccines, the reported rates of autism/condition should not be correlated *at all* with any number of doses of any vaccine, right? I think a bit of clarification and perhaps a change in wording would go a long way, the above statement sounds a little absurd and makes this article lose a lot of credibility.
Good gracious - that is the point, there would be no differences if there was not the causality by the vaxx’s and the differences in the numbers for each vaccine.
This is the key- causality will be proven by the fact that different vaccines have the different number s but proves then the cause.
Me too. Steve needs an editor. I'll give it a shot: "If autism is not caused by vaccines, then the reported rates of autism should be approximately equal among both the vaccinated and unvaccinated hosts."
How do you get out of having doctors vaccinate your baby without your consent? Now I'm paranoid about this process being started when I'm still "out of it" from the process of giving birth. I live in a rural area and don't plan on using daycare services, so it's unlikely that my future kids would have the high exposure to disease that kids in more densely populated areas would. Are there midwives who are against over-vaccinating or anything like that?
Medically-assisted home childbirth is available in some places. And if you don't have that option, why not tough it out without general anesthesia? A local anesthetic plus a smaller dose of morphine might do the the trick. Then, don't take your baby to a doctor unless you've discussed your situation.
Thank you Steve. you have worked very hard. This is very valuable research. Unfortunately, I don’t see any changes coming any time soon. Big Pharma is just too powerful. Maybe with a change in Administration we may see some changes in 2024. Biden has got to go. Thank God my grandkids (12 & 8) didn’t get the COVID shot. My son stood firm and told their mother (a nurse) that they were not getting that experiment. My son (45) & daughter (31) didn’t get it either.
I am hoping the reviewers would raise concerns about the data integrity and the logic behind the conclusions. The author could then respond and make revisions or not. I couldn’t get much confidence in the results from what was provided in the article.
About he increased rate of autism reporting in age group 16-19 since COVID-19 vaccine roll-out:
First, blaming the "autism epidemic" on "greater awareness so more children diagnosed, no real increase" is -- how shall I put this politely? -- bovine manure.
However, it is true that autistic girls have been greatly under-diagnosed because they figure out how to "act normal" much better than autistic boys do. They often aren't diagnosed until the teenage years, including the late teenage years. I think increased awareness of autism in teenage girls, leading to increased assessment and diagnosis, could explain at least some of the recent big increase in autism diagnoses in age group 16-19.
Do separate searches/graphs for male and female patients and see what you get.
The CDC says this about Swine Flu Vaccine: "The program had mixed outcomes. The national vaccination program set an immunization record by vaccinating nearly 43 million Americans in the first 10-week period, proving that an emergency program like this was possible. Unfortunately, public health officials halted the program before completion."
Thank you for reminding me about this, and pointing out how dissapointed CDC was that the vax was halted - without any real mention of the reasons why.
The closing sentence on that CDC link you posted struck a cord:
"... understanding how decisions were made during this program; how risks were weighed; and how the public, media, and industry responded helps CDC prepare for pandemics and other future public health emergencies."
So, next time, they made use censorship was in place and the media was being paid by pharma. They learned their lesson for sure.
Here is another valuable video about that vax-campaign, that shows how far media has since fallen:
I wonder if this is a history clue - bypass CDC and the rest of those Bozos to concentrate on public health officials. Start a program where State, County and City groups are formed, each group would study 10 books and whatever else they want.
The group makes an appointment with the state, city or county health department to present them with evidence like Steve Kirsch's Elephant Deck. At the end of the presentation the group presents them with the 10 books.
Sure, it won't work on some. But it will work on some others, statistically it has to. There's only one way to find out how many.
However, I must say that during COVID, the public health agency in my county was impervious to any information that contradicted The Narrative. In CA, where I lived at the time, the Facebook page of a government agency is considered "public record", so the agency cannot ban anyone from commenting on the agency's posts and cannot delete anyone's comments (or responses to other people's comments).
I took full advantage of this censorship-free environment to post all sorts of "contrary information", addressing all aspects of COVID, virtually always backed up by official statistics, published research, quotes from well-qualified experts, research reports posted on the CDC's own website, statements from WHO or UN officials . . . And all this got no response from the public health agency; all this had no apparent effect at all.
Ironically, quite early on, Facebook decided that I was a "Top Fan" of my county's public health agency, and this cute phrase was added after my name on all my comments.
At one point I wrote and posted a haiku. ( This three-line poetry form was familiar to the locals, because our county was the host of an annual "Haiku Festival.") I'll share it here (Substack will impolitely insert blank lines between the lines):
Your #1 is confusing. "In 2011, the CDC introduced the 16th vaccine, the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, as part of the routine childhood immunization schedule."
I agree with you completely about vaccines cause autism; just confused about the #1 statement. Perhaps you are meaning a different manufacturer for the vaccine?
Mr Kirsch, I'm glad to see you say in your reasoning that the counts of autism incidence should be proportional to the vaccine dosages, because they do depend on that if autism is independent variable from type of vaccine. But the counts are also proportional to the total number of people they were administered, not just proportional to dosages. I didn't see you normalize for that. So if MMR was given to 1000x more kids than say IPV vaccine, and they were both not causing autism (autism and type of vaccine were independent variables), you'd expect the count to be proportinal to the MMR_dosages x 1000 for the MMR vaccine and IPV_dosages x 1 for the IPV vaccine. There's no mention in your analysis of the relative frequencies/popularities of vaccination , so that you normalize for that.
How could autism rates be explained by other than vaccines? Coincidence Theory! As brilliantly explained by Daniel Natal in his video essay on the New American. Y'know, the theory that's replacing pattern and correlation recognition concepts underlying all that "old science" stuff. Solutions for problems in coincidence theory trend toward finding an active volcano and tossing a few virgins into it.....
Ah, what a delicious comment you have here! It wins the prize I award for Best Comment of the Day. Heck, I'll upgrade that to Best Comment of the Week.
Now I gotta go find Daniel Natal's video essay on Coincidence Theory. I can hardly wait to watch it. And I'm so glad to hear about that promising protocol of tossing virgins into active volcanos . . . Does that prevent and/or treat bioweapon-based pandemic diseases? (Asking for a friend.)
“Nobody cares”?
So many of us care! We are here, donating money to you, reading your words, because we care. I know what you mean, though, you mean no one who can make a difference seems to care. No one in the industry seems to care. My fear is that if you continue to think like that, you might give up, and you are too important and making too much of a difference to give up. We Love You Mr. Kirsch
Wow. Behold, the smoking gun.
Visit The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential. www.IAHP.org/
The link works better like this: https://iahp.org/
What the heck, Steve?! Your statement makes no sense: "If autism is not caused by vaccines, the reported rates of autism should be proportional to the number of doses of the vaccine". I'm working hard to wrap my mind around this one. In my mind, if autism (or any other condition) is not caused by the vaccines, the reported rates of autism/condition should not be correlated *at all* with any number of doses of any vaccine, right? I think a bit of clarification and perhaps a change in wording would go a long way, the above statement sounds a little absurd and makes this article lose a lot of credibility.
Good gracious - that is the point, there would be no differences if there was not the causality by the vaxx’s and the differences in the numbers for each vaccine.
This is the key- causality will be proven by the fact that different vaccines have the different number s but proves then the cause.
Me too. Steve needs an editor. I'll give it a shot: "If autism is not caused by vaccines, then the reported rates of autism should be approximately equal among both the vaccinated and unvaccinated hosts."
How do you get out of having doctors vaccinate your baby without your consent? Now I'm paranoid about this process being started when I'm still "out of it" from the process of giving birth. I live in a rural area and don't plan on using daycare services, so it's unlikely that my future kids would have the high exposure to disease that kids in more densely populated areas would. Are there midwives who are against over-vaccinating or anything like that?
Medically-assisted home childbirth is available in some places. And if you don't have that option, why not tough it out without general anesthesia? A local anesthetic plus a smaller dose of morphine might do the the trick. Then, don't take your baby to a doctor unless you've discussed your situation.
Thank you Steve. you have worked very hard. This is very valuable research. Unfortunately, I don’t see any changes coming any time soon. Big Pharma is just too powerful. Maybe with a change in Administration we may see some changes in 2024. Biden has got to go. Thank God my grandkids (12 & 8) didn’t get the COVID shot. My son stood firm and told their mother (a nurse) that they were not getting that experiment. My son (45) & daughter (31) didn’t get it either.
I am hoping the reviewers would raise concerns about the data integrity and the logic behind the conclusions. The author could then respond and make revisions or not. I couldn’t get much confidence in the results from what was provided in the article.
Democide.
About he increased rate of autism reporting in age group 16-19 since COVID-19 vaccine roll-out:
First, blaming the "autism epidemic" on "greater awareness so more children diagnosed, no real increase" is -- how shall I put this politely? -- bovine manure.
However, it is true that autistic girls have been greatly under-diagnosed because they figure out how to "act normal" much better than autistic boys do. They often aren't diagnosed until the teenage years, including the late teenage years. I think increased awareness of autism in teenage girls, leading to increased assessment and diagnosis, could explain at least some of the recent big increase in autism diagnoses in age group 16-19.
Do separate searches/graphs for male and female patients and see what you get.
Simple question please: has the CDC ever removed any vaccine from any schedule?
At some point, live polio vaccine was removed (what's recommended now is inactivated polio vaccine).
In 1999, the original RSV vaccine was removed because it caused intussusception (a serious intestinal adverse effect) in infants.
In the mid-1990's, DPT was removed and replaced with DTaP and Tdap.
Routine smallpox vaccine was stopped (not sure when).
There may be other examples. NVIC could probably tell you the whole history, if you're interested.
The CDC says this about Swine Flu Vaccine: "The program had mixed outcomes. The national vaccination program set an immunization record by vaccinating nearly 43 million Americans in the first 10-week period, proving that an emergency program like this was possible. Unfortunately, public health officials halted the program before completion."
https://www.cdc.gov/museum/online/story-of-cdc/h1n1/index.html
So THEY didn't end it, "public officials" did, "unfortunately" in CDC's opinion.
Here's some more about Swine Flu vaccine: https://drrowen.substack.com/p/lessons-from-swine-flu-vaccine-propaganda
Thank you for reminding me about this, and pointing out how dissapointed CDC was that the vax was halted - without any real mention of the reasons why.
The closing sentence on that CDC link you posted struck a cord:
"... understanding how decisions were made during this program; how risks were weighed; and how the public, media, and industry responded helps CDC prepare for pandemics and other future public health emergencies."
So, next time, they made use censorship was in place and the media was being paid by pharma. They learned their lesson for sure.
Here is another valuable video about that vax-campaign, that shows how far media has since fallen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu2vdE0z7ds
I wonder if this is a history clue - bypass CDC and the rest of those Bozos to concentrate on public health officials. Start a program where State, County and City groups are formed, each group would study 10 books and whatever else they want.
The group makes an appointment with the state, city or county health department to present them with evidence like Steve Kirsch's Elephant Deck. At the end of the presentation the group presents them with the 10 books.
Sure, it won't work on some. But it will work on some others, statistically it has to. There's only one way to find out how many.
Your idea is worth a trial. Give it a go.
However, I must say that during COVID, the public health agency in my county was impervious to any information that contradicted The Narrative. In CA, where I lived at the time, the Facebook page of a government agency is considered "public record", so the agency cannot ban anyone from commenting on the agency's posts and cannot delete anyone's comments (or responses to other people's comments).
I took full advantage of this censorship-free environment to post all sorts of "contrary information", addressing all aspects of COVID, virtually always backed up by official statistics, published research, quotes from well-qualified experts, research reports posted on the CDC's own website, statements from WHO or UN officials . . . And all this got no response from the public health agency; all this had no apparent effect at all.
Ironically, quite early on, Facebook decided that I was a "Top Fan" of my county's public health agency, and this cute phrase was added after my name on all my comments.
At one point I wrote and posted a haiku. ( This three-line poetry form was familiar to the locals, because our county was the host of an annual "Haiku Festival.") I'll share it here (Substack will impolitely insert blank lines between the lines):
public health people:
little clay soldiers
salute the absurd
Yes and the Pima County Health Director Theresa Cullen Nomination Hearing For AZDHS is very enlightening.
https://rumble.com/v29nbwu-pima-county-health-director-theresa-cullen-nomination-hearing-for-azdhs.html
Thank you for all your research, hard work and persistence you’ve done, Steve. Really appreciate it. You’re the only substack that I paid to join.
Too late for my kids but hopefully my future grandchildren will be free from any vaccinations
I just shared to my son so he can protect my grandchildren. I just hope he can convince his wife. Hmmm.
Your #1 is confusing. "In 2011, the CDC introduced the 16th vaccine, the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, as part of the routine childhood immunization schedule."
To my memory, and according to https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-history/developments-by-year "The vaccine for Haemophilus influenzae type b was licensed in 1985 and placed on the recommended schedule in 1989. When the schedule was published again in 1994, the hepatitis B vaccine had been added."
I agree with you completely about vaccines cause autism; just confused about the #1 statement. Perhaps you are meaning a different manufacturer for the vaccine?
Mr Kirsch, I'm glad to see you say in your reasoning that the counts of autism incidence should be proportional to the vaccine dosages, because they do depend on that if autism is independent variable from type of vaccine. But the counts are also proportional to the total number of people they were administered, not just proportional to dosages. I didn't see you normalize for that. So if MMR was given to 1000x more kids than say IPV vaccine, and they were both not causing autism (autism and type of vaccine were independent variables), you'd expect the count to be proportinal to the MMR_dosages x 1000 for the MMR vaccine and IPV_dosages x 1 for the IPV vaccine. There's no mention in your analysis of the relative frequencies/popularities of vaccination , so that you normalize for that.
UNITE WITH GOD AND LIKE MINDED,,,, AND OH YOU KNOW THE THING,,,,, https://bbn1.bbnradio.org/english/listen-now/
UNITE WITH GOD AND LIKE MINDED AND OH YOU KNOW THE THING,,,,, https://bbn1.bbnradio.org/english/listen-now/
How could autism rates be explained by other than vaccines? Coincidence Theory! As brilliantly explained by Daniel Natal in his video essay on the New American. Y'know, the theory that's replacing pattern and correlation recognition concepts underlying all that "old science" stuff. Solutions for problems in coincidence theory trend toward finding an active volcano and tossing a few virgins into it.....
Ah, what a delicious comment you have here! It wins the prize I award for Best Comment of the Day. Heck, I'll upgrade that to Best Comment of the Week.
Now I gotta go find Daniel Natal's video essay on Coincidence Theory. I can hardly wait to watch it. And I'm so glad to hear about that promising protocol of tossing virgins into active volcanos . . . Does that prevent and/or treat bioweapon-based pandemic diseases? (Asking for a friend.)