I agree. My family has been anti-vax. My granddaughter had a medical exemption for vaccines to enter school but we just found out she lost it (we are in California). What recourse is there for her, or link to a recourse?
This might be a guy you want to contact and collaborate with.
Below is one of his essays that document the current paradigm and how linguistics are used by the elitist predatory capitalist and shock doctrine specialists of disaster capitalism.
Daniel Broudy
PhD Deakin University Professor at Okinawa Christian University
Hi Steve, it makes sense to do battle with those who claim a high ranking in their Pro Vax claims! Can you debunk the funk, please? This guy has a large viewing with 'science people he maybe speaking some truths, but he seems to be avoiding all the most important evidence, for example life years lost since c19 jab? I have posted some comments as always but few will listen to a low ranking and so called anti vaxxer like myself.
Claiming vaccines cause autism, as a linear cause and effect, paints the condition to be an undesired disposition.
Well, have you ever taken the point of view of those who actually experience it? Has anyone taken the point of view of the cohort labeled as ‘autistic’, before assessing such half-truth convictions?
Haven’t you noticed that all those so-called “experts” on the topic are neurotypicals (people who are defined as having the "normal" neuronal infrastructure as opposed to neurodivergent)?
How would you feel if a doctor claimed with authoritative conviction that your capacity to filter large amounts of sensory information just from the tonal sound of someone’s voice was just a matter of your imagination and you need “fixing”?
Isn’t that what happened in the beginning with Long Covid patients? Isn’t it what has been happening for the last 30 years with chronic Lyme disease and other chronic ailments?
To note, if you asked any person who was ever diagnosed as neurodivergent (ASD, Autism, Asperger, etc.) NONE of them would tell you that they see their condition as a disorder.
And yet, how come it is defined as one?
The answer lies in lack of context, leading to subjective knowledge.
Context is everything. It doesn’t mean a thing how much data one possesses and how quickly they can draw it from under their belt if there's no continuity. And right now, on any topic, humanity is deeply lacking context which then prevents it from seeing the interdependence that exists between various dimensions of existence.
This brings forth a “side effect” in which we have so many “light workers” who do black work. Their good intentions, coupled with the lack of context, inadvertently pave the way to an opposite outcome: more confusion and more redundant information which further prevents humanity from seeing things for what they are, potentially bringing any added value.
This topic is approached exclusively from the standpoint of neurotypicals. So these labels are created by neurotypicals who have no context and peripheral understanding of the phenomenon from an objective, neutral and (w)holistic point of view.
That’s what’s so troubling in our consciousness: the lack of awareness to the mechanics of mind. That whatever label we choose to define a phenomenon, that’s how it will appear in our reality, rather than the assumption that reality, in and of itself, is a stand alone and independent.
This also reflects the major mechanism underlying the science of medicine, which has morphed into human engineering: The fact that scientists and doctors “create” diseases simply by naming them as such without truly understanding what they are. Then, invest billions of dollars later on trying to eradicate them.
The definition for insanity.
.
.
Have so-called “experts” on the topic ever pondered other possibilities other than the knee-jerk desire to attach it to metals and vaccines?
Have they ever pondered how autism diagnosis is not only exclusive to vaccines; that trauma, birth and even certain conditions such as autoimmune and chronic dis-eases can all trigger the proliferation of what would then be diagnosed as ‘autism’?
Right there, lies the clue to the erroneous approach. Right there it says that connecting vaccines to autism is not the full story.
To put it in a nutshell: autism is not a disorder. It becomes one when it is defined as such. Linking vaccines to autism clouds any potential to understand why autism is on the rise (regardless of vaccines) and what constitutes its proliferation, from an objective point of view.
The truth is that what really needs correction is this paradigm. The entire approach has to be revamped. We need context, not more disconnected “data” that leads to subjective knowledge.
Perhaps, you would want to consider investing money in that.
Humility is paramount. Because you say, "What makes me different is that I’m not afraid to speak out and tell people the truth" does not mean that what you say is the truth. Many people are not afraid to speak out and tell the truth. What they say could be right or wrong, depending on the quality of their arguments. I believe your heart is in the right place, and, I suspect that there must be something driving your passion. However, your "survey" and "data" do not constitute a scientific endeavor. Your work may help you in some way but it has no scientific value. You are certainly partially correct regarding some of your conclusions, but, above, you have said many false things. If you would like, I would be happy to chat with you about these issues as they are also close to me. I wish you all the best.
@Steve, I am trying to find the original video of your testimony in Pennsylvania (low quality version here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6XjUOphIr2mm/) so I can share it properly.
It's not the same event as the one in March I believe, and your speech is absoutely excellent.
Scott Jensen m.d. reports "physician moral injury" has been caused by bunk science in journals which in effect caused docs. to transgress deeply held moral beliefs & expectations which are Oaths docs took to put the patient first; that detrimental reliance upon journals to do the right thing was the cause of moral injury to docs and therefore the cause of physical injury / death to patients; that b/c journals did not live up to doctors' moral expectations, docs were in effect controlled by Journals, thus causing docs to globally compromise their Oath / commitment to put the patient first.
Jensen also reports that journals are now deleting the articles docs relied on which in hindsight (he asserts) impliedly caused patient injury and death.
My take on Jensen's "Alarm" is that docs. are "left holding the bag", to coin a phrase, where it would now appear docs are the responsible party for causing harm, which apparently from the physician's perspective is simply not the case.
For those of us who remember Flip Wilson's famous saying, "the Devil made me do it", again in my opinion, this is the new "go to", the new spin on that immortal quip soon to be adopted by docs.
Here is Jensen's report, sounding his "alarm" to be heard by all of his cohorts, titled: "MEDICAL JOURNALS ARE BEING DELETED TO COVER UP THE PLANDEMIC MALFEASANCE"
I expect we will see this new narrative, "It is the fault of the Journals which control physicians", soon to replace the narratives we have all heard for more than three years, echoed by docs, to wit:
"What injury?" and "Unexplained excess mortality". Thank goodness we now have an explanation to replace the "unexplained" cause of excess mortality, lame as it may be. I note Jensen makes no reference to physician "willful blindness" over the last three years. hmmm.. interesting... to say the least. Perhaps I could "let it go" IF this covid-era death and injury tragedy is a "one-off" event, meaning this was the first time journals have been fully funded to turn a blind eye to good science in favor of their benefactors, e.g. those who fund journals, but alas, it is not. I suspect rather than "moral injury", docs are indoctrinated to "stay in their lane", and "do what they are told - for handsome remuneration" and that such behavior is more akin to moral turpitude than to "moral injury". As a suspicious observer, do I have a right to think that? Yes! That is not to single out Jensen - from my pov, he serves his profession by sounding his alarm which again, from my pov, attempts to open a door for a safe harbor "exit" where there is no door to open, and as evidence of such contention, we only need to look at the historical performance of vaxx to make that case. But if one is not a pediatrician, in the case of autism, for example, one can not expect to criticize travelers in that "lane" any more than one is able to criticize a surgeon, and so it goes. It is a monopoly which involves price fixing and laws to prevent competition, and this new spin is merely the next wave to initiate amnesty by shifting the duty to practice good medicine to publishers who purportedly "control" docs. Perhaps you have a different take on it, and perhaps not.
Steve, what are the potential side effects of graphene oxide covertly included in over the counter tablet or liquid medications such as ibuprofen, Tylenol, cold / flu otc meds, et cetera, and same question for prescription drugs such as blood pressure meds prescribed by medical doctors, and, are docs. responsible (in your opinion) for knowing all contents of drugs they prescribe to patients? Should docs speak up and or boycott their prescription pads out of duty to patient and or out of self interest? Does anyone want to weigh in on this potentially lethal threat we now must consider is on the horizon?
Vaccines cause autism
You are a lay version of biblical St Stephen
(They cover their ears and scream so he can not be heard)
Steve, you have plenty of friends, look at your subst. Dr W is your new friend (i am sure he is) and he was right from the start
I agree. My family has been anti-vax. My granddaughter had a medical exemption for vaccines to enter school but we just found out she lost it (we are in California). What recourse is there for her, or link to a recourse?
Hi Steve,
This might be a guy you want to contact and collaborate with.
Below is one of his essays that document the current paradigm and how linguistics are used by the elitist predatory capitalist and shock doctrine specialists of disaster capitalism.
Daniel Broudy
PhD Deakin University Professor at Okinawa Christian University
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356038863_Vaccine_Development_and_Social_Control_A_Psychopathology_of_Impaired_Reasoning_in_the_Global_Push_for_Mass_Compliance
Well, no the earth is only 4-6000 years old.
Hi Steve, it makes sense to do battle with those who claim a high ranking in their Pro Vax claims! Can you debunk the funk, please? This guy has a large viewing with 'science people he maybe speaking some truths, but he seems to be avoiding all the most important evidence, for example life years lost since c19 jab? I have posted some comments as always but few will listen to a low ranking and so called anti vaxxer like myself.
https://youtu.be/sugCJNAPF9o
Claiming vaccines cause autism, as a linear cause and effect, paints the condition to be an undesired disposition.
Well, have you ever taken the point of view of those who actually experience it? Has anyone taken the point of view of the cohort labeled as ‘autistic’, before assessing such half-truth convictions?
Haven’t you noticed that all those so-called “experts” on the topic are neurotypicals (people who are defined as having the "normal" neuronal infrastructure as opposed to neurodivergent)?
How would you feel if a doctor claimed with authoritative conviction that your capacity to filter large amounts of sensory information just from the tonal sound of someone’s voice was just a matter of your imagination and you need “fixing”?
Isn’t that what happened in the beginning with Long Covid patients? Isn’t it what has been happening for the last 30 years with chronic Lyme disease and other chronic ailments?
To note, if you asked any person who was ever diagnosed as neurodivergent (ASD, Autism, Asperger, etc.) NONE of them would tell you that they see their condition as a disorder.
And yet, how come it is defined as one?
The answer lies in lack of context, leading to subjective knowledge.
Context is everything. It doesn’t mean a thing how much data one possesses and how quickly they can draw it from under their belt if there's no continuity. And right now, on any topic, humanity is deeply lacking context which then prevents it from seeing the interdependence that exists between various dimensions of existence.
This brings forth a “side effect” in which we have so many “light workers” who do black work. Their good intentions, coupled with the lack of context, inadvertently pave the way to an opposite outcome: more confusion and more redundant information which further prevents humanity from seeing things for what they are, potentially bringing any added value.
This topic is approached exclusively from the standpoint of neurotypicals. So these labels are created by neurotypicals who have no context and peripheral understanding of the phenomenon from an objective, neutral and (w)holistic point of view.
That’s what’s so troubling in our consciousness: the lack of awareness to the mechanics of mind. That whatever label we choose to define a phenomenon, that’s how it will appear in our reality, rather than the assumption that reality, in and of itself, is a stand alone and independent.
This also reflects the major mechanism underlying the science of medicine, which has morphed into human engineering: The fact that scientists and doctors “create” diseases simply by naming them as such without truly understanding what they are. Then, invest billions of dollars later on trying to eradicate them.
The definition for insanity.
.
.
Have so-called “experts” on the topic ever pondered other possibilities other than the knee-jerk desire to attach it to metals and vaccines?
Have they ever pondered how autism diagnosis is not only exclusive to vaccines; that trauma, birth and even certain conditions such as autoimmune and chronic dis-eases can all trigger the proliferation of what would then be diagnosed as ‘autism’?
Right there, lies the clue to the erroneous approach. Right there it says that connecting vaccines to autism is not the full story.
To put it in a nutshell: autism is not a disorder. It becomes one when it is defined as such. Linking vaccines to autism clouds any potential to understand why autism is on the rise (regardless of vaccines) and what constitutes its proliferation, from an objective point of view.
The truth is that what really needs correction is this paradigm. The entire approach has to be revamped. We need context, not more disconnected “data” that leads to subjective knowledge.
Perhaps, you would want to consider investing money in that.
Humility is paramount. Because you say, "What makes me different is that I’m not afraid to speak out and tell people the truth" does not mean that what you say is the truth. Many people are not afraid to speak out and tell the truth. What they say could be right or wrong, depending on the quality of their arguments. I believe your heart is in the right place, and, I suspect that there must be something driving your passion. However, your "survey" and "data" do not constitute a scientific endeavor. Your work may help you in some way but it has no scientific value. You are certainly partially correct regarding some of your conclusions, but, above, you have said many false things. If you would like, I would be happy to chat with you about these issues as they are also close to me. I wish you all the best.
And all us parents know too thsnks the utter cowardice , complicity and coercion by these medical “ professionals”.
@Steve, I am trying to find the original video of your testimony in Pennsylvania (low quality version here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6XjUOphIr2mm/) so I can share it properly.
It's not the same event as the one in March I believe, and your speech is absoutely excellent.
Edit: Found it - https://senatormastriano.com/medicalfreedompanel2023/
Scott Jensen m.d. reports "physician moral injury" has been caused by bunk science in journals which in effect caused docs. to transgress deeply held moral beliefs & expectations which are Oaths docs took to put the patient first; that detrimental reliance upon journals to do the right thing was the cause of moral injury to docs and therefore the cause of physical injury / death to patients; that b/c journals did not live up to doctors' moral expectations, docs were in effect controlled by Journals, thus causing docs to globally compromise their Oath / commitment to put the patient first.
Jensen also reports that journals are now deleting the articles docs relied on which in hindsight (he asserts) impliedly caused patient injury and death.
My take on Jensen's "Alarm" is that docs. are "left holding the bag", to coin a phrase, where it would now appear docs are the responsible party for causing harm, which apparently from the physician's perspective is simply not the case.
For those of us who remember Flip Wilson's famous saying, "the Devil made me do it", again in my opinion, this is the new "go to", the new spin on that immortal quip soon to be adopted by docs.
Here is Jensen's report, sounding his "alarm" to be heard by all of his cohorts, titled: "MEDICAL JOURNALS ARE BEING DELETED TO COVER UP THE PLANDEMIC MALFEASANCE"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g1ldKrd3tdke/
I expect we will see this new narrative, "It is the fault of the Journals which control physicians", soon to replace the narratives we have all heard for more than three years, echoed by docs, to wit:
"What injury?" and "Unexplained excess mortality". Thank goodness we now have an explanation to replace the "unexplained" cause of excess mortality, lame as it may be. I note Jensen makes no reference to physician "willful blindness" over the last three years. hmmm.. interesting... to say the least. Perhaps I could "let it go" IF this covid-era death and injury tragedy is a "one-off" event, meaning this was the first time journals have been fully funded to turn a blind eye to good science in favor of their benefactors, e.g. those who fund journals, but alas, it is not. I suspect rather than "moral injury", docs are indoctrinated to "stay in their lane", and "do what they are told - for handsome remuneration" and that such behavior is more akin to moral turpitude than to "moral injury". As a suspicious observer, do I have a right to think that? Yes! That is not to single out Jensen - from my pov, he serves his profession by sounding his alarm which again, from my pov, attempts to open a door for a safe harbor "exit" where there is no door to open, and as evidence of such contention, we only need to look at the historical performance of vaxx to make that case. But if one is not a pediatrician, in the case of autism, for example, one can not expect to criticize travelers in that "lane" any more than one is able to criticize a surgeon, and so it goes. It is a monopoly which involves price fixing and laws to prevent competition, and this new spin is merely the next wave to initiate amnesty by shifting the duty to practice good medicine to publishers who purportedly "control" docs. Perhaps you have a different take on it, and perhaps not.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6kPsscdk8oJG/
Study showing ConVid is not isolated and the symptoms are all random and mRNA is useless.
Steve you deserve to win the Nobel Award. You are a Godsend!
Unfortunately it's very obvious. Vietnam neve had any autism until they introduced injections. Then it was an explosion.
Vaccines do not cause autism because autism is caused by complex genetic and environmental factors. Unvaccinated and vaccinated children have the same rate of autism. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264410X14006367?via%3Dihub
WARNING: Unconfirmed report graphene oxide is now included in UK branded ibuprofen bearing the name, "Nurofen". https://www.bitchute.com/video/z9t78NQ2lwCN/
Steve, what are the potential side effects of graphene oxide covertly included in over the counter tablet or liquid medications such as ibuprofen, Tylenol, cold / flu otc meds, et cetera, and same question for prescription drugs such as blood pressure meds prescribed by medical doctors, and, are docs. responsible (in your opinion) for knowing all contents of drugs they prescribe to patients? Should docs speak up and or boycott their prescription pads out of duty to patient and or out of self interest? Does anyone want to weigh in on this potentially lethal threat we now must consider is on the horizon?