Ground breaking US Senate hearing today on the most important vax/unvax study EVER done + 2 new books that bust the narrative

The US Senate hearing is the first public revelation of the Zervos study that was completed in 2020 but kept secret until now. The reason: Senator Johnson made the request to disclose it.

This was an important hearing exposing the narrative. See Del Bigtree and Robert Malone in the audience. Mary Holland is on the right, slightly cutoff.

Executive summary

A new Henry Ford hospital study led by trusted vaccinologist Marcus Zervos, done over 10 years, completed in 2020, showed, once again, the unvaccinated are far healthier than the vaccinated.

This is not an isolated outlier result. This study is is consistent with every study of the vaxxed/unvaxxed ever done and published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.

Here’s the key result of the Zervos study:

• 57% of vaccinated kids developed chronic disease

• Only 17% of unvaccinated kids did

This one image captures the entire study. Vaccinated kids are supposed to be far healthier, but this study, along with 10 other studies, showed this was not true. It was the reverse.

The study

Dr. Marcus Zervos, Division Head of Infectious Disease at Henry Ford Health in Detroit, led a massive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study involving 18,468 children enrolled between 2000 and 2016.

The results were devastating to the vaccine establishment:

• Vaccinated children were 3.03 times more likely to develop allergic diseases.

• 4.29 times more likely to develop asthma.

• 5.53 times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental disorders — including speech disorders and developmental delays.

• 5.96 times more likely to develop autoimmune diseases.

• Not a single case of ADHD, learning disability, or tics was found among the unvaccinated, while hundreds of cases existed among the vaccinated cohort.

• By age 10, only 43% of vaccinated children remained free of chronic disease — compared to 83% of unvaccinated children

Watch Senator Blumenthal explain why we all should ignore this study, and the ten other studies that show the same thing. Basically, he claims that one unpublished study (from a highly pro-vax doctor) cannot override the “thousands of studies” claiming the vaccines are safe. Really? Spmeone isn’t telling the truth here.

This is the most important vax/unvax study every done in history. The scientists who did the study were all pro-vax and when they saw the results, they didn’t want to lose their jobs, be fired, or make their fellow scientists uncomfortable. So they decided to leave the study secret and unpublished.

“Detection bias” or not?

Aaron Siri said he’s read hundreds of studies and this study is one of the best one he’s ever read. ADHD is caused by immune system issues so there is biological plausibility. The negative control, no increase in cancer, shows the signals were caused by “detection bias” as claimed by the Stanford infectious disease clinician.

Why no autism signal in the signal? Because they were categorized as ADHD due to the classification standards at the time.

Senator Blumenthal left for a committee meeting on Internet Safety, even though he’s the ranking member of THIS committee!

I personally knew about this study beforehand (Del Bigtree told me months ago under the condition I couldn’t tell anyone), but everyone respected the wishes of the scientists who didn’t want to be be fired if the study was published. So it FINALLY came out because Senator Johnson forced the issue.

Attempts to discredit the study are done with hand-waving arguments with zero evidentiary support

Jake Scott, an infectious disease doctor at Stanford, claims the study is “fatally flawed by design” because of “detection bias”… he claims the unvaccinated kids saw doctors less often. However, Dr. Scott failed to note:

1. The study did sensitivity analysis on the “detection bias” claim and still found statistically significant outcomes

2. Cancer was a negative control and showed no signal.

3. This study protocol was designed an executed by pro-vax doctors to show vaccines are safe, not to challenge it.

That’s the problem with Dr. Scott’s explanation. It’s complete hand-waving not supported by the evidence in the study. Had there been a negative control signal, his point could be legitimate. But to claim detection bias while having no signal in the negative control is scientifically dishonest.

Scott is typical of infectious disease doctors… they are taught the vaccines are safe, but never personally spend time to question that belief. They only pay attention to studies within their “bubble” and are unaware there is anything else.

Jake Scott treated over 100 COVID patients and lost over a dozen but he couldn’t quantify it. He treated patients with Remdesivir, cortical steroids (as advocated). He never used HCQ or ivermectin. He never heard of the Surgisphere study!

Jake Scott trusts the Commonwealth Fund study even though it was a blog post. Hmmm…

Scott said his vaccine integrity project found no evidence of suppression of

Here is a link to the spreadsheet (direct link here).

Jake Scott says a true vaxx / unvaxx trial is “unethical.”

Scott says if we stopped vaccines, deaths would increase. How can he know that? He didn’t explain but presumably is because he believes. But Texas measles shows measles outbreaks happened despite vaccines.

Jake Scott said there are 661 studies (out of 1,088) on the vaccine safety using an (biologically or immunologically) inert “placebo” (like mercury and aluminum adjuvants) and an unvaccinated control group (and admits he hasn’t read through them), but Siri explained that only 3 trials were relevant to the childhood vaccines. Saline should be used!!! That should be the control. Chicken pox had only had 300 in the study, not placebo. Gardasil study was not placebo controlled. Gardasil had few hundred with a true placebo, but only after they had previous injections. So basically, no controlled studies. None of the 76 vaccines on the schedule meets the “placebo controlled” study. Not a single one.

The 154 million lives saved study? Based on guesswork and assumptions, not actual records. There were not CIs in the study! It can’t put bounds on the estimate! So 200M lives could have been lost. The DTP studies shows kids died at 10x the rate of kids not having the DTP. The measles vaccine is the other vaccine cited in the study. But measles declined 99% before the vaccines came out. So it’s upside down. HepB was the third vaccine supposedly credited for the majority of the lives saved, but deaths per year went up after the vaccine was introduced. 23X lived saved vs. death counts before the vaccines. What brought down the rate of death was sanitation. They overstate the benefits and ignore the risks.

Jake Scott thinks the mRNA injected in the COVID vaccine is natural and degrades rapidly. He believes that the shots payload stays in the arms despite the biodistribution study from a Japan FOIA request. He didn’t answer the question as to whether he understand how the vaccine works.

Scott was NOT aware of the DNA contamination and said if true, that would be very concerning.

Siri said they had to sue the FDA and CDC to get the clinical trial data.

Siri said VSD data used to be available but they transitioned it so it wouldn’t be covered by FOIA requests. They keep the data hidden.

V-safe data was kept hidden for years and it required a lawsuit to disclose it. They only had checkboxes for useless outcomes. The CDC only showed results within 1 week. 7.7% reported needing medical care! They sought medical care 2x to 3x each. V-safe was designed to affirm safety, not assess safety. They could have added AESI items that they identified, but chose not to. They knew about the issues. V-safe was designed to affirm vaccine safety.

Jake Scott says he doesn’t want to cause harm. He wants to detect safety signals, but admits it isn’t perfect. He says there are other data monitoring systems, but didn’t name one! I’d love to know.

Jake Scott shows he clueless about how people who challenge the narrative have retaliation. He said he’ll come back for future hearings.

The task force tasked by law with making recommendation to make vaccines safer… never issued a report. Ever. No bi-annual report to Congress as required by law.

Scott said we have a measles pandemic, but if you do the math, there is no way RFK Jr. could have caused this with anything he said even if everyone believed him.

But there are only 10 studies comparing fully vaxxed vs. unvaxxed and 100% of them say unvaccinated are far healthier.

SLIGHT DIFFERENCE of opinion here.

Watch the mainstream media ignore this study like did the previous hearings.

Will this hearing prompt people in the Senate to do anything? Unlikely, no matter what is said.

Scott says VAERS doesn’t think VAERS shows causation. He didn’t even know the under reporting factor in VAERS!!

Lots of empty seats. No mainstream media coverage AFAIK.

Senator Blumenthal agrees science corruption is happening, but he thinks the corruption of science is actually happening the other way, e.g., the CDC director is fired and vaccines are being promoted as unsafe!

Watch it live on CHD. Excellent video by Highwire. Awesome testimonies by Aaron Siri and Toby Rogers.

Professor Jeffrey Morris’s attempt to attack the study

The post on the Zervos study by Professor Jeffrey Morris @jsm2334 is massively misleading.

1. Morris never read the study because it hasn't been released yet.

2. The IRR for autism was 1.16 before "adjustment." And autism was lumped into ADHD due to classification standards at the time.

3. The p-value for the autism result was .6 meaning statistically insignificant (because there was just one case in the unvaccinated).

4. They did sensitivity analysis to check for "detection bias".

5. They had at least one negative control, cancer, which showed no signal, validating their results.

6. Their results are consistent with the 10 other vaxxed/unvaxxed studies published in the peer-reviewed literature.

7. How he computes the actual ascertainment bias is a mystery to me. He doesn’t disclose that. If that were true, then these results would mean vaccines would be reducing chronic disease and Zervos would have published the study pointing to the ascertainment bias.

Aaron Siri’s new book: a #1 best seller in Public Health on Amazon

What the experts say in public vs. what they say under oath in court is not the same! Can you believe it?

Vaccines are are a religion. Do you believe in cars? Do you believe in houses? No. But people believe in vaccines. This is what this book is about.

Forbidden Facts by Gavin de Becker

Did you know that the Institutes of Medicine (IOM) recommendations are all gamed? IOM is a private company, not a government agency.

Their meetings are all secret.

But now we have a transcript of the meetings and we find that they are told what to report and they spend all their time talking about how to present it to be convincing to people. They do not examine the evidence.

They are all spin doctors on how to promote a narrative. Never trust the IOM reports again!

This book takes you takes you on the inside of how the sausage is made.

This story of true crime includes:

• bogus research, bribes,

• compromised experts,

• paid conspirators,

• destruction of evidence, and

• massive publicity campaigns to discredit people and truths that don’t fit official wishes.

The source material that clearly details how Government agencies and Big Pharma have routinely conspired to deceive the public on matters of profound importance like whether vaccines cause autism.