2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Mr Kirsch; maybe you can clarify something, which, to my way of thinking anyway, poses somewhat of a dilemna. How did the Pharmaceutical Industry manage to pre-empt Coronavirus¹⁹. Seems to me that the P.I. logically has always of necessity had to "play catch-up" when it comes to any illness. Unless it is known in advance how a real illness is going to manifest, including any potential variants, there is little if any to be gained by trying to predict what is going to effectively prevent it from happening. It will work effectively only by chance. Suggests very strongly that a medication is produced before an illness is "discovered", in effect necessitating an illness being designed and produced to fit the medication. I've spent considerable time pondering this. Salk produced his "sip" several years after polio became a problem, and by the time Polio was already on the wane, which could suggest that the sip may not have been effective as claimed either. How does one determine how many lives have been saved or injuries prevented? We were told by Prof M. Baker in NZ that the jab saved 20,000 covid fatalaties that he had predicted/projected were going to occur. How in God's name did he "know" that?

Expand full comment

As a "success story" related by Professor Baker you are speaking of a study published in New Zealand Medical Journal Oct 6, 2023 by 16 leading doctors and scientists as reported here:

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/499516/new-zealand-s-covid-19-response-saved-20-000-lives-research

Here is that issue https://nzmj.org.nz/journal/vol-136-no-1583 but one must be a subscriber to get access.

Expand full comment