5 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Alan N's avatar

I wrote:

"The WHO shall make NO treaty, law, or directive that denies physicians the exercise of their best judgment nor individuals from exercising their own best judgment in seeking & obtaining treatment in pursuit of their own health and well-being for themselves or their family members."

Keep it simple. IMHO.

Expand full comment
Question Everything's avatar

Should've just ended it at "The WHO shall make no treaty, law, or directive....."

I am an adult and make my own decisions especially when it comes to health- and I did not elect, or SElect a tyrannical murderer (Tedros, look into his past.... YIKES!) to make decisions on my behalf.

Also, perhaps MOST IMPORTANTLY, not a single virus has ever been scientifically proven to exist, or "infect", or act as contagious pathogens, PERIOD.

Expand full comment
Alan N's avatar

It's a good point. The WHO has no jurisdiction over anyone, they are, supposedly, a point of health coordination. But, like anything "World", their megalomania -- and that of the Globalists actually running them (not that clown Gebrayesus) -- has them assuming new powers faster than the Feds print their phoney billions.

As far as viruses, I can agree with a piece of that, in the case of AIDS and now SARS-COV-2, they haven't isolated a single demonstrable virus, nor followed Koch's Postulates and proven it can generate the disease symptoms in a suitable host. I agree they've lied their way through this one. being a medical microbiologist, I've seen CMV, Herpes, and a few others that do exhibit infectivity with symptoms and isolatability in mammalian cell culture. But, yeah, a whole lot clearer and easier with bacteria. This pandemic is one big fraud on so many levels.

Expand full comment
Question Everything's avatar

Look into a book called Virus Mania, and then The Contagion Myth, to start with.

What you are seeing are symptoms, not a virus. Symptoms occur as a result of toxicity - and lord knows we are bombarded with it from every possible direction.

It took me awhile to confidently proclaim that NO VIRUS has ever been scientifically proven, fulfilled Koch's or River's Postulates, or observed (and there are several problems using Electron Microscopy images as "proof" - primarily that you are not observing the particles in their natural state. It requires manipulated, aggregated, macerated, frozen cells that are sliced, & stained with toxic metal dyes.... Its not surprising at all that cytopathic effect is observed. Consider that what we proclaim as proof of viruses, is in fact, proof of necrosis from the procedure itself - we are not, and have not EVER observed a particle invading a cell.)

Also look into Bechamp's work on pleomorphism (and others... Dr Barre Lando comes to mind). "Viruses" originate from within, not from without. Its an outfection, not an infection.

Cell culture in petri dishes is so far removed from anything that would occur in nature that its comical that any scientist with integrity considers that a legitimate experiment. And this is a fairly new practice, beginning with the Enders & Peebles paper on measles in 1954. This is also the first AND LAST time anyone ever used a control in virological cell culture - controls are an absolute REQUIREMENT for science. No control has been performed since. Why?

His conclusion in the paper was that when adding the toxic mixture to the cell culture, the same cytopathic effect was observed in the control.... but no one talks about the paper that started it all ЁЯШЙ

Once you begin really looking into the history of virology & allopathic medicine, how it all started, when it began, how it evolved.... it'll all start to make sense. (Check out the Flexner report too.... thats a BIG pivot in history, and only a little more than 100 years ago)

Expand full comment