I'm going to share two, verifiable anecdotes, that prove, without a doubt, that vaccines cause SIDS and autism. Basically, the medical community claims black swans don't exist. I easily found them.
My 2-year old cousin died of so-called SIDS over 60 years ago, before I was born. And no progress has been made on uncovering the cause of this, because they’re ignoring the most common proximate events: vaccines, the sacrament of public health and modern medicine.
I’d been hoping you’d turn your attention to childhood and other vaccines after your excellent work on investigating the c-19 injections.
I’ve been a medical researcher for decades but only recently did my own deep dive into vaccines. All of the doctors and researchers I’ve worked with over the years operate under the assumption that vaccines are safe and effective, can only rarely do harm (and even then it’s minimal/transient), are the best thing you can do to prevent disease, and have saved millions of lives. Although the details of this were never discussed, one thing was clear: anyone not parroting these talking points must be an ignorant quack, and patients who refuse them are misguided, low-intellect people
I posted the following elsewhere, commenting on another post of yours, but wanted to add it here, too:
I’m not sure it’s literally true that all vaccines have polysorbste 80 (Tween 80) but you are correct that surfactants like these make the gut and blood-brain barriers more permeable, letting in all of the vaccine ingredients where they can do damage.
Mercury is in some vaccines as a ‘preservative/antimicrobial’ which is absolutely unnecessary (something else could be used.)
Aluminum is used in animal research to induce allergies and autoimmune disease, which many/most clinicians don’t seem to know. An injection of aluminum is paired with another material to induce allergy to that substance. I experienced this myself with a new-onset food allergy after getting the aluminum containing hepatitis B series as an adult.
In vaccines it’s used as an ‘adjuvant’ because subunits (pieces of viruses or toxins like tetanus or pertussis) often aren’t recognized by the immune system. Pairing these with aluminum irritates the immune system into reacting, so antibodies will be formed.
So it’s no surprise that asthma, eczema, reflux, irritable bowel, behavior changes, severe pain behaviors, etc. are common, considering the multiple doses of mixed antigen vaccines given in the sane ‘well child’ visits (should be re-named more accurately as allergy & autoimmunity induction visits.)
I agree with doctors like Suzanne Humphries, MD & Judy Mikovits that no currently available vaccines are safe or effective.
If you go to the package insert for each vaccine, look up the biological effect of each ingredient, research how they are made (so contain stray animal viruses, animal and human DNA, debris from cell lines, antibiotics, preservatives, surfactants, etc. etc. it becomes clear why we have an epidemic of chronic disease that begins in childhood.
I have strong written evidence that many SIDS cases are also caused by funghi, that become more active if it is warm an wet. If they consume specific material that can be found in matresses (compounds of Antimon, Aresenic or Phosphorous), they create hightly toxic gas, that is havier than air. Dr. Hannes Kapuste has collected lots of prooving material, and he also made it available on the internet. Either you find it, or otherwise feel free to ask me on telegram under username angwrobl I am happy to share!
Interesting aside: in Australia, Mums would stuff infant pillows with tea tree leaves against SIDS. I have no idea how that fits into the vaccine story - you used to be able to buy "tea tree pillows," but I think medical cartel cut that practice out. Can't be having anything that works that you didn't buy from them.
Great anecdotes. One correction: SIDS within 48 hours of a vaccine should be SIDS within 48 hours of a group of vaccines. Pediatricians who follow the CDC schedule give between 7 and 9 vaccines at one time at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. Thanks. Dr. William Gaunt, retired naturopath
Okay, so let’s breakdown what Steve did here. He said:
“If SIDS is just randomly happening to babies, and babies are vaccinated every 60 days like clockwork, the chance of a SIDS death happening within any 48 hour window post-vaccine is 1/30.”
Hmm. Babies are vaccinated every 60 days like clockwork. How many babies? How can you assess the probability of a random babies chance of SIDS without knowing how many babies were vaccinated during any 60 day interval? You can’t. “Within any 48 hour window post- vaccine is 1/30th”. With this information you cannot determine what the rate of SIDS is. The rate of SIDS is = (the number of SIDS cases)/(total number vaccinated). It is not = (2 days)/(60 days). That is not a rate. It’s a dimensionless quantity. This is the problem. We only know how many SIDS cases there were spread out over 7 years and how many fell within a 2 day interval after vaccination. But it gets more convoluted because there aren’t 30 2 day intervals during a 60 day period as the vaccinations are made every day so there are 60 2 day periods with the last 2 day interval spanning days 60 to 61. But that does not matter. We are missing a crucial number here. We do not know what the rate of SIDS is because we do not know how many babies were vaccinated over that 60 day period.
Steve goes on to say:
“So if there are 300 babies who died of SIDS, we’d expect that 10 of them, on average, would happen within every 48 hour window post vaccine.”
If the 300 events and the 225 events that fall within the 2 day parameter are randomly distributed then we must spread them out over 7 years of overlapping 2 day intervals. Let’s work this out. There were 300 total events over 7 years 225 of those events occurred within a 2-day interval. Over 7 years there are 2556 possible 2-day intervals. If the 225 events are randomly distributed over the 2556 intervals we need each interval has an equal chance of containing 1 of the 225 events so to calculate the expected number per interval there were a total events = 225 and a total of intervals = 2556 so the expected number = Total events / Total intervals make the expected number = 225 / 2556 or the expected number = 0.088 events per interval. Therefore, if the 225 events that occurred in a 2-day interval are randomly distributed over the 2556 total intervals, the expected number of events per 2-day interval is 0.088 not 10. But even with this number we cannot assess the Poisson probability without knowing the rate of SIDS. Could you use the CDC rate of 34.7 per 100,000? Not really. We still need to know how many babies were vaccinated. There’s no way to impute that number without more information. The goal here is attempt to prove these incidents of SIDS within 2 days post vaccination are not random. Just looking at the numbers it certainly looks that way. But what if the number of babies vaccinated is huge compared to the number of SIDS cases within 48 hours of vaccination. If Steve can attain the number of vaccines administered during the 7 year period in question the rate of SIDS can be determined for this analysis.
- "How many babies? [...] the probability of a random babies chance of SIDS"?
We don't need to know that! Steve didn't determine the rate of SIDS. Instead, he made the simplified estimation that on the average each baby - also those 300 babies - got vaccine injections every 60 days, or 6 times per year ("like clock work", but that may be irrelevant). Any unrelated random event that occurs in a year will occur with a chance of ca. 1/360 on any day of that year; the chance for such event to fall inside any of the six 48h periods after vaccination is then 12/360=1/30. And 1/30 = 10/300. In other words, if the vaccines have no effect, we should expect that around 10 of those babies were injected within 48h before they suddenly died. Any strong deviation from that number is a so-called safety signal. And by the way: contrary to VAERS, reporting bias is not an issue here.
It's sad to see you reduced to the use of ad hominems Harry. Here's the problem.
What Steve is doing is hurting the entire effort to expose how dangerous many vaccines are. It's an enormous task with nearly 100 years of propaganda to overcome. The public has been brainwashed. With Steve pushing out flawed analysis after flawed analysis gives the opposition fodder with which to beat down the effort. And they will, I know these people. What we need is properly conducted, replicable research. Not hack jobs with data someone dropped on Steve's doorstep. That is not how science works.
Sorry Paul but it really looked as if you were trolling. I already explained that what you wrote didn't apply to the method that Steve used and I gave up. However, coincidentally it's similar to the one prosecutors used against Lucy Letby. The fault the prosecutors made was that they didn't include the other babies that died. That explanation here: https://twitter.com/profnfenton/status/1692837686166368660
To properly apply a Poisson distribution to model SIDS deaths following vaccinations one would need more than just the number of SIDS deaths and the vaccination schedule. Specifically, you would also need: The total number of babies vaccinated over the analysis time period. This is because the key Poisson parameter λ represents the average rate of SIDS deaths per vaccinated baby over a given time window following vaccination. Without knowing the total number vaccinated, you can't accurately calculate λ, the SIDS rate per vaccinated baby. Simply assuming λ based on the vaccination schedule alone is invalid. Without the full underlying dataset, any Poisson model will be based on unfounded assumptions. The stated 1/30 probability of SIDS within 48 hours of vaccination is purely hypothetical, not derived from actual data. The Poisson distribution models the probability of observing X events in an interval given a known average rate of events (λ). Without empirical data on the actual rate of SIDS occurrences within a time window of vaccinations, λ is unknown. Plugging in an assumed probability like 1/30 as λ gives an invalid model - since this doesn't represent the true observed rate. Any probabilities or conclusions derived from this assumed Poisson distribution are therefore statistically unfounded.
You said in the article you welcome fact checkers. Can you provide the name of the cop whose data you're using? Or some information about the data collection methodology? Thanks.
Steve, there are pediatricians like me who woke up a long time ago-I am a founding member of Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC); the work of re-educating doctors & the public is on-going but there needs to be political change that includes 1.repealing the vaccine act of 1986 to revoke product liability protection that will induce change in the marketplace by increasing competition to make ‘safer’ vaccines; 2. Changing the medical education establishment (i feel like i went into debt for an education to be their shill); These changes will not happen if the govmt policy (per Dr. Robert Malone’s report of the Kissinger documents) is depopulation to keep us below 8B…
I'm almost 60 and only just recently discovered that I've got Asperger's syndrome. It's not pronounced, but it's one of those things that you can't unsee once it's been pointed out to you. The problem is that i had a few friends point it out to me over a decade ago, and I had no inclination to entertain such an idiotic claim.
The medical community doesn't want to be confused by the facts, and neither does the rest of this hopelessly deluded, distracted, eagerly deceived planet. I NEVER bring up the subject of vaccines, politics, health care, etc., but when someone else does it doesn't take more than a few seconds of a few simple easily verifiable facts presented for their edification before their dismissive hand waving lets me know that they're not interested in the truth.
I'm learning how to not only respect a world dead set on embracing the security of ignorance, but the fact that shooting my mouth off is going to get me into a lot of trouble one of these days. I'm learning to nod in agreement and keep my mouth shut. I'm learning that my sense of self-preservation trumps any desire to wake up those who seek the dreamless sleep of the damned.
Thank you for the back history. All I knew at that age was this was something new to us, we didn't even do it at the doctor's office (but I don't remember having ever any school physicals, either), all standing in line for the school nurse to give us these new vaccines or TB testing. It's making me wonder a lot of things now. Downs? It's causing a flood of questions, emotions, distrust in people. Now, what, these poor kids get close to 80 or 85 shots by the time they leave school. Thalidomide wasn't a thing until it was a thing-but it was. We are their guinea pigs. The ghouls love the "practice" of medicine. I want to warn every new parent, but it's not going to be the same for every child. Some won't suffer anything. I guess the same as the covid shot. I'll be honest, I think, if they're so bad, why isn't everyone having a terrible reaction. It causes the true believers to doubt what is being uncovered because nobody they know has had a problem. The doctors in their families aren't concerned. As one friend argued with me, because she's got several MDs in the family, pediatricians, ER, etc. and before taking it they've all done their research, they've seen none of this, and if there was something serious underlying all of this, wouldn't you think there would be warnings, or people would find something n it to be concerned about??!!! I'm thankful they haven't suffered, but I think the only way they will change their minds is if one of them does and it can be directly linked to the shot.
There's a lot more we need to know. Were there batches concocted for their research to correlate with races, areas, countries, levels of affluence, states? The globalists and true elites and certain other groups in the higher status, (not your actors or athletes, they are dropping, but most keeping quiet) are having no issues, no deaths, no strokes, etc. Also, unless I'm able to give them an alternative for what they will be expected to give up, some suggestions, I'm not able to do it on the scale I need to, until I know what to do. I just haven't come to grips with the entire thing yet. My expectations and assumptions have gotten in the way.
Reading A Midwestern Doc has convinced me that most of us are subtly damaged (re: Childhood vaccines, but also those who took CV19 shots). Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it isn't there.
True. Some bodies are able to take things better. Hold on longer. There are often things that lurk. I've heard some batches settle and aren't mixed well at the time of adminstration, so the harmful stuff isn't in every shot. I can't imagine, but I don't know about that. Obviously, I've never seen a vial or had a shot. Unless they pin me to the floor I will NEVER take it. But now, because it was such a betrayal and breech, I don't trust most in the medical profession or that any shot they give is safe now, especially in light of the ways they are experimenting in spreading it through society.
As I watch these sweet decent kids on college campuses stand up for America, the flag, etc. I see why the colleges, the government, pharma, foreign actors, especially, want to make it mandatory, that in order to step foot on campus, you WILL take that shot. They want our young men damaged, unable to procreate, emasculated, even dead.
Another reason for pushing the trans ideology. You won't have strong young men. What better way to take over a country. Can't procreate, are damaged, mentally and physically unfit. The enemies of our society are working the plan.
That family, the physicians in the family I referred to, one has acquired prostate cancer now. It came out around Christmas time, but I don't know when he got it. But they would never admit it was from the shot. People like these aren't reading, watching, listening to what we do and would NEVER connect the dots. Didn't want to receive any more emails I forwarded, they didn't believe what we are interested in learning about. Not always, but I usually want to know what I don't know, be informed about sinister and other things.
I just lost a dear friend in April who died from leukemia. She'd had the shot(s), against her will, coerced by her covid hysterical "wear a mask" nurse daughter. It's a very sad story.
The biggest thing we can do is educate soon-to-be parents and new parents. This well baby handbook summarizes everything a parent needs to know about shots so that parents can make informed decisions. https://circleofmamas.com/store/Well-Baby-Handbook-p257366677
It’s national immunization awareness month. I get newsletters from Boston Children’s Hospital. They are all in on vaccines. I guess they are still unaware of vaccine injuries including SIDS, autism, etc. This from the number one hospital….
Yes, when the diagnoses gets too big, and everyone is vaccinated, it's really hard to tell what is causing what. This is why we need unvaccinated controls.
You mention a video planned for August 2023. Did I miss it? THANKS for all you do. As always, I love your determination.
Thank you, Steve, for addressing this topic.
My 2-year old cousin died of so-called SIDS over 60 years ago, before I was born. And no progress has been made on uncovering the cause of this, because they’re ignoring the most common proximate events: vaccines, the sacrament of public health and modern medicine.
I’d been hoping you’d turn your attention to childhood and other vaccines after your excellent work on investigating the c-19 injections.
I’ve been a medical researcher for decades but only recently did my own deep dive into vaccines. All of the doctors and researchers I’ve worked with over the years operate under the assumption that vaccines are safe and effective, can only rarely do harm (and even then it’s minimal/transient), are the best thing you can do to prevent disease, and have saved millions of lives. Although the details of this were never discussed, one thing was clear: anyone not parroting these talking points must be an ignorant quack, and patients who refuse them are misguided, low-intellect people
I posted the following elsewhere, commenting on another post of yours, but wanted to add it here, too:
I’m not sure it’s literally true that all vaccines have polysorbste 80 (Tween 80) but you are correct that surfactants like these make the gut and blood-brain barriers more permeable, letting in all of the vaccine ingredients where they can do damage.
Mercury is in some vaccines as a ‘preservative/antimicrobial’ which is absolutely unnecessary (something else could be used.)
Aluminum is used in animal research to induce allergies and autoimmune disease, which many/most clinicians don’t seem to know. An injection of aluminum is paired with another material to induce allergy to that substance. I experienced this myself with a new-onset food allergy after getting the aluminum containing hepatitis B series as an adult.
In vaccines it’s used as an ‘adjuvant’ because subunits (pieces of viruses or toxins like tetanus or pertussis) often aren’t recognized by the immune system. Pairing these with aluminum irritates the immune system into reacting, so antibodies will be formed.
So it’s no surprise that asthma, eczema, reflux, irritable bowel, behavior changes, severe pain behaviors, etc. are common, considering the multiple doses of mixed antigen vaccines given in the sane ‘well child’ visits (should be re-named more accurately as allergy & autoimmunity induction visits.)
I agree with doctors like Suzanne Humphries, MD & Judy Mikovits that no currently available vaccines are safe or effective.
If you go to the package insert for each vaccine, look up the biological effect of each ingredient, research how they are made (so contain stray animal viruses, animal and human DNA, debris from cell lines, antibiotics, preservatives, surfactants, etc. etc. it becomes clear why we have an epidemic of chronic disease that begins in childhood.
I have strong written evidence that many SIDS cases are also caused by funghi, that become more active if it is warm an wet. If they consume specific material that can be found in matresses (compounds of Antimon, Aresenic or Phosphorous), they create hightly toxic gas, that is havier than air. Dr. Hannes Kapuste has collected lots of prooving material, and he also made it available on the internet. Either you find it, or otherwise feel free to ask me on telegram under username angwrobl I am happy to share!
Interesting aside: in Australia, Mums would stuff infant pillows with tea tree leaves against SIDS. I have no idea how that fits into the vaccine story - you used to be able to buy "tea tree pillows," but I think medical cartel cut that practice out. Can't be having anything that works that you didn't buy from them.
Your hypothesis still does not answer why most of the deaths are AFTER vaccines and not randomly distributed before and after.
Great anecdotes. One correction: SIDS within 48 hours of a vaccine should be SIDS within 48 hours of a group of vaccines. Pediatricians who follow the CDC schedule give between 7 and 9 vaccines at one time at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. Thanks. Dr. William Gaunt, retired naturopath
Okay, so let’s breakdown what Steve did here. He said:
“If SIDS is just randomly happening to babies, and babies are vaccinated every 60 days like clockwork, the chance of a SIDS death happening within any 48 hour window post-vaccine is 1/30.”
Hmm. Babies are vaccinated every 60 days like clockwork. How many babies? How can you assess the probability of a random babies chance of SIDS without knowing how many babies were vaccinated during any 60 day interval? You can’t. “Within any 48 hour window post- vaccine is 1/30th”. With this information you cannot determine what the rate of SIDS is. The rate of SIDS is = (the number of SIDS cases)/(total number vaccinated). It is not = (2 days)/(60 days). That is not a rate. It’s a dimensionless quantity. This is the problem. We only know how many SIDS cases there were spread out over 7 years and how many fell within a 2 day interval after vaccination. But it gets more convoluted because there aren’t 30 2 day intervals during a 60 day period as the vaccinations are made every day so there are 60 2 day periods with the last 2 day interval spanning days 60 to 61. But that does not matter. We are missing a crucial number here. We do not know what the rate of SIDS is because we do not know how many babies were vaccinated over that 60 day period.
Steve goes on to say:
“So if there are 300 babies who died of SIDS, we’d expect that 10 of them, on average, would happen within every 48 hour window post vaccine.”
If the 300 events and the 225 events that fall within the 2 day parameter are randomly distributed then we must spread them out over 7 years of overlapping 2 day intervals. Let’s work this out. There were 300 total events over 7 years 225 of those events occurred within a 2-day interval. Over 7 years there are 2556 possible 2-day intervals. If the 225 events are randomly distributed over the 2556 intervals we need each interval has an equal chance of containing 1 of the 225 events so to calculate the expected number per interval there were a total events = 225 and a total of intervals = 2556 so the expected number = Total events / Total intervals make the expected number = 225 / 2556 or the expected number = 0.088 events per interval. Therefore, if the 225 events that occurred in a 2-day interval are randomly distributed over the 2556 total intervals, the expected number of events per 2-day interval is 0.088 not 10. But even with this number we cannot assess the Poisson probability without knowing the rate of SIDS. Could you use the CDC rate of 34.7 per 100,000? Not really. We still need to know how many babies were vaccinated. There’s no way to impute that number without more information. The goal here is attempt to prove these incidents of SIDS within 2 days post vaccination are not random. Just looking at the numbers it certainly looks that way. But what if the number of babies vaccinated is huge compared to the number of SIDS cases within 48 hours of vaccination. If Steve can attain the number of vaccines administered during the 7 year period in question the rate of SIDS can be determined for this analysis.
Interesting. My check of your check:
- "How many babies? [...] the probability of a random babies chance of SIDS"?
We don't need to know that! Steve didn't determine the rate of SIDS. Instead, he made the simplified estimation that on the average each baby - also those 300 babies - got vaccine injections every 60 days, or 6 times per year ("like clock work", but that may be irrelevant). Any unrelated random event that occurs in a year will occur with a chance of ca. 1/360 on any day of that year; the chance for such event to fall inside any of the six 48h periods after vaccination is then 12/360=1/30. And 1/30 = 10/300. In other words, if the vaccines have no effect, we should expect that around 10 of those babies were injected within 48h before they suddenly died. Any strong deviation from that number is a so-called safety signal. And by the way: contrary to VAERS, reporting bias is not an issue here.
PS. Steve adjusted his numbers but the method remained the same.
Still wrong. These are not rates and do not apply.
Maybe "Don't feed the trolls" applies?
It's sad to see you reduced to the use of ad hominems Harry. Here's the problem.
What Steve is doing is hurting the entire effort to expose how dangerous many vaccines are. It's an enormous task with nearly 100 years of propaganda to overcome. The public has been brainwashed. With Steve pushing out flawed analysis after flawed analysis gives the opposition fodder with which to beat down the effort. And they will, I know these people. What we need is properly conducted, replicable research. Not hack jobs with data someone dropped on Steve's doorstep. That is not how science works.
Sorry Paul but it really looked as if you were trolling. I already explained that what you wrote didn't apply to the method that Steve used and I gave up. However, coincidentally it's similar to the one prosecutors used against Lucy Letby. The fault the prosecutors made was that they didn't include the other babies that died. That explanation here: https://twitter.com/profnfenton/status/1692837686166368660
To properly apply a Poisson distribution to model SIDS deaths following vaccinations one would need more than just the number of SIDS deaths and the vaccination schedule. Specifically, you would also need: The total number of babies vaccinated over the analysis time period. This is because the key Poisson parameter λ represents the average rate of SIDS deaths per vaccinated baby over a given time window following vaccination. Without knowing the total number vaccinated, you can't accurately calculate λ, the SIDS rate per vaccinated baby. Simply assuming λ based on the vaccination schedule alone is invalid. Without the full underlying dataset, any Poisson model will be based on unfounded assumptions. The stated 1/30 probability of SIDS within 48 hours of vaccination is purely hypothetical, not derived from actual data. The Poisson distribution models the probability of observing X events in an interval given a known average rate of events (λ). Without empirical data on the actual rate of SIDS occurrences within a time window of vaccinations, λ is unknown. Plugging in an assumed probability like 1/30 as λ gives an invalid model - since this doesn't represent the true observed rate. Any probabilities or conclusions derived from this assumed Poisson distribution are therefore statistically unfounded.
Good luck getting study funded!
Also this, before it’s no longer available (Kindle only right now on Amazon):
VACCINE ILLUSION
HOW VACCINATION COMPROMISES OUR
NATURAL IMMUNITY AND WHAT WE CAN DO TO REGAIN OUR HEALTH
TETYANA OBUKHANYCH, PHD
Also a very important book:
Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://a.co/d/ib25396
And of course there is this...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/
regarding Hannah Poling's case
Hi Steve.
You said in the article you welcome fact checkers. Can you provide the name of the cop whose data you're using? Or some information about the data collection methodology? Thanks.
Steve, there are pediatricians like me who woke up a long time ago-I am a founding member of Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC); the work of re-educating doctors & the public is on-going but there needs to be political change that includes 1.repealing the vaccine act of 1986 to revoke product liability protection that will induce change in the marketplace by increasing competition to make ‘safer’ vaccines; 2. Changing the medical education establishment (i feel like i went into debt for an education to be their shill); These changes will not happen if the govmt policy (per Dr. Robert Malone’s report of the Kissinger documents) is depopulation to keep us below 8B…
I'm almost 60 and only just recently discovered that I've got Asperger's syndrome. It's not pronounced, but it's one of those things that you can't unsee once it's been pointed out to you. The problem is that i had a few friends point it out to me over a decade ago, and I had no inclination to entertain such an idiotic claim.
The medical community doesn't want to be confused by the facts, and neither does the rest of this hopelessly deluded, distracted, eagerly deceived planet. I NEVER bring up the subject of vaccines, politics, health care, etc., but when someone else does it doesn't take more than a few seconds of a few simple easily verifiable facts presented for their edification before their dismissive hand waving lets me know that they're not interested in the truth.
I'm learning how to not only respect a world dead set on embracing the security of ignorance, but the fact that shooting my mouth off is going to get me into a lot of trouble one of these days. I'm learning to nod in agreement and keep my mouth shut. I'm learning that my sense of self-preservation trumps any desire to wake up those who seek the dreamless sleep of the damned.
Thank you for the back history. All I knew at that age was this was something new to us, we didn't even do it at the doctor's office (but I don't remember having ever any school physicals, either), all standing in line for the school nurse to give us these new vaccines or TB testing. It's making me wonder a lot of things now. Downs? It's causing a flood of questions, emotions, distrust in people. Now, what, these poor kids get close to 80 or 85 shots by the time they leave school. Thalidomide wasn't a thing until it was a thing-but it was. We are their guinea pigs. The ghouls love the "practice" of medicine. I want to warn every new parent, but it's not going to be the same for every child. Some won't suffer anything. I guess the same as the covid shot. I'll be honest, I think, if they're so bad, why isn't everyone having a terrible reaction. It causes the true believers to doubt what is being uncovered because nobody they know has had a problem. The doctors in their families aren't concerned. As one friend argued with me, because she's got several MDs in the family, pediatricians, ER, etc. and before taking it they've all done their research, they've seen none of this, and if there was something serious underlying all of this, wouldn't you think there would be warnings, or people would find something n it to be concerned about??!!! I'm thankful they haven't suffered, but I think the only way they will change their minds is if one of them does and it can be directly linked to the shot.
There's a lot more we need to know. Were there batches concocted for their research to correlate with races, areas, countries, levels of affluence, states? The globalists and true elites and certain other groups in the higher status, (not your actors or athletes, they are dropping, but most keeping quiet) are having no issues, no deaths, no strokes, etc. Also, unless I'm able to give them an alternative for what they will be expected to give up, some suggestions, I'm not able to do it on the scale I need to, until I know what to do. I just haven't come to grips with the entire thing yet. My expectations and assumptions have gotten in the way.
Reading A Midwestern Doc has convinced me that most of us are subtly damaged (re: Childhood vaccines, but also those who took CV19 shots). Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it isn't there.
True. Some bodies are able to take things better. Hold on longer. There are often things that lurk. I've heard some batches settle and aren't mixed well at the time of adminstration, so the harmful stuff isn't in every shot. I can't imagine, but I don't know about that. Obviously, I've never seen a vial or had a shot. Unless they pin me to the floor I will NEVER take it. But now, because it was such a betrayal and breech, I don't trust most in the medical profession or that any shot they give is safe now, especially in light of the ways they are experimenting in spreading it through society.
As I watch these sweet decent kids on college campuses stand up for America, the flag, etc. I see why the colleges, the government, pharma, foreign actors, especially, want to make it mandatory, that in order to step foot on campus, you WILL take that shot. They want our young men damaged, unable to procreate, emasculated, even dead.
Another reason for pushing the trans ideology. You won't have strong young men. What better way to take over a country. Can't procreate, are damaged, mentally and physically unfit. The enemies of our society are working the plan.
That family, the physicians in the family I referred to, one has acquired prostate cancer now. It came out around Christmas time, but I don't know when he got it. But they would never admit it was from the shot. People like these aren't reading, watching, listening to what we do and would NEVER connect the dots. Didn't want to receive any more emails I forwarded, they didn't believe what we are interested in learning about. Not always, but I usually want to know what I don't know, be informed about sinister and other things.
I just lost a dear friend in April who died from leukemia. She'd had the shot(s), against her will, coerced by her covid hysterical "wear a mask" nurse daughter. It's a very sad story.
Thanks for writing on this Steve. It is so hard to believe how evil pharma is.
For a related story about SIDS see https://donaldbest.ca/public-health-agency-of-canada-personnel-influenced-ottawa-police-investigation-and-charge-against-detective-grus/ and https://donaldbest.ca/famed-nypd-detective-frank-serpico-slams-ottawa-police-cover-up-in-grus-case/
The biggest thing we can do is educate soon-to-be parents and new parents. This well baby handbook summarizes everything a parent needs to know about shots so that parents can make informed decisions. https://circleofmamas.com/store/Well-Baby-Handbook-p257366677
It’s national immunization awareness month. I get newsletters from Boston Children’s Hospital. They are all in on vaccines. I guess they are still unaware of vaccine injuries including SIDS, autism, etc. This from the number one hospital….
https://answers.childrenshospital.org/how-vaccines-work/?utm_campaign=FY23BrandNatl&utm_medium=email&utm_source=feature&utm_content=pa807
https://answers.childrenshospital.org/vaccines-to-prevent-diseases/?utm_campaign=FY23BrandNatl&utm_medium=email&utm_source=feature&utm_content=pa807
https://answers.childrenshospital.org/taming-vaccine-data-joann-arce-phd/?utm_campaign=FY23BrandNatl&utm_medium=email&utm_source=feature&utm_content=pa807
Try gifting "Turtles All The Way Down" book to the head of the hospital.
Yes, when the diagnoses gets too big, and everyone is vaccinated, it's really hard to tell what is causing what. This is why we need unvaccinated controls.