Is it possible that these children already had autism but it just wasn't evident until they had their first meltdown that was triggered by the pain of having a shot?
Almost all children has had amoxicillin at some time during early childhood ( a common antibootic used for upper airway infections) - why hadn't anybody looked for a possible cause there????
What do you mean by nobody wants to replicate your study? There’s been plenty of studies into it and plenty of people who stopped having vaccines out of fear until scientists realised vaccines don’t cause autism.
Also, let’s be honest, autism isn’t a bad thing, whereas vaccines are incredibly important to stopping the spread of deadly diseases and even eradicating them.
So, because you’ve found a vague correlation that confirms your ideologies and beliefs, you challenge decades of rigorous research and consensus by the medical and scientific communities? Go ahead and submit for peer review at any reputable journal. If your evidence is so airtight, it should get printed in Nature or Science without fail. I’ll be glad to listen to you after that.
CONgress is bought and paid for by PIG pHARMa...as are about everyone in all seven mountains of society! Including the CHURCH! Pastors who pushed the C1984 shots are a DEAD GIVEAWAY OF PAYOFFS WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS!!!!!! GOD KNOWS WHO EVERY ONE OF THEM IS! JUDGEMENT IS COMING!!!!!!
No one wants to replicate your survey because your design of experiments is crap. “Statistically impossible” is right. A sample of 44 to represent what population? Junk science.
Because there’s no control. There could’ve been a thousand other explanations for what happened but there’s no way to know, because nothing was controlled. Real science is hard. It’s slow, careful, and often tedious. But every legitimate experiment hinges on one thing: control, ideally with randomly assigned groups.
For example take a chemistry experiment. The chemist can control the temperature, humidity, quantities of reagents—everything. They can run the experiment again and again and get the same result. That’s what science looks like.
Now compare that to an internet survey or any survey actually. You post a questionnaire online that anyone can fill out, with zero control over who responds, under what conditions, or even if they’re telling the truth. How can you call that legitimate evidence? That’s not science. That’s nonsense.
Steve puts out all this garbage because he doesn’t understand the basics of experimental design. And after 45 years as a research statistician, I should know. I don’t doubt Steve’s intentions, his hearts in the right place but his methods are flawed.
And it’s not just Steve. This kind of thing is rampant in medical research. Even Lancet has admitted this. People use whatever data is easiest to collect, and the result is a mountain of garbage studies that can’t be replicated, conclusions that can’t be trusted, and a public left drowning in misinformation. That’s the problem! I have no doubt the MMR vaccine is behind the spike in autism. What we need is real in vivo studies done. I did find one recently study with monkeys. The setting controlled one group placebo the other the mmr vaccine. Many of the monkeys that got the mmr vaccine soon developed autism like symptoms. The placebo group had no symptoms. This is a good start.
But what about the measles virus itself? The MMR vaccine is just weakened measles (and rubella and mumps viruses) after all. I can't find any information about whether measles itself might cause autism because if there is any it's buried under all the crap about the MMR vaccine or from long ago when measles was still common.
Based on all the evidence that you have put forth, the burden of proof is on the people who say that “vaccines are safe and effective“ now it is obvious that those of us who can see what is in front of our eyes do not have to prove we are right The safe and effective people have to prove we are wrong
Cant wait for this blow wide open and take down the DS criminal pHARMA, politicians, and thousands of pediatricians, (the most useless bunch of people who destroy children)
The official steadfast argument rhetoric is that a person arbitrarily (or based on what?) isn't considered vaccinated until after two(2) weeks after the second inoculation and four weeks after the first innoculation totalling six(6) weeks.
Any adverse event including death prior to the six(6) week 'unvaccinated' period are all unvaccinated deaths and injuries.
Deaths or adverse events by those after receiving only one jab are unvaccinated.
Until the statistics address the official 'statistical manipulation' there will only be a belligerent response.
Steve, do you or anyone on here know best contact email for RFK Jr? I've written him a letter asking him to change the declarations for the Prep Act. Found out he can't repeal the entire act without congressional approval, which I doubt will happen.
I cannot locate an email address for HHS. Typical govt. inefficiency. They only list a mailing address and phone number. I get voicemail when I call.
Is it possible that these children already had autism but it just wasn't evident until they had their first meltdown that was triggered by the pain of having a shot?
Hang them all. Nuremberg 2.0
Almost all children has had amoxicillin at some time during early childhood ( a common antibootic used for upper airway infections) - why hadn't anybody looked for a possible cause there????
Awesome post Steve I hope you continue to push this malfeasance by Big Pharma and our government
What do you mean by nobody wants to replicate your study? There’s been plenty of studies into it and plenty of people who stopped having vaccines out of fear until scientists realised vaccines don’t cause autism.
Also, let’s be honest, autism isn’t a bad thing, whereas vaccines are incredibly important to stopping the spread of deadly diseases and even eradicating them.
So, because you’ve found a vague correlation that confirms your ideologies and beliefs, you challenge decades of rigorous research and consensus by the medical and scientific communities? Go ahead and submit for peer review at any reputable journal. If your evidence is so airtight, it should get printed in Nature or Science without fail. I’ll be glad to listen to you after that.
When was that private hearing for Thompson? Are private hearings rare? Is it known which members of Congress were there?
CONgress is bought and paid for by PIG pHARMa...as are about everyone in all seven mountains of society! Including the CHURCH! Pastors who pushed the C1984 shots are a DEAD GIVEAWAY OF PAYOFFS WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS!!!!!! GOD KNOWS WHO EVERY ONE OF THEM IS! JUDGEMENT IS COMING!!!!!!
No one wants to replicate your survey because your design of experiments is crap. “Statistically impossible” is right. A sample of 44 to represent what population? Junk science.
How much are YOU being paid to TROLL????? Buh-BYE!
Not enough! Oh man if I have to deal with YOU responding to my TROLLing!!!!! How much are you being paid for being the TROLLING POLICE!?!?!?!
The kid gets the quackzine then gets the NSAID then -WOOSH - mush brain. Like a binary weapon.
Because there’s no control. There could’ve been a thousand other explanations for what happened but there’s no way to know, because nothing was controlled. Real science is hard. It’s slow, careful, and often tedious. But every legitimate experiment hinges on one thing: control, ideally with randomly assigned groups.
For example take a chemistry experiment. The chemist can control the temperature, humidity, quantities of reagents—everything. They can run the experiment again and again and get the same result. That’s what science looks like.
Now compare that to an internet survey or any survey actually. You post a questionnaire online that anyone can fill out, with zero control over who responds, under what conditions, or even if they’re telling the truth. How can you call that legitimate evidence? That’s not science. That’s nonsense.
Steve puts out all this garbage because he doesn’t understand the basics of experimental design. And after 45 years as a research statistician, I should know. I don’t doubt Steve’s intentions, his hearts in the right place but his methods are flawed.
And it’s not just Steve. This kind of thing is rampant in medical research. Even Lancet has admitted this. People use whatever data is easiest to collect, and the result is a mountain of garbage studies that can’t be replicated, conclusions that can’t be trusted, and a public left drowning in misinformation. That’s the problem! I have no doubt the MMR vaccine is behind the spike in autism. What we need is real in vivo studies done. I did find one recently study with monkeys. The setting controlled one group placebo the other the mmr vaccine. Many of the monkeys that got the mmr vaccine soon developed autism like symptoms. The placebo group had no symptoms. This is a good start.
But what about the measles virus itself? The MMR vaccine is just weakened measles (and rubella and mumps viruses) after all. I can't find any information about whether measles itself might cause autism because if there is any it's buried under all the crap about the MMR vaccine or from long ago when measles was still common.
Based on all the evidence that you have put forth, the burden of proof is on the people who say that “vaccines are safe and effective“ now it is obvious that those of us who can see what is in front of our eyes do not have to prove we are right The safe and effective people have to prove we are wrong
where's "Flatten the Curve" when we need it most?
GO STEVE!!!!
THANK YOU STEVE!!!
Cant wait for this blow wide open and take down the DS criminal pHARMA, politicians, and thousands of pediatricians, (the most useless bunch of people who destroy children)
Agree 100%!!!!
The official steadfast argument rhetoric is that a person arbitrarily (or based on what?) isn't considered vaccinated until after two(2) weeks after the second inoculation and four weeks after the first innoculation totalling six(6) weeks.
Any adverse event including death prior to the six(6) week 'unvaccinated' period are all unvaccinated deaths and injuries.
Deaths or adverse events by those after receiving only one jab are unvaccinated.
Until the statistics address the official 'statistical manipulation' there will only be a belligerent response.
Belligerence is the rhetoric of war.
Steve, do you or anyone on here know best contact email for RFK Jr? I've written him a letter asking him to change the declarations for the Prep Act. Found out he can't repeal the entire act without congressional approval, which I doubt will happen.
I cannot locate an email address for HHS. Typical govt. inefficiency. They only list a mailing address and phone number. I get voicemail when I call.