“Few participants in any cohort (≤0.4% through 1 month after dose 2) had serious adverse events, and none were considered by the investigators to have been vaccine-related.” This means about 10 children had serious adverse events. The text does an insufficient job listing these and does not mention Maddie. Also, the investigators are NOT…
“Few participants in any cohort (≤0.4% through 1 month after dose 2) had serious adverse events, and none were considered by the investigators to have been vaccine-related.” This means about 10 children had serious adverse events. The text does an insufficient job listing these and does not mention Maddie. Also, the investigators are NOT independent of Pfizer/BioNTech. Their opinion that these SAEs are not vaccine-related means nothing. Have statistics evaluated this? It doesn’t pass the smell test. NEJM is not doing an honest peer review.
“Few participants in any cohort (≤0.4% through 1 month after dose 2) had serious adverse events, and none were considered by the investigators to have been vaccine-related.” This means about 10 children had serious adverse events. The text does an insufficient job listing these and does not mention Maddie. Also, the investigators are NOT independent of Pfizer/BioNTech. Their opinion that these SAEs are not vaccine-related means nothing. Have statistics evaluated this? It doesn’t pass the smell test. NEJM is not doing an honest peer review.