85 Comments

Winning!!!

Thank you, Steve and Toby!

Expand full comment

Great interview! In regards to no virus theory, by asking … if not covid then what is it? misses the opportunity to investigate another option … what if there has been nothing at all out there? what if got pulled into the wrong debate here?

Expand full comment

SO MUCH CORRUPTION.

ALL Govt is going down.

Expand full comment

These FDA panels are not there to stop the process, they only seem to be there to push through approvals so they can collect their next check directly or indirectly from the drug they are approving. They certainly don't want to lose their grants if at a school. And it seems like they kicked off anyone from the panels that might say no to these things.

Expand full comment

Toby and Steve, Congrats on an interesting and very informative interview. Just finished. I found Toby’s breakdown of the studies and the meeting quite helpful, and his comments about vérité very hopeful. Thank you.

Expand full comment

As engineers say, “You want it bad, you get it bad.”

Expand full comment

Looking forward to hearing it. I found myself crying today, so sad for our children, such a crime to give them the experiment .

Expand full comment

since nobody talks gene therapies on HUMANS via covid shots, here one more addition:

https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2022/03/gene-edited-cows-just-secured-record-fast-fda-approval-heres-why/

as long people do not get into details, you are HEADED towards PATENTED no more human2.0!

If after this short section of couple if the covid injections injured and a hero Dr. Harvey Klein at the meeting:

https://uncutnews.ch/fda-berater-wird-waehrend-der-anhoerung-des-beratungsausschusses-fuer-covid-impfstoffe-fuer-kinder-beschimpft-sie-werden-auf-ewig-in-der-hoelle-brennen/

FDA didn't react at all, who actually still believes this 'approval' group are real humans???

I slowly, don't think so. Dr. Klein was right, when saying 'you will burn in hell for eternity', in case they 'approve' the GENE THERAPY!

Expand full comment

Alliance for Science expands mission with $10 million reinvestment

24 September 2020

The Cornell Alliance for Science is expanding its mission of science communication and advocacy and broadening its commitment to diversity and inclusion thanks to $10 million in new funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The grant will support the Cornell University-based -->>global communications initiative<<<-- which was founded in 2014 to address misinformation around crop biotechnology, as it widens its focus to counter conspiracy theories and disinformation campaigns that hinder progress in climate change, synthetic biology, agricultural innovations and other key issues. https://gmwatch.org/en/106-news/latest-news/19540-alliance-for-science-expands-mission-with-10-million-reinvestment

Cornell Alliance for Science is a PR campaign for the agrichemical industry

by Stacy Malkan - US Right to Know, October 4, 2018

Despite its academic-sounding name and affiliation with an Ivy League Institution, the Cornell Alliance for Science is a public relations campaign to promote genetically engineered foods and pesticides. With $12 million in funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Cornell Alliance for Science claims to be working to “restore the importance of scientific evidence in decision-making”, however, the examples in this fact sheet show that the group:

* Misleads the public with inaccurate information about science

* Elevates unreliable messengers who make false and unscientific claims

* Partners with front groups that have worked with the tobacco industry or chemical industries to manufacture doubt about science that raises health concerns

The evidence suggests the Cornell Alliance for Science is using Cornell’s name, reputation and authority to promote the talking points and political agenda of the world’s largest agrichemical corporations.

The Gates Foundation Deputy Director Rob Horsch, who worked for Monsanto Company for 25 years, leads the foundation’s agricultural research and development strategies, which have drawn criticism for relentlessly promoting GMOs and agrichemicals in Africa over the opposition of Africa-based groups and social movements, and despite many concerns and doubts about genetically engineered crops across Africa https://usrtk.org/our-investigations/cornell-alliance-for-science-is-a-pr-campaign-for-the-agrichemical-industry/

GMWatch April 2017

Cornell Alliance for Science has launched an initiative in which “citizen scientists” are recruited to evaluate studies on the health risks of GM crops in order to establish whether the “consensus” on GM food safety claimed by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is supported by a review of the scientific literature.

London-based molecular geneticist Dr Michael Antoniou and GMWatch editor Claire Robinson have critiqued the exercise in a new peer-reviewed article (abstract below), published in the journal Frontiers in Public Health. They draw attention to fundamental weaknesses in the study design. New peer-reviewed publication condemns lack of objectivity and scientific rigour in citizen scientists’ exercise https://www.gmwatch.org/en/106-news/latest-news/17558-cornell-alliance-for-science-s-initiative-to-evaluate-gmo-food-safety-is-meaningless

Expand full comment

Thank you for this summary. I was involved and followed very closely that GMO propagation cartel for very long, ever since I realized we are being fed lab made food plus the chemicals already for quite a while. Jeffrey Smith was the first one who found out the details and published it in his 'Genetic Roulette' book. The best historical summary of fraud related to GMO's though was written by Steven Drucker, a lawyer who sued FDA for illegal approval of GMO crops: "Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public" published in Apr 2015.

That's exactly the same situation right now, illegal approval of genetically modifying injections leading to genetically modified, not plants, but this time HUMAN BEINGS!!!!!

Expand full comment

Monsanto is long suit for my research and Jeff did the final draft review of a film I made in 2005-6 about gmo politics, legislation, science and spin. His first book was Seeds of Deception published in 2000 and it was mostly word of mouth via the small 'health food stores' back then. Steven Drucker is an amazing fellow who works w some good friends who are still very active. Twitter banned me in 2020 so my gmo activist network largely vanished but luckily we had Covidian madness to keep me busy finding new rebels. :~)

https://grain.org/en/article/430-seeds-of-deception-book-review

Roundup Ready Nation ~ Dying for Profits (trailer)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDE67nl3ufU

Expand full comment

Thank you! Didn't read the ''Seeds of deception'. Great to hear you know Jeff and Steve! I'm extremely worried about all the GMO's, like many, but in particular now, because when I look into the SPike genome, being injected into billions of arms, I see pieces of Monsanto patented plants!!! These are tiny sections, but still, to me it is significant, ~30% of the amino acid sequences were RANDOMLY optimized for a maximum of chemicals take up by the patented plants.

So why on earth it is landing now in the viral Spike genome ??

I do believe, 'they' are preparing our bodies for a total take over.

Was just listening to another hero of mine, Dr. David Martin, who is confirming this:

https://www.brighteon.com/6d55b653-be9d-49b6-8f9c-35c6ce1ae67e

6/15/2022 Thrive Time Show: Clay Clark ft. Dr. Dave Martin

he starts around 7:30. Btw. all my posts here on substack, are about that binformatics analysis of the covid Spike..

Expand full comment

I’ve been following Toby for a long time he was great as usual. However... given the grave circumstances under discussion, I’m afraid I found Steve’s jokey ‘it’s all a game of cat and mouse’ tone on the earlier half of this call quite ‘off’.

I don’t see any point in no-virus theory people debating with someone who isn’t a virologist!

Expand full comment

Great interview, thanks!

Expand full comment

I expect nothing but the most cynical hatred and inhumanity from the medical establishment. Before I knew about the 100 year history of vaccine deaths and the research funded at the behest of the Satanic asshole John D. Rockefeller (who was already studying ways to murder the general populace he despised), I knew that Chemotherapy was a deadly scam and a rip off that has killed millions. Chemotherapy is the other end of the Polio Vaccine scam. Millions of polio vaccine recipients developed cancer decades later, and then they were sold a treatment that was developed from mustard gas, so that the chemical company (DOW), could continue to profit from the patent after its military use was outlawed by the Nuremburg Code. Chemotherapy was approved because 2% of patients didn't die of their cancer after treatment with the mustard gas therapy. This was 75 years ago, before it was known that in 10% of cases, the cancer disappears on its own. The covid19 vaccine is the most vicious and murderous medicine ever inflicted on the populace by the Satanic malicious medical establishment, but they would never have had the audacity to perpetrate murders on this scale if Chemotherapy hadn't already been a redounding success for them, not only in blinding the public to the truth, but murdering cancer victims and making them pay heavily for the privilege of their poison.

Expand full comment

Steve, I asked the question about the differential toxicity by lot # Saturday night. I want to be clear that I agree that the vaccines are bad through and through and maybe focusing on the hot lot issue is beside the broader point of safety and effectiveness. The point I am trying to make is that given the fact that certain lots have a higher death toll than others the CDC can not claim that VAERS is bad at detecting signals. At the very minimum, with 182 deaths reported to VAERS for the lot that killed our friend, Pfizer EN 6201, the CDC should be issuing a recall for that lot and all the others that have higher AEs and deaths. They can't continue to claim that these are car accidents post shot or whatever BS they claim to deflect from this obvious problem. We reported this death to VAERS. I assure you that we did so honestly and there was no grand conspiracy with 181 others to all report on a single lot. The argument people give back to me is that we do not know the size of that lot. OK Fine, but 1 lot out of tens of thousands of lots that has 182 deaths is a problem even if it was 182 over 1,000,000 EN 6201s. It is unclear to me why this is not more of an issue and I have not received a satisfactory answer from anyone to explain why. Anyhow, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but would love to see this get more attention.

Expand full comment

The hot lots were the real thing, and the cold lots were saline solution. They couldn't afford to kill everyone too quickly, because the whole effort would've been quickly shut down and no one would take the shots, so many of the lots were not the real poison in the beginning. It makes sense that later rounds would include fewer placebos and cause more deaths, because killing people is the point.

Expand full comment

Yes Dan, your point seems to me so important that it screams for attention.

Expand full comment

I had a data scientist pull and compile the raw data because I was so incredulous at the analysis I'd seen online. Sure enough we saw a small % of lots with hundreds or thousands of reports and the majority with single digits or zero. I too would be very interested to see more deep digging on this it seems really important.

Speaking loosely but the hot lots might explain why some people seem to know multiple seriously injured and others don't personally know of any. The difference possibly being geography and where the lots went out to.

Expand full comment

Thats what you call quality control.They obviously do not give a bleep about it

Expand full comment

Steve, the same individuals speaking in favor of authorization during yesterday’s meeting are giving the same speeches during the meetings today. (Dr. Kailey Soller) How could FDA allow the same individuals to speak twice while keeping you from speaking?

Expand full comment

Repeating below my post of yesterday, 06/14. Did anyone ask if these rubber-stamping mental nits actually read the reports? I’m sure not. An absolute phoney circus, and, in my non-trivial experience, there should be de-certifications for such dishonesty and demonstrable lack of real care for public health potential consequences.

If following June 13 2022 report by Toby Rogers, Ph.D is true, then in my opinion, this meeting will be a rubber stamp scam, as the participants have not had the time to read the necessary documents prior to voting in ignorance of contents - single space, 190 pages, 1 or 2 days, etc.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-eua-moderna-covid-vaccine-young-kids/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=fee61304-a3e2-40e3-b46f

Expand full comment

Can somebody with a connection to Hollywood find a director or producer who still has two neurons and a firing synapse left in their brain and tell them to make a documentary about a medical apocalypse and file it under science fiction. A movie about how all the government agency leaders with a do good agenda overdosed on ethics, morals, and values and started throwing up orders insisting everybody in the world get shots of a new prototype serum that's supposed to cure the household flu. People are sick and dying all around and the zombie leaders don't even look because they're only focused on amendments, rules, and guidelines. They go to work everyday and a computer spits out their agenda and all they know how to do is read the paper in front of them and make announcements. Until one day somebody makes a blockbuster movie about it and they all wake up.

Expand full comment

I’d like to see a movie where government, bureaucracy, and pols all ferociously defend life, liberty, and happiness of the people, respect the people’s rights and the rights of States, and follow the original intent and text of the Constitution made by the States. A movie where there is no graft, egos, corruption, and hunger for power in government, and where representatives and bureaucrats alike do willingly step down to let the next person serve with integrity, courage, and character.

Such a movie would be a very nice break from reality.

Expand full comment

No such people found in hollywood

Expand full comment

Rob Schneider might

Expand full comment

That it is still an EUA should in itself be a red flag, especially since there is no emergency for that group. Or any group now, really.

Expand full comment