I’m proposing a structured, public, evidence-bounded discussion addressing one narrow question: "Did the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have a clear net mortality benefit?"
And if anyone wants to catch up on studies, I recommend "Neither Safe Nor Effective: The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines, 3rd Edition," by Dr. Colleen Huber, which cites 1,000 studies. Amaze your friends and family!
Ethics would dictate that if Mr. Offit declines open debate preferring to defer to peer review then logically, no doctor should be allowed on media to talk about any medical topic and media should be restricted to parroting peer review. So if Mr. Offit can spew his opinions on TV... then he can openly debate Steve Kirsch.
The mere fact that these money grabbers run away from a easy $1-$2M payday is all you need to know. They know as we do, that if they cant back up their claims, and that will be the end of them. It may even cost them their lives. Huge money and claims are at stake here and they are not going to stick their necks out. This discussion needs to go to court, where there will ( hopefully) be discovery. I'll not be surpsrised if the courts also have their marching orders on what to " find" ( or not). Bear in mind , we are dealing with a potential fraud and crime of international proportions. It can literally bring goverments down.
I really hope he will show up, unfortunately I don't he will. Off topic tho, I wonder if anyone you know Steve has access to the proposed candidates for the future presidential pardons Iist?
I think it’s valuable that the stated goal is to determine how different experts interpret the same published evidence. It’s less threatening. But he won’t do it. He doesn’t want his methods and rationale exposed or questioned. He thinks he’s right and that’s that. There’s nothing in it for him to have a discussion with you.
Keep at it Steve. The dam’s going to collapse at some point. Thank you for your dogged perseverance and open mind.
This may be the same thing as challenging the pope to a discussion on whether God exists or not. Rational understanding of the situation is not part of the card the medical doctors are the priests and FISER is the pope. Glory be to the great pope of big Pharma.
Is he the #1 top smartest industry-shill vaxx person against whom you should debate?
And maybe not debate the net mortality benefit question (which may not be so narrow), but work up to that with bite-sized sub-questions that strategically narrow the debate (like a chess player) so one can then expand up to net mortality benefit.
And if anyone wants to catch up on studies, I recommend "Neither Safe Nor Effective: The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines, 3rd Edition," by Dr. Colleen Huber, which cites 1,000 studies. Amaze your friends and family!
https://www.amazon.com/Neither-Safe-Nor-Effective-Evidence/dp/B0F1ZJGYKG
Steve, Often I wonder if "medicine" invented/discovered by Big Pharma has done more harm than good. With Offit you are "beating a dead horse."
I hope not. We'll see.
Ethics would dictate that if Mr. Offit declines open debate preferring to defer to peer review then logically, no doctor should be allowed on media to talk about any medical topic and media should be restricted to parroting peer review. So if Mr. Offit can spew his opinions on TV... then he can openly debate Steve Kirsch.
C'mon Paul, just drop the charade, tell the truth, you know that is the right thing to do.
The mere fact that these money grabbers run away from a easy $1-$2M payday is all you need to know. They know as we do, that if they cant back up their claims, and that will be the end of them. It may even cost them their lives. Huge money and claims are at stake here and they are not going to stick their necks out. This discussion needs to go to court, where there will ( hopefully) be discovery. I'll not be surpsrised if the courts also have their marching orders on what to " find" ( or not). Bear in mind , we are dealing with a potential fraud and crime of international proportions. It can literally bring goverments down.
Thank you, Steve. Please keep at it!
I really hope he will show up, unfortunately I don't he will. Off topic tho, I wonder if anyone you know Steve has access to the proposed candidates for the future presidential pardons Iist?
Thanks for all that you have been doing in regard to the Covid-19 vaccines
Offit is a coward & will never allow himself to be shown to be the fraud he is.
Typical of his ilk
I think it’s valuable that the stated goal is to determine how different experts interpret the same published evidence. It’s less threatening. But he won’t do it. He doesn’t want his methods and rationale exposed or questioned. He thinks he’s right and that’s that. There’s nothing in it for him to have a discussion with you.
Keep at it Steve. The dam’s going to collapse at some point. Thank you for your dogged perseverance and open mind.
Love your perseverance, but not holding my breath! Thank you for standing for truth in the public arena…
This may be the same thing as challenging the pope to a discussion on whether God exists or not. Rational understanding of the situation is not part of the card the medical doctors are the priests and FISER is the pope. Glory be to the great pope of big Pharma.
it would be good to settle that one too.
well not same as the pope but possibly some random bishop based in NY city or LA.
I hope he accepts. I would pay a modest registration fee to attend such a debate.
This would be epic. You've got this…but there are some mothers who could take Dr. PrOffit down it’s so clear.
Is Dr. Offit appropriate?
Is he the #1 top smartest industry-shill vaxx person against whom you should debate?
And maybe not debate the net mortality benefit question (which may not be so narrow), but work up to that with bite-sized sub-questions that strategically narrow the debate (like a chess player) so one can then expand up to net mortality benefit.
maybe not but if he was taken down a few notches it would remove one of the most utilized talking heads used by CNN and MSNBC
60 minutes isn’t long enough.
he is welcome to extend it.
yep, 90 at least.
He would be ostracized from the medicine boy's club if he did!