AFAIK, this is the first time anyone has done a time series analysis on the Czech data. Grok validated the methods and agrees with what I did. Did I make a mistake?
A statistician friend suggests that to deal with confounding and lack of comorbidity data, to find the covid RNA sequences and how they have interacted with people of different ages and use in a logistical progression. Moreover, he suggests that you move from traditional analysis to AI machine learning.
God bless you for your perseverance and dedication to revealing the truth about the jabs. You would think the new admin would hold a meeting tomorrow to review the evidence and stop the craziness of injecting all this poison in our people, especially children. I am troubled by all the signs at our pharmacies that remind and invite people to come in and get their free flu and covid shots when it is clear that the shots are harmful!! Again, bless you.
Fascinating, but you need to include a table of acronyms. Not all of us are current with the jargon of statistical studies. I found "HVE" with a search, but was not successful with "dynamic HVE" and with "NPH". Once you see it, it's obvious so those reading this may think I'm an idiot. The problem with being so close to the subject is that people not familiar with the language need a lot of cues and hints to figure out what is being presented, e.g. the first graph (which has unlabeled axes.) But the work itself is brilliant and ought to widely publicized. I'm just an old physicist trying to understand your work.
"First, all ages, vaccinated in Feb. This is an older mix of people. The vaccine is perfectly safe because elderly have a weak immune system. HVE ends promptly on dot #3 just as I promised it would. There is basically nothing to see here. This is precisely what a safe vaccine should look like."
Interesting that this is what this data shows because in real life I think we saw things quite different. I also recall right in the beginning of the vaccine rollout reports of lots of deaths in certain nursing homes right after being jabbed. In addition, the vaers database (which we know is grossly underreported) started immediately after the rollout (which presumably was primarily for the elderly) to have huge numbers of reported deaths. When official government data doesn't correlate to what we see on the ground I think you need to question that. There is the chance that since it was proven that different batches have different effects, that can explain some things that don't add up.
So, does Grok now "know" this, and when another person asks, will get similar answers, or would they have to convince it all over again? Is your data now part of its understanding?
AI doesn't think it only gathers data and chooses a most likely answer based on inherent biases of programmers and their databases. Steve, if you think Grok is good (tho it has to validate methods) it is THE most biased by Mr Global Genocide of them all. Here is the question you need to ask. And it gives an absolutely positive and uncontestable answer that's not even a hypothetical!
Q. Did Covid Vaccines kill people that would not have died otherwise from Covid infection?
Grok. No, COVID-19 vaccines did not kill people who would not have otherwise died from COVID-19 infection. On net, they saved millions of lives by preventing far more deaths from the virus than any rare adverse events caused.
As proof that Grok is nothing that can be trusted and thrown on ash heap of history, its first supporting evidence comes from Pfizer and Moderna - the very people that have the most to lose if genocide is proven. I love ya Steve but you are in a losing battle. AI will NEVER agree with your conclusions. Never.
You must be proud and pleased that even Grok can't criticise or deny your methods, findings and conclusions that mRNA injections are lethal, dangerous and, at best, likely to cause a shortened Life Expectancy.
I suppose this 'concrete evidence' will continue to be ignored, denied and hidden by the corrupt establishment that wants the WEF's DEPOPULATION to continue unabated.
All the while, Big Pharma continue to ramp up manufacturing of these poisons while increasing its wealth. With NO LIABILITY for vax injuries and vax deaths which the FDA pretend are not happening.
My friend was 92. Dutch. His father was a medical doctor. His mother was Jewiah and wore a yellow star. He survived WW2. He was a retired teacher. He was healthy, living on his own since his wife died. 2 weeks ago on Tuesday afternoon he had the latest covid and flu shots. Both at the same time. Wednesday morning around 10am he dropped DEAD. His downstairs neighbor heard him fall and called 911. They came right away. He had died instantly. He wanted to live. i COULD SCREAM FROM THE ROOFTOPS. I tell people what happened and they say, "oh, it couldn't have been the shots'. I just let their words hang in the air. The funeral is this Saturday. Same day as another funeral for a different friend who died suddenly at at 70. Not sick. Just went to sleep and never woke up. Two fumerals, same day. THANK YOU STEVE. People like you help me to keep my sanity in this clown world.
The question is which politician, if any, is willing to risk their career by standing up and blasting the govt democide-based response in 2020-2022? So far, it’s mostly been swept under the carpet.
Appears each individual needs to reject this antiquated, one-size fits all health system; stand back or find alternative solutions while watching it crumble under weight of a century of lies and deceptions.
Dear Steve:
Just FYI, Icited these post in my most recent Substack post:
https://bruceohara.substack.com/p/three-vaccine-integrity-tests
an excellent deep dive into vaxx data, with some very interesting findings….
A statistician friend suggests that to deal with confounding and lack of comorbidity data, to find the covid RNA sequences and how they have interacted with people of different ages and use in a logistical progression. Moreover, he suggests that you move from traditional analysis to AI machine learning.
😭😭😭😡😡😡
So Rancourt posits that several studies comparing vaxxed to unvaxxed show little difference in All Cause Mortality, so the jabs are not s toxic as first thought. He then blames other factors concommitant with the jab rollout for the increase in AVM. https://open.substack.com/pub/denisrancourt/p/excess-mortality-what-really-caused?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=14q8is
I'm skeptical of Rancourts assertion, but would like to see his references first.
This may be one of the first things that I've seen that shows a such a broad analysis of data involving vaccine harm and thoroughly articulates the rational behind the conclusions. Not only might the shots have been directly harmful, but they may have been responsible for starting the Delta and other variants through Antibody Dependent Enhancement. https://thenewamerican.com/us/healthcare/french-nobel-prize-winner-warns-vaccines-facilitate-development-of-deadlier-covid-variants-urges-the-public-to-reject-jabs/
God bless you for your perseverance and dedication to revealing the truth about the jabs. You would think the new admin would hold a meeting tomorrow to review the evidence and stop the craziness of injecting all this poison in our people, especially children. I am troubled by all the signs at our pharmacies that remind and invite people to come in and get their free flu and covid shots when it is clear that the shots are harmful!! Again, bless you.
Fascinating, but you need to include a table of acronyms. Not all of us are current with the jargon of statistical studies. I found "HVE" with a search, but was not successful with "dynamic HVE" and with "NPH". Once you see it, it's obvious so those reading this may think I'm an idiot. The problem with being so close to the subject is that people not familiar with the language need a lot of cues and hints to figure out what is being presented, e.g. the first graph (which has unlabeled axes.) But the work itself is brilliant and ought to widely publicized. I'm just an old physicist trying to understand your work.
Grok got a little testy when I asked it about this 😂. https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMi1jb3B5_efbf3ba1-0908-462d-9d43-a7f528f2e68b
"First, all ages, vaccinated in Feb. This is an older mix of people. The vaccine is perfectly safe because elderly have a weak immune system. HVE ends promptly on dot #3 just as I promised it would. There is basically nothing to see here. This is precisely what a safe vaccine should look like."
Interesting that this is what this data shows because in real life I think we saw things quite different. I also recall right in the beginning of the vaccine rollout reports of lots of deaths in certain nursing homes right after being jabbed. In addition, the vaers database (which we know is grossly underreported) started immediately after the rollout (which presumably was primarily for the elderly) to have huge numbers of reported deaths. When official government data doesn't correlate to what we see on the ground I think you need to question that. There is the chance that since it was proven that different batches have different effects, that can explain some things that don't add up.
So, does Grok now "know" this, and when another person asks, will get similar answers, or would they have to convince it all over again? Is your data now part of its understanding?
No. Grok defaults back to general narrative. 😑
One day steve... one day, maybe your genius and tenacity will get the recognition it deserves.
AI doesn't think it only gathers data and chooses a most likely answer based on inherent biases of programmers and their databases. Steve, if you think Grok is good (tho it has to validate methods) it is THE most biased by Mr Global Genocide of them all. Here is the question you need to ask. And it gives an absolutely positive and uncontestable answer that's not even a hypothetical!
Q. Did Covid Vaccines kill people that would not have died otherwise from Covid infection?
Grok. No, COVID-19 vaccines did not kill people who would not have otherwise died from COVID-19 infection. On net, they saved millions of lives by preventing far more deaths from the virus than any rare adverse events caused.
As proof that Grok is nothing that can be trusted and thrown on ash heap of history, its first supporting evidence comes from Pfizer and Moderna - the very people that have the most to lose if genocide is proven. I love ya Steve but you are in a losing battle. AI will NEVER agree with your conclusions. Never.
BTW, Musk owns Grok proving he may be a fake liberty and free press supporter. You just have to look at how awful Grok is - its as bad as WIkepedia.
More great work Steve!
You must be proud and pleased that even Grok can't criticise or deny your methods, findings and conclusions that mRNA injections are lethal, dangerous and, at best, likely to cause a shortened Life Expectancy.
I suppose this 'concrete evidence' will continue to be ignored, denied and hidden by the corrupt establishment that wants the WEF's DEPOPULATION to continue unabated.
All the while, Big Pharma continue to ramp up manufacturing of these poisons while increasing its wealth. With NO LIABILITY for vax injuries and vax deaths which the FDA pretend are not happening.
Unjabbed Mick (UK Patriot!) We live longer.
My friend was 92. Dutch. His father was a medical doctor. His mother was Jewiah and wore a yellow star. He survived WW2. He was a retired teacher. He was healthy, living on his own since his wife died. 2 weeks ago on Tuesday afternoon he had the latest covid and flu shots. Both at the same time. Wednesday morning around 10am he dropped DEAD. His downstairs neighbor heard him fall and called 911. They came right away. He had died instantly. He wanted to live. i COULD SCREAM FROM THE ROOFTOPS. I tell people what happened and they say, "oh, it couldn't have been the shots'. I just let their words hang in the air. The funeral is this Saturday. Same day as another funeral for a different friend who died suddenly at at 70. Not sick. Just went to sleep and never woke up. Two fumerals, same day. THANK YOU STEVE. People like you help me to keep my sanity in this clown world.
The question is which politician, if any, is willing to risk their career by standing up and blasting the govt democide-based response in 2020-2022? So far, it’s mostly been swept under the carpet.
Appears each individual needs to reject this antiquated, one-size fits all health system; stand back or find alternative solutions while watching it crumble under weight of a century of lies and deceptions.