For what it’s worth, in my opinion, the error in pulmonary embolism is the strongest reason to doubt the claimed “glitch” - nice work on that! - and it doesn’t matter whether it was cherry-picked or not, and the other irregularities are also strong for removing any further doubt that the claimed glitch is a cover up.
For what it’s worth, in my opinion, the error in pulmonary embolism is the strongest reason to doubt the claimed “glitch” - nice work on that! - and it doesn’t matter whether it was cherry-picked or not, and the other irregularities are also strong for removing any further doubt that the claimed glitch is a cover up.
For what it’s worth, in my opinion, the error in pulmonary embolism is the strongest reason to doubt the claimed “glitch” - nice work on that! - and it doesn’t matter whether it was cherry-picked or not, and the other irregularities are also strong for removing any further doubt that the claimed glitch is a cover up.