If you were to compile all of this great info you have, find anyone with legal standing, and file a lawsuit which presents into court record all the info you have collected so far, then what would happen?
Even with assistance of A.I., do you really think a Court (Judge) would actually let you litigate the "science"? Meaning the Judge would have to rule on the merits of the science and not the legal merits if the case. The Judge would need to stipulate via a ruling that one science is correct and the other is incorrect... vis a vis science is static and not challegeable.
Nope. Not a double blind study chance in legal Hell of that happening.
However, defendent (aka Fed Govt, Bigpharma, etc) should not by default prevail in court with their version of scientific truth simply because the Court refuses to rule one way or the other regarding the veracity of the science.
Therefore, science when restricting its use to healthcare should never be embeded in any law, ordinace, or mandate.
If the science itself is not challengeable in court then science itself cannot be used to justify any action or policy position taken by the Fed Govt.
Meaning no law involving
health can simultaneouly use science as both the justification for the law AND justification to prevent legal challenges against the law.
Thus, unless the Courts are willing to now rule on the science justifying the Childhood Vaccine Injury Law, then all vaccine mandates are null and void.
Steve, I have been assuming for 34 years that my daughter is autistic due to vaccines. After reading Dr William Parkers book - Tylenol and Autism: Evidence, Scientific Blunders, and Medicine Gone Wrong. I am more convinced that Tylenol, given at birth, to a child under oxidative stress (in my daughters case, a fever) causes neurodegenerative damage to the brain. The biochemical pathway is known. Infants under stress do not have the ability to clear acetaminophen and the byproducts damage the brain. Read the book. It will broaden your understanding of autism. Yes vaccines cause brain damage but so does acetaminophen when given to certain at risk infants and children from 0-3 years old.
In your 4th paragraph, you write: "If vaccines are causing the spike, then what is?" I think you meant to say: "If vaccines are NOT causing the spike, then what is?"
Hey Steve
If you were to compile all of this great info you have, find anyone with legal standing, and file a lawsuit which presents into court record all the info you have collected so far, then what would happen?
Even with assistance of A.I., do you really think a Court (Judge) would actually let you litigate the "science"? Meaning the Judge would have to rule on the merits of the science and not the legal merits if the case. The Judge would need to stipulate via a ruling that one science is correct and the other is incorrect... vis a vis science is static and not challegeable.
Nope. Not a double blind study chance in legal Hell of that happening.
However, defendent (aka Fed Govt, Bigpharma, etc) should not by default prevail in court with their version of scientific truth simply because the Court refuses to rule one way or the other regarding the veracity of the science.
Therefore, science when restricting its use to healthcare should never be embeded in any law, ordinace, or mandate.
If the science itself is not challengeable in court then science itself cannot be used to justify any action or policy position taken by the Fed Govt.
Meaning no law involving
health can simultaneouly use science as both the justification for the law AND justification to prevent legal challenges against the law.
Thus, unless the Courts are willing to now rule on the science justifying the Childhood Vaccine Injury Law, then all vaccine mandates are null and void.
Steve, I have been assuming for 34 years that my daughter is autistic due to vaccines. After reading Dr William Parkers book - Tylenol and Autism: Evidence, Scientific Blunders, and Medicine Gone Wrong. I am more convinced that Tylenol, given at birth, to a child under oxidative stress (in my daughters case, a fever) causes neurodegenerative damage to the brain. The biochemical pathway is known. Infants under stress do not have the ability to clear acetaminophen and the byproducts damage the brain. Read the book. It will broaden your understanding of autism. Yes vaccines cause brain damage but so does acetaminophen when given to certain at risk infants and children from 0-3 years old.
i haven't heard of any acetaminophen-only sudden onset autism cases. Have you?
In your 4th paragraph, you write: "If vaccines are causing the spike, then what is?" I think you meant to say: "If vaccines are NOT causing the spike, then what is?"
correct. fixed. thanks!