My observation is that when stories or posts DO start to "go viral," someone slams the breaks on these stories soon enough. I've seen this with videos on YouTube showing athletes falling out on the field. The video views were increasingly exponentially for a few hours and then - wham! - the surge in viewership somehow gets capped. A vide…
My observation is that when stories or posts DO start to "go viral," someone slams the breaks on these stories soon enough. I've seen this with videos on YouTube showing athletes falling out on the field. The video views were increasingly exponentially for a few hours and then - wham! - the surge in viewership somehow gets capped. A video that was increasing by 100,000 views every couple hours now increases by 1,000 viewers over several days. This doesn't seem logically possible.
Why would posts matter? We have two options here: either the 'vaccines' HAVE been tested & the people mandating them KNOW they kill, in which case, they're murderers, or they HAVEN'T tested them, making mandating them against international war crime law.
In either case, no one HERE has the balls to prosecute the people mandating the 'vaccines!' So what difference do POSTS make? The POSTS are going to arrest the people responsible?
Find me One Other Person who isn't afraid of getting a constipated-looking scowl of disapproval from Nancy Pelosi. Ideally, I'd need about six organizing this. But just for kicks, I'd like to find even ONE other person not afraid of some Imaginary Retribution from people that, if you believed could actually stop us, you wouldn't be speaking openly on this website against!
This video had received approximately 300,000 views in 24 hours when it was first published at YouTube on November 7, 2021.The person who produced it even made a post at YouTube: “This video is blowing up.”
Alas, he spoke much too soon. Soon either viewers couldn’t access it or couldn’t share it with others and its distribution was obviously stopped full tilt.
In the two-plus months since it was downloaded, it has managed only another 100K or so views (The view number today is 404,844). So a video that was growing at a rate of tens of thousands of viewers every HOUR has slowed to about 1,000 new views a day (if this).
Absent the censorship, this video would have had MILLIONS of views probably in two or three days.Not allowing content that could cause people to question the authorized narrative is of course the goal of censors.
Google has locked it as "age restricted content". This basically kills a video for viralness because it means that (a) users who are not signed on can't watch it, which hugely reduces the audience especially for people like me who browse Incognito and don't stay signed in; and (b) anyone whose Google account doesn't make them over let's say 15 or 18 can't see it.
My observation is that when stories or posts DO start to "go viral," someone slams the breaks on these stories soon enough. I've seen this with videos on YouTube showing athletes falling out on the field. The video views were increasingly exponentially for a few hours and then - wham! - the surge in viewership somehow gets capped. A video that was increasing by 100,000 views every couple hours now increases by 1,000 viewers over several days. This doesn't seem logically possible.
Why would posts matter? We have two options here: either the 'vaccines' HAVE been tested & the people mandating them KNOW they kill, in which case, they're murderers, or they HAVEN'T tested them, making mandating them against international war crime law.
In either case, no one HERE has the balls to prosecute the people mandating the 'vaccines!' So what difference do POSTS make? The POSTS are going to arrest the people responsible?
Find me One Other Person who isn't afraid of getting a constipated-looking scowl of disapproval from Nancy Pelosi. Ideally, I'd need about six organizing this. But just for kicks, I'd like to find even ONE other person not afraid of some Imaginary Retribution from people that, if you believed could actually stop us, you wouldn't be speaking openly on this website against!
This video had received approximately 300,000 views in 24 hours when it was first published at YouTube on November 7, 2021.The person who produced it even made a post at YouTube: “This video is blowing up.”
Alas, he spoke much too soon. Soon either viewers couldn’t access it or couldn’t share it with others and its distribution was obviously stopped full tilt.
In the two-plus months since it was downloaded, it has managed only another 100K or so views (The view number today is 404,844). So a video that was growing at a rate of tens of thousands of viewers every HOUR has slowed to about 1,000 new views a day (if this).
Absent the censorship, this video would have had MILLIONS of views probably in two or three days.Not allowing content that could cause people to question the authorized narrative is of course the goal of censors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhvjXeYEJnU
Google has locked it as "age restricted content". This basically kills a video for viralness because it means that (a) users who are not signed on can't watch it, which hugely reduces the audience especially for people like me who browse Incognito and don't stay signed in; and (b) anyone whose Google account doesn't make them over let's say 15 or 18 can't see it.
I got a message that it was inappropriate or offensive to some audiences.
I could not access this. I get a command to show my age which does not work when I try. Actually I am age 80 date of birth May6 1941.
worked for me