382 Comments

Hi Steve,

You mention the resurgence of shingles.

In the UK they have just started an advertising campaign saying it’s normal for this to come back in older people as their immune system weakens! I can only assume that we are seeing large scale numbers of people getting shingles for them to have to start putting out adverts about it. The website they have created and publicise during the advert is: https://www.understandingshingles.co.uk/

I’ve also posted this info to Jessie Rose in the hope that this gets some traction. It would be interesting to see just how high shingles is compared to pre Covid.

Expand full comment

depends on how rare they want to call normal, yes it happens, but normal? best looking at annual comparisons?

Expand full comment

Do you see this as support for original antigenic sin? Does this complement and work in tandem with ADE in promoting negative vaccine efficacy?

Expand full comment

Probably

Expand full comment

Don't take covid tests, they are another weapon, too. They've been weaponized. Read about theragrippers, swab crystals, swab snakes and tubes. Some of these are already patented drug and chemical delivery systems. They use the tests to deliver toxins to get more of the victims who won't take GM RNA injections.

Expand full comment

These testing kits from China : who vets them to insure that they are reliable & safe ? They could be another delivery mechanism . Remember : China has now learn how to do gain of function . China could release another virus even more deadly & targeted .

Expand full comment

It's like a slow moving trainwreck, and we, the unvaxxed, are standing outside watching ... in horror, as so many on the train are our own.

Expand full comment

I'm not getting any work done, these posts are too interesting! I have just read a brilliant article from a post by Brian Pottinger, a reporter in South Australia. It should be mandatory reading for all politicians moments before they are gently laid onto the operating table for their lobotomies.

Expand full comment

Lobotomies were already self-performed.

Expand full comment

It pays to be certain, some of those scars are hard to detect nowadays and a skilled surgeon can perform one without the politician even being aware!

Expand full comment

I'll have a look at that one,if I ever get any of my daily chores done,it's somewhat of a miracle! I will need to detox from my little old iPad,one day!

Expand full comment

I've got the computer on and the phone going. The radiation is zipping through me like a visit to the small room after a beef vindaloo!

Expand full comment

Funny as ever Charles

Expand full comment

I am responding to the very nicely illustrated and annotated Retrovirus in color! Very cool. Now, I am just a simple mechanical engineer, retired. However, I have used an electron microscope and have at least a basic understanding of seeing things at high power using electrons. On the other hand, I assume it is VERY hard to prepare anything organic for viewing under an electron micrscope because of the need to (usually) metal vapor coat substances in the target. So. I will likely make a fool of myself here but how in the world when a virus is STILL so small(100 nm) all the images I have seen(granted, not many) of virus's shows this image of a particle, sometimes round that is fuzzy at best and if little spikes are there it is pretty hard to be able to CLAIM for sure what they really look like. . . can this wonderful color image possibly have any basis in real fact be created with any semblance of actuality?! It claims to show things way, way smaller than the virus particle itself(the membrane, RNA strands inside?!) I can only theorize that the illustration is no more sure of itself than the theory of evolution is. What say you experts!?

one more thing! . . .

" . . . the authors of two significant papers, which are mentioned in connection with the detection of SARS-CoV-2, concede on request that the electron microscope images shown in their work do not depict completely purified particles. But how can one then conclude with certainty that the RNA gene sequences „pulled“ from the tissue samples prepared in these studies and to which the PCR tests are then „calibrated“ belong to a very specific virus—in this case SARS-CoV-2? Especially since studies also show that the very substances (including antibiotics) used in the test tube experiments (in vitro) can „stress“ the cell culture in such a way that new gene sequences can be formed that were previously undetectable?"

Engelbrecht, Torsten; Köhnlein, Claus; Bailey, Samantha; Scoglio, Stefano. Virus Mania (p. 369).

Expand full comment

Hi.. this is an aside question, but I thought you might be well qualified to give me some insight given your experience with electron microscopes ..if you don't mind me asking. In reference to the efficiency of masks vs covid , I have often thought that if the microbe (virus) is so small..how would a mask even provide a barrier to it. I imagine trying to stop mosquitoes with a chain link fence. I believe I understand the efficacy of preventing mucous spreading. Thank you.

Expand full comment

When a pimply kid at school, my science teacher in more relaxed mood, leaned back against the wall perching precariously on his science stool, lit up a fine Cuban, and peering into a world we could not see, regaled us with the vexatious challenge of generating electricity from fusion rather than fission. He likened it to trying to hold a whole lot of ping pong balls in a string bag. They will insist on popping out to lunch. It is curiously similar to the masks we must wear in order to rescue us from certain death.

Expand full comment

Yes, you raise a good point of concern. I used to work for the company, in fact, who sells most of the N95 masks (actually they are listed as RESPIRATORS by NIOSH) currently in vogue as the last resort to make us all safe! More bunk. I am enjoying this response, here's why:

Recently my emails to brothers have fallen on deaf ears regarding masks being useless. Mainly, it seems obvious to most humans that masks seem like a logical defense against microbes. Unfortunately, MOST folks have never questioned the point you so aptly make-- isn't it like mosquitos and a cyclone fence!? UH, yes it is. But there is more to it than that. In addition to the large opening awaiting a flying virus in an aerosol or droplet there are nice little "electret" charges inherent in the "good" N95 masks that have an attraction for tiny particles that have the ability to grab and hold them. But you have to consider all circumstances:

-- humans do not bother to get the masks fitting tight and when one does within a minute or two you start smelling your own breath in the constantly recirculation in that closed space. This closed pocket exponentially causes a rise in CO2 intake way above the reasonable level(about 7 to 900 ppm). It can raise into the thousands of ppm. It also causes a highly humid environment to grow bacteria, fungas from outside and inside the mask. If you wear it very long you have created a nutrient rich petri dish to breathe through.

-- OK. You are tired of wearing this dang thing, take it OFF! That's what most of us do, ALL of us! It dries out in the interim and those larger aerosol and drop particles caught in the mask media dry out too and ta, da!. . . bare viruses, now reduced to their true size of 100 nm are able to release from the media and go inside YOU or out of the mask.

-- During the entire time of wearing nearly any mask since you breathe OUT with a fair amount of air pressure the seals on the mask pop free from your face and allow depressurization and exit of your breathe and this concentrated breathe to flow out. Any virus aerosols then float for minutes and free viruses themselves stay aloft for hours in the room you are in.

-- Last word. The only thing that is even half way reasonable to protect one is a respirator from 3M or other similar with what is called P100 filters. But you have to change them regularly. Will you do that?! The thing fits like a glove to your face with higher pressure seals and makes you look like a bug. Imagine all your kids in school wearing what looks like a damn gas mask.

Geeez. nuff said?!

Expand full comment

There are so many posts it pays to go back in case you've missed something. Having once seen a photograph of an electron microscope I am now of course an expert on them. I am somewhat bemused by the renditions from them nowadays and can only assume like Reggie below that information is fed into a computer and a model produced. It appears to be the case that computer models are constructed for everything now. Global Warming, Climate Change, Financial Markets.... We have all noticed how fantastically accurate they have proven to be.

Expand full comment

Yes. In industry it was pretty amazing actually to see the top fluid flow modeling scientists put a full model together. It was not something that happened over night. Compute the model, look at REAL results and compare. . . compute again, compare to REAL. . . this full circle process happened many times over years before they considered them solid enough that their models were in use for actual designs throughout the company. AND, these models were for flow systems measuring inches in size and they could verify them in some way with empirical results.

Imagine what disdain I have, after witnessing this, for modeling climate or nanometer size particles in a living system! BUNK!

Expand full comment

I say it's just a computer generated image for the masses who want to see "the enemy". Pure propaganda!

Expand full comment

Why don't we have a readily available test for natural immunity? Not just antibodies but those very important T cells. That would also be proof for the unvaccinated with natural immunity that they don't need a vaccine - however, that doesn't suit the agenda of those in power. People who had SARs1 still have natural immunity seventeen years later...

Expand full comment

Actually there is a very reliable test for natural immunity, you are still alive aren't you? What more do you need?

Expand full comment

Ha ha! I can't be too unlucky - I haven't had a cold for forty years!

Expand full comment

I have heard McCulluogh recommend this test. https://www.t-detect.com. Skeptical I am.

Expand full comment

If you look it up you'll find it's for U.S. residents only. There is a test available in Harley Street - for a price - £199

Expand full comment

Instead of endlessly debating the merits of vaccine vs natural immunity, why not focus on what can easily be proven?

1. the effectiveness of early treatment with safe, well understood products.

2. the unethical act of denying their use, and of threatening those who prescribe them.

If everyone focused on these two related issues, we'd make more progress. Time itself would reveal the validity of early treatment vs. vaccines, while the identity of those who refuse to allow that comparison is already known.

Expand full comment

Look, when you have an agenda that you want to push, telling the great unwashed to ingest cheap, readily available medicines and vitamins will not help. No money in that!

Expand full comment

It makes a very big impact on those who just want to hear truth and get care. The less it costs the more the great unwashed will listen! I am proud to be a member of the great unwashed!!👵😇

Expand full comment

I'm not! I think I would rather be a member of the billion dollar lot, swanning around on my luxury yacht sipping.....whatever it is one sips when one is stinking rich. It would be a concern though dragging a life ring around constantly in case a disgruntled crew member throws me off the stern platform.

Expand full comment

Yes the word "time" is key in any discussion of the Covid aftermath. In "time" we shall see everything clearly. In"time" all will be revealed. In "time" everyone on earth will know the truth. "Time" is running out, and soon it will show us what we already knew to be true.👵😇

Expand full comment

Early treatment certainly deserves focus, and it is receiving it. Highlights from Senator Ron Johnson's "Covid-19 - A Second Opinion" hearing:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/dQH2m1SjfGWA/

More than the first half is all about early treatment. Entire 5-hour video here:

https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 31, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

It appears this data is already appearing, but it isn't "officially recognised" yet.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 2, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

There is a tremendous amount of information on this post and a rabbit hole of other things to look at. Time! I need more time!

Expand full comment

Sounds like the UK. It would be useful if it were recognized by policy makers, but that's the problem, and the reason places like Ottawa are currently filled with trucks.

Expand full comment

I ain't getting tested even if I have symptoms. UNLESS I get one of rare doctors who has bravely fought this NWO nightmare, and they advise it.

Expand full comment

It's that kind of rebellious talk that costs lives! Never mind a doctor, just take your medicine, it's good. Fizzer told us so.

Expand full comment

Charles, God bless you. Keep fighting these psychopaths

Expand full comment

Thanks, one needs a sense of humour. What concerns me though is a rabid anti establishmentarian I pop in to chat with who is very anti masks. Understandable since he runs a gun shop. I keep expecting him to do what I would do if I owned a gun shop, snap, run into the street and start ripping off their masks at gun point screaming" Now what are you going to do punk! Go ahead, make my day and breathe!"

Expand full comment

Yes... sense of humor always. I'm Irish, NY.... always

Expand full comment

The testing of people who have no symptoms is definitely a big mistake we’re making. But there’s this frenzy to constantly test ourselves. How about if you’re sick then stay home? You know like we’ve always done? And if your employer or school makes you test then fine, but stop testing on your own.

Expand full comment

Now we are testing at the Olympiade, so it was not when we only had the yearly flu.

Expand full comment

Sometomes I can't stop laughing at this shit.

Expand full comment

I cannot laugh at it all, it is too depressing. Went to the city yesterday and looked at all of these pathetic zombies shuffling about with their pathetic sad faces hidden, all the shops and eateries had signs on the door: must show vaccine passes, too many young and fit people in this group. Where ARE they getting their education from - the back of a breakfast cereal box?

Expand full comment

Actually, a couple of days ago I was laughing. Now in utter sadness. Peace

Expand full comment

Yup. Never have gotten one. If Biden wastes more money sending a package to me, I'm breaking them in public.

Expand full comment

Back in 1969 and 70 there were lots of demonstrations against the Vietnam war with college girls burning their bras.

masks are a LOT like bras, no reason Wuhan virus spit tests couldn't be added in as kindling?!

Expand full comment

I'd rather look behind a bra than some of these masks.....

Expand full comment

Google Sinopeg.I think they gave good informations coming to truth about vaccines.

Expand full comment

I don’t find a lot of info in the status of the Novavax approval, which leads me to believe Novavax is being slow-rolled by BigPharma controlled FDA. I conclude that any vax not mRNA based is undesireable because it might work and pollute the data from the Big Experimnet. The confounder though is that I read Novavax is from. Bill Gates funded company. I guess the larger point is, what DOESN’T Bill gates have his vax dollars involved in?

Expand full comment

Bill not funding the Australian vaccine Covax 19

Expand full comment

Hear hear, As a fellow physician,

I heartily agree with the good doctors comments.

The credentials for the fact checkers to be fact checkers is seriously in question.

Physicians and scientists without conflicts of interest are more reliable sources of accurate information.

Expand full comment

Actually they're not. Someone with a junior college degree whoring for Gates and Soros fact checking Dr. Malone is utterly ridiculous

Expand full comment

i would not trust malone

Expand full comment

Well for a start he invented the life destroying mRNA vaxxines

for me thats more than enough, i also think he,s controlled

opposition.

END the UN

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Already is gone

Expand full comment

Agreed. Pretty much all of the current medical professional Boards depend on big Pharma funds. It is virtually impossible for them to be entirely objective.

There is a growing group of physicians who have organized and are taking steps to create a whole new system. Please support them.

Expand full comment

Also, no one seems to be addressing the increased death count in the US: is this due to the "antivirals" such as Remdesivir being used now more heavily? We generally are not seeing more increases in countries such as Sweden where they are lifting all mandates.

Expand full comment

Yes DoNMass, you are right, but prayer can work miracles!👵😇

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Indisputable truth. Hm I wonder who would be qualified enough to present that to a decimated world. But only when the time is right of course. It would have to be someone so far above the rest of the human race, that people would actually listen.👵😇

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 31, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

If it's early enough,(like 2 years ago for instance), no one listened then, a few more are listening now. But it still has made absolutely no difference. So you have to wait until people (if there are any left) listen.👵😇

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

So under Figure 2 it shows, as you say, lower mortality in the graphs for the unvaxxed but it is preceded by this statement

Mortality rates for non-COVID-19 deaths for people who received a second vaccination dose at least 21 days ago are lower than for unvaccinated people for all age groups

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

How bad is that? Thanks...

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

My husband and I were apart of a clinical trial that looked at 41 different antibodies generated to the virus. We had been infected quite early on (before vaccinations was even a mention) but still currently show robust antibodies to many parts of the virus, including the nucleuomembrain BUT NOT the nucleocapsid. We both had the disease and one of us is vaccinated while the other is not. From seeing others results from the clinical trial, it doesn’t appear that many people vaccinated or not develop antibodies to this part of the virus.. or perhaps they are quite short lived. I personally think antibody research and understanding (along with T cell memory) is the key to moving forward and correcting mistakes… the ones which can be corrected that is.

Expand full comment

That's interesting.

Expand full comment