None of the people who claim RFK Jr is doing a bad job will consent to public challenge. That's anti-science. Here's a framework for fair public discussions on the most important issues of our time.
Please just get some dude who actually is familiar with medical science to check your articles before publishing. You make tons of good points, then write totally naive noob shit like this or worse, or you make mistakes of misattributing, not accounting for bias, lack of stratification and accounting for confounding, like the average researcher.
The entirety of science operates on a principle of ignorance. Anyone is free to ignore anything, no matter how much sense it makes. You can't just "challenge" people in science. The only thing that works is to write more and more papers that cite each other to make the opposing side look more ridiculous. And if you don't have the finance to do that, you generally lose. This naive stuff you write, it totally misrepresents how the entire system actually works.
As far as I know, reliable data shows a strong correlation between the onset of increased medical harms and the injections of mRNA "vaccines".
Correlation doesn't prove causation, but it doesn't have to when you're dealing with experimental genetic injections, which are found to contain contaminants like SV40, and what few human trials are know to been done showed dangerous results.
As far as I know, reliable data shows a strong correlation between the onset of giving young children these multiple vaccinations and the rise in autism and a general rise in chronic illnesses.
Instead of mongering rumors and narratives against people trying deal with the damage done by a money driven medical-pharma establishment, these people should be answering civil and criminal charges, or already be in medium or high security penitentiaries.
What's not being done, is very dangerous to large numbers of common people. Crime unpunished is crime encouraged.
Steve has been challenging the big names in medicine for a fight--like Rocky on steroids--but his opponents have just been ignoring him and succeeded in this since there is no open, truth seeking mainstream press. With the new year, there is a new solution to this conspiracy--we need a highly influential person to announce the debate to which Offit et al would never ignore without damaging their reputations.
In steps Robert Kennedy Jr, or better yet, Trump to announce that "in the service of our emphasis on objective science and transparency, we are inviting parents to be involved in the important decisions regarding vaccines, and in this respect we invite the public to a university style debate between the vaccine proponents and vaccine questioners". Hotez could not dismiss this as his status and job would be on the line. Therefore, the vaccine cult members step up to the plate, and Steve strikes them out with a powerful straight ball.
Using AI rots your brain. And you don't remember what you wrote - at least compared to those who actually used their brains rather than AI to do their homework assignments.
I suspect reading AI output might rot your brain as well. AI uses 10000 words when 5 will do.
"None of the "experts".... will come to the public discussion table to talk about it." ....
Then they cannot be "experts" , at least in any scientific field... Paid operatives more likely, be they conscious of that fact or not.... The sooner people start putting a public framework around what constitutes "science" and "scientific inquiry", as defined by the classical discipline and its processes that have yielded mankind's best discoveries/defences that have catapulted our developmental progress forward exponentially, and what categorically does NOT, the sooner we can publicly expose and decry the influence of the globalist's so-called "experts' who refuse to engage in same, and yet are getting a free pass to set agendas, talking point parameters and what is scientific 'truth'....
The attack they have wielded against us is their achilles heal, and it is where they are most vulnerable. Recall that healthy scepticism towards the covid "vaccine" magnified enormously when people realised that the producers of their supposedly saving vials were a) given immunity from prosecution and b) not required to complete decades old safety protocol trials, albeit under the smokescreen cover of a health "emergency"....
Anyone with half a brain would realise that since the "emergency" has long passed, requirements for normal parameter scientific trials before full approval would mean that suspension from use of these "vaccines" would be a matter of course until that is now completed, but of course, the "emergency' declaration still remains...... And their people still get to define what is "science"...
Until we drill down into who and what gave them these approvals/immunities, and who or what is keeping them in place, and DEMAND accountability and track flow of funds$$$, we will remain in thrall to the unelected, nefarious powers who define not just what is "science" but what is publicly approved "anything" in our lives... and "experts" will continue to laugh, give us their middle fingers, and continue to refuse point blank come to the public discussion table to talk about it. They don't have to, so why would they???? Don't hold your breath waiting for these acolytes to "do the right thing" by the public they supposedly work for.... Not going to happen... But with will, grit and collective focus, we can ensure it does.. Who's up for it? Let's raise funds, get the right representation, and get it done...
What phobia do Vaccinolatrists (worshippers of vaccines) have that makes them cower under their examining tables, desks and lab benches in lieu of discussion? Pick one or a combination - or name your own! I'm thinking Alethophobia - fear of facts with a side dish of Arithmophobia.
Atychiphobia. Fear of losing. This intense fear can prevent individuals from trying new things or taking risks due to the anxiety of potential loss or failure.
Glossophobia is the fear of public speaking.
Allodoxaphobia is the fear of expressing opinions or being contradicted.
Technophobia is the constant and persistent fear of technology and, in greater depth, is defined as “the feeling of severe anxiety associated with using anything technologically advanced” such as KCOR.
Alethophobia is characterized by an aversion to accepting unpleasant facts about oneself or one's beliefs.
Arithmophobia is fear of math, it literally means fear of numbers (from Greek arithmos = number).
And of course they won't debate you Steve, they are all terrified of being the main course at dinner. Unless of course any debate would occur at lunch time, we all know how messy a pulled-pork sandwich can get. You just can't get a corrupt coward on the menu.
I read that article by Brown, “I Was Wrong About RFK Jr.”. I then read the comments to this article. Quite a number of MDs and RNs responded, what a bunch of delusional Pharisees, they expose their shallow knowledge concerning the truth surrounding vaccines, the data, and history, and they reveal their obvious buy-in to the approved big-pharma narrative. It is no wonder informed critical thinking people no longer trust the medical profession, as the field is filled with the foolish, the clueless, the delusional, the ill-informed, and the corrupt. Did I mention their obvious lack of critical-thinking skills?
I read the comments too and it's frustrating that a "lowly" non-doctor like me could easily debunk most of the claims they made. My only good thought is that most of these doctors are probably retired or not very busy helping people if they have time to comment.
It truly is astonishing that there exists presently, so many people actually engaged in “science” who are reticent to personally engage in debate, I mean it gives one pause and makes one wonder, about what constitutes their thinking, their bona fides.
Furthermore such a mindset presents a real dichotomy and is the antithesis to everything we know and understand that it is that constitutes science, I mean, science itself evolved we know because of vigorous debate, whether publicly, in academia, in the published literature… thus it is non sensical, a cop out actually to decry, refute, malign, denigrate such formats as being unworthy of science, for my money the only “unworthy” or unscientific label that can be affixed is upon those who so opine and run scared to so engage…
Worse still, many of those doing so, refuting and bemoaning debate, are they who purport and hold themselves out to be persons of science, yet by their very position on the matter, embody, as noted above the very antithesis of one of the core tenets which aided and abetted science as we know it today to have evolved, how is it possible they can or able with a straight face to lay claim to such an antithetical position whilst positioning themselves as people of science, a scientist, it makes no sense.
When we consider everything, every barrier, prejudice, every hurdle including religious biases in centuries past that science since the days of the early Greek men of science Plato, Aristotle, Thales, Pythagoras, and Archimedes of Syracuse together the earliest Romans such as Pliny the Elder [ Gaius Plinius Secundus ] Vitruvius (architecture), physicians such as Galen, encyclopedists like Pliny the Elder (Naturalis Historia), and writers on specific topics such as Lucretius (atomism) and Celsus (medicine), alongside prominent Greeks living in the Roman Empire like Ptolemy (astronomy) Raberius, Vegetius, Vitruvius and Dioscorides (pharmacology) to name a few and now being men of re-known, all of whom were amongst those at the vanguard of civilisation as we know it to have been during the earliest Macedonian, Greek and Roman times of history past and all of whom being men who helped establish our modern science as we know it to be today, I can imagine their reaction to the refutation of the Offits, and Hotez’s of this world together their ilk in decrying or better crying off from a robust debate… indeed had such occurred the individual crying off would be humiliated and likely never ever be taken seriously by his peers, in short, crying off from engaging in a robust debate with the like minded and their peers would have led to the equivalence of self cancellation and censorship to use modern parlance… nevertheless such would have resulted.
Even worse is the fact that when considering the pogroms, the inquisitions, the trials as heretics by religious authorities that later men and woman of science endured, doing so as they espoused and with conviction posited theory resulting for many with imprisonment, torture, or suffering the most heinous deaths that could be dreamt up as punishment especially by those who were so close minded, bigoted, prejudiced and biased renders their barbaric acts even more vile, indeed such sentences passed exemplified an evil borne of ignorance, of fear, yet science marched on through the ages by men and woman who because of conviction of belief had the courage to continue and pick up the work of their now deceased predecessors…
Thus I am appalled and offended that there exists many who like to be known as scholarly matriculating in science or to be known as scientists and or who actually because of their vocation can lay claim to being a “Scientist” who by their reticence in the present to engage in debate whether formally, in public, via literature are just as dangerous, just as ignorant it can with good reason be said to be not that different of many of those who assailed their forebear colleagues from times past as gleefully, in a pique of arrogance and haughtiness they sat in judgment upon those they disagreed with… I would even venture it likely intellectual jealousy and inferiority also played a huge role in the unwarranted sentences handed down in those dark times.
Seriously, I applaud the efforts of all like Steve Kirsch who are doing all they can to uphold humanity’s science, because it is our science, we own it, thieves, charlatans, frauds, the compromised and corrupted attempted to steal it from humanity, to thieve it from us, and it clearly can be seen, that when it is said “doing all they can” that you can take that literally, for there does not seem to be much more that can be done than has been done to this point by the Steve Kirsch’s, Del Bigtree, the simply irreplaceable Jessica Rose, Drs Robert and Jill Malone, Dr Jay Battachaya, Dr Peter McCullogh together the outstanding Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, for the McCullough Foundation, the truly indomitable Dr Mary Nass and many more besides as the best and brightest of our science, the cream has literally risen to the top doing so at the exact right moment in human history to fight the rearguard action required to ensure our science isn’t plundered, pillaged, sacrificed upon the altar of greed and avarice but f..k me it was close, they nearly got away with it and it is indeed satisfying as a layman to stand with those more qualified than I as a mere foot soldier in this fight being fought by true titans of science who are doing all and everything to ensure what has gestated over millennia is not simply with keystrokes destroyed, lost forever… take a bow Steve, together the rest of those you know fighting this incessant battle, you have all earned the gratitude of so many whilst you can be satisfied the enemy being fought deservedly have only our scorn and opprobrium for their pernicious efforts… just saying
We are dealing with a type of fascism that combined the power of governments world wide and the private sector. They aren't covering up science but a democide. This crime being of global proportions (over 31 million dead over 125 countries from 2020 to 2023) is reason to take seriously the influence of secret societies.
Completely agree, but that’s not the half of it… once you understand fully the geo political, economics of everything in play it’s right in front of you… I’ve just written a reply to one of Dr Robert Malone’s articles touching upon it… it’s all Bank, fiscal, M1 and M2 Money supply related, the fact they’re all if not bankrupt, something if you and I were to do, trade in such a parlous position, we’d be jailed and fined.. Best and thank you for taking the time to reply and replying as you did… all I can say is prepare.. things are not going to get better.. in fact it’s going to be nasty, irrespective where you live on this planet, save China, Russia, the West essentially is toast, the rest of the world will readily survive what’s coming fiscally, they’ve prepared for it all.. unfortunately we haven’t although efforts are now being made, to little to late though..
"Exley’s team conducted a landmark 2018 study published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, which measured aluminum in autism brain tissue and found “astronomical” amounts, comparable to familial Alzheimer’s. The study imaged aluminium in neurons, microglia-like cells, and inflammatory cells, suggesting a potential link to autism, which involves both genetic and environmental factors. Aluminium in Other Neurological Disorders. In a 2022 study in Scientific Reports, Dr Exley presented findings of aluminium that co-localizes with Biondi ring tangles, potentially contributing to toxicity through rupture and release. A 2020 study also explored aluminium’s co-localization with neurofibrillary tangles in these conditions, suggesting regional variations in brain impact."Mr. Aluminum and his Research. Aluminum and its Research 2025
None of this has anything to do with RFK Jr failing to understand the paper he cited. RFK Jr made a claim off the study in the link, none of these studies. His claim based off of that study was not based in fact and with enough smooth confidence to post it on his twitter account.
When I was in college studying pure mathematics and physics I never liked the idea of the Wave Function Collapse in Quantum Mechanics. Only much later did I learn of Hugh Everett III who took that out of QM reformulating it. His meeting with Bohr did not go well! BTW his son Mark Everett is a great musician. I bet with Hugh.
Big names in MAHA frequently run from public challenges: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/hall-of-infamy?r=6hgshq
Please just get some dude who actually is familiar with medical science to check your articles before publishing. You make tons of good points, then write totally naive noob shit like this or worse, or you make mistakes of misattributing, not accounting for bias, lack of stratification and accounting for confounding, like the average researcher.
The entirety of science operates on a principle of ignorance. Anyone is free to ignore anything, no matter how much sense it makes. You can't just "challenge" people in science. The only thing that works is to write more and more papers that cite each other to make the opposing side look more ridiculous. And if you don't have the finance to do that, you generally lose. This naive stuff you write, it totally misrepresents how the entire system actually works.
"The science".
As far as I know, reliable data shows a strong correlation between the onset of increased medical harms and the injections of mRNA "vaccines".
Correlation doesn't prove causation, but it doesn't have to when you're dealing with experimental genetic injections, which are found to contain contaminants like SV40, and what few human trials are know to been done showed dangerous results.
As far as I know, reliable data shows a strong correlation between the onset of giving young children these multiple vaccinations and the rise in autism and a general rise in chronic illnesses.
Instead of mongering rumors and narratives against people trying deal with the damage done by a money driven medical-pharma establishment, these people should be answering civil and criminal charges, or already be in medium or high security penitentiaries.
What's not being done, is very dangerous to large numbers of common people. Crime unpunished is crime encouraged.
You seem like someone interested in how we're lied to about chronic disease: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/youre-being-lied-to-about-chronic-42c?r=6hgshq
even worse is no calls for investigation autopsies from anyone in the mainstream medical community. Can you name one?
Autopsies? That would be like holding a mirror (or a cross) up to a vampire.
A somewhat similar situation is the occurrence of those blood vessel amyloid clots. Most of the morticians who encountered those things said NOTHING.
Crime unpunished is crime encouraged. We should be on the look out for what's coming next - there's no reason to think this is over.
Steve has been challenging the big names in medicine for a fight--like Rocky on steroids--but his opponents have just been ignoring him and succeeded in this since there is no open, truth seeking mainstream press. With the new year, there is a new solution to this conspiracy--we need a highly influential person to announce the debate to which Offit et al would never ignore without damaging their reputations.
In steps Robert Kennedy Jr, or better yet, Trump to announce that "in the service of our emphasis on objective science and transparency, we are inviting parents to be involved in the important decisions regarding vaccines, and in this respect we invite the public to a university style debate between the vaccine proponents and vaccine questioners". Hotez could not dismiss this as his status and job would be on the line. Therefore, the vaccine cult members step up to the plate, and Steve strikes them out with a powerful straight ball.
They have seen Siri’s plotkin deposition where he beat plotkin like a rented mule and they don’t want any of that
While I support direction, I am reminded of an article that came out last year entitled:
Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08872
Using AI rots your brain. And you don't remember what you wrote - at least compared to those who actually used their brains rather than AI to do their homework assignments.
I suspect reading AI output might rot your brain as well. AI uses 10000 words when 5 will do.
"None of the "experts".... will come to the public discussion table to talk about it." ....
Then they cannot be "experts" , at least in any scientific field... Paid operatives more likely, be they conscious of that fact or not.... The sooner people start putting a public framework around what constitutes "science" and "scientific inquiry", as defined by the classical discipline and its processes that have yielded mankind's best discoveries/defences that have catapulted our developmental progress forward exponentially, and what categorically does NOT, the sooner we can publicly expose and decry the influence of the globalist's so-called "experts' who refuse to engage in same, and yet are getting a free pass to set agendas, talking point parameters and what is scientific 'truth'....
The attack they have wielded against us is their achilles heal, and it is where they are most vulnerable. Recall that healthy scepticism towards the covid "vaccine" magnified enormously when people realised that the producers of their supposedly saving vials were a) given immunity from prosecution and b) not required to complete decades old safety protocol trials, albeit under the smokescreen cover of a health "emergency"....
Anyone with half a brain would realise that since the "emergency" has long passed, requirements for normal parameter scientific trials before full approval would mean that suspension from use of these "vaccines" would be a matter of course until that is now completed, but of course, the "emergency' declaration still remains...... And their people still get to define what is "science"...
Until we drill down into who and what gave them these approvals/immunities, and who or what is keeping them in place, and DEMAND accountability and track flow of funds$$$, we will remain in thrall to the unelected, nefarious powers who define not just what is "science" but what is publicly approved "anything" in our lives... and "experts" will continue to laugh, give us their middle fingers, and continue to refuse point blank come to the public discussion table to talk about it. They don't have to, so why would they???? Don't hold your breath waiting for these acolytes to "do the right thing" by the public they supposedly work for.... Not going to happen... But with will, grit and collective focus, we can ensure it does.. Who's up for it? Let's raise funds, get the right representation, and get it done...
Fund raise Steve?? I'm in.... Who'll join???
I tried to have a conversation with Sayer Ji thinking MAHA wanted open and honest discussion like Steve is calling for. Turns out MAHA also just wants to set the narrative: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/hall-of-infamy?r=6hgshq
Those two citations are priceless, and in this context, hilarious. I hope you emailed them to Offit (and any other scaredy-cats who won't debate you).
What phobia do Vaccinolatrists (worshippers of vaccines) have that makes them cower under their examining tables, desks and lab benches in lieu of discussion? Pick one or a combination - or name your own! I'm thinking Alethophobia - fear of facts with a side dish of Arithmophobia.
Atychiphobia. Fear of losing. This intense fear can prevent individuals from trying new things or taking risks due to the anxiety of potential loss or failure.
Glossophobia is the fear of public speaking.
Allodoxaphobia is the fear of expressing opinions or being contradicted.
Technophobia is the constant and persistent fear of technology and, in greater depth, is defined as “the feeling of severe anxiety associated with using anything technologically advanced” such as KCOR.
Alethophobia is characterized by an aversion to accepting unpleasant facts about oneself or one's beliefs.
Arithmophobia is fear of math, it literally means fear of numbers (from Greek arithmos = number).
Aporophobia - fear of poverty.
Thank you Steve. Great breakdown.
And of course they won't debate you Steve, they are all terrified of being the main course at dinner. Unless of course any debate would occur at lunch time, we all know how messy a pulled-pork sandwich can get. You just can't get a corrupt coward on the menu.
Big MAHA figures don't debate either: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/hall-of-infamy?r=6hgshq
I read that article by Brown, “I Was Wrong About RFK Jr.”. I then read the comments to this article. Quite a number of MDs and RNs responded, what a bunch of delusional Pharisees, they expose their shallow knowledge concerning the truth surrounding vaccines, the data, and history, and they reveal their obvious buy-in to the approved big-pharma narrative. It is no wonder informed critical thinking people no longer trust the medical profession, as the field is filled with the foolish, the clueless, the delusional, the ill-informed, and the corrupt. Did I mention their obvious lack of critical-thinking skills?
To be fair, RFK attempting to read a scientific study is also foolish and clueless: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/how-to-cherry-pick-data-to-scam-people?r=6hgshq
I read the comments too and it's frustrating that a "lowly" non-doctor like me could easily debunk most of the claims they made. My only good thought is that most of these doctors are probably retired or not very busy helping people if they have time to comment.
Only doctors can comment, so there is an echo chamber.
Great article Steve,
It truly is astonishing that there exists presently, so many people actually engaged in “science” who are reticent to personally engage in debate, I mean it gives one pause and makes one wonder, about what constitutes their thinking, their bona fides.
Furthermore such a mindset presents a real dichotomy and is the antithesis to everything we know and understand that it is that constitutes science, I mean, science itself evolved we know because of vigorous debate, whether publicly, in academia, in the published literature… thus it is non sensical, a cop out actually to decry, refute, malign, denigrate such formats as being unworthy of science, for my money the only “unworthy” or unscientific label that can be affixed is upon those who so opine and run scared to so engage…
Worse still, many of those doing so, refuting and bemoaning debate, are they who purport and hold themselves out to be persons of science, yet by their very position on the matter, embody, as noted above the very antithesis of one of the core tenets which aided and abetted science as we know it today to have evolved, how is it possible they can or able with a straight face to lay claim to such an antithetical position whilst positioning themselves as people of science, a scientist, it makes no sense.
When we consider everything, every barrier, prejudice, every hurdle including religious biases in centuries past that science since the days of the early Greek men of science Plato, Aristotle, Thales, Pythagoras, and Archimedes of Syracuse together the earliest Romans such as Pliny the Elder [ Gaius Plinius Secundus ] Vitruvius (architecture), physicians such as Galen, encyclopedists like Pliny the Elder (Naturalis Historia), and writers on specific topics such as Lucretius (atomism) and Celsus (medicine), alongside prominent Greeks living in the Roman Empire like Ptolemy (astronomy) Raberius, Vegetius, Vitruvius and Dioscorides (pharmacology) to name a few and now being men of re-known, all of whom were amongst those at the vanguard of civilisation as we know it to have been during the earliest Macedonian, Greek and Roman times of history past and all of whom being men who helped establish our modern science as we know it to be today, I can imagine their reaction to the refutation of the Offits, and Hotez’s of this world together their ilk in decrying or better crying off from a robust debate… indeed had such occurred the individual crying off would be humiliated and likely never ever be taken seriously by his peers, in short, crying off from engaging in a robust debate with the like minded and their peers would have led to the equivalence of self cancellation and censorship to use modern parlance… nevertheless such would have resulted.
Even worse is the fact that when considering the pogroms, the inquisitions, the trials as heretics by religious authorities that later men and woman of science endured, doing so as they espoused and with conviction posited theory resulting for many with imprisonment, torture, or suffering the most heinous deaths that could be dreamt up as punishment especially by those who were so close minded, bigoted, prejudiced and biased renders their barbaric acts even more vile, indeed such sentences passed exemplified an evil borne of ignorance, of fear, yet science marched on through the ages by men and woman who because of conviction of belief had the courage to continue and pick up the work of their now deceased predecessors…
Thus I am appalled and offended that there exists many who like to be known as scholarly matriculating in science or to be known as scientists and or who actually because of their vocation can lay claim to being a “Scientist” who by their reticence in the present to engage in debate whether formally, in public, via literature are just as dangerous, just as ignorant it can with good reason be said to be not that different of many of those who assailed their forebear colleagues from times past as gleefully, in a pique of arrogance and haughtiness they sat in judgment upon those they disagreed with… I would even venture it likely intellectual jealousy and inferiority also played a huge role in the unwarranted sentences handed down in those dark times.
Seriously, I applaud the efforts of all like Steve Kirsch who are doing all they can to uphold humanity’s science, because it is our science, we own it, thieves, charlatans, frauds, the compromised and corrupted attempted to steal it from humanity, to thieve it from us, and it clearly can be seen, that when it is said “doing all they can” that you can take that literally, for there does not seem to be much more that can be done than has been done to this point by the Steve Kirsch’s, Del Bigtree, the simply irreplaceable Jessica Rose, Drs Robert and Jill Malone, Dr Jay Battachaya, Dr Peter McCullogh together the outstanding Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, for the McCullough Foundation, the truly indomitable Dr Mary Nass and many more besides as the best and brightest of our science, the cream has literally risen to the top doing so at the exact right moment in human history to fight the rearguard action required to ensure our science isn’t plundered, pillaged, sacrificed upon the altar of greed and avarice but f..k me it was close, they nearly got away with it and it is indeed satisfying as a layman to stand with those more qualified than I as a mere foot soldier in this fight being fought by true titans of science who are doing all and everything to ensure what has gestated over millennia is not simply with keystrokes destroyed, lost forever… take a bow Steve, together the rest of those you know fighting this incessant battle, you have all earned the gratitude of so many whilst you can be satisfied the enemy being fought deservedly have only our scorn and opprobrium for their pernicious efforts… just saying
Kia Kaha (Stay strong) from New Zealand
It's also astonishing at MAHA figures making big claims and then running away scared from debate: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/hall-of-infamy?r=6hgshq
We are dealing with a type of fascism that combined the power of governments world wide and the private sector. They aren't covering up science but a democide. This crime being of global proportions (over 31 million dead over 125 countries from 2020 to 2023) is reason to take seriously the influence of secret societies.
Completely agree, but that’s not the half of it… once you understand fully the geo political, economics of everything in play it’s right in front of you… I’ve just written a reply to one of Dr Robert Malone’s articles touching upon it… it’s all Bank, fiscal, M1 and M2 Money supply related, the fact they’re all if not bankrupt, something if you and I were to do, trade in such a parlous position, we’d be jailed and fined.. Best and thank you for taking the time to reply and replying as you did… all I can say is prepare.. things are not going to get better.. in fact it’s going to be nasty, irrespective where you live on this planet, save China, Russia, the West essentially is toast, the rest of the world will readily survive what’s coming fiscally, they’ve prepared for it all.. unfortunately we haven’t although efforts are now being made, to little to late though..
I hope so too, but I won't hold my breath. 😉
I'm amazed at people like Offit who throw out statements not based in fact with such smooth confidence.
I'm amazed at people like RFK Jr who throw out statements not based in fact with such smooth confidence: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/how-to-cherry-pick-data-to-scam-people?r=6hgshq
"Exley’s team conducted a landmark 2018 study published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, which measured aluminum in autism brain tissue and found “astronomical” amounts, comparable to familial Alzheimer’s. The study imaged aluminium in neurons, microglia-like cells, and inflammatory cells, suggesting a potential link to autism, which involves both genetic and environmental factors. Aluminium in Other Neurological Disorders. In a 2022 study in Scientific Reports, Dr Exley presented findings of aluminium that co-localizes with Biondi ring tangles, potentially contributing to toxicity through rupture and release. A 2020 study also explored aluminium’s co-localization with neurofibrillary tangles in these conditions, suggesting regional variations in brain impact."Mr. Aluminum and his Research. Aluminum and its Research 2025
None of this has anything to do with RFK Jr failing to understand the paper he cited. RFK Jr made a claim off the study in the link, none of these studies. His claim based off of that study was not based in fact and with enough smooth confidence to post it on his twitter account.
RFK Jr. is advised by scientists throughout the U.S. including Retsef Levi. You are probably unaware of that fact.
Then it's even more embarrassing if a scientist had that trash take.
Embarrassing is only an opinion. I wouldn't put much store in that one. Retsef is a far more legitimate source than Scam doc.
When I was in college studying pure mathematics and physics I never liked the idea of the Wave Function Collapse in Quantum Mechanics. Only much later did I learn of Hugh Everett III who took that out of QM reformulating it. His meeting with Bohr did not go well! BTW his son Mark Everett is a great musician. I bet with Hugh.