27 Comments
User's avatar
Sukey Watson's avatar

RFK is getting stuff done. He is up against a tremendous bureaucracy as well as of course the coordinated and funded attacks by the industry. We all need patience.

Expand full comment
Kilquor's avatar
1hEdited

'' Science came to bury Caesar ,not praise him ''

Such a set of normalised open debate corrective 'nouthetic' norms will be the most refreshing way to generate an atmosphere of openess & mental health ,as contingent on the physical reality of accountability .

Will motivate each youngster on this planet to investigate with active participation .

Expand full comment
GJTL's avatar

I believe most of these people are not interested in having their reputations challenged AND many of them have been threatened financially and perhaps even physically.

Expand full comment
Vanessa Dylyn's avatar

Thank you so much for doing this important work, Steve. You work like a Trojan to promote transparency in science. Wishing you many more subscribers in 2026!

Expand full comment
norica's avatar

Bernie Sanders is not a scientist.

https://youtube.com/shorts/O-gCbeSx_TM?si=79eci8iGtVRbWDUP

Expand full comment
JEFFREY BARFIELD's avatar

STEVE AN OUTSTANDING PROJECT TO GET TO THE TRUTH. YOU KNOW AS I DO THEY ARE EXPOSED AND ARE COVERING UP. EXCUSE IS THAT BIG PHARMA WILL PUNNISH THEM. ANY IN THE CDC ALSO WILL NOT HAVE OPEN DEBATE FOR FEAR OF REPRISALS. YOU STEVE ARE WINNING AND IF YOU KEEP THIS GREAT WORK THEY WILL CRACK WITH PUBLIC PRESSURE. MORE ARE BEGGINING TO FEEL SOMTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE JAB. REMEMBER THE MOST CRUCIAL POINT IT WAS NOT A VACCINE AND NOT L.ICENCED .AS ONLY 1/3 REMAINED IN THE ARM MUSLE. ALL SHOULD. STEVE YOU ARE FIGHTING FOR JUCTICE FOR THOSE WHO DIED OR INJURD BY THE JAB.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Thank you Steve for your courage, tenacity, and bold approach to challenging the sheer idiocy and self-serving-at-the-expense-of-others mentality demonstrated by the medical and pharmaceutical industry who think most of the population is too dumb, stupid and/or disinterested in our own health and all the misconduct that has been taking place. Well perhaps we have been too disinterested and disconected up to this point -- but now you and those copied on your email to Adam Brown, as well as other brave patriots, are making big strides toward helping educate people and are making progress changing their previously misguided points of view. Thank you for your magnificent efforts!

Expand full comment
James Lyons-Weiler, PhD's avatar

Offit would not know rational discourse or a well-defended thesis if his, instead of everyone else's, life depended on it.

Expand full comment
Primum non nocere's avatar

Everyone idolizes science to such an extent it creates a pedestal effect inwhich the obtaining the transient scientific highground replaces the need for robust scientific debate. Science isnt a thing, person or object; its solely a collection of ideas. Nothing more. Nothing less. Ideas often disproven as much as validated. Its a vehicle through which we humans gain fundamental understanding of ourselves and the universe around us. Once the scientific idea becomes a scientific ideology then whats on the pedestal is no longer worthy of debate since it represent a false idol that cares nothing for debate but rather demands your obedience.

At that point science has become a false god-head who will punish those who are in opposition.

We are at that point.

Expand full comment
buddhi's avatar
3hEdited

If they debate in public they lose their advantage, since they're outside the system that supports them right or wrong - just as they support the system right or wrong.

Expand full comment
D Bergy's avatar

To those who resist any questioning of the narrative, it isn’t about science. It is about serving their masters because the masters have the majority opinion. Opinions are not science but that doesn’t matter. There is safety in the herd as the master protects the herd. Individual opinion that goes against the masters narrative threatens being kicked out of the herd and losing the benefits bestowed upon the herd.

It is about those who are herd animals and those who are not.

Only about 5% of the population are not herd animals

so it will always be an uphill battle.

Science is not the point for them. Staying in the herd is the motivation. The herd instinct is impossible to overcome by science because science isn’t the point. When the science herd becomes more appealing than the profit herd, then things might change. Currently, the profit herd has more benefits.

I think it was Charlie Munger who said “show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome”.

The question then becomes:

How do we change the incentives?

Expand full comment
Marten's avatar

Hear ya, and "rational" thinking will not be tolerated !?!?!?!

Expand full comment
Jr GAS's avatar

Well thought out article. Keep up the good work. As a side note I should point out the public health officials in NYS are beginning a campaign of fear regarding the flu season. First thing on their agenda is to convince everyone to get their flu shot. Next will be mandates. Wait and see!

Expand full comment
William Conklin's avatar

Great argument as usual Steve, but it’s difficult to raise rational issues in the face of the priests of science who know the absolute truth.

Expand full comment
Karl Elshoff's avatar

Why not follow Elon Musk's example and buy out one of leading scientific magazines? These journals are obviously corrupt. Then unblock the censorship.

Expand full comment
Reader East of Albuquerque's avatar

Happy New Year, Steve! I so appreciate your substack.

Expand full comment