What arguments, facts, references do we have to prove that the ongoing vaxdebacle IS an EXPERIMENT? It's obvious, of course, except to the vax enthusiasts and promoters, who argue that the vax is "approved" and therefor not an experiment. It is maybe unfortunate that the Nuremberg document does not say "any and all medical procedures", not just "medical experiments".
What arguments, facts, references do we have to prove that the ongoing vaxdebacle IS an EXPERIMENT? It's obvious, of course, except to the vax enthusiasts and promoters, who argue that the vax is "approved" and therefor not an experiment. It is maybe unfortunate that the Nuremberg document does not say "any and all medical procedures", not just "medical experiments".
What arguments, facts, references do we have to prove that the ongoing vaxdebacle IS an EXPERIMENT? It's obvious, of course, except to the vax enthusiasts and promoters, who argue that the vax is "approved" and therefor not an experiment. It is maybe unfortunate that the Nuremberg document does not say "any and all medical procedures", not just "medical experiments".
I believe constitutions and medical acts use all medical procedures language and that includes vaccines.
Not approved. Only EUA and in third stage study trials with humans as the lab rats..