I agree with using language that doesn’t hinder interest from blue pilled and other readers. One possible more accurate word to use instead of vaccines is inoculations. Also, not suggesting that you use it, but I recently saw them called quack-seens, and think that’s also accurate as well as creative, but wouldn’t use it in most circumstances.
I agree with using language that doesn’t hinder interest from blue pilled and other readers. One possible more accurate word to use instead of vaccines is inoculations. Also, not suggesting that you use it, but I recently saw them called quack-seens, and think that’s also accurate as well as creative, but wouldn’t use it in most circumstances.
I generally use “mRNA injection” when talking to someone. (Besides avoiding the false designation “vaccine,” It helps show I’m not putting down all shots known legitimately as “vaccines.”) If I feel a bit snarky, I might use the term “pseudovaccine” that Italian Professor Dr. Renata Cristin coined in a brilliant article Dr. Robert Malone shared in his Substack last week. It’s catchy and, of course, true.
mRNA is a red herring because the mRNA doesn't survive room temperatures or even movement very well at all?
I just read your post in your link and see the interaction of toxic ingredients in the vax. The mRNA is intended to make the body produce more toxic spike proteins, but the mRNA just doesn't survive shipping very well.
According to its original developers (the Soviets in the early 1980s), mRNA is a red herring, because it would start up a chain reaction that couldn't be controlled, kind of like the magician's apprentice. Dr. Noack confirmed this a few hours before he was taken out by a DEW or something like that.
My impression is that the whole military-grade attack on people all over the world has been, and is being, designed by the very same AI that has been fed live data since around 2007 and is running a worldwide simulation. Chances are that tribes that will compete later are also running their own simulations in order to be able to take out the competition once they are done with the general public.
All the toxins/parasites/graphenes/pathogens interact in ways that only an extremely-developed AI can set up and regulate. The technology has been there for quite a while: a quantum-nanocomputer was already 12k faster in 2012 than today's so-called "supercomputers."
But a red herring that works better than "vaccine" when having a quick and general conversation with someone who kinda heard something about mRNA but never heard of graphene hydroxide and who would glaze over if you took time to explain something even most docs still don't know about or understand. Thanks for your link!
I found a page on graphene studies. It's really nasty stuff. Even if it gets on your skin it can still be absorbed through the skin, and vaccinated people are spreading graphene to others as well. https://wordsalad.info/tag-graphene.html
Good to know you are also working on the same project! :)
Recently, "search engines" have developed the habit of hiding 99% or more of the search results, so one can "find: stuff mostly, when knows where to look...
Please, explain the following: I am not trying to raise contention here, but how can a "study site" be "mainstream" AND reliable, as long as the same six corporations own about 94% of the media?
I don't even consider sources that are still discussing mRNA reliable, although the only way to learn is to read whatever is available and one has the time for, except the veracity and authenticity of the sources must be sized up and only useful information can be used.
For graphene oxide and related phenomena, let me recommend a friend's Substack; she is fantastic:
I agree with using language that doesn’t hinder interest from blue pilled and other readers. One possible more accurate word to use instead of vaccines is inoculations. Also, not suggesting that you use it, but I recently saw them called quack-seens, and think that’s also accurate as well as creative, but wouldn’t use it in most circumstances.
I generally use “mRNA injection” when talking to someone. (Besides avoiding the false designation “vaccine,” It helps show I’m not putting down all shots known legitimately as “vaccines.”) If I feel a bit snarky, I might use the term “pseudovaccine” that Italian Professor Dr. Renata Cristin coined in a brilliant article Dr. Robert Malone shared in his Substack last week. It’s catchy and, of course, true.
The problem with mRNA is that it is most likely a red herring:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/mrna
mRNA is a red herring because the mRNA doesn't survive room temperatures or even movement very well at all?
I just read your post in your link and see the interaction of toxic ingredients in the vax. The mRNA is intended to make the body produce more toxic spike proteins, but the mRNA just doesn't survive shipping very well.
According to its original developers (the Soviets in the early 1980s), mRNA is a red herring, because it would start up a chain reaction that couldn't be controlled, kind of like the magician's apprentice. Dr. Noack confirmed this a few hours before he was taken out by a DEW or something like that.
My impression is that the whole military-grade attack on people all over the world has been, and is being, designed by the very same AI that has been fed live data since around 2007 and is running a worldwide simulation. Chances are that tribes that will compete later are also running their own simulations in order to be able to take out the competition once they are done with the general public.
All the toxins/parasites/graphenes/pathogens interact in ways that only an extremely-developed AI can set up and regulate. The technology has been there for quite a while: a quantum-nanocomputer was already 12k faster in 2012 than today's so-called "supercomputers."
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/imitate-an-ai
But a red herring that works better than "vaccine" when having a quick and general conversation with someone who kinda heard something about mRNA but never heard of graphene hydroxide and who would glaze over if you took time to explain something even most docs still don't know about or understand. Thanks for your link!
I found a page on graphene studies. It's really nasty stuff. Even if it gets on your skin it can still be absorbed through the skin, and vaccinated people are spreading graphene to others as well. https://wordsalad.info/tag-graphene.html
Self-assembling graphene nano-receptors, nano-transmitters, and central control units are definitely in the injections:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/to-create-a-superior-brain-a-perfect
Has the "kill switch" also been activated?
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/mrna
Yes I did an article on that as well. The studies I found were all on mainstream study sites, not hard to find at all.
Good to know you are also working on the same project! :)
Recently, "search engines" have developed the habit of hiding 99% or more of the search results, so one can "find: stuff mostly, when knows where to look...
Please, explain the following: I am not trying to raise contention here, but how can a "study site" be "mainstream" AND reliable, as long as the same six corporations own about 94% of the media?
Thank you for sharing these. It’s hard to believe what human beings are willing to do to our species.
Red herrings are fantastic! They always work! :)
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/moon-landing-bluffing-is-a-good-weapon
I don't even consider sources that are still discussing mRNA reliable, although the only way to learn is to read whatever is available and one has the time for, except the veracity and authenticity of the sources must be sized up and only useful information can be used.
For graphene oxide and related phenomena, let me recommend a friend's Substack; she is fantastic:
https://outraged.substack.com
Lethal injections do. :)