Just two pieces of data are needed: the risk-benefit calculation by age where VAERS was used for the death data, and show us the autopsy results where the proper tests were made to rule out causality.
OH MY GOSH, WHAT SAY YOU ABOUT THIS? DR LEE MERRITT SUSPICIOUS OF DR. MALONE???!!!!......It's an unfair question to ask you but Epiphany? or suspect? What on earth is going on? bitchute.com/video/PGXxvYdnyFzX/
Yesterday, I had an appt with my Ophthalmologist. People in the waiting room were not wearing masks. Much to my surprise, I found my doctor wearing 2 masks - one was the black polyester type mask with the blue disposable mask over it. I could not keep my mouth shut and had to ask why she was still doing it when there was so many studies showing they didn't work and surely couldn't be helping with building immunity against other germs - I was informed I wasn't qualified, was highly misinformed according to her immunologist friend. I responded she was correct but I was qualified to read the disclaimer on the box of masks stating they were ineffective against colds, flus and viruses plus able to read all the numerous studies stating how they had fared during the pandemic. Rather than get more heated, both of us calmed down and I told her I'd lived through many illnesses and so had she. Never in our lives had any of us worn masks or behaved like we have. She admitted a lot of the mask wearing was to please the patients. What she fails to understand is for patients like me - how can I believe what she tells me is true or accurate when I can visually see she's going along with BS that has been shown was never effective over and over?
Steve you wrote ¨Professor Prasad - He’s the most honest guy in the mainstream medical community. Nobody else comes close. It is stunning that in the entire mainstream medical community there is just one honest guy with the courage to consistently tell the truth.¨
Only one?? Have you lost your mind tonight? How about Dr Malone. How about Dr Tess Lawrie? Dr Lee Merritt? And all the Dr at America's Frontline Doctors?? https://www.aflds.org/ and more.
From the very beginning, the CDC has been lying about the scientific support they claimed they had for this policy. I wish I had known about how to archive a webpage back then. I looked at the CDC's page about masks the day they came out with the recommendations to see what scientific support they were using to justify it. They said they had several studies, and encouraged people to trust that their recommendations were science-based. I went to the footnotes and looked at the references. There were six of them, I think. Every single one was about asymptomatic transmission or asymptomatic infection, not about masks at all. And they weren't even very definitive about that. So what they were saying is: we think that anyone could be infected at any time without knowing it, and we think that they can transmit the virus to others, so everyone should wear a mask whenever they are around anyone else.
Dubious evidence for necessity.
ZERO proof of efficacy.
ZERO proof of safety.
I don't trust an agency that lies to me to try to convince me to do something.
Steve: Look what you wrote here: "Professors Prasad and Makary are the only two mainstream doctors I am aware of to publicly acknowledge that our trust in public health officials was misplaced."
The only two?
Not only are they not "the only two", but they weren't even close to being on the forefront of this "public acknowledgement", as you put it.
I don't know why you've been ignoring me, but I've got evidence of having said this over and over since early March 2020 and, by extention, from a post I made on February 20, 2020.
And a word about Drs. Prasad and Makary.
Dr. Prasad is very sharp and sincere. His contributions have been many and of excellent quality. But he's been dead wrong on plenty of important things. If you want examples, I'll provide them here. You wrote about him:
Yet in the very quote you used to demonstrate his " he wrote, regarding the CDC's lack of performing yet another mask study to justify their support of mandates, "It kept us in the dark." "us"? I certainly was never in the dark. Why? I looked at the literature. I found 72 years of randomized-controlled trials showing that masks don't reduce transmission significantly for every scenario you could imagine(the symptomatic wearing masks, the noninfected wearing masks, everyone wearing masks, etc.). But you didn't even need to do that! All Dr. Prasad (or anyone else) had to do, was look at the graphs from this year!
You went on to say about Dr. Prasad, "He’s the most honest guy in the mainstream medical community. Nobody else comes close. It is stunning that in the entire mainstream medical community there is just one honest guy with the courage to consistently tell the truth". Wait... What??! "Nobody else comes close.", "in the entire mainstream medical community there is just one honest guy with the courage to consistently tell the truth".
Listen, I love Dr. Prasad as much as anyone. He is obviously a man, a practicing doctor, of considerable intellect and compassion.. His contributions to the conversation about Covid and the vaccines through both his writings, and video and podcast appearances, have been outstanding. And, like you say, he has been honest in his assessments. But he's been wrong on a few, not that his other great work has been tarnished by it. As a matter of fact, if I was going to make a list of 10 or so prominent internet voices of the past two years that I would like to debate on a few of the major issues, he would certainly be on the list. This would not be because he has been reckless, flippant, lacking in knowledge, etc.- in other words, an easy mark-. No, I would want to debate Dr. Prasad because he has been the opposite of all of those things. But he appears to feel very strongly about a few things that I happen to disagree with and I'd like to hash them out with him. I would say the same things about Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, with whom I have been making videos of our discussions covering all the major topics of the last two years He has been a delight. I could not have imagined a more formidable, accomodating, and gentlemanly "opponent" over the 20+ hours it has taken us to get through everything. I would expect the same of Dr. Prasad. But you need to look around a little bit more. You wrote, "in the entire mainstream medical community there is just one honest guy with the courage to consistently tell the truth." No. That is not correct.
Dr. Makary has also been wrong on important portions of this. He changes his position at times and this tells us that he is not thinking in principles. Again, I'll provide examples that you must have missed along the way.
I don't know why you keep ignoring me. We were classmates at MIT although we didn't know each other then. Why are you ignoring someone who has been right on every major call? Even your standout, Dr. Makary, has adnitted that he was wrong on major calls or "changed his thinking and now I believe..." .
You of all people, Steve, should know that science is not about marketing or branding, but that seems to be your guiding light. You keep acknowledging people who have been wrong over and over again, but have made a big name for themselves somehow, rather than giving credit where credit is due. This is a very destructive choice you've made. You're celebrating people who have not understood this virus, as evidenced by their incorrect calls, which lends credence, in the public's eyes, to their incorrect statements and reasoning, instead of celebrating (or at least acknowledging) someone who has gotten everything right. This is not helpful- and I'm not talking about being helpful to me- I'm talking about being helpful to society. PS. Please enable attachments to the comment section so commenters can supply proof of their claims. PSS: I'm writing this here because you won't respond to private messages. PSSS: You couldn't possibly be ignoring me because I have written something unflattering about you. On the contrary, I have sung your praises on several occasions.
AFLDS Frontline Films production, Doc Tracy: Physician Investigator, aimed at exposing the power, corruption and lies of Big Pharma, Big Government, and Big Media. 21:30 min
Nope, VAERS just needs to revert back to 2011 when follow-up reports were "updated" to the Wonder system!! (Events and reports are not the same. For example, a single event has one "primary" or initial report, and may also have several subsequent or follow-up reports. Since January 2011, only primary reports are included in the data.) https://i.imgur.com/oQkcYPR.jpg Ummm..., I wonder how many people are now since DEAD in VAERS, since ONLY INITIAL REPORTS ARE MADE PUBLIC!!??
Canadian Police for Freedom Demand Criminal Investigations for Covid Crimes
¨A detailed report and demand for criminal investigation into federal and provincial authorities
Police for Freedom is an international organization of active duty and retired police as well as other emergency service professionals and citizens. The organization formed in response to the covid-19 crimes against humanity with the intention of returning the rule of law and human rights to society.
Police for Freedom has a Canadian division with chapters in multiple provinces.
Police for Freedom Canada has directed a detailed 88 page letter to Manitoba Police Forces demanding and justifying (in detail) a criminal investigation into Public Health officials in Manitoba for alleged covid-19 crimes. The letter is very enlightening and contains details of law, police oath and duties, Health Canada statistics, and an extensive appendix of government and scientific documents.¨ Read More
The evil ones are attacking our food supply...22 fires at food processing plants in the U.S. Stock up people this is brought to you by the same people behind the jabs...Now why is this not headline news?
"Massive Nordic study finds risk of post-vaccination myo/pericarditis resulting in hospitalization in males 16-24 of 380/million (1/2600) post pfizer-moderna combination. This is 28x higher than the 13.7/million rate they found post-covid"
Russians pointed to this GAO report to indicate the scale of the biolab problem: "High- Containment Laboratories: Improved Oversight of Dangerous Pathogens Needed to Mitigate Risk." Report to Congressional Committees. GAO-16-642. August 2016. -- https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-16-642 -- This report considers the 575 shipments of incompletely inactivated Bacillus anthracis that were sent to 194 laboratories and contractors around the world from 2004 through 2015. The report finds weak controls, little or no oversight, no followup, no penalties for serious errors, untested procedures, defective safety equipment, little data on biolabs (even the number is unclear), haphazard reporting of incidents, a lack of standard procedures, even failure to correctly label containers of lethal pathogens, etc.. And this network of 194 biolabs is just the HHS-Department of Agriculture network for anthrax, TB, ebola, etc., parallel to the DOD-Department of State network in Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan and beyond working with the same pathogens. A very interesting document.
Perhaps as I type this, elements within the HHS are preparing manipulated, false data.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zKetpTXYSFfh/
Why isn't this on every channel? It's dated for yesterday.
Steve, can you do a FOIA request for the documents?
Absolutely
They are the ones spreading misinformation: https://rumble.com/v117nxz-who-is-spreading-the-misinformation.html
OH MY GOSH, WHAT SAY YOU ABOUT THIS? DR LEE MERRITT SUSPICIOUS OF DR. MALONE???!!!!......It's an unfair question to ask you but Epiphany? or suspect? What on earth is going on? bitchute.com/video/PGXxvYdnyFzX/
Yesterday, I had an appt with my Ophthalmologist. People in the waiting room were not wearing masks. Much to my surprise, I found my doctor wearing 2 masks - one was the black polyester type mask with the blue disposable mask over it. I could not keep my mouth shut and had to ask why she was still doing it when there was so many studies showing they didn't work and surely couldn't be helping with building immunity against other germs - I was informed I wasn't qualified, was highly misinformed according to her immunologist friend. I responded she was correct but I was qualified to read the disclaimer on the box of masks stating they were ineffective against colds, flus and viruses plus able to read all the numerous studies stating how they had fared during the pandemic. Rather than get more heated, both of us calmed down and I told her I'd lived through many illnesses and so had she. Never in our lives had any of us worn masks or behaved like we have. She admitted a lot of the mask wearing was to please the patients. What she fails to understand is for patients like me - how can I believe what she tells me is true or accurate when I can visually see she's going along with BS that has been shown was never effective over and over?
Steve you wrote ¨Professor Prasad - He’s the most honest guy in the mainstream medical community. Nobody else comes close. It is stunning that in the entire mainstream medical community there is just one honest guy with the courage to consistently tell the truth.¨
Only one?? Have you lost your mind tonight? How about Dr Malone. How about Dr Tess Lawrie? Dr Lee Merritt? And all the Dr at America's Frontline Doctors?? https://www.aflds.org/ and more.
From the very beginning, the CDC has been lying about the scientific support they claimed they had for this policy. I wish I had known about how to archive a webpage back then. I looked at the CDC's page about masks the day they came out with the recommendations to see what scientific support they were using to justify it. They said they had several studies, and encouraged people to trust that their recommendations were science-based. I went to the footnotes and looked at the references. There were six of them, I think. Every single one was about asymptomatic transmission or asymptomatic infection, not about masks at all. And they weren't even very definitive about that. So what they were saying is: we think that anyone could be infected at any time without knowing it, and we think that they can transmit the virus to others, so everyone should wear a mask whenever they are around anyone else.
Dubious evidence for necessity.
ZERO proof of efficacy.
ZERO proof of safety.
I don't trust an agency that lies to me to try to convince me to do something.
Steve: Look what you wrote here: "Professors Prasad and Makary are the only two mainstream doctors I am aware of to publicly acknowledge that our trust in public health officials was misplaced."
The only two?
Not only are they not "the only two", but they weren't even close to being on the forefront of this "public acknowledgement", as you put it.
I don't know why you've been ignoring me, but I've got evidence of having said this over and over since early March 2020 and, by extention, from a post I made on February 20, 2020.
And a word about Drs. Prasad and Makary.
Dr. Prasad is very sharp and sincere. His contributions have been many and of excellent quality. But he's been dead wrong on plenty of important things. If you want examples, I'll provide them here. You wrote about him:
Yet in the very quote you used to demonstrate his " he wrote, regarding the CDC's lack of performing yet another mask study to justify their support of mandates, "It kept us in the dark." "us"? I certainly was never in the dark. Why? I looked at the literature. I found 72 years of randomized-controlled trials showing that masks don't reduce transmission significantly for every scenario you could imagine(the symptomatic wearing masks, the noninfected wearing masks, everyone wearing masks, etc.). But you didn't even need to do that! All Dr. Prasad (or anyone else) had to do, was look at the graphs from this year!
You went on to say about Dr. Prasad, "He’s the most honest guy in the mainstream medical community. Nobody else comes close. It is stunning that in the entire mainstream medical community there is just one honest guy with the courage to consistently tell the truth". Wait... What??! "Nobody else comes close.", "in the entire mainstream medical community there is just one honest guy with the courage to consistently tell the truth".
Listen, I love Dr. Prasad as much as anyone. He is obviously a man, a practicing doctor, of considerable intellect and compassion.. His contributions to the conversation about Covid and the vaccines through both his writings, and video and podcast appearances, have been outstanding. And, like you say, he has been honest in his assessments. But he's been wrong on a few, not that his other great work has been tarnished by it. As a matter of fact, if I was going to make a list of 10 or so prominent internet voices of the past two years that I would like to debate on a few of the major issues, he would certainly be on the list. This would not be because he has been reckless, flippant, lacking in knowledge, etc.- in other words, an easy mark-. No, I would want to debate Dr. Prasad because he has been the opposite of all of those things. But he appears to feel very strongly about a few things that I happen to disagree with and I'd like to hash them out with him. I would say the same things about Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, with whom I have been making videos of our discussions covering all the major topics of the last two years He has been a delight. I could not have imagined a more formidable, accomodating, and gentlemanly "opponent" over the 20+ hours it has taken us to get through everything. I would expect the same of Dr. Prasad. But you need to look around a little bit more. You wrote, "in the entire mainstream medical community there is just one honest guy with the courage to consistently tell the truth." No. That is not correct.
Dr. Makary has also been wrong on important portions of this. He changes his position at times and this tells us that he is not thinking in principles. Again, I'll provide examples that you must have missed along the way.
I don't know why you keep ignoring me. We were classmates at MIT although we didn't know each other then. Why are you ignoring someone who has been right on every major call? Even your standout, Dr. Makary, has adnitted that he was wrong on major calls or "changed his thinking and now I believe..." .
You of all people, Steve, should know that science is not about marketing or branding, but that seems to be your guiding light. You keep acknowledging people who have been wrong over and over again, but have made a big name for themselves somehow, rather than giving credit where credit is due. This is a very destructive choice you've made. You're celebrating people who have not understood this virus, as evidenced by their incorrect calls, which lends credence, in the public's eyes, to their incorrect statements and reasoning, instead of celebrating (or at least acknowledging) someone who has gotten everything right. This is not helpful- and I'm not talking about being helpful to me- I'm talking about being helpful to society. PS. Please enable attachments to the comment section so commenters can supply proof of their claims. PSS: I'm writing this here because you won't respond to private messages. PSSS: You couldn't possibly be ignoring me because I have written something unflattering about you. On the contrary, I have sung your praises on several occasions.
America’s Frontline Doctors - Simone Gold, MD, JD Founder
AFLDS Frontline Films production, Doc Tracy: Physician Investigator, aimed at exposing the power, corruption and lies of Big Pharma, Big Government, and Big Media. 21:30 min
https://rumble.com/vytqog-doc-tracy-pi-s1-e1-lawsons-hunt.html
Nope, VAERS just needs to revert back to 2011 when follow-up reports were "updated" to the Wonder system!! (Events and reports are not the same. For example, a single event has one "primary" or initial report, and may also have several subsequent or follow-up reports. Since January 2011, only primary reports are included in the data.) https://i.imgur.com/oQkcYPR.jpg Ummm..., I wonder how many people are now since DEAD in VAERS, since ONLY INITIAL REPORTS ARE MADE PUBLIC!!??
Canadian Police for Freedom Demand Criminal Investigations for Covid Crimes
¨A detailed report and demand for criminal investigation into federal and provincial authorities
Police for Freedom is an international organization of active duty and retired police as well as other emergency service professionals and citizens. The organization formed in response to the covid-19 crimes against humanity with the intention of returning the rule of law and human rights to society.
Police for Freedom has a Canadian division with chapters in multiple provinces.
Police for Freedom Canada has directed a detailed 88 page letter to Manitoba Police Forces demanding and justifying (in detail) a criminal investigation into Public Health officials in Manitoba for alleged covid-19 crimes. The letter is very enlightening and contains details of law, police oath and duties, Health Canada statistics, and an extensive appendix of government and scientific documents.¨ Read More
https://drtrozzi.org/2022/04/19/canadian-police-for-freedom-demand-criminal-investigations-for-covid-crimes/
The evil ones are attacking our food supply...22 fires at food processing plants in the U.S. Stock up people this is brought to you by the same people behind the jabs...Now why is this not headline news?
"Massive Nordic study finds risk of post-vaccination myo/pericarditis resulting in hospitalization in males 16-24 of 380/million (1/2600) post pfizer-moderna combination. This is 28x higher than the 13.7/million rate they found post-covid"
https://twitter.com/TracyBethHoeg/status/1517309675015876608
Link directly to the study:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2791253
Russians pointed to this GAO report to indicate the scale of the biolab problem: "High- Containment Laboratories: Improved Oversight of Dangerous Pathogens Needed to Mitigate Risk." Report to Congressional Committees. GAO-16-642. August 2016. -- https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-16-642 -- This report considers the 575 shipments of incompletely inactivated Bacillus anthracis that were sent to 194 laboratories and contractors around the world from 2004 through 2015. The report finds weak controls, little or no oversight, no followup, no penalties for serious errors, untested procedures, defective safety equipment, little data on biolabs (even the number is unclear), haphazard reporting of incidents, a lack of standard procedures, even failure to correctly label containers of lethal pathogens, etc.. And this network of 194 biolabs is just the HHS-Department of Agriculture network for anthrax, TB, ebola, etc., parallel to the DOD-Department of State network in Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan and beyond working with the same pathogens. A very interesting document.