Don't trust me. Do your own survey. You can prove to yourself that the COVID vaccines are more than 30,000 times more deadly than the "average" vaccine in the US. Wow.
Steve, have you heard about this? A group of New Zealand doctors have penned an open letter to the Chief of the country's police, asking them to investigate deaths due to the vaccines.
"Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the public's perception on the safety and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines in real time by using Twitter polls.
Methods: We developed 2 Twitter polls to explore the public's views on available COVID-19 vaccines. The surveys were pinned to the Digital Health and Patient Safety Platform Twitter timeline for 1 week in mid-February 2021, and Twitter users and influencers were asked to participate in and retweet the polls to reach the largest possible audience."
There are literally dozens maybe hundreds more studies using Twitter as the data source (just look at the 'Similar Articles' on PubMed for instance)
Cognitive dissonance indeed. It appears that no matter how many studies, how many reports, how many first hand accounts of tragedy, the minds of those incapable of forming their own opinions, their own thoughts, will forever be influenced by the narrative. They’ve no desire to educate themselves. They’ve no desire to read, process, & form logical opinions especially if given information is not comprised of welcome information. It appears that they will go to extreme lengths to protect their minds from truth. They will sacrifice their own children in order to maintain a narrative they have chosen not to destroy in the name of righteousness.
The KGB ran an experiment many years back, prior to a time when the words “misinformation” were coined. During this experiment they supplied a group of people with false information about varying topics. This experiment didn’t last very long. The second half of the experiment entailed the same participants being given true information. After no more time than that of a few months, of being told “misinformation” these participants were either unwilling or incapable of believing the truth. They chose to continue believing the false information that had been fed to them during the initial phases of this experiment.
I’m left to wonder why some of us are capable of expanding our minds whilst our peers are stuck in an eternal process of mind control. Ignorance is truly bliss for those who choose not to accept reality.
Given that, "covid-19", has become a rebranding for all-cause mortality, over the past two years, the masses will never know how many the jab has killed.
I do wonder, though, why did your smart guy (from the other post) not discuss the jump in mortality and morbidity, as posted and seemingly accepted in CDC/Wonder/VAERS? Is that above his head?
I’m curious though- could it be bias among the audience- as the followers of many of these accounts are there for medical freedom & data. Is it possible that these polls of followers are simply the product of a biased audience & quick responses???
Did anyone see the article re: the ‘approved by the FDA Pfizer comitry (sic) COVID19 vaccine? Remember about 3-4 months ago Fauci and all the other complicit evil doers claimed FDA finally approved Pfizer’s COVID19 vaccine- same vaccine just under new name, Comitry, so when you go and get your vaccine that is what you will be receiving, (of course that would mean you could sue Pfizer for any vaccine related injury/death since Comitry, (sic?), is approved by FDA and no longer under experimental emergency use.
Gee, (a La Gomer Pile), GOLLY- SURPRISE SURPRISE SURPRISE Pfizer admitted no such thing as Comitry vaccine. I kid you not- look it up.
My problem with these survey's (unless I'm missing something) is the selection bias that each of these have. They all appear to be twitter surveys, which tends to surveil the followers of the individual asking the question. As such, the people who would even ASK this sort of question presupposes populations of people who are already thinking along the same lines that there may be risk to utilizing the vaccines.
I'm not suggesting that the surveys are wrong. I'm suggesting the data collected does not have a properly compelled sample group to have meaningful answers. Ask a group of people about how nasty a certain President's son is, and you'll end up conjuring an image. If you voted Blue, you get Don Jr, if you voted Red, you get Hunter. I'm suggesting that the populations following these people have been red pilled, and as such, they're seeing the world from that perspective.
There is no government entity even PRETENDING to track (less than 1%) of the LONG-TERM health injuries and consequent deaths! The majority of these injuries are not immediately diagnosable and they will NEVER be attributed to the "triggering" event of injection.
Have you heard of onset of Type 1 Diabetes triggered by the jab?
Steve, have you heard about this? A group of New Zealand doctors have penned an open letter to the Chief of the country's police, asking them to investigate deaths due to the vaccines.
https://nzdsos.com/2022/05/24/deaths-following-c-19-vaccination/
Apparently, twitter polls can be used to extrapolate scientific data - what's good for the goose is good for the gander:
People's Willingness to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 Despite Their Safety Concerns: Twitter Poll Analysis
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33872185/
"Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the public's perception on the safety and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines in real time by using Twitter polls.
Methods: We developed 2 Twitter polls to explore the public's views on available COVID-19 vaccines. The surveys were pinned to the Digital Health and Patient Safety Platform Twitter timeline for 1 week in mid-February 2021, and Twitter users and influencers were asked to participate in and retweet the polls to reach the largest possible audience."
There are literally dozens maybe hundreds more studies using Twitter as the data source (just look at the 'Similar Articles' on PubMed for instance)
Cognitive dissonance indeed. It appears that no matter how many studies, how many reports, how many first hand accounts of tragedy, the minds of those incapable of forming their own opinions, their own thoughts, will forever be influenced by the narrative. They’ve no desire to educate themselves. They’ve no desire to read, process, & form logical opinions especially if given information is not comprised of welcome information. It appears that they will go to extreme lengths to protect their minds from truth. They will sacrifice their own children in order to maintain a narrative they have chosen not to destroy in the name of righteousness.
The KGB ran an experiment many years back, prior to a time when the words “misinformation” were coined. During this experiment they supplied a group of people with false information about varying topics. This experiment didn’t last very long. The second half of the experiment entailed the same participants being given true information. After no more time than that of a few months, of being told “misinformation” these participants were either unwilling or incapable of believing the truth. They chose to continue believing the false information that had been fed to them during the initial phases of this experiment.
I’m left to wonder why some of us are capable of expanding our minds whilst our peers are stuck in an eternal process of mind control. Ignorance is truly bliss for those who choose not to accept reality.
The polls and surveys suggest. There has to be a more reliable way to determine/know.
Given that, "covid-19", has become a rebranding for all-cause mortality, over the past two years, the masses will never know how many the jab has killed.
I do wonder, though, why did your smart guy (from the other post) not discuss the jump in mortality and morbidity, as posted and seemingly accepted in CDC/Wonder/VAERS? Is that above his head?
I’m curious though- could it be bias among the audience- as the followers of many of these accounts are there for medical freedom & data. Is it possible that these polls of followers are simply the product of a biased audience & quick responses???
TYPO 2nd paragraph - "less" seems extraneous.
Steve,
Have you written about Event 201? I can't find it in search on your site.
That's scary as fuck. I hope they recall that shot and soon.
Did anyone see the article re: the ‘approved by the FDA Pfizer comitry (sic) COVID19 vaccine? Remember about 3-4 months ago Fauci and all the other complicit evil doers claimed FDA finally approved Pfizer’s COVID19 vaccine- same vaccine just under new name, Comitry, so when you go and get your vaccine that is what you will be receiving, (of course that would mean you could sue Pfizer for any vaccine related injury/death since Comitry, (sic?), is approved by FDA and no longer under experimental emergency use.
Gee, (a La Gomer Pile), GOLLY- SURPRISE SURPRISE SURPRISE Pfizer admitted no such thing as Comitry vaccine. I kid you not- look it up.
What will it take for people to WAKE UP???
I know the article is 100% true- I have been researching this from day one.
I don’t understand the ‘LESS’ before the statistics or numbers of those that died compared to other vaccines combined.
Before I share the heck out of the article what does the ‘less’ mean? It sounds like less than...
Please excuse me if I am missing something obvious- it’s been a very stressful day.
Thank you
My problem with these survey's (unless I'm missing something) is the selection bias that each of these have. They all appear to be twitter surveys, which tends to surveil the followers of the individual asking the question. As such, the people who would even ASK this sort of question presupposes populations of people who are already thinking along the same lines that there may be risk to utilizing the vaccines.
I'm not suggesting that the surveys are wrong. I'm suggesting the data collected does not have a properly compelled sample group to have meaningful answers. Ask a group of people about how nasty a certain President's son is, and you'll end up conjuring an image. If you voted Blue, you get Don Jr, if you voted Red, you get Hunter. I'm suggesting that the populations following these people have been red pilled, and as such, they're seeing the world from that perspective.
Thesa\e surveys are not going to change anything, unfortunately. They can be fabricated, just playing the devil's advocate here.
Steve K continues to doggedly fight this good fight. Do I smell a future Congressional Medal of Honor?!
With VAERS less than 1% reporting rate for injuries and deaths shortly after vaccination (SEE: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system ) we must FIRST multiply the VAERS numbers by at least 100 times in order to begin to understand the scale of devastation, and this will ONLY give us a picture of the SHORT TERM destruction.
There is no government entity even PRETENDING to track (less than 1%) of the LONG-TERM health injuries and consequent deaths! The majority of these injuries are not immediately diagnosable and they will NEVER be attributed to the "triggering" event of injection.