We've been fluoridating water since the 1950's. The science is similar to vaccines: they simply forgot to do the all-cause mortality and morbidity studies showing the benefits outweigh the harms.
What about fluoride in juices that contain 'water and concentrated fruit juice'. Given the amount of water relative to the amount of concentrated fruit juice, these products are potentially loaded with fluoride. All bottled water lists the 'typical mineral analysis in parts per million', this same analysis should be extended to juices that are reconstituted with water.
I have no time and even fewer subscribers, so there's little point in me doing this but...
The world needs to KNOW about Aspartame.
I found this truth very much in the way you did with Fluoride, and the similarities are remarkable. I strongly urge (and ask) you to consider watching a documentary which will blow your mind every bit as much as the Fluoride Deception, and then some. If you're not aware, trust me, you're about to experience another one of those 'moments' like RFK and all of us have had.
Understand WHY they are banning sugar and here in the UK you get TAXED MORE if you want sugar instead of Aspartame POISON in your drink. McDonalds costs more and you have to ask specifically for SUGAR in your drink. Here's why....
Try this on for size.... I am in the UK. Our children eat a LOT of fruit, i mean heaps of it. They rarely eat sugary stuff but they do occasionally. We have never allowed fluoride anywhere near them. We made the mistake of telling our NHS dentist this fact when she tried to sell us some toothpaste due to some decay on the kids' teeth (which even she said was caused by fruit sugars). We politely declined and explained our intelligent and rational reasons why. She responded:
"Do you realise I could report you to social services for refusing to give your children Fluoride?"
I left the room quickly as my anger was boiling up as it always does when some fascist threatens the STATE against your children when you're about 10000 times more conscientious than 99% of other parents.
NHS. Heroes. Of course. The UK needs a revolution.
We have new technology and I also own the copyright of the national identity card. Did your driving license. Digital passport. Digital wallet. The digital wallet. I am the copyright for it. Join our club and help or support everybody. We want you to come on board now join our club get in touch and listen to me we have new technology and we can beat the government by copyright infringement get in touch
I've been taking flouride out of our water for over 20 years! And did not let my children use flouride toothpaste.
I've read recently about fluvoxamine leading to cancer. Glad I've kept flouride out of my household's experience!
I had mercury amalgam fillings removed years before I was pregnant with my first child. I know then that metal poisons in our environment would cause problems for my future children.
Hi Steve. Dr Kinnane here. Pharmacist for 52 years, acupuncturist and Chinese herbalist 34 years. You are right on the money with fluoride! Its a poison introduced into our water supply by the aluminum industry to make a profit off their toxic waste like Carnegie promoted “organic chemicals” made from the steel industry toxic waste, coal tar. Now with that said, please let me say that all chemicals containing fluorine or fluoride are toxic as well since the body in breaking down the chemical must eventually reach the fluoride molecule which when released will poison the system it touches. Now, knowing this, I ask you who turned you on to fluvoxamine for covid? Are you not aware that each molecule of fluvoxamine contains 3 molecules of fluorine and that fluorine found in fluvoxamine when metabolized is just as toxic as that found in some water supplies? No offense but I think someone who knows chemistry well is having some fun at your expense..
Steve, since you mentioned the Berkey filter, I have to let you know that I just found out that the company that makes Berkey, Millennium Concepts, has been defrauding its customers for years. They have not done the testing on their filters that they claim they have, the testing they have done did not give the results they claim, and there's currently a class action lawsuit underway which they are of course trying to stall as long as possible because they have no case. The filters are complete garbage. I'm trying to get the word out so people will stop buying them because some of us have been using Berkey filters thinking that the water that comes out of them is clean and safe, and actually it's basically the same as the water we put in, at least in terms of some of the more dangerous contaminants we're trying to filter out. This is horrendous.
I know this isn't your main area of focus but you have such a large audience, and you recommended the Berkey filter, so if you were so inclined I'd love to see what you could dredge up on the topic, or at the very least, if you could do a quick "fact check" to confirm what I've been hearing, and maybe amend your recommendation in a future post, it might do a lot of good for people who are concerned about the quality of their drinking water.
Correction - looks like Berkey does list their test results and they appear to do well. But the fact remains that the laboratory where they did testing told 2 different sources that they never tested beyond 1100 gallons, while industry standard is you're supposed to test to 150-200% of the official life of the filter and publish THOSE results. The test results made available online don't specify at what point in the filter life the tests were done. And since there's no certification, there's no third party checking up to make sure it was done at the appropriate time. Furthermore, tests performed by other labs and commissioned by people who dont' work for New Milennium Concepts, were not able to replicate Berkey's claimed results.
So all the data I've seen suggests that the "independent" lab that did Berkey's testing was paid off to give them some nice looking test results. Loathe as I am to link to the New York Times...:
Let me translate that for you: "Actual certifications through the official regulatory agency are expensive, and as the most expensive countertop water filtration system available, we couldn't possibly afford these certifications, which are in any case not necessary because our private lab, whose results we won't show you, has already tested our system and found that it works for all the things that NSF tests for, so there's no need to have an official regulator test to confirm that what we just told you is actually true and not just us lying."
Both a reporter from the New York Times (rag though it is) and the concerned former customer whose YouTube video I linked to, separately spoke to the someone at the lab that did the testing for Berkey, and in both cases the lab disputed the results claimed on the Berkey website, saying they never even tested to the 3000 gallons that Berkey claims as the lifetime of one of its filters - at most they tested up to 1100 gallons, although even that number was inconsistent in the two communications.
For comparison, if you look at a comparable countertop system like Aquasana for example, they list in their manual the complete test results from their NSF certification, showing the 30 or so contaminants that they have been tested for and what their score was (98-99% for most of them), and that countertop system only costs around $130. Berkeys start around $330 for the smallest model with no accessories, and replacement filters run about $80 a pop.
Now I can't be sure that the results that companies like Aquasana list are accurate, but at least you can look them up on the NSF website and confirm that they're certified for what they claim to be. And obviously I can't speak for the NSF certification in itself - it may be completely insufficient, it may be that the NSF regulators are corrupt or incompetent. But to not even bother to get the certification and then claim that your results are better so you don't need to? And then charge that much money? It's kind of insulting our intelligence, or it would be if any of us bothered to do the research before buying, instead of just relying on a company's reputation among our trusted networks and hoping someone already did their due diligence so we don't have to. That's what I did, and now I'm feeling like those recently red-pilled vaccine recipients, kicking myself and wondering how I could have been so naive.
I haven't heard about aluminum but independent test results done as part of the class action lawsuit found their performance to be so dismal as to be effectively useless. They only tested a few things - I think mostly industrial chemical contaminants like hexavalent chromium was among them, but I forget the others. The effectiveness varied for different contaminants but I think all of them maxed out in the 40-80% range (as in content was reduced by that much), but it hit those levels within the first 100 gallons and then quickly tapered off, in some cases down to less than 1% after only a couple hundred cycles. Meanwhile the advertised rating is in 96-99% for up to 3000 gallons for almost all of the several hundred contaminants they claim to filter out. So yeah, maybe it filters out some things really well - it certainly seems to improve the clarity of the water - but most of us are filtering for chemicals and/or bacteria. And incidentally I did an at home test for coliform bacteria on mine, and found more in the filtered water than in the tap water despite cleaning out the chamber! Wtf?
A couple other important notes and clues: The same cohort of mainstream health reporters who vilify those who question any vaccines, do the same to those who question fluoridation. The exact same tactics are used.
In many municipalities -- who decide on fluoridation -- it is the exact same authorities in public health that push fluoridation on the population through scare tactics. In these cases, it is important to follow the money. It inevitably leads to industry funding vs grass roots efforts to stop the poisoning of the water.
If you have not already, you should look up Dr Hardy Limeback former dental authority on Fluoridation who switched sides after doing real research.
Lastly, if you really want to understand the real source of dental carries, you should read a very old book: Why Raise Ugly Kids? Hal Huggins (also known for raising the alarm about mercury in fillings). It is fascinating.
Hey Steve, it seems you're starting to see the patterns here.
The Case against fluoridation is based on pretty reliable science at this point, far more definitive than some other health issues.
The case for fluoridation was never based on anything concrete. This and vaccination were declared public health's greatest successes over the century.
If it’s in your mouth, it’s going to be absorbed into your bloodstream, so I say no to even having it in your mouth in toothpaste or mouthwash. It’s a dangerous neurotoxin and is said to calcify the pineal gland, your third eye!
Never allowed my children to get fluoride treatments (eldest is 32) and we used fluoride free toothpaste since they were little. I learned about it reading grassroots, Mothering Magazine in the 90's. That was my Bible for healthy living. I learned a great deal from it. We use Berkey Filters in our homes. Mine has charcoal and fluoride filters.
Vaccines shed so even unvaccinated will be exposed. Fluoride is still enforced because those in government don't care about you. It's about Business, reelection and wealth. The EPA offices do not drink fluoride water,
I am in Dallas, Texas -We have been trying to get the Dallas City Council to STOP Fluoridation for over TEN Years! I am trying to get the local D Magazine Editor to do an article on this--and I am going to use you and your article to help persuade him! Since selling magazines is his ultimate goal your article getting love and comments should help! Right??!!
What about fluoride in juices that contain 'water and concentrated fruit juice'. Given the amount of water relative to the amount of concentrated fruit juice, these products are potentially loaded with fluoride. All bottled water lists the 'typical mineral analysis in parts per million', this same analysis should be extended to juices that are reconstituted with water.
Steve: PLEASE READ.
I have no time and even fewer subscribers, so there's little point in me doing this but...
The world needs to KNOW about Aspartame.
I found this truth very much in the way you did with Fluoride, and the similarities are remarkable. I strongly urge (and ask) you to consider watching a documentary which will blow your mind every bit as much as the Fluoride Deception, and then some. If you're not aware, trust me, you're about to experience another one of those 'moments' like RFK and all of us have had.
Understand WHY they are banning sugar and here in the UK you get TAXED MORE if you want sugar instead of Aspartame POISON in your drink. McDonalds costs more and you have to ask specifically for SUGAR in your drink. Here's why....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toKyRlpmG7A
Try this on for size.... I am in the UK. Our children eat a LOT of fruit, i mean heaps of it. They rarely eat sugary stuff but they do occasionally. We have never allowed fluoride anywhere near them. We made the mistake of telling our NHS dentist this fact when she tried to sell us some toothpaste due to some decay on the kids' teeth (which even she said was caused by fruit sugars). We politely declined and explained our intelligent and rational reasons why. She responded:
"Do you realise I could report you to social services for refusing to give your children Fluoride?"
I left the room quickly as my anger was boiling up as it always does when some fascist threatens the STATE against your children when you're about 10000 times more conscientious than 99% of other parents.
NHS. Heroes. Of course. The UK needs a revolution.
We have new technology and I also own the copyright of the national identity card. Did your driving license. Digital passport. Digital wallet. The digital wallet. I am the copyright for it. Join our club and help or support everybody. We want you to come on board now join our club get in touch and listen to me we have new technology and we can beat the government by copyright infringement get in touch
Why aren't you replying to my messages Steve get in touch with me
Become a member click the link below
https://dailyplanet.club/
I've been taking flouride out of our water for over 20 years! And did not let my children use flouride toothpaste.
I've read recently about fluvoxamine leading to cancer. Glad I've kept flouride out of my household's experience!
I had mercury amalgam fillings removed years before I was pregnant with my first child. I know then that metal poisons in our environment would cause problems for my future children.
Hi Steve. Dr Kinnane here. Pharmacist for 52 years, acupuncturist and Chinese herbalist 34 years. You are right on the money with fluoride! Its a poison introduced into our water supply by the aluminum industry to make a profit off their toxic waste like Carnegie promoted “organic chemicals” made from the steel industry toxic waste, coal tar. Now with that said, please let me say that all chemicals containing fluorine or fluoride are toxic as well since the body in breaking down the chemical must eventually reach the fluoride molecule which when released will poison the system it touches. Now, knowing this, I ask you who turned you on to fluvoxamine for covid? Are you not aware that each molecule of fluvoxamine contains 3 molecules of fluorine and that fluorine found in fluvoxamine when metabolized is just as toxic as that found in some water supplies? No offense but I think someone who knows chemistry well is having some fun at your expense..
Steve, since you mentioned the Berkey filter, I have to let you know that I just found out that the company that makes Berkey, Millennium Concepts, has been defrauding its customers for years. They have not done the testing on their filters that they claim they have, the testing they have done did not give the results they claim, and there's currently a class action lawsuit underway which they are of course trying to stall as long as possible because they have no case. The filters are complete garbage. I'm trying to get the word out so people will stop buying them because some of us have been using Berkey filters thinking that the water that comes out of them is clean and safe, and actually it's basically the same as the water we put in, at least in terms of some of the more dangerous contaminants we're trying to filter out. This is horrendous.
I know this isn't your main area of focus but you have such a large audience, and you recommended the Berkey filter, so if you were so inclined I'd love to see what you could dredge up on the topic, or at the very least, if you could do a quick "fact check" to confirm what I've been hearing, and maybe amend your recommendation in a future post, it might do a lot of good for people who are concerned about the quality of their drinking water.
Here's the video where I started - it's the first in a series so later videos have updates - and there are a lot of links in the description. In any case, thank you for all the work that you do! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jct_bVz5eZc&list=PLUlaEW2OF6xHhz-QpU3-R7vy_6OAvzbUW
Berkey's view on the certifications:
https://berkeywaterkb.com/are-the-black-berkey-purification-elements-nsf-certified/
Correction - looks like Berkey does list their test results and they appear to do well. But the fact remains that the laboratory where they did testing told 2 different sources that they never tested beyond 1100 gallons, while industry standard is you're supposed to test to 150-200% of the official life of the filter and publish THOSE results. The test results made available online don't specify at what point in the filter life the tests were done. And since there's no certification, there's no third party checking up to make sure it was done at the appropriate time. Furthermore, tests performed by other labs and commissioned by people who dont' work for New Milennium Concepts, were not able to replicate Berkey's claimed results.
So all the data I've seen suggests that the "independent" lab that did Berkey's testing was paid off to give them some nice looking test results. Loathe as I am to link to the New York Times...:
https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/big-berkey-water-filter-system/
Let me translate that for you: "Actual certifications through the official regulatory agency are expensive, and as the most expensive countertop water filtration system available, we couldn't possibly afford these certifications, which are in any case not necessary because our private lab, whose results we won't show you, has already tested our system and found that it works for all the things that NSF tests for, so there's no need to have an official regulator test to confirm that what we just told you is actually true and not just us lying."
Both a reporter from the New York Times (rag though it is) and the concerned former customer whose YouTube video I linked to, separately spoke to the someone at the lab that did the testing for Berkey, and in both cases the lab disputed the results claimed on the Berkey website, saying they never even tested to the 3000 gallons that Berkey claims as the lifetime of one of its filters - at most they tested up to 1100 gallons, although even that number was inconsistent in the two communications.
For comparison, if you look at a comparable countertop system like Aquasana for example, they list in their manual the complete test results from their NSF certification, showing the 30 or so contaminants that they have been tested for and what their score was (98-99% for most of them), and that countertop system only costs around $130. Berkeys start around $330 for the smallest model with no accessories, and replacement filters run about $80 a pop.
Now I can't be sure that the results that companies like Aquasana list are accurate, but at least you can look them up on the NSF website and confirm that they're certified for what they claim to be. And obviously I can't speak for the NSF certification in itself - it may be completely insufficient, it may be that the NSF regulators are corrupt or incompetent. But to not even bother to get the certification and then claim that your results are better so you don't need to? And then charge that much money? It's kind of insulting our intelligence, or it would be if any of us bothered to do the research before buying, instead of just relying on a company's reputation among our trusted networks and hoping someone already did their due diligence so we don't have to. That's what I did, and now I'm feeling like those recently red-pilled vaccine recipients, kicking myself and wondering how I could have been so naive.
Yes. I have been hearing about aluminum in the filters
I haven't heard about aluminum but independent test results done as part of the class action lawsuit found their performance to be so dismal as to be effectively useless. They only tested a few things - I think mostly industrial chemical contaminants like hexavalent chromium was among them, but I forget the others. The effectiveness varied for different contaminants but I think all of them maxed out in the 40-80% range (as in content was reduced by that much), but it hit those levels within the first 100 gallons and then quickly tapered off, in some cases down to less than 1% after only a couple hundred cycles. Meanwhile the advertised rating is in 96-99% for up to 3000 gallons for almost all of the several hundred contaminants they claim to filter out. So yeah, maybe it filters out some things really well - it certainly seems to improve the clarity of the water - but most of us are filtering for chemicals and/or bacteria. And incidentally I did an at home test for coliform bacteria on mine, and found more in the filtered water than in the tap water despite cleaning out the chamber! Wtf?
😬😬😬
Great Steve, looks like you hit a nerve!
🤣🤣🤣
https://apnews.com/article/health-vermont-fluoridation-climate-and-environment-375fe7224a329bafb7a6dfa7480b5750
Just wanted to add that even showering/bathing in fluoridated water is not safe. It used to be used like a dip since it's also absorbed topically.
A couple other important notes and clues: The same cohort of mainstream health reporters who vilify those who question any vaccines, do the same to those who question fluoridation. The exact same tactics are used.
In many municipalities -- who decide on fluoridation -- it is the exact same authorities in public health that push fluoridation on the population through scare tactics. In these cases, it is important to follow the money. It inevitably leads to industry funding vs grass roots efforts to stop the poisoning of the water.
If you have not already, you should look up Dr Hardy Limeback former dental authority on Fluoridation who switched sides after doing real research.
Lastly, if you really want to understand the real source of dental carries, you should read a very old book: Why Raise Ugly Kids? Hal Huggins (also known for raising the alarm about mercury in fillings). It is fascinating.
Hey Steve, it seems you're starting to see the patterns here.
The Case against fluoridation is based on pretty reliable science at this point, far more definitive than some other health issues.
The case for fluoridation was never based on anything concrete. This and vaccination were declared public health's greatest successes over the century.
A bit shocking no?
If it’s in your mouth, it’s going to be absorbed into your bloodstream, so I say no to even having it in your mouth in toothpaste or mouthwash. It’s a dangerous neurotoxin and is said to calcify the pineal gland, your third eye!
Never allowed my children to get fluoride treatments (eldest is 32) and we used fluoride free toothpaste since they were little. I learned about it reading grassroots, Mothering Magazine in the 90's. That was my Bible for healthy living. I learned a great deal from it. We use Berkey Filters in our homes. Mine has charcoal and fluoride filters.
Vaccines shed so even unvaccinated will be exposed. Fluoride is still enforced because those in government don't care about you. It's about Business, reelection and wealth. The EPA offices do not drink fluoride water,
I am in Dallas, Texas -We have been trying to get the Dallas City Council to STOP Fluoridation for over TEN Years! I am trying to get the local D Magazine Editor to do an article on this--and I am going to use you and your article to help persuade him! Since selling magazines is his ultimate goal your article getting love and comments should help! Right??!!