They said the paper wasn't balanced so they retracted it. You can't declare a paper unfixable if you never told the author what needed fixing. This is not how science is supposed to work.
Regardless of where someone stands on the larger COVID debate, transparency around scientific retractions is incredibly important. If a paper contains factual or methodological problems, those problems should be identified as specifically as possible so that authors, researchers and readers can understand the reasoning. Likewise, if the concern is primarily interpretation, emphasis or the possibility of misinterpretation, it seems valuable to clearly distinguish that from an error in the underlying data. Public trust in science benefits when both publication and retraction decisions can withstand open scrutiny.
Godless Satan-inspired nations get Godless Satan-inspired death and suffering! It's why "Our-Creator"/ God inspired founding fathers used God and His Bible's wisdom to build this nation! "As long as we can keep it! John Adams put it, "our nation was designed only for a Godley people and totally inappropriate for any other," I,e., a mass baby-killing LGBTQIA+pimping hell bound nation!
Very sad as they try to clean the Internet memory. The AAFP on Covid shots reads like a church cathecism . The MD’s are propagandized everywhere https://www.aafp.org/afp/2017/0615/p786
The living human organism carries deep phylogenetic imprints — spontaneous and automated reaction patterns that have been shaped and stored across evolutionary history. These are not random or archaic leftovers, but highly functional, species-specific, and task-specific adaptations. They function as phylogenetic conditioned response stereotypes — reliable, fast, often unconscious behavioral, physiological, and emotional tendencies that promote survival, rejuvenation, normalisation, adaptation, and the continuation of the life cycle in typical environments(https://vegetativetraining.wordpress.com/vegetative-training-self-regulation-experience-and-the-expansion-of-possibility/).
Vegetative training works by expanding this field of opportunity at its source. By restoring access to spontaneous regulatory movements, it allows contradictions to be metabolized rather than managed. What changes is not will, insight, or belief, but the conditions under which choice becomes possible at all.
I recently sat next to a couple at a restaurant on a cruise out of Australia. The obligatory questions, such as what one did for work, elicited a strange response from the wife. She said she worked in a bloods lab in Brisbane. She was itching to tell us that blood samples were weird after the Covid-19 jabs, with high incidence of blood clots, among other tests. Then she said that staff were under strict instruction not to divulge these concerns to the public. Her husband, opposite, received only one dose as he had an adverse reaction and did not want a repeat. The strange thing was that she divulged this without knowing my wife and I were opposed to the covid jabs, which we soon mentioned. She regretted the jabs and only participated to keep her job.
How many times have I read that a paper is withdrawn because the public might gain the impression that the jabs were not safe, nor effective. Since when has it become the norm that shielding the public from the facts is scientific? The fact is that they were never safe, nor effective.
Thank you Steve for all you do and have done over these most difficult, disastrous but awakening COVID years. While like so many who have suffered, it has been a battle and you have been a life line for me in staying sane while the so called medical professionals gas lit me and continue to do so (I’m still alive 🙏🏾)
Coming from NZ I would especially like to thank you for the support you have given to Barry Young, he is still fighting to this day and like you a hardworking hero, a truth teller, sharing the data and asking the questions that need answering. Your continued work is so very valuable and commendable. Just in case you don’t know that I for one am very grateful.
This is interesting. Before the shots rolled out, I don't recall any reported deaths (outside hospitals) directly related to c19. They were exclusively the result of medical malpractice in hospitals. When the shots came out, they started killing in completely different ways. The paper shows the shots had zero effectiveness in reducing deaths. So much for "safe and effective". The coverup continues.
With big pharmas [so-called] medicine [just in the USA] having to pay $62 billion in fraud fines and beeing the leader in iatrogenic deaths, killing *800,000 a year! [*see Dr. Nulls et-al book Death by Medicine!]. Then, for the mass COVID murders, for money, see the book What the Nurses Saw! Godless, hell-bound nations deserve and get Godless medicine!
Regardless of where someone stands on the larger COVID debate, transparency around scientific retractions is incredibly important. If a paper contains factual or methodological problems, those problems should be identified as specifically as possible so that authors, researchers and readers can understand the reasoning. Likewise, if the concern is primarily interpretation, emphasis or the possibility of misinterpretation, it seems valuable to clearly distinguish that from an error in the underlying data. Public trust in science benefits when both publication and retraction decisions can withstand open scrutiny.
Would love to get your take on the recent shingrix/dinentia claims. Claimed to be supported by multiple studies.
The tinfoil hats we have are not conspiratorial enough
Godless Satan-inspired nations get Godless Satan-inspired death and suffering! It's why "Our-Creator"/ God inspired founding fathers used God and His Bible's wisdom to build this nation! "As long as we can keep it! John Adams put it, "our nation was designed only for a Godley people and totally inappropriate for any other," I,e., a mass baby-killing LGBTQIA+pimping hell bound nation!
Very sad as they try to clean the Internet memory. The AAFP on Covid shots reads like a church cathecism . The MD’s are propagandized everywhere https://www.aafp.org/afp/2017/0615/p786
Why did they attempt to publish such research in a pharma propaganda rag like the BMJ?
The living human organism carries deep phylogenetic imprints — spontaneous and automated reaction patterns that have been shaped and stored across evolutionary history. These are not random or archaic leftovers, but highly functional, species-specific, and task-specific adaptations. They function as phylogenetic conditioned response stereotypes — reliable, fast, often unconscious behavioral, physiological, and emotional tendencies that promote survival, rejuvenation, normalisation, adaptation, and the continuation of the life cycle in typical environments(https://vegetativetraining.wordpress.com/vegetative-training-self-regulation-experience-and-the-expansion-of-possibility/).
Vegetative training works by expanding this field of opportunity at its source. By restoring access to spontaneous regulatory movements, it allows contradictions to be metabolized rather than managed. What changes is not will, insight, or belief, but the conditions under which choice becomes possible at all.
I recently sat next to a couple at a restaurant on a cruise out of Australia. The obligatory questions, such as what one did for work, elicited a strange response from the wife. She said she worked in a bloods lab in Brisbane. She was itching to tell us that blood samples were weird after the Covid-19 jabs, with high incidence of blood clots, among other tests. Then she said that staff were under strict instruction not to divulge these concerns to the public. Her husband, opposite, received only one dose as he had an adverse reaction and did not want a repeat. The strange thing was that she divulged this without knowing my wife and I were opposed to the covid jabs, which we soon mentioned. She regretted the jabs and only participated to keep her job.
How many times have I read that a paper is withdrawn because the public might gain the impression that the jabs were not safe, nor effective. Since when has it become the norm that shielding the public from the facts is scientific? The fact is that they were never safe, nor effective.
Thank you Steve for all you do and have done over these most difficult, disastrous but awakening COVID years. While like so many who have suffered, it has been a battle and you have been a life line for me in staying sane while the so called medical professionals gas lit me and continue to do so (I’m still alive 🙏🏾)
Coming from NZ I would especially like to thank you for the support you have given to Barry Young, he is still fighting to this day and like you a hardworking hero, a truth teller, sharing the data and asking the questions that need answering. Your continued work is so very valuable and commendable. Just in case you don’t know that I for one am very grateful.
Thank you ❤️
Also from NZ and I totally concur. The medical bureaucracy, like the judiciary, is a law unto itself and needs to be reigned in.
This is interesting. Before the shots rolled out, I don't recall any reported deaths (outside hospitals) directly related to c19. They were exclusively the result of medical malpractice in hospitals. When the shots came out, they started killing in completely different ways. The paper shows the shots had zero effectiveness in reducing deaths. So much for "safe and effective". The coverup continues.
With big pharmas [so-called] medicine [just in the USA] having to pay $62 billion in fraud fines and beeing the leader in iatrogenic deaths, killing *800,000 a year! [*see Dr. Nulls et-al book Death by Medicine!]. Then, for the mass COVID murders, for money, see the book What the Nurses Saw! Godless, hell-bound nations deserve and get Godless medicine!
Canadian dr now bankrupt because of covid heroism. Can we get him more exposure?
https://www.facebook.com/share/14r9CjypBRL/
I think our HHS secretary was/is investigating such underhandedness in the scientific journals - hopefully this will be part of the reviews.
Scientific journals sell advertizing and push B.S. for money! (A documented fact!)
all the med ppeople take too much meds. How about sharing it anousmly in a newspapaer or social diahrheea(I mean social media)
"public advocacy" is far too positive a term. Public manipulation may hold a more accurate impression.
"Misleading information " = inconvenient truth.
corruption