They said the paper wasn't balanced so they retracted it. You can't declare a paper unfixable if you never told the author what needed fixing. This is not how science is supposed to work.
The BMJ decisions on what papers survive in their journal are not being determined by objective criteria (COPE guidelines); they are being determined by whether the paper is consistent with the beliefs of the editors. If you violate that, they retract your paper.
This is not science.
100% correct imagine what scientists of old would think of this sad state of affairs of such a ludicrous and oh so trite style of management not only pathetic but truly bathetic…. Seriously you’d think that with all the negativity following in my opinion chief CIA, DoD and DARPA Asset Fauci’s lame effort during the recent house hearing, commensurate all of the other reveals, what now seems an avalanche of papers of serious quality that have evolved of late debunking virtually every previous official narrative and point extolling the virtues of the poison they foisted upon the global populace that scientists who were so imbued and acted as flag bearers for the miscreants behind the Scamdemic, would endeavour to put things right, to undertake the mea culpa needed to set the record and their reputations right, alas nope, its double, treble down time, none more so than these now flagrantly irrelevant medical journals…
I believe sufficient quality of professionals in medicine, science, research exist to establish a new peer review publishing facility, governed by the doctrine of robust fact based review and subsequently the publishing of appropriately reviewed work, such in my opinion would make irrelevant these established journals, with Tech, A.I to assist the editing etc… it wouldn’t need a great deal of capital, quality content written world class professionals would suffice, such an enterprise would ensure irrelevance was the next stop these assholes… good old fashioned peer pressure is the key… and in the fraternity of professionals debunking the Covid scam, we have truly world class professionals… me thinks it’s time… put the bought, sold, corrupted out with the trash… there will be a new journal … just saying
It isn't about being 'consistent with the beliefs of the editors'. It is about being consistent with the goals of those funding it (several layers up), and their overall control grid/eugenics plan. The former editors of both the New England Journal of Medicine, and the British Medical Journal publicly stated that at least 50% of what is published is hogwash. They were clearly NOT in charge.
Steve they know you are correct, but they are pleasing their financiers (Big Pharma) and their higher ups. In so doing, they are destroying their journal and other journals who also cater to this bullshit. In time their journal will be another mistrusted and useless company. They are only proving that they have no morals and little if any intelligence.
Yes and the guy Henrik Svensmark who had a different theory than the co2 global warming crap was just fired from Danish dtu - and a professor who made a device that could measure wind turbine noise was also fired as it would be bad for the wind turbine industry --
Steve...I asked ChatGPT about this...and they both applaud and critique your analysis. Here's what they said:
The BMJ was justified in deciding that the article, as published, contained an inadequately supported and selectively framed discussion. However, the publicly disclosed reasons do not make a completely convincing case that the descriptive findings themselves were unreliable enough to require full retraction. A major correction, transparent methodological critique, and publication of the authors’ response may have been the more proportionate and scientifically informative remedy.
So I agree with Kirsch that the retraction raises a genuine publication-ethics concern—especially the invocation of “consensus” and “misinformation.” I do not agree that this proves censorship of sound evidence that vaccines caused excess deaths. The original study never performed the analysis necessary to establish that proposition.
The BMJ also bears significant responsibility: its peer-review system accepted the article, classified it as original research, issued publicity around it, and then took more than two years to retract it. That failure should not be attributed solely to the authors.
Even though it once stood for "British Medical Journal" they changed the official name in 1988 to just "BMJ," and in 2014 it was changed again to "The BMJ."
So if the article said "British Medical Journal" in parentheses, it would be officially wrong, and all the pharma bots would gleefully proclaim that the article is flawed.
BMJ stands for British Medical Journal. Once considered among the best in the world the BMJ has become thoroughly Americanized ( full of 💩) and is now just a vehicle for censorship and propaganda. For higher and more trustworthy standards and rigor in research instead of 🇺🇸☠️💉🐂💩 perhaps look to journals from Russia, Communist China or North Korea.
The journals are circling the drain and will go down with the ship rather than change just like MSM. Just read the comments on X when MSM posts a comment defending pharma, they get slaughtered.
I believe this isn't even directly about vaccines. It's about money and power. If their trillion dollar vaccine scam is threatened, people might realize the medical industry doesn't want to heal them. It wants to make them progressively sicker as one ages, because the older generations are the ones who've invested and are double dipping, which makes them more capable of paying for the wildly expensive new medical procedures, medicines and specialists. That means Big Pharma isn't just rolling in the vaccine money, they're also rolling in the medication, medical equipment and medical procedure tools money. They produce masks, gloves, hospital linens, fungal, viral and bacterial cleaning products, plastic masking, eye protection and surgical gowns. The list is endless but the people's money isn't, so they eventually die from some product or procedure and then Big Pharma starts all over with new suckers. They're even involved in supplements and holistic medicine. With all that money, Big Pharma wields enormous power in Washington, Brussels and every other seat of power in the West. There's no escaping the bloodsuckers. Their tentacles are everywhere. Sci-fi got Dracula all wrong. Big Pharma is a mix between a kraken and a vampire and they don't want to kill you - not until you're destitute anyway.
What??? "This is public advocacy."??? No. No. This is a CONTINUED cover up for a cold bloody murder!
A diagram means NUMBERS from a reliable source. There is NO LANGUAGE in numbers. If the source was fraud that could trigger a retraction, but it does not seem so, isn't it?
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” — Eric Arthur Blair
What happened to Peter Doshi?
The BMJ decisions on what papers survive in their journal are not being determined by objective criteria (COPE guidelines); they are being determined by whether the paper is consistent with the beliefs of the editors. If you violate that, they retract your paper.
This is not science.
100% correct imagine what scientists of old would think of this sad state of affairs of such a ludicrous and oh so trite style of management not only pathetic but truly bathetic…. Seriously you’d think that with all the negativity following in my opinion chief CIA, DoD and DARPA Asset Fauci’s lame effort during the recent house hearing, commensurate all of the other reveals, what now seems an avalanche of papers of serious quality that have evolved of late debunking virtually every previous official narrative and point extolling the virtues of the poison they foisted upon the global populace that scientists who were so imbued and acted as flag bearers for the miscreants behind the Scamdemic, would endeavour to put things right, to undertake the mea culpa needed to set the record and their reputations right, alas nope, its double, treble down time, none more so than these now flagrantly irrelevant medical journals…
I believe sufficient quality of professionals in medicine, science, research exist to establish a new peer review publishing facility, governed by the doctrine of robust fact based review and subsequently the publishing of appropriately reviewed work, such in my opinion would make irrelevant these established journals, with Tech, A.I to assist the editing etc… it wouldn’t need a great deal of capital, quality content written world class professionals would suffice, such an enterprise would ensure irrelevance was the next stop these assholes… good old fashioned peer pressure is the key… and in the fraternity of professionals debunking the Covid scam, we have truly world class professionals… me thinks it’s time… put the bought, sold, corrupted out with the trash… there will be a new journal … just saying
Kia Kaha (Stay strong) from New Zealand
It isn't about being 'consistent with the beliefs of the editors'. It is about being consistent with the goals of those funding it (several layers up), and their overall control grid/eugenics plan. The former editors of both the New England Journal of Medicine, and the British Medical Journal publicly stated that at least 50% of what is published is hogwash. They were clearly NOT in charge.
Steve they know you are correct, but they are pleasing their financiers (Big Pharma) and their higher ups. In so doing, they are destroying their journal and other journals who also cater to this bullshit. In time their journal will be another mistrusted and useless company. They are only proving that they have no morals and little if any intelligence.
Thank you Steve, keep it up, your work is just so valuable.
Yes and the guy Henrik Svensmark who had a different theory than the co2 global warming crap was just fired from Danish dtu - and a professor who made a device that could measure wind turbine noise was also fired as it would be bad for the wind turbine industry --
Science is dead - the left killed it
Mandates for the Covid shot (+ Flu & others) are STILL in effect across the US for the next gen of health professionals
Some programs no longer accept ANY exemption 🚨
Multiple requests to the current admin have fallen on deaf ears
Visit: StopCollegeMandates.org
x.com/teamrealityct/…
https://x.com/teamrealityct/status/2089160808009744786?s=61&t=LZT8Nm-IfSvAmdXXY-gSpQ
And they call us nazi?? They do know it violate like a shitload of ethics laws on medical ?? And ironic the nuremberg code?
Vara Sharav, a Nazi concentration camp survivor agrees completely. See her book, "Never Again is Now Global"
Steve...I asked ChatGPT about this...and they both applaud and critique your analysis. Here's what they said:
The BMJ was justified in deciding that the article, as published, contained an inadequately supported and selectively framed discussion. However, the publicly disclosed reasons do not make a completely convincing case that the descriptive findings themselves were unreliable enough to require full retraction. A major correction, transparent methodological critique, and publication of the authors’ response may have been the more proportionate and scientifically informative remedy.
So I agree with Kirsch that the retraction raises a genuine publication-ethics concern—especially the invocation of “consensus” and “misinformation.” I do not agree that this proves censorship of sound evidence that vaccines caused excess deaths. The original study never performed the analysis necessary to establish that proposition.
The BMJ also bears significant responsibility: its peer-review system accepted the article, classified it as original research, issued publicity around it, and then took more than two years to retract it. That failure should not be attributed solely to the authors.
Steve, At least mention WTF BMJ stands for at least once in an article so I or others don't have to chase it down. It's getting to be the Same Old 💩.
Even though it once stood for "British Medical Journal" they changed the official name in 1988 to just "BMJ," and in 2014 it was changed again to "The BMJ."
So if the article said "British Medical Journal" in parentheses, it would be officially wrong, and all the pharma bots would gleefully proclaim that the article is flawed.
BFD
BMJ stands for British Medical Journal. Once considered among the best in the world the BMJ has become thoroughly Americanized ( full of 💩) and is now just a vehicle for censorship and propaganda. For higher and more trustworthy standards and rigor in research instead of 🇺🇸☠️💉🐂💩 perhaps look to journals from Russia, Communist China or North Korea.
And where does it say "British Medical Journal" ANYWHERE in that article??
I haven't seen anything from the British Medical Journal in 40 years, but I'm supposed to know what BMJ is??
british medical journal
Yeah, I had to spend time looking it up because I didn't know what it stood for.
Where was it in your article?
The official name is "The BMJ."
The journals are circling the drain and will go down with the ship rather than change just like MSM. Just read the comments on X when MSM posts a comment defending pharma, they get slaughtered.
They removed the paper but the wayback time machine has copies that can't be retracted. Another straw on the Camels back which is approaching failure.
I believe this isn't even directly about vaccines. It's about money and power. If their trillion dollar vaccine scam is threatened, people might realize the medical industry doesn't want to heal them. It wants to make them progressively sicker as one ages, because the older generations are the ones who've invested and are double dipping, which makes them more capable of paying for the wildly expensive new medical procedures, medicines and specialists. That means Big Pharma isn't just rolling in the vaccine money, they're also rolling in the medication, medical equipment and medical procedure tools money. They produce masks, gloves, hospital linens, fungal, viral and bacterial cleaning products, plastic masking, eye protection and surgical gowns. The list is endless but the people's money isn't, so they eventually die from some product or procedure and then Big Pharma starts all over with new suckers. They're even involved in supplements and holistic medicine. With all that money, Big Pharma wields enormous power in Washington, Brussels and every other seat of power in the West. There's no escaping the bloodsuckers. Their tentacles are everywhere. Sci-fi got Dracula all wrong. Big Pharma is a mix between a kraken and a vampire and they don't want to kill you - not until you're destitute anyway.
Time for an alternative publishing house? It's long past time for an alternative to Rockefellers Medicine Men.
Significant Increase in Excess Deaths after Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination in Japan
Japanese Medical Assn. Journal (JMA), March 7, 2025
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12095670/
Why? BMJ knows who funds them!
Follow the money is getting to be so repetitive but so true 💰
What??? "This is public advocacy."??? No. No. This is a CONTINUED cover up for a cold bloody murder!
A diagram means NUMBERS from a reliable source. There is NO LANGUAGE in numbers. If the source was fraud that could trigger a retraction, but it does not seem so, isn't it?
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” — Eric Arthur Blair
Was Eric talking about AF?
Yup! He was talking about all of them and all of it!