Bret Weinstein replicated my autism survey results using his followers. Will any pro-vaccine group show we got it wrong? No. Never. They won't even try.
Amidst all the research and statistics there is still the simplest fact: American children are second to last in Health of all developed countries, and American children, the second sickest children in the world, are THE MOST vaxxinated.
Replication is always worth encouraging, particularly with questions that generate this much disagreement. At the same time, similar findings across audiences with overlapping characteristics do not necessarily eliminate selection bias, confounding or other methodological issues. To me, the most interesting next step would be a genuinely independent, preregistered study using representative participants and verified medical records, with the methodology agreed upon in advance. If the signal is as large as these surveys suggest, rigorous independent research should be capable of detecting it.
I am immensely surprised by the lack of reaction to my polite request for Steve to release his potentially valuable data to public domain. I wonder how he ihis action differs from crooked government blocking us, researchers from de-identified health data that belongs to us, patients. The "pandemic" disaster and crimes committed by those in charge of the health system would never taken place if we were able to publish on time. Our accurate prediction in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32292911/ was based on public data and would have help a lot if it were published expeditiously in a medical journal of high reputation. Evidently, I am able to help Steve (who is better with $$$ than in statistics but has brilliant ideas such as this survey).
1) How did you control for health-seeking behavior in your analysis? Unvaccinated children have been shown to have lower utilization of healthcare than vaccinated (PMID 33478789), and therefore less opportunities to get diagnosed with autism.
2) Longitudinal analysis shows that increased rates of autism are primarily due to increased prevalence of milder forms with less disability. The rate of more severe, disabling forms of autism has remained constant since 2000 (PMID: 41457676). Do you agree with the authors that greater awareness of ASD is the most likely explanation for this increase in prevalence of mild forms?
Hey @Steve Kirsch some time ago pro-vaccine advocate Ron Unz dismissed your mRNA vaccine analysis of Japan because there was no excess death in 2021. This is highly misleading. The large deficit in 2020 masked the increase in 2021, resulting in zero cumulative excess mortality for those two years collectively. In reality, in raw numbers, there were 67,101 more deaths in 2021 than in 2020. In 2022, mortality trends exploded, and there was a raw increase of 196,295 deaths relative to 2020. After adjusting for previous trends, I estimate that there were 472,820 excess deaths from 2021-2024. While the final death toll varies depending upon one’s method, there is no doubt that the mRNA vaccine rollout was associated with an unprecedented health disaster in Japan. Read my analysis here: https://rethinkgovernment.com/the-impact-of-mrna-vaccines-in-japan/it vindicates your conclusions.
I saw the poll but had nothing to add, given the specific question regarding regressive autism. How about another poll for people like me, whose 30 yr old son, as a child, was plagued with all of the symptoms of vaccine injury, from unexplained crying/screaming ("colic"), ear infections, febrile seizure (later on "juvenile myoclonic epilepsy"), night terrors, ADHD-I, inability to maintain eye contact, zero executive function, dysgraphia - there's more but I think you get the picture. Actually I think that all three of my kids had some degree of injury, they just had so many issues that we kids of the 70's never did.
Im vehemently anti the Covid shot and is starting to work up a head of steam as far as vaccines in general are concerned . Having said that, as far as this poll is concerned....is it not likely that parents with autistic children will be more likely to take the time and do the survey as opposed to parents without autistic kids? Almost like an Amazon review ...if the product you bought is good- no review due to a lack of time. If the product sucks- take a day off from work to write a stinker of a review.
May I recommend the book “turtles all the way down”? Don’t be put off by the title. It has a virtual plethora of documentation and some little known even unknown facts about the vaccine industry and pharmaceutical practices. Personally have read/done some research on this topic, finding this to be perhaps the best source of up to date material to date. Parents, grandparents, everyone would benefit by reading this book. If you don’t have time to read it, it’s available in Audible so you can listen.
Most parents believe that vaccines have no downsides at all and that the diseases they claim to protect against resulted in death more of the time of the time than is true. In comments there are statements like, you don’t have to vaccinate all of your children, just the ones you want to live, or mistaken references to Darwin. What I would like to see is a survey based on hypotheticals-the predicted protection and duration of each vaccine vs current prevalent chronic health conditions that might stem from them. If they could pretend while taking the survey that chronic conditions are a possible outcome. I wonder where the lines are . Is it one percent for autism after mmr or five? What about food allergies, asthma, eczema, ADHD, etc? The mumps vaccine effectiveness deteriorates significantly over time leading to regular outbreaks in populations of fully vaccinated college students. Is that limited protection worth a .5% chance of a lifetime of asthma or eczema?
Interesting that these numbers are so similar to what we found in the Control Group study. In the entirely unvaccinated who ALSO avoided the K-shot at birth, there was ZERO autism. In fact the only two cases of autism were in children who got the K-shot, or the mother was vaccinated during the pregnancy. Literally could not find any other possible sources of autism because it's not present in kids who completely avoided these two exposures (before and after birth).
Amidst all the research and statistics there is still the simplest fact: American children are second to last in Health of all developed countries, and American children, the second sickest children in the world, are THE MOST vaxxinated.
Simple. Fact.
So sad!! We should be one of the healthiest nations in the world!!
Excellent observation!!!
Replication is always worth encouraging, particularly with questions that generate this much disagreement. At the same time, similar findings across audiences with overlapping characteristics do not necessarily eliminate selection bias, confounding or other methodological issues. To me, the most interesting next step would be a genuinely independent, preregistered study using representative participants and verified medical records, with the methodology agreed upon in advance. If the signal is as large as these surveys suggest, rigorous independent research should be capable of detecting it.
I am immensely surprised by the lack of reaction to my polite request for Steve to release his potentially valuable data to public domain. I wonder how he ihis action differs from crooked government blocking us, researchers from de-identified health data that belongs to us, patients. The "pandemic" disaster and crimes committed by those in charge of the health system would never taken place if we were able to publish on time. Our accurate prediction in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32292911/ was based on public data and would have help a lot if it were published expeditiously in a medical journal of high reputation. Evidently, I am able to help Steve (who is better with $$$ than in statistics but has brilliant ideas such as this survey).
1) How did you control for health-seeking behavior in your analysis? Unvaccinated children have been shown to have lower utilization of healthcare than vaccinated (PMID 33478789), and therefore less opportunities to get diagnosed with autism.
2) Longitudinal analysis shows that increased rates of autism are primarily due to increased prevalence of milder forms with less disability. The rate of more severe, disabling forms of autism has remained constant since 2000 (PMID: 41457676). Do you agree with the authors that greater awareness of ASD is the most likely explanation for this increase in prevalence of mild forms?
Canadian dr now bankrupt because of covid heroism. Can we get him more exposure?
https://www.facebook.com/share/14r9CjypBRL/
Hey @Steve Kirsch some time ago pro-vaccine advocate Ron Unz dismissed your mRNA vaccine analysis of Japan because there was no excess death in 2021. This is highly misleading. The large deficit in 2020 masked the increase in 2021, resulting in zero cumulative excess mortality for those two years collectively. In reality, in raw numbers, there were 67,101 more deaths in 2021 than in 2020. In 2022, mortality trends exploded, and there was a raw increase of 196,295 deaths relative to 2020. After adjusting for previous trends, I estimate that there were 472,820 excess deaths from 2021-2024. While the final death toll varies depending upon one’s method, there is no doubt that the mRNA vaccine rollout was associated with an unprecedented health disaster in Japan. Read my analysis here: https://rethinkgovernment.com/the-impact-of-mrna-vaccines-in-japan/it vindicates your conclusions.
I saw the poll but had nothing to add, given the specific question regarding regressive autism. How about another poll for people like me, whose 30 yr old son, as a child, was plagued with all of the symptoms of vaccine injury, from unexplained crying/screaming ("colic"), ear infections, febrile seizure (later on "juvenile myoclonic epilepsy"), night terrors, ADHD-I, inability to maintain eye contact, zero executive function, dysgraphia - there's more but I think you get the picture. Actually I think that all three of my kids had some degree of injury, they just had so many issues that we kids of the 70's never did.
Im vehemently anti the Covid shot and is starting to work up a head of steam as far as vaccines in general are concerned . Having said that, as far as this poll is concerned....is it not likely that parents with autistic children will be more likely to take the time and do the survey as opposed to parents without autistic kids? Almost like an Amazon review ...if the product you bought is good- no review due to a lack of time. If the product sucks- take a day off from work to write a stinker of a review.
May I recommend the book “turtles all the way down”? Don’t be put off by the title. It has a virtual plethora of documentation and some little known even unknown facts about the vaccine industry and pharmaceutical practices. Personally have read/done some research on this topic, finding this to be perhaps the best source of up to date material to date. Parents, grandparents, everyone would benefit by reading this book. If you don’t have time to read it, it’s available in Audible so you can listen.
Most parents believe that vaccines have no downsides at all and that the diseases they claim to protect against resulted in death more of the time of the time than is true. In comments there are statements like, you don’t have to vaccinate all of your children, just the ones you want to live, or mistaken references to Darwin. What I would like to see is a survey based on hypotheticals-the predicted protection and duration of each vaccine vs current prevalent chronic health conditions that might stem from them. If they could pretend while taking the survey that chronic conditions are a possible outcome. I wonder where the lines are . Is it one percent for autism after mmr or five? What about food allergies, asthma, eczema, ADHD, etc? The mumps vaccine effectiveness deteriorates significantly over time leading to regular outbreaks in populations of fully vaccinated college students. Is that limited protection worth a .5% chance of a lifetime of asthma or eczema?
Interesting that these numbers are so similar to what we found in the Control Group study. In the entirely unvaccinated who ALSO avoided the K-shot at birth, there was ZERO autism. In fact the only two cases of autism were in children who got the K-shot, or the mother was vaccinated during the pregnancy. Literally could not find any other possible sources of autism because it's not present in kids who completely avoided these two exposures (before and after birth).
Pharma obviously thinks their poisons, should replace natural immunity. We have every right, to flip pharma off and go about our business of living.
✌🏻
Autism-inducer is new 4th gen. super-persistent organophosphate:
https://rronors.substack.com/p/a-completely-terrible-mess-2ff
https://besacenter.org/persistent-nerve-agents/
https://chemm.hhs.gov/nerveagents/FGA.htm
THANK YOU. :)
The truth is a lion after all. Let the idiots scream. So many of my former friends, unfortunately are screamers.