I think in this case, Steve is being tongue-in-cheek because he KNOWS this is intentional negligence that violates all prior protocols and established practices.
I am just driving the point home that we must avoid using the culprits' exculpatory language, even in jest, as the narrative crafters are busy seeding the "mistakes were made" framing in their limited hangout damage-control pieces.
I think in this case, Steve is being tongue-in-cheek because he KNOWS this is intentional negligence that violates all prior protocols and established practices.
I am just driving the point home that we must avoid using the culprits' exculpatory language, even in jest, as the narrative crafters are busy seeding the "mistakes were made" framing in their limited hangout damage-control pieces.
I think in this case, Steve is being tongue-in-cheek because he KNOWS this is intentional negligence that violates all prior protocols and established practices.
I am just driving the point home that we must avoid using the culprits' exculpatory language, even in jest, as the narrative crafters are busy seeding the "mistakes were made" framing in their limited hangout damage-control pieces.
Perhaps, the missed sarcasm emoji is because there isn't one except for👉 🙄?