As I work extensively in the legal profession, it just struck me whether the term "vaccine injured" cannot be legally expanded to include those whose education and professional lives have been damaged, as a result of their refusal (perfectly legitimate refusal) to take these injections?
As I work extensively in the legal profession, it just struck me whether the term "vaccine injured" cannot be legally expanded to include those whose education and professional lives have been damaged, as a result of their refusal (perfectly legitimate refusal) to take these injections?
As I work extensively in the legal profession, it just struck me whether the term "vaccine injured" cannot be legally expanded to include those whose education and professional lives have been damaged, as a result of their refusal (perfectly legitimate refusal) to take these injections?
Just a thought.
It’s what Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and his legal team are doing