'Don't engage with dissenters' a quote at a public meeting when I was present from Chris Whitty England's Chief Medical Officer. It's standard practice.
However, another possible route if Stanford is important to you, sourced from Wiki via AI
' ...At Stanford, student-run groups like the Stanford Speakers Bureau, along with heavily endowed campus hubs like the Hoover Institution and the Freeman Spogli Institute, bring global leaders, tech titans, and policymakers to campus. However, these are typically structured as standalone lectures or Q&As rather than formal parliamentary debates. ...'
Steve, your finding is similar to Dr. Peter Hotez's response, who declined discussing his take on vaccines b/c the opposition's "lawyers present clever arguments", implying he didn't have time for that sort of discussion. A reply like that sounds like the "pot calling the kettle black".
This no longer surprises me and two things come to mind.
1. Now we know how Max Planck must have felt when he wrote in his autobiography (paraphrasing a bit), "science advances one funeral at a time". Clearly, nothing has changed.
2. Considering the attitude of MDs and government officials vis-a-vis what is now virtually irrefutable knowledge of vaccines, imagine how wrong so many other fields must be. A person has to be insane not to question everything.
Steve, you always win, because you do the math/stats and don't fudge the data. You have helped save millions of lives by exposing the reality, and thus enlightening people to the hazards of the jabs, and the failings of our government, and the BS of the academic world. And let's not forget Big Pharma knowingly deceiving humanity. You deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, assuming it still has some integrity and honor.
What sense does their reaction make? If they sincerely believed in "safe and effective" then why are they not rushing to defend it? If they do not, why are they still clinging to it? It is almost as if admitting they were wrong and stupid is harder than persisting in error. Or maybe they actually do believe that killing one in a million random babies ( in fact the number is way higher) is an acceptable price to pay for herd immunity ( whatever the heck that might be) but they just don't want to say it out loud. Or maybe they are mostly for hire place holders without much intelligence who brown nosed and their way to their positions and know perfectly well they would crumble at your first fact. Anyway, thanks for the offer and thanks for spreading truth to so many.
Im pretty sure that NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya ,also from Stanford , should be able to help. He was also heavily blackballed by not only Stanford but the US medical complex.
Not only industry will make their voice known, to not support it, but the admin at Stanford will oppose it strongly. They are afraid of law suits and spilling the beans.
'Don't engage with dissenters' a quote at a public meeting when I was present from Chris Whitty England's Chief Medical Officer. It's standard practice.
However, another possible route if Stanford is important to you, sourced from Wiki via AI
' ...At Stanford, student-run groups like the Stanford Speakers Bureau, along with heavily endowed campus hubs like the Hoover Institution and the Freeman Spogli Institute, bring global leaders, tech titans, and policymakers to campus. However, these are typically structured as standalone lectures or Q&As rather than formal parliamentary debates. ...'
Steve, your finding is similar to Dr. Peter Hotez's response, who declined discussing his take on vaccines b/c the opposition's "lawyers present clever arguments", implying he didn't have time for that sort of discussion. A reply like that sounds like the "pot calling the kettle black".
It's not only Stanford Medical School. For most people it's way too uncomfortable to look at anything thats going on.
Once again getting I don’t want to see hear or speak about facts!
Unbelievable that this is still going on after 6 years.
The powers to be have well and truly got hold of the narrative unfortunately and it’s like Stockholm syndrome.
Isn't Fauci a mass murderer?
This no longer surprises me and two things come to mind.
1. Now we know how Max Planck must have felt when he wrote in his autobiography (paraphrasing a bit), "science advances one funeral at a time". Clearly, nothing has changed.
2. Considering the attitude of MDs and government officials vis-a-vis what is now virtually irrefutable knowledge of vaccines, imagine how wrong so many other fields must be. A person has to be insane not to question everything.
Stanford used to be one of the worst or best on the smoking issue decades ago. The have officially turned into their enemy. Not one college would promote vaping even though it works best to quit smoking! Invented in 2003ish. This study from 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e-cigarettes-around-95-less-harmful-than-tobacco-estimates-landmark-review
Steve, you always win, because you do the math/stats and don't fudge the data. You have helped save millions of lives by exposing the reality, and thus enlightening people to the hazards of the jabs, and the failings of our government, and the BS of the academic world. And let's not forget Big Pharma knowingly deceiving humanity. You deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, assuming it still has some integrity and honor.
What sense does their reaction make? If they sincerely believed in "safe and effective" then why are they not rushing to defend it? If they do not, why are they still clinging to it? It is almost as if admitting they were wrong and stupid is harder than persisting in error. Or maybe they actually do believe that killing one in a million random babies ( in fact the number is way higher) is an acceptable price to pay for herd immunity ( whatever the heck that might be) but they just don't want to say it out loud. Or maybe they are mostly for hire place holders without much intelligence who brown nosed and their way to their positions and know perfectly well they would crumble at your first fact. Anyway, thanks for the offer and thanks for spreading truth to so many.
Im pretty sure that NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya ,also from Stanford , should be able to help. He was also heavily blackballed by not only Stanford but the US medical complex.
That's because they are scared of the truth, and they're cowards!!
You're a good man for trying. This needs to get exposed, because their ignorance speaks volumes of hiding important information.
Well done Mr. Kirsch.
They should be ashamed calling themselves doctor’s.
They are lobbyists on the take and part of a very evil and greedy machine.
Thank you for all that you do Steve!
Way to go! Attack with flags waving! Victims become victors! They can’t have that! 🤭
Also try Stanford pediatric grand rounds.
Surely there will be takers, unless industry prevents it.
Not only industry will make their voice known, to not support it, but the admin at Stanford will oppose it strongly. They are afraid of law suits and spilling the beans.