Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve Kirsch's avatar

see my other pinned comment.

I've updated the article with two papers from Sin Lee and the "Sin Lee Challenge."

I've also added a debate challenge at the end. They won't debate us. I'm hoping there is someone who is qualified who will.

You REALLY have to be suspicious of their experiment which uses PCR *or* lateral flow assay to confirm their samples instead of Sanger sequencing. Why would they specify samples with an unreliable test? This sets it up from the start for unpredictable results. And how do we know each lab got the same samples?

They don't seem to be interested in meeting to DESIGN their challenge in an open public recorded forum. That's very troubling to me. Why didn't they ASK us to participate in the design of the challenge? And have all the discussion in an open public forum that is recorded?

I added the email I sent to Poornima Wagh. If she responds, I'll let you know what she said.

Expand full comment
Steve Kirsch's avatar

Instead of almost 3,000 comments, why don't you all agree on the 3 people to represent the opposition, and we'll debate those 3 people.

Only 3 people were willing to debate.

They are all listed here: https://airtable.com/shrSEEbWS3aadecYs

All three believe themselves to be highly qualified for a debate.

Shall we use those 3?

I've asked for an initial meeting to ask some clarifying questions, but only one person responded and he can't do it until Friday because he needs to have an audience.

That's how science works.

Expand full comment
2581 more comments...

No posts