Does anyone actually read henjin posts. They are well detailed. He/she has an astounding amount of data; nothing seems to be beyond him/her . Not sure how a single personn has the time and resources. Sets a high bar. Does Steve Kirsch have anyone similar on his team? Steve should respond .
Does anyone actually read henjin posts. They are well detailed. He/she has an astounding amount of data; nothing seems to be beyond him/her . Not sure how a single personn has the time and resources. Sets a high bar. Does Steve Kirsch have anyone similar on his team? Steve should respond .
Thanks for this comment. Today Kirsch or one of his moderators deleted all of my comments from his Substack.
I had spent probably more than a hundred hours writing the comments, and they generally dealt with specific details of Kirsch's posts unlike the vast majority of comments he gets. I have done a huge amount of work for free helping Kirsch correct his errors.
I guess these champions of free speech only believe in free speech as long as it's speech that doesn't challenge their views.
Oh apparently it wasn't just Kirsch, but all of my comments from all Substack blogs got deleted.
I got this notification: "We've removed your publication from public view due to a violation of Substack's Spam & Phishing policy."
Perhaps it was because I sometimes posted links to my website, but often I had to post links to my website because it's not possible to post images or properly formatted code in Substack comments.
If I woud've posted my research at a Substack blog instead of my website, all of my research would now also be gone. It's a great lesson on why not to trust these social media or web 2.0 sites.
This is not acceptable. Your research that I've read should be available and then people can decide. We don't want an echo chamber where dissenting views are silenced.
i talk to him all the time. He likes to pick things apart, but seems to lose the big picture. The czech data is a prime example. I'll point out that it shows the vaccine doesn't work and he'll say "but if you cherry pick this segment..."
Thanks Steve. So are these chats private? I imagine he is supporting Wilf in the debate. If you can counter him, henning, you can counter anyone. I admire both of you for your analytical skills. Ben, at mortalitywatch.com is another clever investigator and is more in your camp.
Does anyone actually read henjin posts. They are well detailed. He/she has an astounding amount of data; nothing seems to be beyond him/her . Not sure how a single personn has the time and resources. Sets a high bar. Does Steve Kirsch have anyone similar on his team? Steve should respond .
Thanks for this comment. Today Kirsch or one of his moderators deleted all of my comments from his Substack.
I had spent probably more than a hundred hours writing the comments, and they generally dealt with specific details of Kirsch's posts unlike the vast majority of comments he gets. I have done a huge amount of work for free helping Kirsch correct his errors.
I guess these champions of free speech only believe in free speech as long as it's speech that doesn't challenge their views.
That's crazy and deeply disturbing. I can still access all your research on your url. Truth should not be censored.
Oh apparently it wasn't just Kirsch, but all of my comments from all Substack blogs got deleted.
I got this notification: "We've removed your publication from public view due to a violation of Substack's Spam & Phishing policy."
Perhaps it was because I sometimes posted links to my website, but often I had to post links to my website because it's not possible to post images or properly formatted code in Substack comments.
If I woud've posted my research at a Substack blog instead of my website, all of my research would now also be gone. It's a great lesson on why not to trust these social media or web 2.0 sites.
This is not acceptable. Your research that I've read should be available and then people can decide. We don't want an echo chamber where dissenting views are silenced.
It's important to look past the headline and get into the detail.
i talk to him all the time. He likes to pick things apart, but seems to lose the big picture. The czech data is a prime example. I'll point out that it shows the vaccine doesn't work and he'll say "but if you cherry pick this segment..."
Thanks Steve. So are these chats private? I imagine he is supporting Wilf in the debate. If you can counter him, henning, you can counter anyone. I admire both of you for your analytical skills. Ben, at mortalitywatch.com is another clever investigator and is more in your camp.