I wonder why is it that a paper like this gets published and then retracted citing all those "concerns that can’t be remedied with a correction". Of course I prefer to have had the opportunity to read it, but why wouldn't the editors notice these "concern issues" BEFORE the paper gets published?
I wonder why is it that a paper like this gets published and then retracted citing all those "concerns that can’t be remedied with a correction". Of course I prefer to have had the opportunity to read it, but why wouldn't the editors notice these "concern issues" BEFORE the paper gets published?
I wonder why is it that a paper like this gets published and then retracted citing all those "concerns that can’t be remedied with a correction". Of course I prefer to have had the opportunity to read it, but why wouldn't the editors notice these "concern issues" BEFORE the paper gets published?