among the 295 current comments below, were somewhere my initial extremely good responses regarding this paper, based on ONE rejection comment of the reviewers, it was the gene therapy point! Actually, I did that without even reading that paper or its abstract carefully!!! Mea culpa! Reading more in detail just the abstract, I realized to…
among the 295 current comments below, were somewhere my initial extremely good responses regarding this paper, based on ONE rejection comment of the reviewers, it was the gene therapy point! Actually, I did that without even reading that paper or its abstract carefully!!! Mea culpa! Reading more in detail just the abstract, I realized to have done a terrible MISTAKE in promoting this paper for a wide distribution among everyone!!! That one sentence from the abstract should have waken me up;
" we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered."
=> so the authors are, like Malone, for the universal GENETIC MODIFICATION OF THE HUMAN GENOME, aren't you, Mr. Kirsch et al.? That's CRIMINAL and you ALL know that from VERY BEGIN!!!! NONE OF YOU, authors, has the right to tell any human being on this planet to erase their God given genetic heritage for the common good of 'safety'! You all know NOTHING ABOUT GENES, equally like the reviewers! This paper, because of being only part truth, while still promoting 'safe mRNA treatments', should be flashed into a toilet and get degraded by the worst worms out there, together with the reviewers comments. SHAME ON YOU!
Your comment makes zero sense. Do you understand what the word, "moratorium" means? It means to prohibit or stop. A "global moratorium", therefore, means to stop or prohibit the modified mRNA products. The authors of the article were being professional, by stating this point with such polite language.
How on Earth are you reaching the conclusion that Malone and Kirsch et al. are the evil beings that you seem to think?
among the 295 current comments below, were somewhere my initial extremely good responses regarding this paper, based on ONE rejection comment of the reviewers, it was the gene therapy point! Actually, I did that without even reading that paper or its abstract carefully!!! Mea culpa! Reading more in detail just the abstract, I realized to have done a terrible MISTAKE in promoting this paper for a wide distribution among everyone!!! That one sentence from the abstract should have waken me up;
" we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered."
=> so the authors are, like Malone, for the universal GENETIC MODIFICATION OF THE HUMAN GENOME, aren't you, Mr. Kirsch et al.? That's CRIMINAL and you ALL know that from VERY BEGIN!!!! NONE OF YOU, authors, has the right to tell any human being on this planet to erase their God given genetic heritage for the common good of 'safety'! You all know NOTHING ABOUT GENES, equally like the reviewers! This paper, because of being only part truth, while still promoting 'safe mRNA treatments', should be flashed into a toilet and get degraded by the worst worms out there, together with the reviewers comments. SHAME ON YOU!
Blind me.
Your comment makes zero sense. Do you understand what the word, "moratorium" means? It means to prohibit or stop. A "global moratorium", therefore, means to stop or prohibit the modified mRNA products. The authors of the article were being professional, by stating this point with such polite language.
How on Earth are you reaching the conclusion that Malone and Kirsch et al. are the evil beings that you seem to think?