20 Comments
User's avatar
Rickyrickardo's avatar

MD/Pharma community is saturated with liars.

They CHEAT!

Volker Birk's avatar

I just learned from Dr. Fauci: Trust the Silence!

Sisyphus's avatar

In the US the Amish are not vaccinated. Healthy children and adults. As a population from young to old these make for a perfect CONTROL GROUP.

Now various groups are sueing them you get vaccinated.

Guess they figured out if to don't get vaccinated you're Healthy.

Note: Logically, if getting a vaccination causes you to NOT get a disease, WHY do the vaccinated and health officials care about the unvaccinated?

WHY? IT'S OBVIOUS 🤬

Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, PhD's avatar

This:

"They have successfully siloed the most important health data in German history, and they have built a bureaucratic wall around it that only allows people who are “safe” for the institution to enter. It is the ultimate form of data suppression. And this is unlikely to ever change."

is fully applicable to each and every country all my 100+ coauthors come from (multiple coauthors may come from the same country). Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), healthcare constitutes about 23.7% of total spending across all levels of government combined.

This is one of the best newsletters posted by Steve. Congratulations.

Deep Dive's avatar

Steve,

In your "Full Comparison Table" there is a statistically significant difference in rates of otitis media (middle ear infection), scarlet fever, and hay fever.

While there were 13,359 vaccinated kids in the KiGGS study (and 94 unvaccinated), I used just 1,000 in the vaccinated for easy computation -- because the difference of proportions was already so high that even enlarging the standard error (by arbitrarily reducing one of the sample sizes) may not be enough to make the data "become" insignificant.

In other words, my findings of significance apply even more to the full group of 13,359 vs. 94, a test which would have a smaller standard error than the one I relied upon.

If significance is so strong that it even passes my "weak" test for it, why did researchers say that KiGGS did not find superiority to remaining unvaccinated?

Are they ignoring even super-obvious significance calculable on a restaurant napkin?

Laurie Newsom's avatar

Most of the people that I have actually had a conversation about vaccines decide that I am wearing a tin hat. So sad

JEFFREY BARFIELD's avatar

STEVE THE BIG PHARMA VACCINATION PROFITS A VARST. I AS YOU KNOW MANY ONLY A JAB. THEY WILL KEEP FIGHTING ON. PLEASED GERMAQNY DID A STUDY THAT UNVAXED DID FAR BETTER BUT COVERD UP. NO SUPRISE TO THOSE WHO KNOW.

I SEE FAUCY CLAIMED HIS 5TH AMMENDMEBT RIGHTS IN CONGRESS. EVEN THOUGH ONE OF THE FEW GLOBALISTS HAD THE JAB/ JABS AND GOT INJURED. ESCAPED DEATH THOUGH.

Barbara Charis's avatar

Unvaccinated children would naturally be healthier than children who have been injected with toxic matter. The vaccine manufacturers claimed that their products caused a strong reaction in the Immune System...which they said indicated their vaccines worked. The Natural Immune System is designed to produce a strong reaction, when any toxic substance is injected. Our government accepted the claims of vaccine manufacturers who were promoting their products. The government did not do any real Third Party objective testing to verify the validity of the claims.

The ignorance of many in the medical profession is profound. Injecting foreign matter into the bloodstream is an action that deserves questioning? Those who promote injections are ignorant of the function of the bloodstream and the lymphatic system. The bloodstream was designed to carry nutrients from natural food to every organ, gland and cell to NOURISH them. This provides energy and good health. Any substances other than nutrients from food do not belong in the bloodstream. Any foreign matter entering the bloodstream would be attacked by our natural Immune System with its white corpuscles from the Lymph Glands or Lymph Nodes. The duty of the white corpuscles is to clean out bacteria, viruses, microscopic food allergens, foreign proteins, dead cells, etc. This is information that was known years ago. Why has it been ignored by the medical profession?

Sharon's avatar

Just reading Dr. Sami Timimi's book "Searching for Normal". Finally, what I've been touting for years - so validating! Worth reading! You can find it in your local library but I will be buying my own copy now - as well as his other book, "Insane Medicine: How the Mental Health Industry Creates Damaging Treatment Traps and How you can Escape Them".

KC & the Sunshine's avatar

Steve, I’ve been pondering various ways to get our knowledge over the massive speed bump / WALL, and into the hands and what’s left of the minds of the masses.

I believe that they may be not so easily led into the truth, (which will set them free), as they were led into the lie that vaccines are our saviors, but I do think they can be led.

One seemingly simple move

would be to get everyone who KNOWS the truth about vaccines to post a hard truth on ALL their social media on the same day— sort of a Vaccine Truth Tsunami— that comes at them from every direction.

People could choose their most moving vax injury story, their fave charts, a pic of their most informative book or resource— whatever.

If we ALL post on ALL formats on the SAME day, wouldn’t that move the needle?

We need to chose a day, then chose hundreds of people with thousands of followers, and give the order. I think it could start with you.

What do you think?

Sharon's avatar
1hEdited

Definitely true! My grandkids are unavaxxed and never get sick - healthier and smarter than other kids. Also, over DX of ADHD, when kids are being kids, is a money grab, and suddenly, many adult women are lately being DX with ADHD. Brave New World - dumb everyone down!

AMV's avatar

Didn’t the Henry Ford study comparing vaxed to unvaxed kids have 18,000 participants? The unvaxed were so much healthier. It’s factual but hidden from parents. But parents need to study the real facts, look at their kids and other kids health and make informed decisions and not just follow pediatricians recommendations since they get payoffs from big pharma.

Steve Kirsch's avatar

The split: 16,511 vaccinated and 1,957 unvaccinated children with records in the system, born between 2000 and 2016. Most coverage rounds this to more than 18,000 children, of whom roughly 1,900 were unvaccinated.

AMV's avatar

Thanks Steve. The results were strikingly positive for unvaxed!

Lori's avatar

RKI must be taking advice from Fauci on how to hide the truth and manipulate studies.

scott carl's avatar

Wow, does anyone have an explanation on the scoliosis delta?

trichard2's avatar

not surprising at all.

settled science or for that matter settled anything demands censorship to compel obedience

therefore unless you ask yourself who benefits from censorship you're lost in space

covid was a masterclass in this exact methodology and sadly 80% of americans to name just one country can't think their way of a box.

TriTorch's avatar

Imagine a world where the biggest threat to health are the nutrition and medical industries. A world where repeat mass injecting aluminium and mercury into the most innocent and vunerable from within hours after birth to 18 years of age is considered perfectly normal and is defended with upmost fury by parents of children with autism who had their lives ruined by the poison vaccines masquerading around as medicine.

To what do we tell our children and grandchildren about such a sick and twisted society?

John Roberts's avatar

This is my answer to your question.

People were more concerned about defending the safe and effective narrative than they were about defending the lives of their children !!!

Sharon's avatar

Hopefully they won't all be zombies by then! :-(