The had only 94 kids on the unvaccinated group so the results were not statistically significant. But in 13/14 comparisons looked at in the study, the unvaccinated kids were much healthier.
"They have successfully siloed the most important health data in German history, and they have built a bureaucratic wall around it that only allows people who are “safe” for the institution to enter. It is the ultimate form of data suppression. And this is unlikely to ever change."
is fully applicable to each and every country all my 100+ coauthors come from (multiple coauthors may come from the same country). Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), healthcare constitutes about 23.7% of total spending across all levels of government combined.
This is one of the best newsletters posted by Steve. Congratulations.
I tried to open and then download the PDF of the Muller/Walach paper via the link from this article (https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7684). At least in my case, the PDF seems to be of the correct article. Perhaps they have fixed the issue “if you try to download the PDF, the journal downloads a completely different paper” in the meantime?
As a person 80 years old and unvaxxed all my life, not only are unvaxxed children healthier, it carries into adulthood. I am literally the healthiest person I know. I don't get sick. I have no allergies...seasonal, food, insect bites like fire ants, bee stings...none of that. I haven't had as much as a cold since the 1980's when I volunteered at my child's kindergarten. You do not get healthy by injecting poison!!!
I am not surprised the researchers don't want to go 'There' ! It would cost them funding. I may cost them their jobs. Unfortunately 15 years is a lot of time and many thousands of children have been denied better health and continue to be denied. That includes my 10 year old grandchild who is most definitely vaccine injured.
This all sounds very familiar of course. The thing that disappointed me the most was the complicity from the German media. One might hope they'd be less corrupt than American media. I mean, what the hell - is the same thing happening over there - that pharmaceutical companies buy lots of advertising so that the media won't bite the hand that feeds them?
The central question that the entire Peds Specialty has yet to answer….Why are you as a group so desiring a head-in- the -sand position about vacs…even the current damaging covid vac. We see time and again the attitude of..” nothing to see here” with blinders on when you should be open to a full discussion of The Science…not the Faucci “Science”. You as a group has not even address the egregious position of covid vac for pregnant conditions even though there was little to zero real studies and lost babies in researched groups. Are you really interested in patient safety?…sure does not look like it.
Hello Steve: I have some questions> First, I cannot find all cause mortality figures from 2015 to 2026 that make sense. Second, do you know the number of deaths from the Covid Vaccines world wide and the US? Either I am bad at research on the Internet or the info is not there. I'd like to share this with friends who think that the Covid vaccine saved lives which we know is false. I would be most grateful.
I believe that the scientific evidence in https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-018-1837-published by a one of the Springer Nature journals is sufficient to initiate a grassroot movement to release our de-identified medical records to public domain when cybercriminals are selling them on Darknet (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darknet) for 30 cents per head (giving $30,000 for one million medicinal records). Alternatively, a petition should be filed with an appropriate Senate Committee (I suggest the one for Fauci case). We, the people, have the right to do with our medical records what serves us better. There would be no "Fauci problem" if Steven, I and approximately 165,300 medical researcher in the USA alone had access to medical records to analyze. I can gladly testify in Senate as an expert witness but my petition can be ignored by your Senate since I am only a Canadian living in Northern Ontario amongst ~100,000 black bears, who hardly knows where America is. (Are you in Africa? :)
@stevekirsch It occurred to me as I was scrolling through Facebook that we could use pets as a vaccination study. My niece was posting how her dog was sick, again, and the dog is less than 2 years old. She got this dog after her other dog died, and that one was always having some issue that she was posting about. The previous dog was not very old, and was a replacement for a middle-aged dog. She is one of those people who does all the medical establishment stuff (masks, social distance, delivered groceries, jabs), and she took her dogs for all their shots.
Anyway, if you could get some data on pet jabs versus unjabbed, maybe that could show something, although I think most municipalities require shots.
Sasha Latypova has written about how putting anything in your veins is not a good idea:
"The second shot, or what do vaccinators and sewer rats have in common?"
There may be some vets who have done studies. There has been scepticism regarding injections and cancer amongst pet owners for some time. Vets tend to be far more innovative in trying out new ideas.
I haven't looked but I suspect racehorses are monitored very closely due to their value. (Another can of worms to be prised open!)
It isn't that no-one is able to do the studies. They all know the truth, but either wilful blindnes is earning them a lot of money or they are captured in some other way or maybe some truly have the warped belief that maiming and killing biological humanity is a good thing. I am probably stating the obvious at this point.
"All by itself, this paper actually destroys the credibility of the argument that ACIP got it wrong. This should be a textbook case used as an example of confirmation bias."
"Between May 2003 and May 2006, Germany’s highest health authority the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) conducted a large scale survey named KIGGS to assess the physical and mental health of children and youths up to the age of 17. The study comprised 17,641 children and gathered an enormous amount of data, including their vaccination status.
Private citizens were able to obtain the raw data for a fee, which enabled Angelika Kögel-Schauz (now Angelika Müller) to make a statistical assessment of the information pertaining to vaccination, a topic she has a long-standing interest in.
The results of her investigation clearly show and confirmed that vaccine-free children are healthier than vaccinated children. A scoliosis, which is an abnormal curvature of the spine, was e.g. found in 5.3% of vaccinated children, while among the vaccine-free children the number of scoliosis cases was zero, which from a statistical viewpoint is a highly significant finding.
Vaccines are neurotoxic, meaning they have a particularly detrimental effect on the nervous system, including the brain. If a nerve or nerves going to the muscles which hold the spine in place are damaged by vaccines, the spine is pulled out of alignment, resulting in an abnormal curvature of the spine (scoliosis).
A collection of images of vaccine-injured children in China shows a severe case of vaccine-related scoliosis. ..."
The govt is full of hubris and they themselves mostly know that. Their greatest hope is that the average citizens never discover it.
It's so unfortunate that many are still so brainwashed to believe the official narrative. All any sane govt has to do is to release raw data of vaccinated vs unvaccinated data for the public to feast on and the charade or antagonism will be all over. Yet no govt in the world, not one, has the liver to release raw data. If nothing else, that should show everyone how satanic and patently evil this people are and their real intentions towards us as humans.
Recently, on NewsMax, Chad Prather gave them ALL a pass, including Fox News etc. by declaring 'they went with what they knew at the time'
ie he keeps the LIE moving along
Reputable healthcare providers were shoved aside to accommodate
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and CONTROL and the ringmaster and monster, Fauci
stepped fully into the spotlight
I was fortunate to smell a rat early and began to research.
At the same time, I was under the care of a reputable healthcare provider who had been networking with others
He outlined the alternative protocol that I began using in early '20
I have yet to have a sniffle while friends died who were fully jabbed
That alternative protocol would have been stopped dead in its tracks
Even today that protocol is dismissed entirely by those who orchestrated and kept it moving
I will NEVER forget how WE were treated not only by those who orchestrated and enabled it, but in many cases, family, friends etc., perhaps the most painful.
Sadly, NONE of them will ever be made accountable in this lifetime, but there will be an accounting
in eternity for what they did to His creation, and even Fauci won't be able to slither out of it
Re: 'they went with what they knew at the time' >>> Even Fauci knew at the time that Hydroxychloroquine worked and that his pet drug Remdesivir wouldn't. No pass for Chad Prather.
If Muller was to take legal action against KiGGS for defamation, would they be forced to disclose the data (if it exists) upon which they relied to assert Muller is a sandwich short of a picnic? Might be an interesting way to call their bluff, if the action could be funded.
So sad that so many places the public turns for help for their loved ones and the good of Society; the manipulators led by personal greed and a false sense of what “respect for one’s work or mankind actually means; and deserves are ignored.
This:
"They have successfully siloed the most important health data in German history, and they have built a bureaucratic wall around it that only allows people who are “safe” for the institution to enter. It is the ultimate form of data suppression. And this is unlikely to ever change."
is fully applicable to each and every country all my 100+ coauthors come from (multiple coauthors may come from the same country). Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), healthcare constitutes about 23.7% of total spending across all levels of government combined.
This is one of the best newsletters posted by Steve. Congratulations.
I tried to open and then download the PDF of the Muller/Walach paper via the link from this article (https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7684). At least in my case, the PDF seems to be of the correct article. Perhaps they have fixed the issue “if you try to download the PDF, the journal downloads a completely different paper” in the meantime?
As a person 80 years old and unvaxxed all my life, not only are unvaxxed children healthier, it carries into adulthood. I am literally the healthiest person I know. I don't get sick. I have no allergies...seasonal, food, insect bites like fire ants, bee stings...none of that. I haven't had as much as a cold since the 1980's when I volunteered at my child's kindergarten. You do not get healthy by injecting poison!!!
I am not surprised the researchers don't want to go 'There' ! It would cost them funding. I may cost them their jobs. Unfortunately 15 years is a lot of time and many thousands of children have been denied better health and continue to be denied. That includes my 10 year old grandchild who is most definitely vaccine injured.
This all sounds very familiar of course. The thing that disappointed me the most was the complicity from the German media. One might hope they'd be less corrupt than American media. I mean, what the hell - is the same thing happening over there - that pharmaceutical companies buy lots of advertising so that the media won't bite the hand that feeds them?
The central question that the entire Peds Specialty has yet to answer….Why are you as a group so desiring a head-in- the -sand position about vacs…even the current damaging covid vac. We see time and again the attitude of..” nothing to see here” with blinders on when you should be open to a full discussion of The Science…not the Faucci “Science”. You as a group has not even address the egregious position of covid vac for pregnant conditions even though there was little to zero real studies and lost babies in researched groups. Are you really interested in patient safety?…sure does not look like it.
Hello Steve: I have some questions> First, I cannot find all cause mortality figures from 2015 to 2026 that make sense. Second, do you know the number of deaths from the Covid Vaccines world wide and the US? Either I am bad at research on the Internet or the info is not there. I'd like to share this with friends who think that the Covid vaccine saved lives which we know is false. I would be most grateful.
I believe that the scientific evidence in https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-018-1837-published by a one of the Springer Nature journals is sufficient to initiate a grassroot movement to release our de-identified medical records to public domain when cybercriminals are selling them on Darknet (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darknet) for 30 cents per head (giving $30,000 for one million medicinal records). Alternatively, a petition should be filed with an appropriate Senate Committee (I suggest the one for Fauci case). We, the people, have the right to do with our medical records what serves us better. There would be no "Fauci problem" if Steven, I and approximately 165,300 medical researcher in the USA alone had access to medical records to analyze. I can gladly testify in Senate as an expert witness but my petition can be ignored by your Senate since I am only a Canadian living in Northern Ontario amongst ~100,000 black bears, who hardly knows where America is. (Are you in Africa? :)
@stevekirsch It occurred to me as I was scrolling through Facebook that we could use pets as a vaccination study. My niece was posting how her dog was sick, again, and the dog is less than 2 years old. She got this dog after her other dog died, and that one was always having some issue that she was posting about. The previous dog was not very old, and was a replacement for a middle-aged dog. She is one of those people who does all the medical establishment stuff (masks, social distance, delivered groceries, jabs), and she took her dogs for all their shots.
Anyway, if you could get some data on pet jabs versus unjabbed, maybe that could show something, although I think most municipalities require shots.
Sasha Latypova has written about how putting anything in your veins is not a good idea:
"The second shot, or what do vaccinators and sewer rats have in common?"
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-second-shot-or-what-do-vaccinators
I don't think they track vaccinations and health outcomes for pets. Am I wrong?
Coincidence that this was posted yesterday by Midwestern Doctor?
"How To Determine The Risks and Benefits of Each Vaccine"
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-to-determine-the-risks-and-benefits
There may be some vets who have done studies. There has been scepticism regarding injections and cancer amongst pet owners for some time. Vets tend to be far more innovative in trying out new ideas.
I haven't looked but I suspect racehorses are monitored very closely due to their value. (Another can of worms to be prised open!)
It isn't that no-one is able to do the studies. They all know the truth, but either wilful blindnes is earning them a lot of money or they are captured in some other way or maybe some truly have the warped belief that maiming and killing biological humanity is a good thing. I am probably stating the obvious at this point.
baffling with all this money there are no histograms showing onset date relative to the date of last vaccination.
Addendum.
Epistemic Asymmetry Drives CIDRAP Study That Claims (After Cherry-Picking) “Strong Evidence” of Efficacy of Birth Dose of Hepatitis B Vaccine
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/epistemic-asymmetry-drives-cidrap
"All by itself, this paper actually destroys the credibility of the argument that ACIP got it wrong. This should be a textbook case used as an example of confirmation bias."
James Lyons-Weiler, PhD - Feb 25, 2026
-
We are lied to - and the tool is called "science"
Brilliant summary !
Let me add. these findings in direkt conjunction:
Vaccinations as a Cause of Spine, Face & Eye Asymmetry
http://www.similia.cc/interesanti/viss-par-vakcinam-vakcinaciju/vaccinations-as-a-cause-of-spine-face-eye-asymmetry/
-
"Between May 2003 and May 2006, Germany’s highest health authority the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) conducted a large scale survey named KIGGS to assess the physical and mental health of children and youths up to the age of 17. The study comprised 17,641 children and gathered an enormous amount of data, including their vaccination status.
Private citizens were able to obtain the raw data for a fee, which enabled Angelika Kögel-Schauz (now Angelika Müller) to make a statistical assessment of the information pertaining to vaccination, a topic she has a long-standing interest in.
The results of her investigation clearly show and confirmed that vaccine-free children are healthier than vaccinated children. A scoliosis, which is an abnormal curvature of the spine, was e.g. found in 5.3% of vaccinated children, while among the vaccine-free children the number of scoliosis cases was zero, which from a statistical viewpoint is a highly significant finding.
Vaccines are neurotoxic, meaning they have a particularly detrimental effect on the nervous system, including the brain. If a nerve or nerves going to the muscles which hold the spine in place are damaged by vaccines, the spine is pulled out of alignment, resulting in an abnormal curvature of the spine (scoliosis).
A collection of images of vaccine-injured children in China shows a severe case of vaccine-related scoliosis. ..."
-
... related too
Kill or cure: Vaccines in China
https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/photo/2013-07/05/content_16735853_19.htm
Updated: 2013-07-05
... and
Vaccinations as a Cause of Spine, Face & Eye Asymmetry
in Developmental disorders, Disablement, Eye problems, Facial asymmetry, Scoliosis
https://web.archive.org/web/20130824205652/https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccination-as-a-cause-of-spine-face-and-eye-asymmetry/
July 23, 2013 - Vaccination Information Network
-
Crimes against Kids.
Since ages.
The govt is full of hubris and they themselves mostly know that. Their greatest hope is that the average citizens never discover it.
It's so unfortunate that many are still so brainwashed to believe the official narrative. All any sane govt has to do is to release raw data of vaccinated vs unvaccinated data for the public to feast on and the charade or antagonism will be all over. Yet no govt in the world, not one, has the liver to release raw data. If nothing else, that should show everyone how satanic and patently evil this people are and their real intentions towards us as humans.
May God help us all.
Recently, on NewsMax, Chad Prather gave them ALL a pass, including Fox News etc. by declaring 'they went with what they knew at the time'
ie he keeps the LIE moving along
Reputable healthcare providers were shoved aside to accommodate
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and CONTROL and the ringmaster and monster, Fauci
stepped fully into the spotlight
I was fortunate to smell a rat early and began to research.
At the same time, I was under the care of a reputable healthcare provider who had been networking with others
He outlined the alternative protocol that I began using in early '20
I have yet to have a sniffle while friends died who were fully jabbed
That alternative protocol would have been stopped dead in its tracks
Even today that protocol is dismissed entirely by those who orchestrated and kept it moving
I will NEVER forget how WE were treated not only by those who orchestrated and enabled it, but in many cases, family, friends etc., perhaps the most painful.
Sadly, NONE of them will ever be made accountable in this lifetime, but there will be an accounting
in eternity for what they did to His creation, and even Fauci won't be able to slither out of it
Re: 'they went with what they knew at the time' >>> Even Fauci knew at the time that Hydroxychloroquine worked and that his pet drug Remdesivir wouldn't. No pass for Chad Prather.
What was the protocol, please?
If Muller was to take legal action against KiGGS for defamation, would they be forced to disclose the data (if it exists) upon which they relied to assert Muller is a sandwich short of a picnic? Might be an interesting way to call their bluff, if the action could be funded.
So sad that so many places the public turns for help for their loved ones and the good of Society; the manipulators led by personal greed and a false sense of what “respect for one’s work or mankind actually means; and deserves are ignored.