Nobody should be vaccinated. Ever. Especially not during pregnancy. And vaccines are also the #1 cause of sexual orientation issues. The numbers are consistent with other published studies.
I forgot to mention the positive and negative controls in my article. I’m adding that section shortly. There were other sections i neglected to add as well. So as of 4/3/24 at 10:47am the missing pieces have been added.
Please never forget that the very same doctors you go to "religiously" (The church of modern medicine, and her high priests in white coats), are the same doctors who gave the shots to save THEIR paycheck!! Yet, most run back to them with a sniffle or a pain. What is the definition of insanity? Yeah, y'all know!!
I respect you & your work & objective goals … FIND THE TRUTH !
I’d love to see what unbiased statistition experts would say after a full analysis of your study and data… ( you are one, I realize). They MAY find it all ok & correct and then agree with your conclusions ?…..
PERHAPS ED DOWD could do it?…. He seems quite objective…. ( having many statistic experts would be best)
However, conclusions about the health of Fully vaccinated (FV) people who have received all the Recommended childhood vaccines is likely difficult to assess….. Their age group could make a difference.!!
Some Points that I have (as an MD out of UCLA) to be questioned/analysed would be:
1. If many of the unvaccinated (UV) population in years past died of the diseases that they were not protected from, how would/could that have affected population selection.
2. This is not a study of measured outcomes of past medical studies, but a look at possibly subjective answers on questionaires by people with variable memories AND opinions… Are they honest and how is their memory recall and accuracy.
3. I plan to read it, but haven’t yet. Just generating thought/discussion now!
4. If the Fully Vaccinated (FV) people had more deaths, how would that affect population selection.
5a. If the opinions of UV people made them more or less likely to participate in your questionaire, how could/would THAT affect population make-up in your study… 5b. Same question for FV people.
6. Education level for the FV vs the UV groups was kikely quite different…. As would be medical care availability….
7. The fact that the incidence & prevalence of the diseases vaccinated for undoubtedly changed (DECREASED) over past decades THIS undoubtedly changed the risk (exposure) of disease for both groups (decreased, i guess). The HERD immunity was changed by past immunization programs.
8. I wonder what a similar questionaire type study would show in areas of the world which had No- Low, vs high Vaccination access over the decades..
The baseline (background) rate for birth defects from all causes OTHER THAN vaccines during pregnancy is 0.29%.
Stale national stats for birth defects in the U.S. population, 50% of which is exposed to vaccines during the pregnancy is OVER 3%. Again, the birth defect rates are stale in incomplete for the U.S. And the % of women who vaccinate during pregnancy has been increasing over the past 20 years. Until about 25 years ago, it was almost unheard of to push vaccines on pregnant women. It was UNDERSTOOD that this was dangerous to the baby. No new research was completed to prove that it was suddenly "safe." One day, they just started pushing it and CLAIMING (falsely) that they knew it was safe.
Although the CDC states that the birth defect rate is 3%, I do not know HOW they could have determined this because I found THIS in the study they cited:
"The United States does not have a national birth defects surveillance system to
estimate birth defect prevalence on a national scale." Source: file:///C:/Users/Stayout/Downloads/cdc_149716_DS1.pdf
Also found in this same paper cited by the CDC to support their "3%" presumption:
"However, most states have birth defects surveillance systems to monitor these conditions. Data from these programs have been used to estimate the prevalence of birth defects in the United States. In 2006, Canfield et al. (2006) published national birth defect prevalence estimates for deliveries from 1999 to 2001. Parker et al. (2010) published estimates for deliveries from 2004 to 2006, and Mai et al.
(2019) published estimates for deliveries from 2010 to 2014."
So at best, we might have a mixture of data running up to 2014. I have to assume the birth defect rates are much higher today than when the numbers were last collected and published. According to the Control Group numbers, the CURRENT birth defect rate amongst babies exposed to vaccines during the pregnancy is at least 6%. And of course, you'll notice the CDC's word-salad about the entire issue in their term "major birth defects." I don't care what the defect is, when it's YOUR child suffering from it, it's MAJOR.
The horror of the covid-vaccine deaths, injuries, cover-up, and deliberate defamation of those who told the truth, has done enormous damage.
That's why it's vital we create a way to sometimes publish and peer-review scientific preprints and research with all authors and editors pseudonymous or anonymous.
The obvious way to do this is by publishing preprint academic papers on the blockchain with all authors, editors, and institutions anonymised or pseudonymised.
This has an extra benefit -- making each pseudonym reversible at the discretion of the person whose identity is protected. If ten years go by, the academic consensus gradually shifts, and Dr FFF (or Researcher 22X or Editor PP1) decides to announce his or her name as being that person on that historic anonymous research paper, the dividend of having turned out to be a dissident who was right, of being prescient when the consensus was suppressing all dissident views, can be reaped.
We can do this by creating an easy-to-use, turn-key software package that turns the text of a normal academic research paper into an equally readable paper with all identifying authors, editors, reviewers, and institutions blockchain-encrypted behind pseudonyms.
We are looking for both blockchain coders, and participating academics in any research field (climate science, epidemiology, health administration, any area where positions have become politicised) to join us in creating an early working version of this text-editing tool.
For centuries in science, ad hominem attacks on the private lives of researchers with politically unpopular views have stifled the search for truth. This must change. We all deserve a way that dissident voices can be protected from persecution & intimidation, and science will benefit from research papers which can be judged only on the strength of the presented results and reasoning, blinded from reputation effects.
We could consider this as "triple-blinding", extending the benefits of double-blind studies to shield established suitable authors and editors from reputation-led bias. Get in touch to help out.
I knew sexual development was impaired among the vaccinated developing children because there are both genders from aborted fetal tissues in the vaccines. I did not know how high the prevalence was for causing gender dysphoria. Many children have developed strangely opposite sex physical characteristics but still remain straight as they grow older.
Nothing short of nuremberg trials will suffice for the sick people behind this.
You couldn't have nailed it on the proverbial head any better. Outstanding work! From our dirty Congress prostituting themselves for big pharma dollars to the entire connection between chronic diseases and vaccines, boom!
Ok…call me a rustic bumpkin BUT it seems to me that if one “takes” something that doesn’t actively complement the human body / anti-disease system (aka one’s immune system) … then one is “playing with fire”. To me this whole mRNA vaccine humbug was a no-brainer. First for it to work required a system that Rube Goldberg would marvel at. There were so many steps and processes that had to work perfectly - it was akin to buying a lotto ticket and expecting to win the jackpot - every time! Assuming everything went right…it was designed to “mess” with one’s genetic makeup. What could go wrong???? Well it turns out we rapidly found out… and the results are currently tragic on the way to catastrophic. Pax
This CAN be fixed. In the option of SCOUTUS during if gun manufactures could be shielded from liability. They concluded that NO LAW could be made to shield a company from law suits. THIS IS HOW to attack the Childhood vaccine injury act and get it shut down and no more protection for big pharma. need someone with the resources to attack it at that angle in federal court. The law would be thrown out and then we could bankrupt the vaccine industery!
Keep in mind if all vaccines were ceased tomorrow, some illnesses would definitely make a comeback, most notably measles & chickenpox. The incidences would skyrocket. The authorities always hammer this fear into the population. But over years, the benefit of no vaccines would become obvious, a generally healthier generation of children.
If gender dysphoria, what you are terming LGBT, was a real mental condition there is no reason to think it would not affect the population equally. Because its only affecting 2% of Republicans, that would lead me to believe it's not a real mental condition but a mind virus for those who follow a particular ideology. When I say mind virus I mean it's not a real clinical mental condition but something that infects the mind. Could be my definition of mind virus is just not correct.
Steve, the WHO, WEF, CDC, NIH and all the rest of the COVID and Clot Shot co-conspirators have the DNC, DOJ, FBI, the federal courts and even the CCP covering for them. It's not just you they are ignoring, it's the rest of humanity. Communists are like that.
Communists have never been voted out of office ...EVER once that have been voted into power.
If the country gets rid of the Democrat Communists in power in the USA (...and it won't be by voting) you may have a shot.
The battle you want to fight, that we want you to win, can only happen after a bigger battle is won.
Thank you, Steve, for conducting these surveys. There is a strong cross-section of the population to compare which improves its validity. I am quite surprised by how many of the survey participants did NOT take the CV vax, albeit also a positive finding. Alternatively, many of us born in the 1960s received standard CDC vaccines. I even remember standing in line at school to receive the smallpox vaccination. An excellent historical analysis of vaccinations in the late 1800s by Alexander Wilder, M.D. is a great read "The fallacy of vaccination" (1899): https://archive.org/details/101229606.nlm.nih.gov/mode/2up?q=the+fallacy+of+vaccination
Again, thank you. Many people around the world are grateful!
The results of "scientific" studies will always support those who are payng for the studies. Otherwise, how did so many bad products get marketed? Third party "unbiased" reports can be paid for, too. Our government looks the other way, when money is in the picture. Vaccine manufacturers claimed... vaccines were responsible for the massive drop in childhood diseases. This was erroneous.... Sanitation and better nutrition were resposnbile. The history of vaccines showed how dangerous they were; causing massive injuries and deaths. Moneyed interests used these so called, "vaccines" to benefit themselves ...using the MODUS OPERANDI OF FEAR to sell them. The human body has 5 layers of skin to prevent the bloodstream from becoming contaminated. A needle can pierce right through and inject matter directly into the bloodstream. This does not create immunity...it causes sickness and deatth. What a scam has been perpetrated on the human race!
I forgot to mention the positive and negative controls in my article. I’m adding that section shortly. There were other sections i neglected to add as well. So as of 4/3/24 at 10:47am the missing pieces have been added.
Please never forget that the very same doctors you go to "religiously" (The church of modern medicine, and her high priests in white coats), are the same doctors who gave the shots to save THEIR paycheck!! Yet, most run back to them with a sniffle or a pain. What is the definition of insanity? Yeah, y'all know!!
Dear Steve
I respect you & your work & objective goals … FIND THE TRUTH !
I’d love to see what unbiased statistition experts would say after a full analysis of your study and data… ( you are one, I realize). They MAY find it all ok & correct and then agree with your conclusions ?…..
PERHAPS ED DOWD could do it?…. He seems quite objective…. ( having many statistic experts would be best)
However, conclusions about the health of Fully vaccinated (FV) people who have received all the Recommended childhood vaccines is likely difficult to assess….. Their age group could make a difference.!!
Some Points that I have (as an MD out of UCLA) to be questioned/analysed would be:
1. If many of the unvaccinated (UV) population in years past died of the diseases that they were not protected from, how would/could that have affected population selection.
2. This is not a study of measured outcomes of past medical studies, but a look at possibly subjective answers on questionaires by people with variable memories AND opinions… Are they honest and how is their memory recall and accuracy.
3. I plan to read it, but haven’t yet. Just generating thought/discussion now!
4. If the Fully Vaccinated (FV) people had more deaths, how would that affect population selection.
5a. If the opinions of UV people made them more or less likely to participate in your questionaire, how could/would THAT affect population make-up in your study… 5b. Same question for FV people.
6. Education level for the FV vs the UV groups was kikely quite different…. As would be medical care availability….
7. The fact that the incidence & prevalence of the diseases vaccinated for undoubtedly changed (DECREASED) over past decades THIS undoubtedly changed the risk (exposure) of disease for both groups (decreased, i guess). The HERD immunity was changed by past immunization programs.
8. I wonder what a similar questionaire type study would show in areas of the world which had No- Low, vs high Vaccination access over the decades..
……. many more issues to discuss!
COMMENTS ?
The baseline (background) rate for birth defects from all causes OTHER THAN vaccines during pregnancy is 0.29%.
Stale national stats for birth defects in the U.S. population, 50% of which is exposed to vaccines during the pregnancy is OVER 3%. Again, the birth defect rates are stale in incomplete for the U.S. And the % of women who vaccinate during pregnancy has been increasing over the past 20 years. Until about 25 years ago, it was almost unheard of to push vaccines on pregnant women. It was UNDERSTOOD that this was dangerous to the baby. No new research was completed to prove that it was suddenly "safe." One day, they just started pushing it and CLAIMING (falsely) that they knew it was safe.
Although the CDC states that the birth defect rate is 3%, I do not know HOW they could have determined this because I found THIS in the study they cited:
"The United States does not have a national birth defects surveillance system to
estimate birth defect prevalence on a national scale." Source: file:///C:/Users/Stayout/Downloads/cdc_149716_DS1.pdf
Also found in this same paper cited by the CDC to support their "3%" presumption:
"However, most states have birth defects surveillance systems to monitor these conditions. Data from these programs have been used to estimate the prevalence of birth defects in the United States. In 2006, Canfield et al. (2006) published national birth defect prevalence estimates for deliveries from 1999 to 2001. Parker et al. (2010) published estimates for deliveries from 2004 to 2006, and Mai et al.
(2019) published estimates for deliveries from 2010 to 2014."
So at best, we might have a mixture of data running up to 2014. I have to assume the birth defect rates are much higher today than when the numbers were last collected and published. According to the Control Group numbers, the CURRENT birth defect rate amongst babies exposed to vaccines during the pregnancy is at least 6%. And of course, you'll notice the CDC's word-salad about the entire issue in their term "major birth defects." I don't care what the defect is, when it's YOUR child suffering from it, it's MAJOR.
The horror of the covid-vaccine deaths, injuries, cover-up, and deliberate defamation of those who told the truth, has done enormous damage.
That's why it's vital we create a way to sometimes publish and peer-review scientific preprints and research with all authors and editors pseudonymous or anonymous.
The obvious way to do this is by publishing preprint academic papers on the blockchain with all authors, editors, and institutions anonymised or pseudonymised.
This has an extra benefit -- making each pseudonym reversible at the discretion of the person whose identity is protected. If ten years go by, the academic consensus gradually shifts, and Dr FFF (or Researcher 22X or Editor PP1) decides to announce his or her name as being that person on that historic anonymous research paper, the dividend of having turned out to be a dissident who was right, of being prescient when the consensus was suppressing all dissident views, can be reaped.
We can do this by creating an easy-to-use, turn-key software package that turns the text of a normal academic research paper into an equally readable paper with all identifying authors, editors, reviewers, and institutions blockchain-encrypted behind pseudonyms.
We are looking for both blockchain coders, and participating academics in any research field (climate science, epidemiology, health administration, any area where positions have become politicised) to join us in creating an early working version of this text-editing tool.
For centuries in science, ad hominem attacks on the private lives of researchers with politically unpopular views have stifled the search for truth. This must change. We all deserve a way that dissident voices can be protected from persecution & intimidation, and science will benefit from research papers which can be judged only on the strength of the presented results and reasoning, blinded from reputation effects.
We could consider this as "triple-blinding", extending the benefits of double-blind studies to shield established suitable authors and editors from reputation-led bias. Get in touch to help out.
Been reading your twitter posts. I hope you have a followup survey for pet owners RSN. Thanks for all your hard work!
I knew sexual development was impaired among the vaccinated developing children because there are both genders from aborted fetal tissues in the vaccines. I did not know how high the prevalence was for causing gender dysphoria. Many children have developed strangely opposite sex physical characteristics but still remain straight as they grow older.
Nothing short of nuremberg trials will suffice for the sick people behind this.
You couldn't have nailed it on the proverbial head any better. Outstanding work! From our dirty Congress prostituting themselves for big pharma dollars to the entire connection between chronic diseases and vaccines, boom!
Ok…call me a rustic bumpkin BUT it seems to me that if one “takes” something that doesn’t actively complement the human body / anti-disease system (aka one’s immune system) … then one is “playing with fire”. To me this whole mRNA vaccine humbug was a no-brainer. First for it to work required a system that Rube Goldberg would marvel at. There were so many steps and processes that had to work perfectly - it was akin to buying a lotto ticket and expecting to win the jackpot - every time! Assuming everything went right…it was designed to “mess” with one’s genetic makeup. What could go wrong???? Well it turns out we rapidly found out… and the results are currently tragic on the way to catastrophic. Pax
This CAN be fixed. In the option of SCOUTUS during if gun manufactures could be shielded from liability. They concluded that NO LAW could be made to shield a company from law suits. THIS IS HOW to attack the Childhood vaccine injury act and get it shut down and no more protection for big pharma. need someone with the resources to attack it at that angle in federal court. The law would be thrown out and then we could bankrupt the vaccine industery!
Oh boy, you are right over the target.
Keep in mind if all vaccines were ceased tomorrow, some illnesses would definitely make a comeback, most notably measles & chickenpox. The incidences would skyrocket. The authorities always hammer this fear into the population. But over years, the benefit of no vaccines would become obvious, a generally healthier generation of children.
If gender dysphoria, what you are terming LGBT, was a real mental condition there is no reason to think it would not affect the population equally. Because its only affecting 2% of Republicans, that would lead me to believe it's not a real mental condition but a mind virus for those who follow a particular ideology. When I say mind virus I mean it's not a real clinical mental condition but something that infects the mind. Could be my definition of mind virus is just not correct.
Steve, the WHO, WEF, CDC, NIH and all the rest of the COVID and Clot Shot co-conspirators have the DNC, DOJ, FBI, the federal courts and even the CCP covering for them. It's not just you they are ignoring, it's the rest of humanity. Communists are like that.
Communists have never been voted out of office ...EVER once that have been voted into power.
If the country gets rid of the Democrat Communists in power in the USA (...and it won't be by voting) you may have a shot.
The battle you want to fight, that we want you to win, can only happen after a bigger battle is won.
Thank you, Steve, for conducting these surveys. There is a strong cross-section of the population to compare which improves its validity. I am quite surprised by how many of the survey participants did NOT take the CV vax, albeit also a positive finding. Alternatively, many of us born in the 1960s received standard CDC vaccines. I even remember standing in line at school to receive the smallpox vaccination. An excellent historical analysis of vaccinations in the late 1800s by Alexander Wilder, M.D. is a great read "The fallacy of vaccination" (1899): https://archive.org/details/101229606.nlm.nih.gov/mode/2up?q=the+fallacy+of+vaccination
Again, thank you. Many people around the world are grateful!
I have three boys aged 18, 15, and 10 who have zero vaccinations. I keep telling them they should be able to sell their sperm at a premium.
The results of "scientific" studies will always support those who are payng for the studies. Otherwise, how did so many bad products get marketed? Third party "unbiased" reports can be paid for, too. Our government looks the other way, when money is in the picture. Vaccine manufacturers claimed... vaccines were responsible for the massive drop in childhood diseases. This was erroneous.... Sanitation and better nutrition were resposnbile. The history of vaccines showed how dangerous they were; causing massive injuries and deaths. Moneyed interests used these so called, "vaccines" to benefit themselves ...using the MODUS OPERANDI OF FEAR to sell them. The human body has 5 layers of skin to prevent the bloodstream from becoming contaminated. A needle can pierce right through and inject matter directly into the bloodstream. This does not create immunity...it causes sickness and deatth. What a scam has been perpetrated on the human race!