According to Rancourt, there was a massive death signal (5X normal) in India only when they did the big vaxx push among the elderly and comorbid over 45. The younger groups fared much better. Similar effect in the US: when you vaxx the fragile, they die at about a 1% rate. The only 2 possible explanations I can offer you then are that ei…
According to Rancourt, there was a massive death signal (5X normal) in India only when they did the big vaxx push among the elderly and comorbid over 45. The younger groups fared much better. Similar effect in the US: when you vaxx the fragile, they die at about a 1% rate. The only 2 possible explanations I can offer you then are that either Sweden and Canada have a lot fewer fragile people, even among the elderly, or the composition of the vaxx was particularly deadly in India. That the elderly would be generally in much better health in Canada and Sweden vs. India and the US is not hard to imagine.
According to Rancourt, there was a massive death signal (5X normal) in India only when they did the big vaxx push among the elderly and comorbid over 45. The younger groups fared much better. Similar effect in the US: when you vaxx the fragile, they die at about a 1% rate. The only 2 possible explanations I can offer you then are that either Sweden and Canada have a lot fewer fragile people, even among the elderly, or the composition of the vaxx was particularly deadly in India. That the elderly would be generally in much better health in Canada and Sweden vs. India and the US is not hard to imagine.