I understand, from both a preponderance of the evidence and evidence beyond a reasonable doubt standard, that sars-cov 2's are bioweapon lab created virus that cause covid-19 and a host of "slow kill" pathology in humans..
I have been using N95's for nearly 50 years along with a full kit of respiratory protection. I chose Real Prevention …
I understand, from both a preponderance of the evidence and evidence beyond a reasonable doubt standard, that sars-cov 2's are bioweapon lab created virus that cause covid-19 and a host of "slow kill" pathology in humans..
I have been using N95's for nearly 50 years along with a full kit of respiratory protection. I chose Real Prevention from day one with early treatment backup. It is now as simple as D3 and first "salting the battlefield", the viral entry route, with home mixed sprays to inhibit viral binding and kill what does leak through or around the N95 and basic eye protection thus greatly reducing potential viral load from "shared air". Then home mixed antiviral nasal flush and eye and mouth wash when back home as a matter of course as washing my hands. Then perhaps a few sprays inhaled, a few mL of vodka nebulized and D3 depending on perceived potential exposure levels
To date NO covid and No vax for me, for which I Am Grateful. I hope you did as well.
A comparison of face mask and respirator filtration test methods
Samy Rengasamy,a Ronald Shaffer,a Brandon Williams,b and Sarah Smitb
"filtration efficiencies of “N95 FFRs” including six N95 FFR models and three surgical N95 FFR models, and three SM models were measured using the NIOSH NaCl aerosol test method, and FDA required particulate filtration efficiency (PFE) and bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) methods, and viral filtration efficiency (VFE) method"
"Results showed that the efficiencies measured by the NIOSH NaCl method for “N95 FFRs” were from 98.15–99.68% compared to 99.74–99.99% for PFE, 99.62–99.9% for BFE, and 99.8–99.9% for VFE methods."
2) the real time mask testing on a real person truth. he puts the mask on ,simply adjusts and tests
"Aaron Collins real time mask testing videos on you tube allow those who chose to see the Truth to see Aaron Collins put on a N95 "real category" mask and watch the reduction in the range above 99% of the inhalation of salt test particles a average of ~64 nanometers in diameter, in the mix of particles those 10 times smaller and twice larger. from wickedpedia "Each SARS-CoV-2 virion is 60–140 nanometres (2.4×10−6–5.5×10−6 in) in diameter;"
3) the real world British hospital system truth showing the effectiveness of real FFP3 masks, worn by real people, in an environment with real cov2 virus.
"Study author Chris Illingworth from the MRC Biostatistics Unit at the University of Cambridge, said, “Before the face masks were upgraded, the majority of infections among healthcare workers on the covid-19 wards were likely because of direct exposure to patients with covid-19. Once FFP3 respirators were introduced, the number of cases attributed to exposure on covid-19 wards dropped dramatically—in fact, our model suggests that FFP3 respirators may have cut ward based infection to zero.”
Please note; " FFP3 respirators may have cut ward based infection to zero.”
"Taken together, these results suggest that the majority of cases among HCWs on green wards were caused by community-acquired infection, whereas cases among HCWs on red wards were caused by both community-acquired infection and direct, ward-based infection from patients with COVID-19, effectively mitigated by the use of FFP3 respirators."
Please note; " effectively mitigated by the use of FFP3 respirators."
also note; these FFP3 are "REAL" respirator grade masks and NOT low grade "bogus" masks. FFP3 is a european standard, it is in the N95 and better category of "real" respirator grade masks.
I understand, from both a preponderance of the evidence and evidence beyond a reasonable doubt standard, that sars-cov 2's are bioweapon lab created virus that cause covid-19 and a host of "slow kill" pathology in humans..
I have been using N95's for nearly 50 years along with a full kit of respiratory protection. I chose Real Prevention from day one with early treatment backup. It is now as simple as D3 and first "salting the battlefield", the viral entry route, with home mixed sprays to inhibit viral binding and kill what does leak through or around the N95 and basic eye protection thus greatly reducing potential viral load from "shared air". Then home mixed antiviral nasal flush and eye and mouth wash when back home as a matter of course as washing my hands. Then perhaps a few sprays inhaled, a few mL of vodka nebulized and D3 depending on perceived potential exposure levels
To date NO covid and No vax for me, for which I Am Grateful. I hope you did as well.
Yours Truely,
James
1) "scientific" N95 Truth
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7157953/
A comparison of face mask and respirator filtration test methods
Samy Rengasamy,a Ronald Shaffer,a Brandon Williams,b and Sarah Smitb
"filtration efficiencies of “N95 FFRs” including six N95 FFR models and three surgical N95 FFR models, and three SM models were measured using the NIOSH NaCl aerosol test method, and FDA required particulate filtration efficiency (PFE) and bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) methods, and viral filtration efficiency (VFE) method"
"Results showed that the efficiencies measured by the NIOSH NaCl method for “N95 FFRs” were from 98.15–99.68% compared to 99.74–99.99% for PFE, 99.62–99.9% for BFE, and 99.8–99.9% for VFE methods."
Please note; "99.8–99.9% for VFE" " viral filtration efficiency (VFE) method"
2) the real time mask testing on a real person truth. he puts the mask on ,simply adjusts and tests
"Aaron Collins real time mask testing videos on you tube allow those who chose to see the Truth to see Aaron Collins put on a N95 "real category" mask and watch the reduction in the range above 99% of the inhalation of salt test particles a average of ~64 nanometers in diameter, in the mix of particles those 10 times smaller and twice larger. from wickedpedia "Each SARS-CoV-2 virion is 60–140 nanometres (2.4×10−6–5.5×10−6 in) in diameter;"
for instance - on a mask I bought at home depot. test # 644 8/8/22 3M 9205+ Aura[Lot A220769] N95, Boat, As Worn, White, Headband, 21,820 particles per cc outside the mask at the start of the test 21,720 particles per cc outside the mask at the end of the test, 70 particles per cc inside the mask for a 99.68% reduction. Aaron Collins youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/@coll0412 Data can be found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M0mdNLpTWEGcluK6hh5LjjcFixwmOG853Ff45d3O-L0/edit?gid=1976839763#gid=1976839763
3) the real world British hospital system truth showing the effectiveness of real FFP3 masks, worn by real people, in an environment with real cov2 virus.
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1663
Covid-19: Upgrading to FFP3 respirators cuts infection risk, research finds
BMJ 2021; 373 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1663 (Published 29 June 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;373:n1663
"Study author Chris Illingworth from the MRC Biostatistics Unit at the University of Cambridge, said, “Before the face masks were upgraded, the majority of infections among healthcare workers on the covid-19 wards were likely because of direct exposure to patients with covid-19. Once FFP3 respirators were introduced, the number of cases attributed to exposure on covid-19 wards dropped dramatically—in fact, our model suggests that FFP3 respirators may have cut ward based infection to zero.”
Please note; " FFP3 respirators may have cut ward based infection to zero.”
https://www.authorea.com/users/421653/articles/527590-ffp3-respirators-protect-healthcare-workers-against-infection-with-sars-cov-2
"Taken together, these results suggest that the majority of cases among HCWs on green wards were caused by community-acquired infection, whereas cases among HCWs on red wards were caused by both community-acquired infection and direct, ward-based infection from patients with COVID-19, effectively mitigated by the use of FFP3 respirators."
Please note; " effectively mitigated by the use of FFP3 respirators."
also note; these FFP3 are "REAL" respirator grade masks and NOT low grade "bogus" masks. FFP3 is a european standard, it is in the N95 and better category of "real" respirator grade masks.
also note: for more REAL TRUTH see here " COMMENTARY: Wear a respirator, not a cloth or surgical mask, to protect against respiratory viruses " at the u of m cidrap page https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/commentary-wear-respirator-not-cloth-or-surgical-mask-protect-against-respiratory-viruses
BASIC PREVENTION can stop pandemics within a willing, informed population - boiled water, salt, baking soda, povidone-iodine solution 10%, Johnson's regular baby shampoo, nasal spray bottles and a NeilMed 8 oz nasal flush bottle, 3M N95's
This.is nonsense and has no basis in reality. Being a hypochondriac is no way to live your life