This stunning brand comparison study shows the Pfizer shots increased your risk of death by at least 36%. Vaccines are NEVER supposed to INCREASE your risk of death.
He surely has the courage needed to be in the position of Surgeon General. Yet he also has immense courage in taking this study on and speaking out!! I am thoroughly impressed by his courage and strength of character!!
Yes many people died from the Covid vaccine but we need more information about what it has done to the people who have lived. There are many people who have health conditions that they would have never had if they didn’t get vaccine.
Grok does not appear to be consistent. Here’s what it “thought” 10 minutes ago.
the question- “In the light of the Levi study should I believe the Pfizer COVID vaccine is safe and effective ?”
It’s summary
### Recommendation
Don’t let the Levi study alone sway your view—it’s an outlier with significant limitations. Consider the broader evidence: RCTs, real-world studies, and global safety monitoring all affirm the Pfizer vaccine’s safety and effectiveness for most people. However, individual health conditions matter. Consult a healthcare provider to weigh personal risks (e.g., history of allergic reactions or heart issues) against benefits, especially given rare side effects like myocarditis in young males.
AI analysis of this and many other articles promoted by SK states - Steve Kirsch’s claims that COVID-19 vaccines have caused millions of deaths, specifically using New Zealand data, are widely debunked by independent experts and fact-checkers. His analysis is classified as misinformation-false or misleading information shared without intent to deceive-because it relies on flawed statistical methods, incorrect assumptions, and misinterpretation of mortality data. There is no credible evidence supporting his assertion that vaccines have killed one in a thousand people; official New Zealand statistics show no such excess mortality after vaccination, and published studies consistently find no increased risk of death from COVID-19 vaccines.
Breakdown of content categories in Kirsch’s claims:
Misinformation: ~100% (his analysis is factually incorrect, but there is no direct evidence he intends to deceive).
Disinformation: ~0% (no proof of deliberate intent to mislead).
Malinformation/Fraudulent: ~0% (not based on true information weaponized for harm or clear fraudulent intent).
Why can a seemingly qualified person spread such claims?
Kirsch’s background in technology, not epidemiology, gives him public credibility but not subject-matter expertise.
Social media and alternative platforms amplify controversial claims rapidly, outpacing fact-checking and regulatory responses.
Regulatory and medical authorities have limited power to police non-professional speech, especially when framed as opinion or “independent analysis”.
In summary, Kirsch’s viral claims about vaccine deaths are almost entirely misinformation, enabled by public misunderstanding of expertise, rapid online dissemination, and regulatory gaps.
Why do you continue to call the EUA shot a vaccine? You spoke then truth in math and statistics. It's time to call the shot what it really is.
They should give several shots to the people involved in making the vaccine.
Ah yes, Mr Pro Virus.
And the rest!!!!
That’s a lot of murders
Vaccines are created with the death of monkeys and fetuses.
When we injected death into us, we get death.
ALL those involved must be put in prison for life, or face the death penalty.
He surely has the courage needed to be in the position of Surgeon General. Yet he also has immense courage in taking this study on and speaking out!! I am thoroughly impressed by his courage and strength of character!!
They need to remove ALL Covid vaccines in the US and world! NOW
very true—-but that is NOT the first BIG FAT lie.——that killed many people…..https://open.substack.com/pub/hrabmv/p/what-makes-us-warm-in-not-the-co2
It’s more, much more than that and soon it will become undeniable.
Yes many people died from the Covid vaccine but we need more information about what it has done to the people who have lived. There are many people who have health conditions that they would have never had if they didn’t get vaccine.
Grok does not appear to be consistent. Here’s what it “thought” 10 minutes ago.
the question- “In the light of the Levi study should I believe the Pfizer COVID vaccine is safe and effective ?”
It’s summary
### Recommendation
Don’t let the Levi study alone sway your view—it’s an outlier with significant limitations. Consider the broader evidence: RCTs, real-world studies, and global safety monitoring all affirm the Pfizer vaccine’s safety and effectiveness for most people. However, individual health conditions matter. Consult a healthcare provider to weigh personal risks (e.g., history of allergic reactions or heart issues) against benefits, especially given rare side effects like myocarditis in young males.
Nice to see a honest appraisal, great study.
Those officials who pushed this drug should be in jail for mass murder.
Safe and effective?
Such hokum it’s hard to know where to even start. So let’s just leave it.
AI analysis of this and many other articles promoted by SK states - Steve Kirsch’s claims that COVID-19 vaccines have caused millions of deaths, specifically using New Zealand data, are widely debunked by independent experts and fact-checkers. His analysis is classified as misinformation-false or misleading information shared without intent to deceive-because it relies on flawed statistical methods, incorrect assumptions, and misinterpretation of mortality data. There is no credible evidence supporting his assertion that vaccines have killed one in a thousand people; official New Zealand statistics show no such excess mortality after vaccination, and published studies consistently find no increased risk of death from COVID-19 vaccines.
Breakdown of content categories in Kirsch’s claims:
Misinformation: ~100% (his analysis is factually incorrect, but there is no direct evidence he intends to deceive).
Disinformation: ~0% (no proof of deliberate intent to mislead).
Malinformation/Fraudulent: ~0% (not based on true information weaponized for harm or clear fraudulent intent).
Why can a seemingly qualified person spread such claims?
Kirsch’s background in technology, not epidemiology, gives him public credibility but not subject-matter expertise.
Social media and alternative platforms amplify controversial claims rapidly, outpacing fact-checking and regulatory responses.
Regulatory and medical authorities have limited power to police non-professional speech, especially when framed as opinion or “independent analysis”.
In summary, Kirsch’s viral claims about vaccine deaths are almost entirely misinformation, enabled by public misunderstanding of expertise, rapid online dissemination, and regulatory gaps.