Near universal RT-PCR testing at the end of the blinded phase of the Moderna trial showed positives 157 placebo vs. 153 vaccine. At best, after ~2-3 months, any "protection" was gone.
The PCR test doesn’t diagnose anything. It only shows that molecules are present. Then the test has to be done at the correct cycle threshold which was over emphasized during Covid. So they used a higher cycle threshold to make it seem Covid was active! It was all a farce. PCR tests first do not show activity at all, just presence of molecules whether active or not. It doesn’t test for disease! It was all a lie! One huge scam!
So, RT-PCR tests are way more sensitive than normal PCR tests, right? But both (especially the RT kind) amplify the DNA (converted from RNA in the test material) to absurd levels. All in all, are these tests a credible diagnostic tool at all? Remember when people were testing kiwi fruit as positive for covid? Or something absurd like that was revealed I recall.
Palantir Tiberius for jab-lot# targeting of their victims. Vertex VX-522 for aerosolized LNPs ($75 million Moderna collab September 2020. CFTR mRNA (among others) which messed up cellular ion channels. They designed hot lots to shed and become self-spreading. They deployed to the surrounding unjabbed people and then claimed positive PCR results *AFTER* the poisons were deployed. So, it's criminal at this point; it always was - since Matt Groening was in the Epstein files it's obvious they always show their hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5A0fhme7ys
Great find Steve. Unfortunately nobody still taking vaccines cares. The faithful vaccines enthusiasts "believe" it's safe and the people here reading this article already know they're worthless and Mrna toxins can kill you 15+ different ways...
I'm still sadly waiting for Kennedy and the covid dissidents at the FDA/CDC to accomplish a single thing. As of today, a pregnant woman can still go get her mrna booster at CVS. Even the stupid food dyes are still in everything.
STEVE WHEN WILL YOU LEARN TO STOP SUPPORTING BIG PHARMA. IT IS NOT A VACCINE BUT A DANGEROUS JAB SIMILAR TO SNAKE VENOM. IN FACT THE JAB CONTAINS SNAKE VENOM ITSELF. TAKEN FROM A MARKEDED PRODUCT. PREHAPS SNAKE VENOM AS AN ANTIDOTE TO A SNAKE BITE.
ON THE INTERNET DR BRIAN ARDIS SHOW.COM AND ON RUMBLE.COM AROUND EARLY APRIL ELIJAH STREAMS STEVE WITH BRYAN ARDIS VIDEO EXPLAINS ALL AND THE PROOF THAT THE JAB CONTAINS DIFFERENT TYPES OF SNAKE VENOM. HE ONLY DEALS FOR BLOOD CLOTS WITH SIMPLE WAYS TO STOP THEM. NOTHING ON CANCER AND OTHER PROBLEMS ON THIS VIDEO. BUT WE KNOW THEM ALL. HE IS A VERY BRAVE AMERICAN DOCTOR.
What was the CT thresholds used to deem "positive testing"?
I was up to my eyeballs in all things COVID testing with fielding questions spanning from "VIPs" to lowly joe public patients regarding "asymptomatic positive tests" at 1-5 CTs within the "acceptable" cuttoff to declare a test positive.
It was such an utter mess and such a horrifically inadequate testing methodology.
For those of us in diagnostic clinical lab medicine, the PCR test made us look like we were "making up test results".
I would suggest the "vaccine" worked as intended - not the way it was advertised. Many have suggested the jab was a kill weapon. The evidence of the mRNA jab is it was intended to change human DNA, and it was VERY successful in doing that - to the detriment of each individual and all humanity in general.
Like many other items in the news, "they" will put off bringing any to justice for the harm they have done. That is the pattern for at least the last 300 years, and it does not show any signs of changing.
We were conned on every aspect of the COVID scam. The PCR tests were also shown to be a scam. If you want to bullshit them with their own lies I guess you can do that. IMO it makes no sense to give this study any credibility.
Great article. It can't be conple without an understanding of #6, where Kerry Mullins got murdered and his tech stolen & #8 ModeRNA's background. SEE the scribed Covid Audit, now in Geneva for peace!
Steve, if you think for one minute that the PCR testing means anything at all then you are sadly mistaken. Secondly, if you believe that there is a ‘Covid virus’ or any other virus on the planet then you are even further mistaken…..
Yeah, there was that study in Germany that showed almost 90% of the positive covid PCR tests were false.
But interesting how even when using the same PCR marketing BS that was used on us at the time, the same PCR marketing BS showed such ineffective trial results after just a few months.
On the matter of PCR marketing BS, who was it that did the PCR testing of the widely dispersed trial participants around the world in the pfizer trials? You might already know but is anyone genuinely surprised all samples were flown to pfizers own lab in New York (I think it was, can't recall now) for testing. Gee, I wonder which lab also had the blood samples from every participant. Yeah, a spectacularly unblinded lab that also did not disclose the PCR cycle counts used. Nothing wrong with anything about that process. It was "gold standard" science. LOL.
I'm not sure they trusted that method. I like to think they are not that incompetent, rather just garden variety sociopaths. Ignorance should be no defence for those pfuckers. If they trusted anything it was that going along with the BS would be their most beneficial career move and they would not be accountable to the public for their deception.
The PCR test doesn’t diagnose anything. It only shows that molecules are present. Then the test has to be done at the correct cycle threshold which was over emphasized during Covid. So they used a higher cycle threshold to make it seem Covid was active! It was all a farce. PCR tests first do not show activity at all, just presence of molecules whether active or not. It doesn’t test for disease! It was all a lie! One huge scam!
So, RT-PCR tests are way more sensitive than normal PCR tests, right? But both (especially the RT kind) amplify the DNA (converted from RNA in the test material) to absurd levels. All in all, are these tests a credible diagnostic tool at all? Remember when people were testing kiwi fruit as positive for covid? Or something absurd like that was revealed I recall.
Here are a few highlights from today's hearing re: the covid "vaccines" chaired by Senator Ron Johnson..https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-hearing-exposes-deliberate?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Palantir Tiberius for jab-lot# targeting of their victims. Vertex VX-522 for aerosolized LNPs ($75 million Moderna collab September 2020. CFTR mRNA (among others) which messed up cellular ion channels. They designed hot lots to shed and become self-spreading. They deployed to the surrounding unjabbed people and then claimed positive PCR results *AFTER* the poisons were deployed. So, it's criminal at this point; it always was - since Matt Groening was in the Epstein files it's obvious they always show their hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5A0fhme7ys
Great find Steve. Unfortunately nobody still taking vaccines cares. The faithful vaccines enthusiasts "believe" it's safe and the people here reading this article already know they're worthless and Mrna toxins can kill you 15+ different ways...
I'm still sadly waiting for Kennedy and the covid dissidents at the FDA/CDC to accomplish a single thing. As of today, a pregnant woman can still go get her mrna booster at CVS. Even the stupid food dyes are still in everything.
STEVE WHEN WILL YOU LEARN TO STOP SUPPORTING BIG PHARMA. IT IS NOT A VACCINE BUT A DANGEROUS JAB SIMILAR TO SNAKE VENOM. IN FACT THE JAB CONTAINS SNAKE VENOM ITSELF. TAKEN FROM A MARKEDED PRODUCT. PREHAPS SNAKE VENOM AS AN ANTIDOTE TO A SNAKE BITE.
ON THE INTERNET DR BRIAN ARDIS SHOW.COM AND ON RUMBLE.COM AROUND EARLY APRIL ELIJAH STREAMS STEVE WITH BRYAN ARDIS VIDEO EXPLAINS ALL AND THE PROOF THAT THE JAB CONTAINS DIFFERENT TYPES OF SNAKE VENOM. HE ONLY DEALS FOR BLOOD CLOTS WITH SIMPLE WAYS TO STOP THEM. NOTHING ON CANCER AND OTHER PROBLEMS ON THIS VIDEO. BUT WE KNOW THEM ALL. HE IS A VERY BRAVE AMERICAN DOCTOR.
What was the CT thresholds used to deem "positive testing"?
I was up to my eyeballs in all things COVID testing with fielding questions spanning from "VIPs" to lowly joe public patients regarding "asymptomatic positive tests" at 1-5 CTs within the "acceptable" cuttoff to declare a test positive.
It was such an utter mess and such a horrifically inadequate testing methodology.
For those of us in diagnostic clinical lab medicine, the PCR test made us look like we were "making up test results".
I would suggest the "vaccine" worked as intended - not the way it was advertised. Many have suggested the jab was a kill weapon. The evidence of the mRNA jab is it was intended to change human DNA, and it was VERY successful in doing that - to the detriment of each individual and all humanity in general.
Like many other items in the news, "they" will put off bringing any to justice for the harm they have done. That is the pattern for at least the last 300 years, and it does not show any signs of changing.
We were conned on every aspect of the COVID scam. The PCR tests were also shown to be a scam. If you want to bullshit them with their own lies I guess you can do that. IMO it makes no sense to give this study any credibility.
“I’m sure health officials…”
LoL 😂
🤣😂🤣 They'll definitely act on it - by suppressing the study results for as long as they can.
Great article. It can't be conple without an understanding of #6, where Kerry Mullins got murdered and his tech stolen & #8 ModeRNA's background. SEE the scribed Covid Audit, now in Geneva for peace!
#6 & #8
https://WHOtoSTOP.org
Steve, if you think for one minute that the PCR testing means anything at all then you are sadly mistaken. Secondly, if you believe that there is a ‘Covid virus’ or any other virus on the planet then you are even further mistaken…..
Yeah, there was that study in Germany that showed almost 90% of the positive covid PCR tests were false.
But interesting how even when using the same PCR marketing BS that was used on us at the time, the same PCR marketing BS showed such ineffective trial results after just a few months.
On the matter of PCR marketing BS, who was it that did the PCR testing of the widely dispersed trial participants around the world in the pfizer trials? You might already know but is anyone genuinely surprised all samples were flown to pfizers own lab in New York (I think it was, can't recall now) for testing. Gee, I wonder which lab also had the blood samples from every participant. Yeah, a spectacularly unblinded lab that also did not disclose the PCR cycle counts used. Nothing wrong with anything about that process. It was "gold standard" science. LOL.
What was q (quantity of replication cycles)? There is no "PCR test" without qPCR!
Steve and Ron - Kudos to the both of you for a polite exchange and a meeting of the minds.
this was the method that HEALTH OFFICIALS trusted. I am pointing out that THEIR method shows no effect.
I'm not sure they trusted that method. I like to think they are not that incompetent, rather just garden variety sociopaths. Ignorance should be no defence for those pfuckers. If they trusted anything it was that going along with the BS would be their most beneficial career move and they would not be accountable to the public for their deception.
Oh, ok, apologies Steve, I switch off as soon as I see someone promoting or highlighting misinformation
Cheers
Kind of shames the meme/cartoon showing the hapless man saying “honey, I found something on the internet that 000’s of scientists missed”
Old news?
where was it noted before???