Large Canadian hospital: before COVID, they'd see 2 cases per year. Now they see 27 in just 6 weeks. That's a 117X increase. But the CDC says it's only "slightly elevated."
I want to check these numbers Steve - I am a physician in Canada. Please tell me-where you got these numbers from
I would be interested in where you got your numbers. I’m currently making and argument against v’ing my son but my ex is using the legal system to push his agenda. My son is 10
My 6 year old Granddaughter received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine. Now 4 months later, my 6 year old Granddaughter has an appointment to see a child cardiologist, and a neurologist. My Granddaughter was a perfectly healthy young girl who was active in soccer and ballet. She now tells her school friends she cannot play any running games she once loved. You see, my Granddaughter's mother, my Daughter, is a RN and 4x vaccinated herself. My Daughter strongly believes in vaccines, and believed the lies her Hospital and medical journals were promoting to the medical staff regarding safety and efficacy. Against my pleas and shared studies of the dangers of covid-19 vaccines and zero risk to my Granddaughter from the C-19 virus, she had my Granddaughter vaccinated with the Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine prior to the start of her first day of First Grade. Before my Granddaughter was recently rushed to the ER due to her passing out while clutching her chest and turning almost blue, my Daughter truly believed the complaints from my Granddaughter over the past 4 months of chest pains were due to anxiety or indigestion. I know how extremely painful it is for her to accept the truth and reality of the extent of evil and deception that tragically damaged the one who is most innocent and most loved of our family.
Nova Scotia has a pretty good Freedom of Information regime. A FOI request is in order!
Renewal, Replenishing, and Reconnecting to Spirit
Ever heard of Zaki Sherif lead investors at the CDC
Steve tomorrow is the one year anniversary of the death of this top CDC doctor. He was the go to guy for hard to solve cases with over 30 years experience. He was basically the Dr House at the CDC. He died at his home on 11/22/21 from falling down some steps. I would love to see an investigation into this death. He either knew too much or was on to someone or something.
Steve, how do we get this in front of Rep Jim Jordan and Sen Johnson?
I wonder what the baseline for child myocarditis was before the first vaccine invention was distributed? Because 1-100,000 seems awfully high to me.
Watch from the 20 minute mark. These were your " dancing covid doctors and nurses"
Nazi camp doctors had nothing on these psychopaths.
Hi Steve you might contact this MD, who wrote this blog: https://drjessmd.com/why-i-willingly-surrendered-my-hard-earned-medical-license-in-california/
Many greetings Kees
Why would you inject anyone with mrna for a virus that if it exists is no more dangerous than influenza and is 99% treatable with generic medicines. I got sick in 2021 but have no idea if it was covid as the test for covid is about has zero sensitivity or specificity. I just took vitamin d, C and zinc. Many of my jabbed family members have been hospitalized with blood clots. I am just fine
Can you or another expert please give me their opinion on this?
From what I understand they are saying that getting COVID-19 is by far more dangerous for heart-related diseases than from a vaccine (Moderna or Pfizer)
They have obliterated the future of young men and women who choose to skip or receive the jab. One gets no education, the other permanent disability or death. It's a game of Russian Roulette. College has never been so expensive.
Thank you Steve. You are a hero!💕
This is just a quick ramble but I figured I would post it here in case it helps anyone else who finds themselves in an argument with someone who wants to throw shade at any number of the studies, such as the one done in Florida, that show the harmful effects of the jab.
Let us consider, hypothetically, that creating a study to support some position (jab good, jab bad, climate change good/bad, smoking makes you strong...whatever) is a crime if the study is intentionally flawed to produce a desired outcome (let's say the crime is "fraud"). Let us also presume that attacking a good study in order to discredit it is also a crime.
Now, what are the elements of a crime: Means, opportunity and motive. Opportunity is easy. Anyone can create or discredit a study anywhere, anytime. So, let's consider means. For a study or debunking, means would be the use of one's credentials (PhD, MD, etc) in an honest or dishonest way, by either misrepresenting the data or falsifying data.
But the big one is motive. What is the motive for someone who creates a study that goes against the jab? Money? No. Not only will the doctors and researchers who create these studies have to spend a bunch of their own time and money to create the studies, they would also not be getting paid by big pharma or government grants (in most cases). Worse yet, they will come under immense public scrutiny by the machinery of big government and big politics, and licensing boards, if they publish these studies. Universities will threaten and fire them in many cases, as well.
Now consider the motive for those bashing the studies. I'll leave that part as your homework assignment. Don't worry, it won't take you long to complete it.