518 Comments

Does this apply to green card applicants? I feel like we’re treated like second class citizens… because we’re not citizens

Expand full comment

I had some laptop issues so I'm catching up on my reading, etc..... I liked your speech. It was easy to understand and to the point. Thank you for your work!

Expand full comment

Hi Steve,

1. I sense many people are no longer sharing deaths of close family outside of close family and certainly not with those considered anti-vax!

2. Very few will discuss the vaccine status of dead people as they simply do not believe the jab caused the death, or the injury.

3. Even many that harbour doubts, still seem to believe it was worth the risk, and/or the injury/death was taking one for the team!

4. I think we really need to start producing spread sheets, graphs etc focused around all cause mortality/injuries and such like. The undeniable data separated/listed by

a) Life years lost

b) Age group

c) Country

d) Injury or Death type

e) etc

5. Facebook seems able now to pick up some screen shots of graphs i share! And then attach a fact check/etc when they deem them counter pharma/government narrative!

* Today Facebook tagged my post and referred me to a Spanish language website which allegedly fact checks the graph suggesting it might not be correct.

https://www.facebook.com/TankMan333PowerFlower/posts/pfbid0365VGhGPwgqbkNWcbLUTqPow8Km5uSH9gDpDgFw7Zjo3CJowyMNtVcjNRMzen8sv3l

Expand full comment

Can anyone give some links to red pill a mother who wants to vaccinate her 5 year old son? Thanks

Expand full comment

Hi Steve,

Unrelated, but currently all corruption is sort of related:

I just saw this: https://ourorganicwellness.com/amish-farmer-faces-250k-fine-jail-time-and-losing-his-sustainable-farm-for-processing-his-own-meat/

Could you help expose what is happening to this Amish farmer?

Also, I didn’t know that my grass fed beef is still treated with products at the USDA meat processing plants!

Expand full comment

I have written several emails describing hypnotic communication which persuades people that vaccines are safe and effective. The prime method of persuasion is to assume that which you wish to have people believe and focus their attention on other matters. For example: you wish to have someone sit down. "Would you prefer to sit in the blue chair or the red chair?" The assumption is "You will be sitting." Here are some other examples.

Here is the link to the offending NYTimes op ed: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/27/opinion/covid-vaccine-kids.html?searchResultPosition=1

The headline is "Did Faulty Assumptions Dash Parents' Hope for an Under-5 Vaccine?"

Already 2 hypnotic assumptions:

1)Parents' hope exists--parents are hoping for an mRNA vaccine for their babies

2)It is faulty to argue that young children shouldn't be vaccinated

Are you feeling helpless anger arguing against these assumptions which no one even questions?

Here are some other symptoms of hypnotic influence. Take the case of post hypnotic suggestions. PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THEY WERE HYPNOTIZED BUT FEEL COMPELLED TO FOLLOW THE POST HYPNOTIC SUGGESTIONS AND THINK IT'S THEIR OWN IDEA EXCEPT THAT THEIR OWN IDEAS CAN BE CHANGED BUT NOT POST HYPNOTIC SUGGESTIONS WHICH ARE OPERATING AT A DEEPER LEVEL

The hypnotist suggests to the subject he will do some crazy thing after he comes out of his trance session but forget that he was given the suggestion. Suppose, for example, he suggests the subject will want to open the windows in 10 minutes (even though it's snowing and there is a blizzard outside.

(10 minutes later) Subject: "I think I'll open the windows"

Group: Are you crazy? What are you doing? It's snowing outside, the snow will come in and ruin the carpet!

Subject: No, but we need the air it's stuffy in here.

Group: Can't you see how crazy that is? Besides it's not even your own idea. You were hypnotized, for God's sake.

Subject: This is totally my own idea. A hypnotist could never persuade me do something against my will. Besides, I would remember if I got persuaded. I think I know my own mind.

Further challenge leads to more denial and hardening of positions (and of the arteries of the vaccinated)

POST HYPNOTIC SUGGESTIONS CAN INDUCE INCONSISTENT BEHAVIOR

It is common for hypnotized people to be able to believe 2 incompatible ideas and have no trouble believing both of them at once. For example, take negative hallucinations. It is common to hypnotize someone and suggest that they will no longer see a chair that is standing empty near them. They will, indeed, fail to recognize the object they have been suggested to believe no longer exists. But they will behave as though it does exist, but continue to say it doesn't.

HYPNOTIST TO SUBJECT: Look around you. Do you see any objects in front of you?

Subject: No, the room is completely empty. I don't see anything.

Hypnotist: Ok, now could you walk up to my desk?

Subject (Walks up to hypnotist taking detour around the chair which isn't supposed to exist) OK So what did you want?

Hypnotist: Did you notice the chair when you avoided it?

Subject: What chair? I don't see any chair. I didn't avoid anything.

Hypnotist asks another member to go to the chair and sit down in it. Now do you see a chair? Is X sitting in a chair?

Subject: I'm sorry, I still don't see any chair. X is squatting. There is nothing else to see.

What the hypnotist has done is split the subject's mind into unconscious compulsions that cannot be addressed because the subject doesn't realize they exist--and conscious rationalizations which will support the compulsions. It's quite clever because the hypnotist can rely on the subject to provide his or her own justifications which will make sense to the subject (even if they don't make sense to anyone else).

It is worthless to argue against the subject's rationalizations, because they exist only to support the deeper compulsion which the subject doesn't realize has been imposed on him. Actually most subjects vehemently deny that they have been influenced because now the influence is inside them.

Expand full comment

In general, I'm not a fan of surveys, but the more data and the more it fits with other forms of data, the more valid it stands as secondary or tertiary evidence.

There are biases to consider, always, but those can also be thought through to some degree.

Expand full comment

Steve, is there any way to find out even though a FOIA if any of these ACIP committee members have received payments from big pharma or govt gifts or such? I mean there was the 35 million NIH stuff recently released. Could we find out similar information exists for these member committees?? That would be the bombshell of the century and May take some serious undercover work but if so then bam! Explains why they keep approving without data to back the approvals.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much for speaking for us. (for myself no doubt) I believe there are strong-willed, good, decent people like yourself Steve, you have impeccable intelligence which is beyond remarkable. Being in nursing for so long...this JUST IS NOT RIGHT! I'll say this again...I REFUSED the vax BECAUSE of my underlying medical conditions...what part of that don't MY DOCTORS understand??? Still ongoing, but I still refuse the vax. I'm so glad I am NOT alone. -Again thank you Steve.

Expand full comment

Death is rarer than injury.

Expand full comment

My congressperson (Washington State) is not listening to me either. But your example inspired me to call him and I shall reply to his quite ignorant email.

Expand full comment

Thanks for all you do!

Expand full comment

one possible reason CDC is not interested in read data, ergo not interested in Mr. Kirsch's testimony about injury, harm, and lack of need to vaccinate kids. We know certain batches of vax turn humans into "conductors" able of receiving 5G signals to their detriment; does the Pfizer technology linked below further shed light on population tracking plan?

Medical Tracking - state of the art: a tablet to track medical compliance; does it also receive signals, e.g. a "transceiver"? A pill without consent which includes a transmitter (microchip) brought to you by Pfizer link here:

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/pfizer-ceo-pill-computer-chip

Expand full comment

I wish I could speak to the CDC. I have been researching vaxis for 23 years using CDC information and data.

Expand full comment

Thanks Steve. Nice presentation ... concise and a technicolor portrayal of the insanity the CDC sells. Shopping malls in NJ have long displayed propaganda posters with little kids and the cute red bandaid ... a ticket to “fun with friends ... off to Gramma’s ... family reunion.” Smiling adult in the background. Makes ya sick. That bandaid is a little participation trophy in the Darwin Awards. Winners will be announced later.

Here is an age stratified question (referring to my age). Did I forget or cease to care? What are the implications of 1. CDC approval versus 2. FDA approval. No one is waiting for either to shoot up everyone. When the “emergency” is over I guess you need option 2 for a mandate. Something like that.

Expand full comment

I'm going to say that it was because of you that there was one "no" vote. That's progress. Again, thanks for not giving up.

Expand full comment