6 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

When someone declares that a kind of evidence that is clearly at least possible (and we know it's more than "possible") CANNOT exist, she isn't even trying to sound reasonable -- and more importantly, knows she doesn't need to, at least not yet.

I'm glad people are going on the record as being this blunt-force beaten. They sounds like swamp preachers who get irritated when someone asks for objective evidence that Jesus really did inhabit someone's ketchup-stain at Bobby Lou's Diner a week ago Wednesday.

Expand full comment

"That evidence cannot exist. All the scientific studies show vaccines do not cause autism."

She should almost be thanked for her beautifully simple and honest answer. This is EXACTLY the way they think. There is not a more direct, crystal-clear illustration of how the pathetic the critical thinking is in the supposed "thinking class". You hear the same nonsense elsewhere as well. All credible scientists agree 100% with the climate change narrative. All credible scientists agree 100% that the Convid shot is safe and effective. Uh....no, that's not true.

Expand full comment

Very Sam Harris-esque of her.

Expand full comment

Right....at least not yet!

Expand full comment

I saw the face of Jesus on my toast, then on a tostada.

Sometimes you don't believe, but sometimes you gotta.

Expand full comment

That kind of toast cannot exist. All our toasting studies show that Jesus doesn’t appear on toast. Good luck to you.

Expand full comment