26 Comments
User's avatar
Helen's avatar

Hey Steve I wondered if you had a chance to see TALKNETs substack article on the Great Disappearance (12% reduction in population), before he/she suddenly closed down their stack two weeks later? I wondered what you thought of it for accuracy, seems to be drawing stats from a wide variety of places. Perhaps you could evaluate it and re-post? I can forward an email of the article, but it has disappeared entirely off of substack. If interested, let me know where to send it.

EmilyTVProducer's avatar

Steve, Please see your email and text from me, Producer Emily

Hoping to get you on a livestream, hosted by a physician...

Neal Tuteur's avatar

Never took the jab. Still ended up with adverse effects. First being pancreatic cancer, stage 3, 3 yrs ago. Whole immune system was compromised. Dealing with 2nd bout now. Got better without standard "care", chemo, radiation, ect. So went back to same protocols, just extending them this time. "Shedding" was pause. Usually NOT a normal reaction in my case.

David Robson's avatar

I was initially sceptical of the spike protein shedding theory, but after frequent respiratory tract infections whenever I travelled by air I investigated the evidence more closely. I discovered that a number of medical papers had been published on the theory and that there was good statistical correlation for a number of ailments experienced by unvaccinated people exposed to multiple close encounters with vaccinated people. Some of the research showed that certain individuals were more prone to this effect than others. Also a number of unvaccinated women have claimed that they experienced menstrual irregularities after sex with vaccinated partners, but that evidence is purely anecdotal at the moment.

STH's avatar

I didn’t believe the menstrual irregularities until it happened to two of my friends. As for shedding, my husband and I both got Covid about a week after two very recently vaccinated 30 yo houseguests. Apparently the young ones mount a bigger immune response. We were the first in our circle of friends and family in late May of 2021, and hadn’t been anywhere to catch it, other than the grocery store. It was the sickest either of us had ever been in our lives (59 & 66) and it was NO flu. I get so offended when people say it was a hoax or just the flu. Flu doesn’t cause micro clots down your shin. Flu doesn’t take away your taste and smell. Flu doesn’t cause POTS for months. And flu doesn’t cause permanent neurological bladder disfunction. Those are just a few of the bizarre symptoms we experienced. I hope I live to see the day Fauci is held accountable.

Helen's avatar

The latter will remain anecdotal, because Pharma isn't going to pay for a study on the neg affects of their V.

JetMechTraveler's avatar

In April 2020, we'll before the poison bioweapon injections came out or we're mandated, I correctly predicted that you would see a 5 year spike in all cancers. The reasoning was simple. People weren't allowed to go to their doctor unless they had the sniffles. Testicle feels a little off, too bad. Armpit lymph node swollen, sucks to be you. Fatigue, muscle aches, horrible migraines, etc....not Covid so we don't care. All those early check opportunities delayed for up to 2 years because of the Fauci Ouchie. I had a coworker finally go to the doctor in early 2022 cause he was feeling off, given 6 weeks to live with Stage 4 lymphoma. He was dead in 2. I have watched that scenario play out a dozen times from friends, family, and coworkers. I said hundreds of times that I have never wanted to be proven wrong about something more than that but it was inevitable. They wanted everyone inside their stuff homes sedentary watching Tiger King and eating Door Dash garbage instead of outside in the fresh air and sun growing their own food. Cancer rates spiking is just one symptom of that.

Anne Ash's avatar

Would like to but live in Australia

Michael Hey's avatar

I'm in Canada. I'm not a part of this survey but I salute you for the work you are doing.

Susan79's avatar

Thank you for listening. Was diagnosed with cancer 5 months after the Covid injection. Diffuse Large B Cell non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. It was only caught because I broke my arm right where the tumor was(right where I received the jab). I’m only here because of a miracle. Please keep on. We appreciate all you do, Susan.

Helen's avatar

Wow, the body speaks so clearly! So glad you discovered it, and so sorry that you have it in the first place. Best wishes for your quick recovery.

Susan79's avatar

Thank you Helen. Doing well now.

Kaycee's avatar

I would fill it out except for all the data it states it will collect abs share with third parties.

Boris A. Doyle's avatar

I understand your Americans think that the entire world revolves around America.

☺️

I'm in Ireland I can't fill your form out.

🤨

Steve Kirsch's avatar

Nope, just a big enough sample size. different vaccines in other countries.

Clark's avatar

Does anyone know where Dr. Robert Malone's input ends and the obviousy AI generated writing of his articles begins?

Tom Vail's avatar

Hi Steve, In my little church of roughly 180 people, we have 10 with relatively recent cancer diagnoses. One who appeared to have a form of turbo-cancer died almost 2 weeks ago. All of them were jabbed. So, I appreciate your work! Keep on, keeping on! Thanks, Tom

Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, PhD's avatar

10 of 180 gives 5.6%. Google search shows: " new cases per \(100,000\) people. Currently, there are over \(18.1\) million cancer survivors, meaning about \(5.4\%\) of the American population is living with a current or past cancer diagnosis." 180 data sample gives slightly more than 90% statistical confidence. So, tragic as it is, it is also statistically "normal" and a crown example how emotions can deviate perception. It is almost certain that the pandemic paranoia contributed to cancer by locking hospitals for some time (in my opinion, crime against humanity) but it is hard to prove that "covid" or vaxx have done it. One of the reasons is long time for cancer development.

Steve Kirsch's avatar

I should do a church survey!!! But the medical practice survey may give me enough info, but this is a fabulous idea.

Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, PhD's avatar

Steve, you have a "heart" but may need a bit of help (google my family name may help you to find me -- also https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32292911/ -- the first in the world accurate prediction of this sh*t :D )

Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, PhD's avatar

68 is the minimum size sample for 95%...

Paul Fischer's avatar

Self-selecting samples are worthless, Steve. That's not data it's fan mail. Cutting corners doesn’t produce valid results; it just highlights your statistical illiteracy.

Steve Kirsch's avatar

Paul, you have my permission to do it properly. Go for it. Let me know what you find.

Paul Fischer's avatar

Steve,

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. You can’t pawn off fixing your methodology to someone else. A self-selected Substack poll is structurally worthless for estimating population-level effects, it’s not a minor flaw, it’s fatal selection bias. No amount of “do it properly” changes that without you including all the raw respondent data, demographics, and how you handled non-response. But you don’t have a sample so non-response cannot be calculated.

I’m happy to help you with statistical problems in detail or show you how proper probability sampling or rigorous bias-adjusted designs work. But I’m not going to do your homework for you just because you issued another ridiculous challenge. Valid data requires valid methods from the start. Fan mail isn’t data.

caroline.kaus@gmail.com's avatar

It would seem you must be living in the US to be peet of this data gathering exercise?

Steve Kirsch's avatar

yes. If you are outside the US, no need because the US data is sufficient.