I sent the following email to the ONS. I received an automatic response that they will get back to me in ten days. In the meantime, if anyone here could read through my analysis of these published statistics and provide some feedback, that would be most helpful. Thanks.
———————————
This email is intended for Sarah Caul, head of Mortality Analysis at the Office of National Statistics. I have found what I believe to be a compelling association between the UK Health Security Agency's published data on vaccine uptake and the ONS data on excess mortality by covid vaccine status. Can you please review my analysis and provide some feedback as to the conclusions? It's a fairly straight-forward comparison and I have been as explicit as possible and have included all the relevant links. This breakdown was originally posted on social media but I plan to write a larger article about the issue although I need some expert feedback before I proceed to ensure that the methodology and assumptions aren't fundamentally flawed in ways that I've overlooked. If you can identify any obvious errors in the reasoning I've applied to this, please be as specific as possible.
Thank you for taking the time to read this and I look forward to a thoughtful response. Sincerely,
Stuart F. Andrews
___________________
This is a fairly complicated post with a LOT of numbers but don't be intimidated. At the core of it, the principle is extremely simple. It's a straight forward compare and contrast between two sets of numbers so I'll do my best to break it down as clearly as possible but the conclusions are utterly compelling so try to hang in there.
The Office of National Statistics in the U.K. published an incredible set of data by revealing "All Cause Mortality" from April 2021 to May 2023 broken down by covid injection status.
You can download the spreadsheet to see it all for yourself.
The reason they did this was to track if there was a clear signal between the rollout of the experimental injections and an increase in all cause mortality. I read a number of pieces on the BBC declaring that there was no such signal although these articles disingenuously obfuscate the data with absurd false comparisons.
But the headline of the following BBC article screams volumes:
EXCESS DEATHS IN 2022 AMONG WORST IN 50 YEARShttps://www.bbc.com/news/health-64209221
In this piece, the BBC dares to ask if there's any evidence of the so-called vaccines being implicated in these deaths to which they conclude, "Figures up to June 2022 looking at deaths from all causes show unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people."
And they link to the same data from the Office of National Statistics that I mentioned above.
Anyway, is it true what they're saying? Do the figures show that the unvaccinated are more likely to die from ALL CAUSES than the vaccinated?
Well, using nothing more than official published data, I can answer that for you with a resounding NO, as I will demonstrate with crystal clear clarity in the following breakdown:
Along with the ONS data on excess mortality by covid vaccination status, the UK Health Security Agency kindly published covid vaccine uptake statistics broken down by age groups.
These two data sets allow us to perform a very simple compare and contrast exercise to help determine if there's an obvious signal for the covid injections being implicated in the crisis of EXCESS DEATHS (a crisis the BBC admits to).
Let's start with the HSA table which is an extremely revealing set of official published statistics. The baseline is the total number of eligible recipients in the U.K. across the entire population. The number they provide is 63.3 million.
But for the purposes of our exercise, I'm only interested in the 18-40 age range, the least likely age group to die from covid but like every other age group, is also experiencing dramatic spikes in excess deaths due to non-covid causes.
According to the data in the table, this cohort breaks down like this:
18-20 - 1.3 million
20-25 - 3.9 million
25-30 - 4.5 million
30-35 - 4.8 million
35-40 - 4.6 million
That's a total of 19.1 million eligible injection recipients.
So looking at the next column over, the numbers of people in this age bracket who received at least one dose in England are...
18-20 - 1.0 million
20-25 - 2.8 million
25-30 - 3.1 million
30-35 - 3.4 million
35-40 - 3.4 million
This is a total number of 13.7 million.
So 13.7 out of 19.1 million equals 71%.
That means that in this age range, 29% of people in England are covid injection "Refuseniks".
But proportionally speaking, if the vaccines aren't implicated in the crisis of excess mortality, we should see the very same proportions of vaxxed versus unvaxxed mirrored in the 18-40 group of excess deaths, meaning that roughly 29% of the deaths should be in the unvaccinated group.
To help clarify this point, in case it's at all confusing, what we're doing by identifying the percentages of jabbed versus the unjabbed in this age group is simply describing the overall makeup of a particular population. If we had 71% of people with brown hair and 29% of people with blonde hair, and then we had a sudden epidemic of excess deaths in the same population, if we noticed that more of the blondes were dying than the browns, and in very high numbers proportionally, then it would be natural to examine the role of hair colour in excess deaths. If hair colour isn't a factor, then we should expect to see that same distribution (more or less) mirrored in the numbers of excess deaths.
So what we need to do next is look at the ONS data which shows excess mortality in this age group due to ALL CAUSES. If the total number of non-vaxxed in the group exceeds 29%, that's a signal that being unvaxxed leads to excess mortality......
BUT....
If the total number of non-vaxxed excess mortality is LESS than 29%, that's a strong signal that the jabs may be implicated in excess mortality.
However the good news is that we actually CAN do this comparison on our own. We have the data right there and a complete breakdown of excess mortality in the 18-39 range from April 2021 to May 2023.
Incidentally, I'm only looking at the data from 2022 onwards because I imagine most people who were gonna get jabbed, were likely jabbed by Jan 2022. Using data from the earlier months is meaningless because there will be many more "not yet injected" people in the unjabbed group so that's going to throw off our percentages.
But let's compare the 29% number above to ALL CAUSE mortality and thankfully, the ONS have made this extremely simple for us. They give us two values: The exact number of Unvaxxed deaths and the exact number of Vaxxed (at least one dose) deaths.
Here's the data (which you can clearly see for yourself in the spreadsheet linked to below):
Jan 2022
ALL CAUSE deaths in the Unvaxxed 2166
ALL CAUSE deaths in the Vaxxed 38457
Feb 2022
Unvaxxed 1493
Vaxxed 32613
Mar 2022
Unvaxxed 1437
Vaxxed 35348
Apr 2022
Unvaxxed 1349
Vaxxed 34885
May 2022
Unvaxxed 1017
Vaxxed 29468
June 2022
Unvaxxed 1436
Vaxxed 35371
July 2022
Unvaxxed 1704
Vaxxed 38422
Aug 2022
Unvaxxed 1499
Vaxxed 36518
Sep 2022
Unvaxxed 1353
Vaxxed 35450
Oct 2022
Unvaxxed 1562
Vaxxed 40940
Nov 2022
Unvaxxed 1481
Vaxxed 38828
Dec 2022
Unvaxxed 2048
Vaxxed 52508
Jan 2023
Unvaxxed 1757
Vaxxed 47274
Feb 2023
Unvaxxed 1384
Vaxxed 36731
Mar 2023
Unvaxxed 1433
Vaxxed 40537
Apr 2023
Unvaxxed 1319
Vaxxed 35984
May 2023
Unvaxxed 1165
Vaxxed 33980
And here's the TOTAL numbers of all the preceding months added together:
Unvaxxed 25603
Vaxxed 643314
So to summarize, 25603 is 3.9 % of 643314.
Now, keep in mind, there will be some slight variance in those percentages because we're not comparing two exact values. The ONS data looks at 18-39 and the HSA data is from 18-40 but this is as about as close as we can get to comparing apples to apples.
Nevertheless, this percentage is MASSIVELY lower than what we'd expect to see if the jabs were harmless. Supposedly, in this age range, 29% of 18-39 year olds are unvaccinated, but according to the government's own data, this unvaccinated group accounts for only 3.9% of excess mortality from All Causes.
This is a clear and obvious signal that something is seriously wrong with these injections, despite what the BBC says.
I'm going to share this breakdown with a number of individuals skilled in the realm of data analysis to hopefully get some perspective on whether or not my conclusions are as reasonable and rational as I believe they are.
In a piece by Patrick Lawrence (written in Consortium News Volume 28, Number 343 - Friday, December 12, 2023.) [consortiumnews.com] he wrote the following:
"In late-imperial phases all cultural institutions must be made to serve the state. Universities, museums, media, the important sectors - we can count all these as cultural entities and note the case wherein they are required to reflect the state's ideology and conform to its dictates."
I think this explains what's happening in the world.
Steve, off topic but of interest. In Jan 2020 the ONS (pre Caul) responded to an FoI request for a summary of deaths listed with Covid as the ONLY cause.
One should also note that at the same time, the MHRA had on record c2k deaths from the jab. They had also publicly stated that they believed that only 1% to 10% of ADRs were reported (including fatalities).
Let's be generous, and say 10%.
So 20k died of the jab. 10k from Covid.
There ya go. The jabs are twice as dangerous as Covid.
It seems that Ms Caul might be guilty of covering up mass-murder?
It's taken 3 years for the evil cabal to be identified as callous and mercenary 'decision makers' who are guilty of MURDER. Italy might be the first to properly investigate such deadly indiscretions? Every country seems to have the same set of ruling monsters that helped promote The New World Order's depopulating scheme.
When will the UK arrest our MURDERING Covid and DEADLY VAX promoters we referred to as 'EXPERTS'?
With every day that we continue to spread the TRUTH about the man-made Covid Scamdemic and the 'Death Jab' (called a vaccine), we are convincing more to question the 'narrative' they've been exposed to since 2020.
We're now seeing some progress and advancement in 'our' Mission in the most encouraging aspect of 'Vax hesitancy', which has taken nearly THREE YEARS to get people to realise that the jab does NOTHING to cure, inhibit, or contain Covid, but in fact, simply increases its likelihood by destroying human natural resistance to nearly ALL illnesses and diseases, thereby creating more long-term 'CUSTOMERS' for Big Pharma to financially exploit or simply destroy.
And still, incredibly, these murdering Vax makers enjoy NO LIABILITY for the millions they have damaged or MURDERED - all in the name of PROFIT!
Many are now realising that Covid was deliberately created to justify an EXPERIMENTAL (Deadly but hugely profitable) injection that permanently harms all that fell for the ongoing scam = "The EXPERIMENTAL Vax is SAFE & EFFECTIVE". It was, in fact, designed to do exactly the opposite!
Many now realise the evil of the 'Elites', members of the New World Order (WEF). The WEF's long-term plan is to DEPOPULATE the PLANET as well as inject every human with dangerous or DEADLY poisons to exterminate, or CONTROL, the masses. Leaving any survivors of these 'EXPERIMENTS' with permanent disabilities and with far more frequently occurring diseases that consequentially require the costly, but useless, medications that generate enormous profits for Big Pharma.
Big Pharma's motto "There's no profit in HEALTHY Humans, so how can we make more of them sick - and for longer"? This is why Big Pharma dictated that they must have ZERO LIABILITY for any ill effects of their poisons!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer and remain ready to fight our oppressors - DIRTY!
Blood clots can impair judgment in several ways. For example, they can block blood flow to the brain, which can lead to problems with thinking and decision-making. They can also cause a stroke, which is a serious medical condition that can lead to permanent brain damage.
Sarah works for the matrix. First rule of the matrix is to protect the matrix.
They first tried this by obfuscating the data. Removing the count of the unvaccinated population, taken from NHS NIMS vaccination records, and used in their ASMR calculations. Instead, replacing it with a hidden figures - based on an ESTIMATE from an incomplete CENSUS in 2021. This ESTIME undercounted the unvaccinated population by -40%
Even with this manipulation however, we were still able to prove that the unvaccinated died at a LOWER rate than all of the vaccinated cohorts (all cause mortality).
Once it was clear the unvaccinated were winning, Sarah pulled the data and it is no longer being published.
Their 'slow roll' has already worked. Most Americans are not interested in discussing anything about COVID rationally. I'm vax injured and when I bring it up people just act weird. If I brought up any other medical issue, I'd not get the weirdness. They have been 'inoculated' by the propaganda to believe any questions about the vax are from 'conspiracy theorists' and crazy Right wingers. Trump does not help as he still thinks Operation Warp Speed is a political positive for him. If the Right does not pick up this issue full bore, we will never get any change in policies moving forward or justice for the past CRIMES. Anthony Fauci should be in jail for murder. Period. Along with many others. Any sane, self-loving people would already have hung him in the public square.
A hugely interesting legal case in Australia today... a woman convicted of killing her 4 babies was today acquitted after spending 20 years in prison. A number of inquiries were held over the years, the latest in 2022. All her children were vaccinated with various childhood jabs. No cause of death has ever been established, just a few theories about certain genes being a possibility.
Was the death of Kathleen Folberg's 4 children caused by their vaccinations? The 2022 inquiry refused to allow that issue to be examined. According to The Guardian article....
Late on Monday’s hearing, a woman who had been in the gallery of the inquiry sought leave and appeared to table evidence including material from the “federal government” that she said linked the Folbigg children’s vaccination history to their deaths. Thomas Bathurst KC, who was conducting the inquiry, denied the application, citing that the children’s medical histories were already forming part of the inquiry.
I heard your interview on The Platform. The smearing and dirty tactics were deplorable. I did a write up on what happened and debunked most of Plunket's arguments.
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: On the video posted on rumble and bitchute there is a running transcript; my transcript differs mainly in very minor instances of punctuation and capitalization.
TEXT ON SCREEN: On the 4th December 2023 UK MP Andrew Bridgen was joined in a special parliamentary meeting by Dr David E. Martin, Dr Robert Malone, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Pierre Kory, Professor Angus Dalgliesh & Steve Kirsch who gave their testimony on the Pandemic & its consequences. Two video presentations by Dr Peter McCullough and Dr Mike Yeadon were due to be shown, but unfortunate technical issues prevented this happening.
[Dr. Yeadon appears, wearing a blue-and-white checked shirt and directly addressing the camera]
DR. MICHAEL YEADON: Hello. My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist and biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously a former vice president at Pfizer, I left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of Respiratory Research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept.
In the 10 years after leaving Pfizer I worked an an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded, led and sold my own biotech, Ziarco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes magazine, I think it was Converting Pfizer Discards into Gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member.
So 3 years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry.
I'm going to tell you that the design of the so-called vaccines was intentionally to harm people. And I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there by luck. It's in there because people chose it to be in there and they intended certain things to flow from their choices.
But just very briefly, you should know, I hope, there has not been a pandemic. Dennis Rancourt's* data shows that the all cause mortality evidence data did not increase at all in the run up to the declaration, fraudulently, by WHO of a pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. An inappropriate, fraudulent PCR test was used to give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't. There were all the normal diseases.
And then what happened was in three different ways people were treated badly, through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation. Briefly, mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants, which led to their deaths. My PhD. was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied life-saving antibiotics and died of bacterial pneumonia.
There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our savior.
Two things. As I say, first, there's no pandemic so you certainly don't need a experimental, rushed medical intervention.
But secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you, it's absolutely impossible to invent tests, clinically evaluate and manufacture and then launch on global scale a complex biomedical product. It's absolutely impossible. It's not just close, it's years wrong. The fastest record price of this was 6 years. And friends of mine who've worked all all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me, the methods development alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is you think was done, I am telling you, it was not the development of a proper medical product.
What I think happened was the advancement of materials that are intentionally toxic. And then they were sketchily advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, with the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died. I don't have time today to explain what I think they're going to do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this.
So, like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic?
Let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself, but when it's infected or detects a cancer, it goes to war? And the answer is, it distinguishes self, things that are meant to be inside you, from non self, from foreign things that are not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self, foreign things.
If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein, from a foreign organism, your body will detect that. Every single cell that takes up that material and expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system.
Now if you think that's advanced immunology, let me put you right. It's in the first chapter. Distinguishing self from non self is one of the foremost lessons of immunology. And every single person involved in the, in the train of delivery of these materials to doctors' hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury.
Then, on top of that, it's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein, you're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood for example, they start to coagulate. It clots. Those materials are biological toxins.
So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins. That means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if should you release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get one or other of several neurological defects.
And of course it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor, and there are many others, but let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated, it's normal to formulate drugs, these are formulated in fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all around your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there.
And that was the entire point of it.
So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes and they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body, including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body.
But here's the thing. Ten years ago, there were papers published, and it was well-established and well-known in the industry, that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers, deposit their cargo preferentially in the ovaries. And that was confirmed with a Pfizer product in an animal experiment performed for the Japanese regulators.**
So, by design, these agents caused an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well-understood biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they
deposited their cargos preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls.
So if you think that's by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind that anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood what they were designing and manufacturing.
So I think, having, having heard what I've just said, there was no pandemic and the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think 5 and a half billion people, with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17 million of whom have died so far, what do you think is happening? And what do you think is your role as an individual is in stopping this crime?
A Pfizer Document the FDA Tried to Hide Shows LNPs from COVID-19 Vaccine Travel Everywhere in the Body: It’s very bad to have LNP in the liver, ovaries, spleen, and more...
I sent the following email to the ONS. I received an automatic response that they will get back to me in ten days. In the meantime, if anyone here could read through my analysis of these published statistics and provide some feedback, that would be most helpful. Thanks.
———————————
This email is intended for Sarah Caul, head of Mortality Analysis at the Office of National Statistics. I have found what I believe to be a compelling association between the UK Health Security Agency's published data on vaccine uptake and the ONS data on excess mortality by covid vaccine status. Can you please review my analysis and provide some feedback as to the conclusions? It's a fairly straight-forward comparison and I have been as explicit as possible and have included all the relevant links. This breakdown was originally posted on social media but I plan to write a larger article about the issue although I need some expert feedback before I proceed to ensure that the methodology and assumptions aren't fundamentally flawed in ways that I've overlooked. If you can identify any obvious errors in the reasoning I've applied to this, please be as specific as possible.
Thank you for taking the time to read this and I look forward to a thoughtful response. Sincerely,
Stuart F. Andrews
___________________
This is a fairly complicated post with a LOT of numbers but don't be intimidated. At the core of it, the principle is extremely simple. It's a straight forward compare and contrast between two sets of numbers so I'll do my best to break it down as clearly as possible but the conclusions are utterly compelling so try to hang in there.
The Office of National Statistics in the U.K. published an incredible set of data by revealing "All Cause Mortality" from April 2021 to May 2023 broken down by covid injection status.
You can download the spreadsheet to see it all for yourself.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland?fbclid=IwAR0ZsbzZMy8fSapisVMOYIGnUU498TnmYI3lendx2dlPEvgIRx0lNRVcQHg
The reason they did this was to track if there was a clear signal between the rollout of the experimental injections and an increase in all cause mortality. I read a number of pieces on the BBC declaring that there was no such signal although these articles disingenuously obfuscate the data with absurd false comparisons.
But the headline of the following BBC article screams volumes:
EXCESS DEATHS IN 2022 AMONG WORST IN 50 YEARShttps://www.bbc.com/news/health-64209221
In this piece, the BBC dares to ask if there's any evidence of the so-called vaccines being implicated in these deaths to which they conclude, "Figures up to June 2022 looking at deaths from all causes show unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people."
And they link to the same data from the Office of National Statistics that I mentioned above.
Anyway, is it true what they're saying? Do the figures show that the unvaccinated are more likely to die from ALL CAUSES than the vaccinated?
Well, using nothing more than official published data, I can answer that for you with a resounding NO, as I will demonstrate with crystal clear clarity in the following breakdown:
Along with the ONS data on excess mortality by covid vaccination status, the UK Health Security Agency kindly published covid vaccine uptake statistics broken down by age groups.
The data we need to focus on is listed in the chart on page 65. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1088929/Weekly_Flu_and_COVID-19_report_w27.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3x067_H0oYjC6q_6E_K8XSOeTPNL1B6DQkrbZhep0LJinUJospNl0hQHI
These two data sets allow us to perform a very simple compare and contrast exercise to help determine if there's an obvious signal for the covid injections being implicated in the crisis of EXCESS DEATHS (a crisis the BBC admits to).
Let's start with the HSA table which is an extremely revealing set of official published statistics. The baseline is the total number of eligible recipients in the U.K. across the entire population. The number they provide is 63.3 million.
But for the purposes of our exercise, I'm only interested in the 18-40 age range, the least likely age group to die from covid but like every other age group, is also experiencing dramatic spikes in excess deaths due to non-covid causes.
According to the data in the table, this cohort breaks down like this:
18-20 - 1.3 million
20-25 - 3.9 million
25-30 - 4.5 million
30-35 - 4.8 million
35-40 - 4.6 million
That's a total of 19.1 million eligible injection recipients.
So looking at the next column over, the numbers of people in this age bracket who received at least one dose in England are...
18-20 - 1.0 million
20-25 - 2.8 million
25-30 - 3.1 million
30-35 - 3.4 million
35-40 - 3.4 million
This is a total number of 13.7 million.
So 13.7 out of 19.1 million equals 71%.
That means that in this age range, 29% of people in England are covid injection "Refuseniks".
But proportionally speaking, if the vaccines aren't implicated in the crisis of excess mortality, we should see the very same proportions of vaxxed versus unvaxxed mirrored in the 18-40 group of excess deaths, meaning that roughly 29% of the deaths should be in the unvaccinated group.
To help clarify this point, in case it's at all confusing, what we're doing by identifying the percentages of jabbed versus the unjabbed in this age group is simply describing the overall makeup of a particular population. If we had 71% of people with brown hair and 29% of people with blonde hair, and then we had a sudden epidemic of excess deaths in the same population, if we noticed that more of the blondes were dying than the browns, and in very high numbers proportionally, then it would be natural to examine the role of hair colour in excess deaths. If hair colour isn't a factor, then we should expect to see that same distribution (more or less) mirrored in the numbers of excess deaths.
So what we need to do next is look at the ONS data which shows excess mortality in this age group due to ALL CAUSES. If the total number of non-vaxxed in the group exceeds 29%, that's a signal that being unvaxxed leads to excess mortality......
BUT....
If the total number of non-vaxxed excess mortality is LESS than 29%, that's a strong signal that the jabs may be implicated in excess mortality.
However the good news is that we actually CAN do this comparison on our own. We have the data right there and a complete breakdown of excess mortality in the 18-39 range from April 2021 to May 2023.
Incidentally, I'm only looking at the data from 2022 onwards because I imagine most people who were gonna get jabbed, were likely jabbed by Jan 2022. Using data from the earlier months is meaningless because there will be many more "not yet injected" people in the unjabbed group so that's going to throw off our percentages.
But let's compare the 29% number above to ALL CAUSE mortality and thankfully, the ONS have made this extremely simple for us. They give us two values: The exact number of Unvaxxed deaths and the exact number of Vaxxed (at least one dose) deaths.
Here's the data (which you can clearly see for yourself in the spreadsheet linked to below):
Jan 2022
ALL CAUSE deaths in the Unvaxxed 2166
ALL CAUSE deaths in the Vaxxed 38457
Feb 2022
Unvaxxed 1493
Vaxxed 32613
Mar 2022
Unvaxxed 1437
Vaxxed 35348
Apr 2022
Unvaxxed 1349
Vaxxed 34885
May 2022
Unvaxxed 1017
Vaxxed 29468
June 2022
Unvaxxed 1436
Vaxxed 35371
July 2022
Unvaxxed 1704
Vaxxed 38422
Aug 2022
Unvaxxed 1499
Vaxxed 36518
Sep 2022
Unvaxxed 1353
Vaxxed 35450
Oct 2022
Unvaxxed 1562
Vaxxed 40940
Nov 2022
Unvaxxed 1481
Vaxxed 38828
Dec 2022
Unvaxxed 2048
Vaxxed 52508
Jan 2023
Unvaxxed 1757
Vaxxed 47274
Feb 2023
Unvaxxed 1384
Vaxxed 36731
Mar 2023
Unvaxxed 1433
Vaxxed 40537
Apr 2023
Unvaxxed 1319
Vaxxed 35984
May 2023
Unvaxxed 1165
Vaxxed 33980
And here's the TOTAL numbers of all the preceding months added together:
Unvaxxed 25603
Vaxxed 643314
So to summarize, 25603 is 3.9 % of 643314.
Now, keep in mind, there will be some slight variance in those percentages because we're not comparing two exact values. The ONS data looks at 18-39 and the HSA data is from 18-40 but this is as about as close as we can get to comparing apples to apples.
Nevertheless, this percentage is MASSIVELY lower than what we'd expect to see if the jabs were harmless. Supposedly, in this age range, 29% of 18-39 year olds are unvaccinated, but according to the government's own data, this unvaccinated group accounts for only 3.9% of excess mortality from All Causes.
This is a clear and obvious signal that something is seriously wrong with these injections, despite what the BBC says.
I'm going to share this breakdown with a number of individuals skilled in the realm of data analysis to hopefully get some perspective on whether or not my conclusions are as reasonable and rational as I believe they are.
In a piece by Patrick Lawrence (written in Consortium News Volume 28, Number 343 - Friday, December 12, 2023.) [consortiumnews.com] he wrote the following:
"In late-imperial phases all cultural institutions must be made to serve the state. Universities, museums, media, the important sectors - we can count all these as cultural entities and note the case wherein they are required to reflect the state's ideology and conform to its dictates."
I think this explains what's happening in the world.
Regards, Andy. 15 Dec. 2023.
Steve, off topic but of interest. In Jan 2020 the ONS (pre Caul) responded to an FoI request for a summary of deaths listed with Covid as the ONLY cause.
Here
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021
<10k in 21 months
1 under age 14
c100 < age 50
Average c10 per diem.
I've asked for an up to date version.
One should also note that at the same time, the MHRA had on record c2k deaths from the jab. They had also publicly stated that they believed that only 1% to 10% of ADRs were reported (including fatalities).
Let's be generous, and say 10%.
So 20k died of the jab. 10k from Covid.
There ya go. The jabs are twice as dangerous as Covid.
It seems that Ms Caul might be guilty of covering up mass-murder?
It's taken 3 years for the evil cabal to be identified as callous and mercenary 'decision makers' who are guilty of MURDER. Italy might be the first to properly investigate such deadly indiscretions? Every country seems to have the same set of ruling monsters that helped promote The New World Order's depopulating scheme.
When will the UK arrest our MURDERING Covid and DEADLY VAX promoters we referred to as 'EXPERTS'?
With every day that we continue to spread the TRUTH about the man-made Covid Scamdemic and the 'Death Jab' (called a vaccine), we are convincing more to question the 'narrative' they've been exposed to since 2020.
We're now seeing some progress and advancement in 'our' Mission in the most encouraging aspect of 'Vax hesitancy', which has taken nearly THREE YEARS to get people to realise that the jab does NOTHING to cure, inhibit, or contain Covid, but in fact, simply increases its likelihood by destroying human natural resistance to nearly ALL illnesses and diseases, thereby creating more long-term 'CUSTOMERS' for Big Pharma to financially exploit or simply destroy.
And still, incredibly, these murdering Vax makers enjoy NO LIABILITY for the millions they have damaged or MURDERED - all in the name of PROFIT!
Many are now realising that Covid was deliberately created to justify an EXPERIMENTAL (Deadly but hugely profitable) injection that permanently harms all that fell for the ongoing scam = "The EXPERIMENTAL Vax is SAFE & EFFECTIVE". It was, in fact, designed to do exactly the opposite!
Many now realise the evil of the 'Elites', members of the New World Order (WEF). The WEF's long-term plan is to DEPOPULATE the PLANET as well as inject every human with dangerous or DEADLY poisons to exterminate, or CONTROL, the masses. Leaving any survivors of these 'EXPERIMENTS' with permanent disabilities and with far more frequently occurring diseases that consequentially require the costly, but useless, medications that generate enormous profits for Big Pharma.
Big Pharma's motto "There's no profit in HEALTHY Humans, so how can we make more of them sick - and for longer"? This is why Big Pharma dictated that they must have ZERO LIABILITY for any ill effects of their poisons!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer and remain ready to fight our oppressors - DIRTY!
Blood Clots and Judgment
Blood clots can impair judgment in several ways. For example, they can block blood flow to the brain, which can lead to problems with thinking and decision-making. They can also cause a stroke, which is a serious medical condition that can lead to permanent brain damage.
Sarah works for the matrix. First rule of the matrix is to protect the matrix.
They first tried this by obfuscating the data. Removing the count of the unvaccinated population, taken from NHS NIMS vaccination records, and used in their ASMR calculations. Instead, replacing it with a hidden figures - based on an ESTIMATE from an incomplete CENSUS in 2021. This ESTIME undercounted the unvaccinated population by -40%
Even with this manipulation however, we were still able to prove that the unvaccinated died at a LOWER rate than all of the vaccinated cohorts (all cause mortality).
Once it was clear the unvaccinated were winning, Sarah pulled the data and it is no longer being published.
Damn! Moderna stock up 8 points today! Time to take my 12 point loss from shorting the stock....
Moderna stock is a compensation system, looks like it doesn’t matter whether or not the products are harmful.
Their 'slow roll' has already worked. Most Americans are not interested in discussing anything about COVID rationally. I'm vax injured and when I bring it up people just act weird. If I brought up any other medical issue, I'd not get the weirdness. They have been 'inoculated' by the propaganda to believe any questions about the vax are from 'conspiracy theorists' and crazy Right wingers. Trump does not help as he still thinks Operation Warp Speed is a political positive for him. If the Right does not pick up this issue full bore, we will never get any change in policies moving forward or justice for the past CRIMES. Anthony Fauci should be in jail for murder. Period. Along with many others. Any sane, self-loving people would already have hung him in the public square.
Steve, your investment advice is killing me
https://www.investors.com/news/technology/moderna-stock-cancer-vaccine-cuts-risk-of-relapse-death/
In your own words:
If we are going to save humanity from extinction, we had better be doing something about these 3 issues:
global warming
overpopulation
the accelerating decline of every single major ecosystem
Are we supposed to trust you?
A hugely interesting legal case in Australia today... a woman convicted of killing her 4 babies was today acquitted after spending 20 years in prison. A number of inquiries were held over the years, the latest in 2022. All her children were vaccinated with various childhood jabs. No cause of death has ever been established, just a few theories about certain genes being a possibility.
Was the death of Kathleen Folberg's 4 children caused by their vaccinations? The 2022 inquiry refused to allow that issue to be examined. According to The Guardian article....
Late on Monday’s hearing, a woman who had been in the gallery of the inquiry sought leave and appeared to table evidence including material from the “federal government” that she said linked the Folbigg children’s vaccination history to their deaths. Thomas Bathurst KC, who was conducting the inquiry, denied the application, citing that the children’s medical histories were already forming part of the inquiry.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/nov/14/rare-gene-shared-by-kathleen-folbigg-and-two-daughters-may-have-contributed-to-deaths-inquiry-hears
In the UK data they put most deaths within 2 weeks for the Nth dose in the N-1 dose group.
I heard your interview on The Platform. The smearing and dirty tactics were deplorable. I did a write up on what happened and debunked most of Plunket's arguments.
https://powerfulsecretknowledge.substack.com/p/voices-in-the-wilderness
Relatedly--
Mike Yeadon: Address to parliamentary special meeting 4/12/2023
Mike Drop "Shareable informative videos from Dr Mike Yeadon’s Telegram channel: https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel"
December 5, 2023
https://rumble.com/v3zq2jj-mike-yeadon-address-to-parliamentary-special-meeting-4122023.html
Backup: https://www.bitchute.com/video/47kqv4ps06r8/
TRANSCRIPT
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: On the video posted on rumble and bitchute there is a running transcript; my transcript differs mainly in very minor instances of punctuation and capitalization.
See also Dr. Yeadon's post: https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/270
00:00
TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Mike Yeadon's address to members of parliament
Telegram channel: Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadsonsolochannel
[cut]
TEXT ON SCREEN: On the 4th December 2023 UK MP Andrew Bridgen was joined in a special parliamentary meeting by Dr David E. Martin, Dr Robert Malone, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Pierre Kory, Professor Angus Dalgliesh & Steve Kirsch who gave their testimony on the Pandemic & its consequences. Two video presentations by Dr Peter McCullough and Dr Mike Yeadon were due to be shown, but unfortunate technical issues prevented this happening.
Telegram channel: Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadsonsolochannel
[cut]
TEXT ON SCREEN: This is the presentation by Dr. Yeadon that parliament was meant to hear
Telegram channel: Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadsonsolochannel
0:18
[Dr. Yeadon appears, wearing a blue-and-white checked shirt and directly addressing the camera]
DR. MICHAEL YEADON: Hello. My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist and biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously a former vice president at Pfizer, I left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of Respiratory Research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept.
In the 10 years after leaving Pfizer I worked an an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded, led and sold my own biotech, Ziarco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes magazine, I think it was Converting Pfizer Discards into Gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member.
So 3 years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry.
I'm going to tell you that the design of the so-called vaccines was intentionally to harm people. And I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there by luck. It's in there because people chose it to be in there and they intended certain things to flow from their choices.
But just very briefly, you should know, I hope, there has not been a pandemic. Dennis Rancourt's* data shows that the all cause mortality evidence data did not increase at all in the run up to the declaration, fraudulently, by WHO of a pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. An inappropriate, fraudulent PCR test was used to give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't. There were all the normal diseases.
And then what happened was in three different ways people were treated badly, through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation. Briefly, mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants, which led to their deaths. My PhD. was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied life-saving antibiotics and died of bacterial pneumonia.
There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our savior.
Two things. As I say, first, there's no pandemic so you certainly don't need a experimental, rushed medical intervention.
But secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you, it's absolutely impossible to invent tests, clinically evaluate and manufacture and then launch on global scale a complex biomedical product. It's absolutely impossible. It's not just close, it's years wrong. The fastest record price of this was 6 years. And friends of mine who've worked all all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me, the methods development alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is you think was done, I am telling you, it was not the development of a proper medical product.
What I think happened was the advancement of materials that are intentionally toxic. And then they were sketchily advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, with the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died. I don't have time today to explain what I think they're going to do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this.
So, like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic?
Let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself, but when it's infected or detects a cancer, it goes to war? And the answer is, it distinguishes self, things that are meant to be inside you, from non self, from foreign things that are not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self, foreign things.
If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein, from a foreign organism, your body will detect that. Every single cell that takes up that material and expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system.
Now if you think that's advanced immunology, let me put you right. It's in the first chapter. Distinguishing self from non self is one of the foremost lessons of immunology. And every single person involved in the, in the train of delivery of these materials to doctors' hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury.
Then, on top of that, it's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein, you're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood for example, they start to coagulate. It clots. Those materials are biological toxins.
So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins. That means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if should you release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get one or other of several neurological defects.
And of course it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor, and there are many others, but let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated, it's normal to formulate drugs, these are formulated in fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all around your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there.
And that was the entire point of it.
So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes and they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body, including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body.
But here's the thing. Ten years ago, there were papers published, and it was well-established and well-known in the industry, that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers, deposit their cargo preferentially in the ovaries. And that was confirmed with a Pfizer product in an animal experiment performed for the Japanese regulators.**
So, by design, these agents caused an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well-understood biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they
deposited their cargos preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls.
So if you think that's by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind that anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood what they were designing and manufacturing.
So I think, having, having heard what I've just said, there was no pandemic and the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think 5 and a half billion people, with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17 million of whom have died so far, what do you think is happening? And what do you think is your role as an individual is in stopping this crime?
Thank you for listening.
9:32
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
* https://denisrancourt.ca/
** See:
"A Moratorium on mRNA 'Vaccines' is Needed: Revisiting the Biodistribution of Lipid Nanoparticles"
Dr. Byram W. Bridle, April 22, 2022
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/a-moratorium-on-mrna-vaccines-is
See also:
A Pfizer Document the FDA Tried to Hide Shows LNPs from COVID-19 Vaccine Travel Everywhere in the Body: It’s very bad to have LNP in the liver, ovaries, spleen, and more...
by Aaron Siri, May 23, 2023
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/a-pfizer-document-the-fda-tried-to
You may be waiting a long time.. [sound of crickets]
They are all in it together. They all know. We all know. They are stalling until they can't stall any further.