At the start of the mRNA injections, the Nurses in the England were tested with the PCR tests. They were the first to get these experiments. The tests showed a rise in viral load (lower PCR count to detect virus). Which indicates that the injections helped the virus. Probably by harming the immune system.
To hide this disaster, the testing of the injected people was reduced / avoided. And months later when only injected people got very sick, they blamed new virus variants.
Sadly, I don't have the link to the report on the nurses. But with all the changes in testing, is certain that institutions were aware of the frauds.
The main problem with the whole argument you presented from top to bottom is the core assumption that the data is any good. The reality is it was all distorted by range of financial incentives and political pressures. The only data that is half-way reliable is the all-cause mortality data and even that if you read the small print from Statistics Canada is that it is preliminary and thus don't draw any conclusions from it. Even my other post fall prey to this.
They reality is there are even holes in the all-cause mortality data that are large and varying by region. Furthermore if the manufacturing quality of the alleged vaccines was as poor and as wide a range of toxicity as some think then that muddies the data even further requiring one to do highly localized epidemiology studies in great detail across the country to sort it out. Rancourt and his team at Correlation Research did the best job so far and show they scale of effort needed but multiply that by 10 or even 100X the effort to really get to the bottom of things.
My simplistic posts talking about the BC Senior's Advocate data of course also assume the data is valid which it is not. The data is good enough to make the point to the officials if we take their data a face value, which they seem to want us to do, then it actually says the opposite of what they represented to us (at least in BC Canada). The problem is they still have that darn fine print saying the data is all preliminary.
Obvious in real time in US. Most localities - outside of NY, maybe NO, did not experience high rates of illness until jab rolllouts- vaccine strain. Same with delta, omicron flares. Most ppl who died died of those vaccine strains and selective effects it makes.. and spreads.
I have found your article very confusing. However I am and was already convinced of your conclusion. I hope other scientists will understand and spread the word!!!
Each new variant had a different R0 and was increasingly contagious, That's why despite vaccination, the spread would spike when the new variants took over despite vaccination.
bingo! known decades ago.. which is why jabbination even vaccination of literally anyone during a partial supposed pamdemic, even a slightly possible one, is stupid and entirely contraindicated. But all the docs and scientists who yelled this were cancelled in our commie censorship society!
I havent been sick in the last 7 years, I disobeyed our terrible lockdowns, refused to wear masks, travelled everywhere and talked to many people in many situations. If it was so contagious how come I never got sick around those who were supposedly able to transmit it from 6 feet. Side note if it was so contagious how come you had to test up your nose to your brain and the testers didnt come down with the C19 daily.
nonsense, in NZ there was no identifier of different strains, despite govt insistence ( they still cannot test for different "strains" here) and yet one month it was the original and as soon as USA announced a new strain, our then govt told everyone a new strain came in via a flight passenger the next day.
Was at my mom's assisted living last night and the nurse said she (the nurse) had Covid last week. I asked "are you vaccinated?" and she said "oh we have to be -fully.!" and I said "how many times have you have Covid?" and she said "five." All I could say was "wow."
The VAST majority of the eradication of those diseases came before vaccines were introduced. The reason why is because of widespread sanitation such as community water and sewage systems. The saviors of mankind from these diseases are the engineers and laborers who designed and installed these systems all over the world. Add to the the year-round availability of nutritious food via shipping. Here's one of many graphs from public health agencies:
The antivax movement is hundreds of years old for a reason: they've always been harmful and deadly. Here's a good explanation of how bad the smallpox vaccine was during its alleged days of "success". Note the many parallels to the covid vaccine.
They have never proven the existence of vaccines. If there is no benefit, it is not a vaccine. Benefit also means net benefit over not getting it on health which means including harms.
They told me I would go to heaven if I took the jab. Since there is very little chance I would get there by myself, it only makes sense that I keep getting boosted until this happens. But I can't miss any recommended boosters or this offer is off the table.
check out and read carefully a petion at citizengo.org..say no to the who,s health dictatorship-reject the pandemic treaty..be aware its a worldwide petition ot can be signed and reshared widely worldwide from ANY country in the world including america...also be aware citizen go are an independent organisation which simply means that no government can interfere with censor Or suppress this petition FACT..it currently has 134,651,signatures..........be sure to also check out the expose
No benefit?? It depends upon who we are talking about. Did humans benefit, no! Did the medical establishment benefit? Hugely! Did the pharmaceutical industry benefit? absolutely! Did certain individuals benefit? Yes! So again, it depends on who we are talking about.
.
My favorite parts of Covid:
#79
Privilege.
Let’s talk about privilege.
As I lean back with my feet up.
With those vaccinated left staring at the soles of my handsome shoes.
A privilege well earned.
.
At the start of the mRNA injections, the Nurses in the England were tested with the PCR tests. They were the first to get these experiments. The tests showed a rise in viral load (lower PCR count to detect virus). Which indicates that the injections helped the virus. Probably by harming the immune system.
To hide this disaster, the testing of the injected people was reduced / avoided. And months later when only injected people got very sick, they blamed new virus variants.
Sadly, I don't have the link to the report on the nurses. But with all the changes in testing, is certain that institutions were aware of the frauds.
The main problem with the whole argument you presented from top to bottom is the core assumption that the data is any good. The reality is it was all distorted by range of financial incentives and political pressures. The only data that is half-way reliable is the all-cause mortality data and even that if you read the small print from Statistics Canada is that it is preliminary and thus don't draw any conclusions from it. Even my other post fall prey to this.
They reality is there are even holes in the all-cause mortality data that are large and varying by region. Furthermore if the manufacturing quality of the alleged vaccines was as poor and as wide a range of toxicity as some think then that muddies the data even further requiring one to do highly localized epidemiology studies in great detail across the country to sort it out. Rancourt and his team at Correlation Research did the best job so far and show they scale of effort needed but multiply that by 10 or even 100X the effort to really get to the bottom of things.
My simplistic posts talking about the BC Senior's Advocate data of course also assume the data is valid which it is not. The data is good enough to make the point to the officials if we take their data a face value, which they seem to want us to do, then it actually says the opposite of what they represented to us (at least in BC Canada). The problem is they still have that darn fine print saying the data is all preliminary.
Obvious in real time in US. Most localities - outside of NY, maybe NO, did not experience high rates of illness until jab rolllouts- vaccine strain. Same with delta, omicron flares. Most ppl who died died of those vaccine strains and selective effects it makes.. and spreads.
Why are you STILL presenting evidence that the jabs are no good? We got the memo years ago...
A million dollars is a pretty good incentive.
I have found your article very confusing. However I am and was already convinced of your conclusion. I hope other scientists will understand and spread the word!!!
https://substack.com/profile/306439052-a-citizen/note/c-92791239
I suspect the government is currently creating the bird flu scamdemic and will be vaccinating our food supply soon. Sound crazy?
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/national-wildlife-programs/rabies/vaccine
Each new variant had a different R0 and was increasingly contagious, That's why despite vaccination, the spread would spike when the new variants took over despite vaccination.
bingo! known decades ago.. which is why jabbination even vaccination of literally anyone during a partial supposed pamdemic, even a slightly possible one, is stupid and entirely contraindicated. But all the docs and scientists who yelled this were cancelled in our commie censorship society!
I havent been sick in the last 7 years, I disobeyed our terrible lockdowns, refused to wear masks, travelled everywhere and talked to many people in many situations. If it was so contagious how come I never got sick around those who were supposedly able to transmit it from 6 feet. Side note if it was so contagious how come you had to test up your nose to your brain and the testers didnt come down with the C19 daily.
nonsense, in NZ there was no identifier of different strains, despite govt insistence ( they still cannot test for different "strains" here) and yet one month it was the original and as soon as USA announced a new strain, our then govt told everyone a new strain came in via a flight passenger the next day.
Was at my mom's assisted living last night and the nurse said she (the nurse) had Covid last week. I asked "are you vaccinated?" and she said "oh we have to be -fully.!" and I said "how many times have you have Covid?" and she said "five." All I could say was "wow."
Gee, I wonder why she had it five times?? (Sarcasm)
The medical freedom movement even used the bogus data to claim that the vaccines had periods of benefit that waned over time.
I never believed it.
If the injections have no benefit then they aren't vaccines.
Show us the data that PROVE vaccines have benefit.
I am not pro-vaccine at all, but diseases did wiped out large number of people in past history.
Human population had gone straight-up since 1900s.
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/population-boom-charting-nearly-8-billion-people/
The VAST majority of the eradication of those diseases came before vaccines were introduced. The reason why is because of widespread sanitation such as community water and sewage systems. The saviors of mankind from these diseases are the engineers and laborers who designed and installed these systems all over the world. Add to the the year-round availability of nutritious food via shipping. Here's one of many graphs from public health agencies:
https://drsuzanne.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/us-deaths-1900-19651.jpg
This is the article that the graph is from:
https://drsuzanne.net/dr-suzanne-humphries-vaccines-vaccination/
Coincidence and illusion.
Maybe also vaccines created in the past were not designed to be harmful or deadly ?
The antivax movement is hundreds of years old for a reason: they've always been harmful and deadly. Here's a good explanation of how bad the smallpox vaccine was during its alleged days of "success". Note the many parallels to the covid vaccine.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/what-we-can-learn-from-the-smallpox?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
They have never proven the existence of vaccines. If there is no benefit, it is not a vaccine. Benefit also means net benefit over not getting it on health which means including harms.
Go Steve!
They told me I would go to heaven if I took the jab. Since there is very little chance I would get there by myself, it only makes sense that I keep getting boosted until this happens. But I can't miss any recommended boosters or this offer is off the table.
...and that is the truth from the mouth of a devout atheist and an ardent believer of scientism. Hehehe...
check out and read carefully a petion at citizengo.org..say no to the who,s health dictatorship-reject the pandemic treaty..be aware its a worldwide petition ot can be signed and reshared widely worldwide from ANY country in the world including america...also be aware citizen go are an independent organisation which simply means that no government can interfere with censor Or suppress this petition FACT..it currently has 134,651,signatures..........be sure to also check out the expose
No benefit?? It depends upon who we are talking about. Did humans benefit, no! Did the medical establishment benefit? Hugely! Did the pharmaceutical industry benefit? absolutely! Did certain individuals benefit? Yes! So again, it depends on who we are talking about.