The Japanese were heavily vaccinated against COVID. Their data shows it was a net harmful intervention. I'm offering up to $1M to anyone who can show the opposite. Offer details in the post.
Submit entries under this pinned comment. Any reply to this comment that isn't a submission from a qualified source (as listed in the article) WILL BE DELETED so that people can clearly see the submissions (or lack thereof) in one place.
I would like to have an open discussion. You will be used to prove all critical people are wrong. It is better to have a discussion about the data. I am sorry to see that you are taking this to lightly. I am very critical about the vaccin, but what you are doing: mixing large age different groups, comparing 1x, 2x and 3x vaccinated etc. without considering age differences does not help. It is complicated. You are making the same mistakes the vaccin researchers are making: taking it to lightly!!!
I like your critical thinking. There are many mistakes made by the "vaccine" researchers. First ignoring the HVE effect and not correcting for that. 2. Ignoring the large concentration effect due to the large amount of vaccinated people to not vaccinated people which follows the self-selection effect (=HVE). Both are creating very large errors.
But now you are going too fast in your conclusions.
And I do not like your comment: that you delete some admissions. Are you scared?
I would like an open discussion without deletion with all those involved.
Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study
These findings highlight repeated vaccination as a poor prognostic factor in PC patients and suggest that IgG4 is induced by repeated vaccination and may be associated with a poor prognosis in these patients.
I can show beyond doubt that the data is flawed and not usable to draw any conclusions, hence you would need to fall back to FDA wisdom that the vaccines are safe. Does that count?
Maybe RFK and his new team will take up the challenge? MRNA stabs are still on the market - why? With all of the data and so called safety signals showing harm the product needs to be pulled. I am not impressed by the HHS secretary downwards moving slowly on the Convid injection kill data. We need something big because Convid court cases like mine need some good news and leverage - especially in California courts where judges are corrupt and compromised and fully injected.
Hello Steve, I'm humbled by your service to humanity.
I found a simple and easy means to make sure meaningful and productive discourse is done here. I was inspired by Ben Franklin, who wrote this about his Junto Club meeting in Philly:
"and, to prevent warmth [heatedness] , all expressions of positiveness in opinions, or direct contradiction, were after some time made contraband and prohibited under small pecuniary penalties [monetary fines]. . . ."
He enforced tiny fines for people expressing opinions, which in effect created "business decorum" for his meetings. We have extremely productive meetings at work all the time - because we stick to facts, and opinions are discarded. We adhere to the "ten commandments of logic". And we make decisions fast and accurately.
You can't enforce fines here, but you can certain make opinions contraband, as they are in courtrooms across the nation. Opinions often contain lies, so they are poison to productive debate. All claims in a debate must be made with reference to supporting data and what it indicates without violating the ten commandments of logic. if the debater fails to provide provably true supporting facts and logic for a point they made, then the post they created is summarily deleted unless they admit error and apologize for making a flaky, illogical conclusion.
Ask a couple of regular readers to be judges if a reader believes they were treated unfairly.
Using "business decorum" rules, disruptors like David Roy can be throttled by simply allowing anyone to ask him for the facts which support his conclussion. A "cross examination" request. The queried opinionator, at that point, must graciously provide referenced supporting facts and the logic followed. If they became catty or offended - I deleted their post.
My participation and readership went from 500 to 2000 followers after I implemented these rules. More smart people and readers appeared - and debated - when business decorum rules were enforced.
Interestingly - all the liberal debaters on my wall were OFFENDED I required them to provide proof of any fact that claimed, and sound logic for any opinion they wrote which was not a logically defendable claim based on facts. Conservatives for the most part were very happy and gracious to reply when cross examined. and they would apologize and were often thankful for being corrected.
All this process is chronicled in my book "Atlas Shouts", chapters 4-6. Dr Lyle Rossiter (RIP), a published U.Chicago Psychiatrist, reviewed my chronology for sound research practices and conclusions.
Steve Kirsch, there is also a red flag in batches of the COVID shot being deadlier than others. Have you looked into this? Its been suggested that red states were targeted with these deadlier shots.
what on earth is happening Steve, are you running out of cash..., 2,500$ only? This study is so solid that of course there won't be any epidemiologist to fight this, in particular for this little 'tip'..
SORRY for being nasty, just run out of good jokes in these war times.
It would be interesting tom compare the results from your multiple reviews against the last DMED data dump before it was taken down and massaged. If it shows similar results as all of your other analysis, then it would support the contention that the data has since been manipulated.
Nothing worse than a hypocrite behind their word. Calling them out and proving it is tge best form of getting this lie exposed. Congressional interviews with fear of jail time may be in order.
Ahh. But if the overall ACM was .041 (4.1%) and the benefit was .042 (4.2%) you should thank us for saving humanity! There is the great conundrum defense. You can't prove a negative.
Submit entries under this pinned comment. Any reply to this comment that isn't a submission from a qualified source (as listed in the article) WILL BE DELETED so that people can clearly see the submissions (or lack thereof) in one place.
I would like to have an open discussion. You will be used to prove all critical people are wrong. It is better to have a discussion about the data. I am sorry to see that you are taking this to lightly. I am very critical about the vaccin, but what you are doing: mixing large age different groups, comparing 1x, 2x and 3x vaccinated etc. without considering age differences does not help. It is complicated. You are making the same mistakes the vaccin researchers are making: taking it to lightly!!!
you should take my offer!
I like your critical thinking. There are many mistakes made by the "vaccine" researchers. First ignoring the HVE effect and not correcting for that. 2. Ignoring the large concentration effect due to the large amount of vaccinated people to not vaccinated people which follows the self-selection effect (=HVE). Both are creating very large errors.
But now you are going too fast in your conclusions.
And I do not like your comment: that you delete some admissions. Are you scared?
I would like an open discussion without deletion with all those involved.
i delete some admissions?! what are you talking about?
Did you say you were going to use Chat-GPT as the judge? I don't trust "artificial intelligence" to judge anything. It can be taught to lie like a cheap rug. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2463113-vaccine-misinformation-can-easily-poison-ai-but-theres-a-fix/
the new versions are MUCH better.
Much better at lying? https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/researchers-showed-how-gpt-4-can-deceive-users-without-being-prompted-to-do-so-explicitly/
Once it learns how to lie .. it becomes better and better https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.05566
Thank you for attempting to expose what's really going on❤️🙏❤️
Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study
These findings highlight repeated vaccination as a poor prognostic factor in PC patients and suggest that IgG4 is induced by repeated vaccination and may be associated with a poor prognosis in these patients.
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202504.1167/v1
I can show beyond doubt that the data is flawed and not usable to draw any conclusions, hence you would need to fall back to FDA wisdom that the vaccines are safe. Does that count?
Let's see the proof. II've inspected the data and it makes perfect sense to me.
“ one man with courage is a majority.”
Maybe RFK and his new team will take up the challenge? MRNA stabs are still on the market - why? With all of the data and so called safety signals showing harm the product needs to be pulled. I am not impressed by the HHS secretary downwards moving slowly on the Convid injection kill data. We need something big because Convid court cases like mine need some good news and leverage - especially in California courts where judges are corrupt and compromised and fully injected.
Hello Steve, I'm humbled by your service to humanity.
I found a simple and easy means to make sure meaningful and productive discourse is done here. I was inspired by Ben Franklin, who wrote this about his Junto Club meeting in Philly:
"and, to prevent warmth [heatedness] , all expressions of positiveness in opinions, or direct contradiction, were after some time made contraband and prohibited under small pecuniary penalties [monetary fines]. . . ."
He enforced tiny fines for people expressing opinions, which in effect created "business decorum" for his meetings. We have extremely productive meetings at work all the time - because we stick to facts, and opinions are discarded. We adhere to the "ten commandments of logic". And we make decisions fast and accurately.
You can't enforce fines here, but you can certain make opinions contraband, as they are in courtrooms across the nation. Opinions often contain lies, so they are poison to productive debate. All claims in a debate must be made with reference to supporting data and what it indicates without violating the ten commandments of logic. if the debater fails to provide provably true supporting facts and logic for a point they made, then the post they created is summarily deleted unless they admit error and apologize for making a flaky, illogical conclusion.
Ask a couple of regular readers to be judges if a reader believes they were treated unfairly.
Using "business decorum" rules, disruptors like David Roy can be throttled by simply allowing anyone to ask him for the facts which support his conclussion. A "cross examination" request. The queried opinionator, at that point, must graciously provide referenced supporting facts and the logic followed. If they became catty or offended - I deleted their post.
My participation and readership went from 500 to 2000 followers after I implemented these rules. More smart people and readers appeared - and debated - when business decorum rules were enforced.
Interestingly - all the liberal debaters on my wall were OFFENDED I required them to provide proof of any fact that claimed, and sound logic for any opinion they wrote which was not a logically defendable claim based on facts. Conservatives for the most part were very happy and gracious to reply when cross examined. and they would apologize and were often thankful for being corrected.
Ben Franklin's Junto Club background:
https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/becomingamer/ideas/text4/juntolibrary.pdf
All this process is chronicled in my book "Atlas Shouts", chapters 4-6. Dr Lyle Rossiter (RIP), a published U.Chicago Psychiatrist, reviewed my chronology for sound research practices and conclusions.
Steve Kirsch, there is also a red flag in batches of the COVID shot being deadlier than others. Have you looked into this? Its been suggested that red states were targeted with these deadlier shots.
A number of research could track conclusions by batch. Steve, you should contact Karl Denninger at market-ticker.org
without record level data, it's way too confounded.
karl is a genius, I bet he'll convince you.
Sacha Latypova was involved in setting up the 'how bad is my batch' website - maybe she has some data analysis on it 🤷♂️
no record level data --> no meaningful analysis.
I 100% agree Steve. Love your boldness sir!
what on earth is happening Steve, are you running out of cash..., 2,500$ only? This study is so solid that of course there won't be any epidemiologist to fight this, in particular for this little 'tip'..
SORRY for being nasty, just run out of good jokes in these war times.
It's not a bet. I could lose, but I doubt it. If I offer $1M people really get nasty if they lose. And if I offer a lot, people know they can't win.
It would be interesting tom compare the results from your multiple reviews against the last DMED data dump before it was taken down and massaged. If it shows similar results as all of your other analysis, then it would support the contention that the data has since been manipulated.
'Are you up to date on your COVID shots and boosters?' -
is the first question I would ask someone defending the COVID shot's 'safe and effective' status.
If they can't eat the food they are cooking that disqualifies them from the competition.
Nothing worse than a hypocrite behind their word. Calling them out and proving it is tge best form of getting this lie exposed. Congressional interviews with fear of jail time may be in order.
Ahh. But if the overall ACM was .041 (4.1%) and the benefit was .042 (4.2%) you should thank us for saving humanity! There is the great conundrum defense. You can't prove a negative.
this data shows a strong signal.