Would love

To see an update on this.

Expand full comment

Nothing to see here... just another incapacitated pilot... https://www.theblaze.com/news/pilot-plane-passenger-landing

Expand full comment

Truth from Germany? Seems (first impression) trying to break through. Even though that may be the same country where the CEO of the insurance company got fired, for intention to go more public about high excess mortality since "vax."

Not sure this has been on the Steve K. substack yet:


Seems (once again first impression) a medical organization in Germany very openly discussing vax injuries. We know in the USA the Gummit (govt.) would prefer to pretend that they are extremely rare and so the dreaded Covid is worse.

Expand full comment

Thank you for writing this informative article. The conversation should now move to another level. That is, what are the REAL reasons these injections must be delivered, and how take back global public health systems to stop them. A few burning questions you may be able to address are:

1) Why the insistence on the shots?

2) How is it that countries - US, UK, China, Russia primarily - were so well coordinated and quick in announcing they had a 'vaccine'? Did WWlll start in 2019 with the weapon of choice, the 'vaccine'?

3) Why hide the ingredients? Has any entity addressed extraneous material found in the shot fluids? Which manufacturers are affected?

4) Who provides the talking points / coordination - globally - to have business, entertainment, politicians, etc. fall in line?

5) Who has the power to silence the relatives of the 'famous' dead; perhaps from the shots?

Maybe control is only a path to the primary goal. What is the goal here; and who wants it?

Expand full comment

"75% of the radiology department at MarinHealth/UCSF have requested a religious exemption from the booster"

This person should screenshot something and come out publicly. We can fund this person right? We'll make sure this person does not go homeless.

PS. If you got the first two shots without quoting God, how do you get a RE to the booster?

Expand full comment
May 12, 2022·edited May 12, 2022

I think it may be that the tide has turned. At least at this facility.

When 5% of your staff requests a policy exemption you reject every request and fire those who don't comply. In business this is true for nearly every policy exemption except those exemptions required by law.

But there is a tipping point where a policy is ignored even if it is never rewritten.

For this reason I find it more credible to believe that 75% of the staff have an exemption versus say 10% of the staff.

Expand full comment

I see what you mean. They must be seeing to pull that off. The q is - will the tide change enough before the 4th requirement arrives this Fall?

Expand full comment

God can speak to you anytime. Nobody can argue with that.

Expand full comment

Perhaps, but the types that approve these things don't exactly think in that manner.

Expand full comment

I understand/agree - but I’ve now seen it work for several airline pilots and college students.

Expand full comment

By my count 132 USA dead over 15 months. About double the average year. Troubling to be sure but not 29X, unless there is missing data. Its still alarming enough to set off alarm bells

Expand full comment

I believe they may be including numbers of pro and scholastic athletes from other countries.

Expand full comment

I think highly likely the WHO

issues lockdowns around the world including USA in next 6 months. Gert expects immune escaped variants to begin harming and killing vaccinated in a few months. I expect blame to be placed on unvaccinated. His interview from last week is here.



Expand full comment

Don't wait for an answer from Bob Wachter. Here's his latest effusion of mask (and jab) delusional psychosis: https://twitter.com/Bob_Wachter/status/1523539573665505280

Expand full comment
May 9, 2022·edited May 9, 2022

"75% of the radiology department at MarinHealth/UCSF have requested a religious exemption from the booster" this is shocking.

However, is there another source for this info? I cannot find this data anywhere except here on Steve's site.

Expand full comment

You expected CNN to verify this? I agree that it's great to get verification of information, but the Libs most certainly don't require it, so we're not violating their rules. This is not business as usual, friend. The cultural wars are devolving into something very ugly. Let's not unilaterally disarm conservative thought in such a time.

Expand full comment

Dear Steve. I've reviewed data from K12 school, number of infirmary visits. Looks like more than double the number of visits post vaccine compared to last 5 years (not including 2020 and parts of 2021). I'd like to share and review data with your team and invite more people that can contribute with more data.

Expand full comment

!!!!!!! STEVE!!!! Please read!!!


Expand full comment

Why should he read it? It's a huge waste of time for everyone else to have to click on that article just because you didn't say the relevance of what you are asking him to read.

Expand full comment

While governments no longer provide vax vs. unvax data, of all places, Walgreens is. They have a Covid Tracker website (https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp) and slide three is updated each day to show positivity rates for unjabbed, single dose, double dose and triple jabbed. Right now, unvaxxed have a positivity rate of 17.1% while triple jabbed have 31.2%!!!

Expand full comment

by vaccination status doesn't add up to 100% for all of the various groups. Am I reading it wrong?

Expand full comment
May 10, 2022·edited May 10, 2022

I believe it says that X% of those tested in that category are positive. This is not the distribution of categories among + people.

Expand full comment

Yes, was happy to find that as well. It won't last long, it will get pulled.

Expand full comment

As of today, the Government of Ontario is still publishing the unvarnished covid data: https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data

Expand full comment

Germany also stopped reporting the data per vaccination status as of this week. The creepy thing is that they still push for mandates.

Expand full comment

Hey Steve, check out Walter Chestnut if you haven't. He has a compelling theory on the athletes and was booted off Twitter for a single sentence on point. That alone gives the theory some credibility. He's on sub stack. Hope he's hooked in with you, Malone & McCullough. Could hopefully help some people.

Expand full comment



Read about it here:



Let's look at the death data (from covid-19) for those ≥80 years of age, from week 3 (the fraud) onwards:


Period A B C (covid-19 deaths per 100,000)


week03 39 309 270

week04 57 322 265

week05 78 326 248

week06 103 324 221

week07 114 280 165

week08 120 243 124

week09 120 190 70

week10 110 152 42

week11 101 141 40

week12 90 134 44

week13 84 122 37

Column A is deaths among those "suitably triple jabbed" per 100,000

Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000

Column C is Column B minus Column A


So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).

Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.

Image/Graph http://www.preearth.net/images/deaths-caused-saved-by-vaccines.png

I must emphasize that the above data only records deaths due to covid-19. It does not record any deaths due to adverse reactions to the vaccine.

Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide an excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:

"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."

The relevant data can be found in the following PDF:


Expand full comment