“I’m very heavily vaccinated. My kids took all the vaccines, too. I didn’t look at it critically when they were born. So let me tell you, just because I wasn’t injured by the vaccines; it doesn’t make it okay. I think it’s very important for people to hear this. Just because they did fine with the vaccines doesn’t mean it’s okay”
“When I was a child, the rate of autism was one in 10,000,” denoted Peter McCullough. “Now that rate today, the CDC says, is an emergency. It’s 1 in 36. It’s an epidemic.”
“I think we’re building a pretty strong case that Andy Wakefield, years ago, yourself [Paul Thomas] and other pioneers, that you were right all along — that HYPER-Vaccination is a determinant of autism”
I see from his Wikipedia page that he is not entirely vaccine minded and opposed the vaccination of children to Covid 19 (which is the 'flu but I don't suppose he realises that).
However, 'am runt Dr kill off' is one anagram of his name. Perhaps he does want to kill off the weak in society.
But according to Wikipedia "On February 13, 2022, Kulldorff tweeted in support of the Canada convoy protest," against vaccine mandates so he has some sense. He is confused clearly re vaccines if he thinks they are any good, but compared to that nutter Peter Hotez he seems relatively sane.
They all hide behind falsities, BIG AG (Glyphosate), Telecommunications ( Wireless Radiation aka WiFi) and Big pHARMa ( Vaccines and medications) It's one BIG depopulation agenda.
Vacc-indoctrination is deep in 99% of health professionals. Even those who stood up to covid policies. They are slowly waking up to the issues of vaccines and immunity.
A well copywritten leaflet through every letter box is the only way to bypass censorship. This is what needs to happen. Send copies to all international embassies too as a way to get the message to brainwashed staff who look up to WHO and western science. Repeat the process every 3-4 months at least as a minimum . all marketing campaigns depend on resources.
Totally agree -- and yet sometimes the debates help wake up those who still believe the autism situation is overblown. Denial is such a strange aspect of the human condition, necessary for survival, but also an integral part of our collective insanity as inhabitants of this blue-green planet.
excellent letter by JLW. It is crystal clear he has done the research. How can a scientist not consider ALL potential causal variables considering the exploding rates of autism and other neurodevelopmental issues in kids. 1 in 36 boys are born with autism now, is that correct? Oh, lets just keep this up until every child is born with it- just look at the trajectory of where it's going!! For God's sake these people need to wake up to this crisis!
Steve writes: "I have a $5M pool of money reserved to match anyone who wants to bet against me on this issue. See this article for details.
To date, not a single person is willing to risk their money on this."
There may be another reason for their debate hesitancy. The risk of losing money is a greater threat to a smaller net worth than to someone with a much larger net worth. Behavioural Economics 101: the fear of loss nearly always outweighs the thrill of gain.
What if you make a risk-reversing proposition where there is only upside for the winner? That changes the equation for you, but certainly compels more people to come forward. The result is that the world would then sit up straight to see that the vaxxers can't win this debate — even when there's no risk involved.
I’m terribly disappointed (and surprised) with Kulldorf. He was an early critic of Covid policies and remains so. I think he is a good man and holds his positions with honesty. Positions are moving substantially since global governments have been proven wrong about just about all their responses to the pandemic. The latest epiphany of the mRNA vaccine critics is expanding to many other traditional vaccines as the connection with autism and other disorders is re-examined. It seems to me that a good deal of work needs to be done in respect to this proposition. I wouldn’t therefore attack Kulldorf too strongly at this juncture.
Proving a negative ("Vaccines do NOT.......") is an EXTREMELY high bar, and requires an enormous amount of reproducible data. This is because the number of possible confounders (as JLW mentions) is immense, and traversing such a minefield is only done with the greatest humility and integrity.
Conversely, inferring possible causality only requires a few anecdotal cases and a plausible mechanism of action, which then SHOULD (in a world of scientific integrity) spawn a very large number of safety (NOT efficacy) studies to investigate a possible connection. Due to financial and reputational corruption, clearly this did not occur.
When I showed our congregation before and after pictures that doctors posted online of patients blood cells taken just before the jab, then less than a week after, not a single person took the poison jab. They even ignored the dummies in white coats that were begging them to take it. I only wish they taught common sense in medical school. Common sense is like deodorant. The people who need it the most never use it.
Our Message to Dr Kulldorf would read "If your 'World' is threatened by Reality, then it isn't destined to last " Substitute the Word Reality with 'Real Science' and there we have it.
It appears Dr. McC is speaking about this Topic-too:
https://open.substack.com/pub/vigilantfox/p/dr-mccullough-echoes-andy-wakefield?r=1vjtiw&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
“I’m very heavily vaccinated. My kids took all the vaccines, too. I didn’t look at it critically when they were born. So let me tell you, just because I wasn’t injured by the vaccines; it doesn’t make it okay. I think it’s very important for people to hear this. Just because they did fine with the vaccines doesn’t mean it’s okay”
“When I was a child, the rate of autism was one in 10,000,” denoted Peter McCullough. “Now that rate today, the CDC says, is an emergency. It’s 1 in 36. It’s an epidemic.”
“I think we’re building a pretty strong case that Andy Wakefield, years ago, yourself [Paul Thomas] and other pioneers, that you were right all along — that HYPER-Vaccination is a determinant of autism”
Martin Kulldorff sounds like Martin Killed off.
I see from his Wikipedia page that he is not entirely vaccine minded and opposed the vaccination of children to Covid 19 (which is the 'flu but I don't suppose he realises that).
However, 'am runt Dr kill off' is one anagram of his name. Perhaps he does want to kill off the weak in society.
But according to Wikipedia "On February 13, 2022, Kulldorff tweeted in support of the Canada convoy protest," against vaccine mandates so he has some sense. He is confused clearly re vaccines if he thinks they are any good, but compared to that nutter Peter Hotez he seems relatively sane.
They all hide behind falsities, BIG AG (Glyphosate), Telecommunications ( Wireless Radiation aka WiFi) and Big pHARMa ( Vaccines and medications) It's one BIG depopulation agenda.
The deliberate tampering of the lot's toxicity is a factor. This has not been considered on the same level that has occurred with the CV19 jabs.
Vacc-indoctrination is deep in 99% of health professionals. Even those who stood up to covid policies. They are slowly waking up to the issues of vaccines and immunity.
A well copywritten leaflet through every letter box is the only way to bypass censorship. This is what needs to happen. Send copies to all international embassies too as a way to get the message to brainwashed staff who look up to WHO and western science. Repeat the process every 3-4 months at least as a minimum . all marketing campaigns depend on resources.
Totally agree -- and yet sometimes the debates help wake up those who still believe the autism situation is overblown. Denial is such a strange aspect of the human condition, necessary for survival, but also an integral part of our collective insanity as inhabitants of this blue-green planet.
excellent letter by JLW. It is crystal clear he has done the research. How can a scientist not consider ALL potential causal variables considering the exploding rates of autism and other neurodevelopmental issues in kids. 1 in 36 boys are born with autism now, is that correct? Oh, lets just keep this up until every child is born with it- just look at the trajectory of where it's going!! For God's sake these people need to wake up to this crisis!
Keep exposing Steve!
Steve writes: "I have a $5M pool of money reserved to match anyone who wants to bet against me on this issue. See this article for details.
To date, not a single person is willing to risk their money on this."
There may be another reason for their debate hesitancy. The risk of losing money is a greater threat to a smaller net worth than to someone with a much larger net worth. Behavioural Economics 101: the fear of loss nearly always outweighs the thrill of gain.
What if you make a risk-reversing proposition where there is only upside for the winner? That changes the equation for you, but certainly compels more people to come forward. The result is that the world would then sit up straight to see that the vaxxers can't win this debate — even when there's no risk involved.
I’m terribly disappointed (and surprised) with Kulldorf. He was an early critic of Covid policies and remains so. I think he is a good man and holds his positions with honesty. Positions are moving substantially since global governments have been proven wrong about just about all their responses to the pandemic. The latest epiphany of the mRNA vaccine critics is expanding to many other traditional vaccines as the connection with autism and other disorders is re-examined. It seems to me that a good deal of work needs to be done in respect to this proposition. I wouldn’t therefore attack Kulldorf too strongly at this juncture.
Proving a negative ("Vaccines do NOT.......") is an EXTREMELY high bar, and requires an enormous amount of reproducible data. This is because the number of possible confounders (as JLW mentions) is immense, and traversing such a minefield is only done with the greatest humility and integrity.
Conversely, inferring possible causality only requires a few anecdotal cases and a plausible mechanism of action, which then SHOULD (in a world of scientific integrity) spawn a very large number of safety (NOT efficacy) studies to investigate a possible connection. Due to financial and reputational corruption, clearly this did not occur.
When I showed our congregation before and after pictures that doctors posted online of patients blood cells taken just before the jab, then less than a week after, not a single person took the poison jab. They even ignored the dummies in white coats that were begging them to take it. I only wish they taught common sense in medical school. Common sense is like deodorant. The people who need it the most never use it.
KULLDORF 1 OF THE MANY PAID OFF SCUM
Our Message to Dr Kulldorf would read "If your 'World' is threatened by Reality, then it isn't destined to last " Substitute the Word Reality with 'Real Science' and there we have it.
James Lyons-Weiler provides a very succinct summary extremely useful to all.
Copy, paste, provide it to your medical practitioner or jab practitioner nurse, local health authority, ministry of health.
Excellent.
All those willing to debate Dr Kulldorf should send him a letter stating they will FIRST defer to JLW!