174 Comments

Negligence? Or is this what those in the shadows want?

Expand full comment

I have read and watched a couple of your videos, but I feel like you are naive in believing that they don’t want to debate you, in reality they have no need to. They have an agenda and they are winning. If people don’t know about the danger this bio weapon poses, then they will continue to do what they are told. The fact that people are now letting their children get it is proof of that.

Expand full comment

Senator Ron Johnson and Senator Mike Lee have spoken out against it and many representatives have but I think they are against the mandate more than the so called vaccines.

Expand full comment

Do any other healthcare professionals reading this notice third spacing in their patients skin? Also a translucent almost ghostly appearance in the faces of their patients?

Expand full comment

I’m just heart broken what is happening with this vaccine!! It is crimes against humanity. A genocide by all definitions!!! How is this being allowed!!!

Expand full comment

What an unseemly, corrupted, unethical, immoral, criminal mess.

Expand full comment

Before 2020, all new drugs, especially first-in-class, were considered guilty until proven innocent. That is the whole point of clinical trials. But FDA has required no proof of innocence from Pfizer. The standard of practice to prove a drug's "innocence" is base on pre/post drug administration bloodwork and procedural findings. You get baseline (pre-drug) values (chemistry, hematology, inflammatory biomarkers, cardiac enzymes, D-dimer, toxicology, ECGs, vitals, physical exams, etc.) and then you get post-drug values over months and years to prove that there are no dangers. Did Pfizer present these findings to the FDA? No, because they didn't do any tests in their single combined phase 2/3 study. They tested for immunogenicity, but that is it. No ECGs. No vitals. No blood tests. Pfizer has no idea what the vaccine does because it hasn't run any tests. What is this "rigorous safety" data they are referring to? Dr. Su, Dr. Rubin, and every other criminal who has allowed this "vaccine" to be approved for even an EUA, must face charges of, at least malfeasance, but murder is more apt. These are indeed crimes against humanity. Thank you, Steve, for standing up against Goliath. You are not alone, but you are in the front line. May other brave hearts join you there. You will win for all of us.

Expand full comment

Hes a complete waste of skin, on one can be that stupid as not to see the warning signs even without the urf. He deserves a public hanging

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2021Liked by Steve Kirsch

Sounds to me like he'll take the fall if the cabal gets nervous. I wonder if he can flee to China?

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2021Liked by Steve Kirsch

Excellent piece. Thank you. Sounds like Dr. Su is doing an excellent job at what he is paid to actually do. If the central bankers are going to make sure that thousands of doctors, nurses and health care workers continue to poison millions of people, including now children, it is essential to give them the ability to pretend is it "safe and effective." The need to understand the real goals is another reason why it is important to determine what is actually in these injections.

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2021Liked by Steve Kirsch

I would comment but I don't have words that common decent folk would not find highly offensive. Even in reference to filth such as this!

Expand full comment
Nov 4, 2021Liked by Steve Kirsch

Watch to the end when Neil Fergusson (ex SAGE) agrees to debate scientifically. If you could get him to agree and get the panel together… no need to interrupt. Just wait and let him hang himself by his own lies.

Expand full comment
Nov 3, 2021Liked by Steve Kirsch

All I can say is thank you for speaking out! I am sharing this. People are so asleep it is very scary!

Expand full comment

I went after the MHRA, the UK's vax regulator after they couldn't back their statement that the "numbers of death reports were not unusual for a new vaccine", in text contained in their Yellow Card Summary of Reporting. They provided no figures (which I asked for) and then admitted to believe it or not, "we are not comparing against other vaccine rollouts for the purposes of the summary". That was essentially what they said and an absurd contradiction and yet their original statement remains. I went after them and I am awaiting their internal review reply.

Expand full comment

Anyone who looked at the VAERS database numbers even without accounting for underreporting should be alarmed, but I've spoken with a few doctors about my concerns and they seem to be stuck on the "but getting covid is really bad" frame of mind and downplay possible vaccine side effects.

One doctor recently told me he would send me some sort of article from a medical association responding to vaccine concerns; I said, "I can read the VAERS data myself." It kind of gave me the impression that the doctor wasn't actually aware of the VAERS data, much less even some of the reported serious side effects...though he had apparently personally dealt with a few patients who had some side effects, which he claimed were mild and "went away in a few days." (One of these "mild side effects" was neuropathy, which I never consider to be mild!)

BTW, I personally know of one person who had a reaction to a vaccine (nerve damage) and was AFRAID to report it to VAERS because of the "felony" warning on the website for misreporting. So he reported it to the manufacturer (as if that'd do any good). He can't be the only one.

Expand full comment